Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link

Disclaimer: Early release articles are not considered as final versions. Any changes will be reflected in the online version in the month the article is officially released.

Volume 32, Number 1—January 2026

CME ACTIVITY - Research

Group A Streptococcus Meningitis, United States, 1997–2022

On This Page
CME Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
CME Follow Up
Cite This Article
Figures
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Tables
Table 1
Table 2
Table 3
Downloads
Article
Appendix
RIS [TXT - 2 KB]
Article Metrics
Metric Details
Author affiliation: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA (P.A. Hawkins, S. Chochua, N. Prasad, J.O. Okaro, Y. Li, S. Chai, A.L. Cohen, C.J. Gregory); Oregon Health Authority, Portland, Oregon, USA (T. Martin, A. Thomas); New York State Department of Health, Albany, New York, USA (B.J. Anderson, K.E. Burzlaff); Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA (L. Harrison, S. Seopaul); Colorado Department of Public Health and the Environment, Denver, Colorado, USA (N. Alden, R. Herlihy); Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee, USA (W. Schaffner, H.K. Talbot); Minnesota Department of Health, St. Paul, Minnesota, USA (R. Lynfield, K. Como-Sabetti); California Emerging Infections Program, Oakland, California, USA (M. Rosales, S. Chai); Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta (S. Sefton, J.R. Howard-Anderson); New Mexico Department of Health, Santa Fe, New Mexico, USA (S. Khanlian, J. Houston); Connecticut Department of Public Health, Hartford, Connecticut, USA (S. Petit)

Cite This Article

Introduction

CME Logo

Medscape CME ACTIVITY

In support of improving patient care, this activity has been planned and implemented by Medscape, LLC and Emerging Infectious Diseases. Medscape, LLC is jointly accredited with commendation by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (ACCME), the Accreditation Council for Pharmacy Education (ACPE), and the American Nurses Credentialing Center (ANCC), to provide continuing education for the healthcare team.

Medscape, LLC designates this Journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1.00 AMA PRA Category 1 Credit(s)™. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity.

Successful completion of this CME activity, which includes participation in the evaluation component, enables the participant to earn up to 1.0 MOC points in the American Board of Internal Medicine's (ABIM) Maintenance of Certification (MOC) program. Participants will earn MOC points equivalent to the amount of CME credits claimed for the activity. It is the CME activity provider's responsibility to submit participant completion information to ACCME for the purpose of granting ABIM MOC credit.

All other clinicians completing this activity will be issued a certificate of participation. To participate in this journal CME activity: (1) review the learning objectives and author disclosures; (2) study the education content; (3) take the post-test with a 75% minimum passing score and complete the evaluation at https://www.medscape.org/qna/processor/76466?showStandAlone=true&src=prt_jcme_eid_mscpedu; and (4) view/print certificate.

NOTE: It is the policy of Medscape Education to avoid the mention of brand names or specific manufacturers in accredited educational activities. However, trade and manufacturer names in this activity are provided in an effort to provide clarity. The use of brand or manufacturer names should not be viewed as an endorsement by Medscape of any specific product or manufacturer.

Release date: January 26, 2026; Expiration date: January 26, 2027
Learning Objectives

Upon completion of this activity, participants will be able to:

  • Assess demographic variables associated with group A streptococcal (GAS) meningitis

  • Analyze rate of comorbid illness among children and adults with GAS meningitis

  • Evaluate other GAS syndromes among patients with GAS meningitis

  • Distinguish rate of antimicrobial resistance among patients with GAS meningitis

CME Editor

Amy J. Guinn, MA, Technical Writer/Editor, Emerging Infectious Diseases. Disclosure: Amy J. Guinn, BA, MA, has no relevant financial relationships.

CME Author

Charles P. Vega, MD, Health Sciences Clinical Professor of Family Medicine, University of California, Irvine School of Medicine, Irvine, California. Disclosure: Charles P. Vega, MD, has the following relevant financial relationships: consultant or advisor for Boehringer Ingelheim; Exact Sciences.

Authors

Paulina A. Hawkins, MPH; Sopio Chochua, MD, PhD; Namrata Prasad, PhD; Jennifer O. Okaro, MPH; Yuan Li, PhD; Tasha Martin, MPH; Ann Thomas, MD, MPH; Bridget J. Anderson, PhD; Kari E. Burzlaff, MPH; Lee Harrison, MD; Shannon Seopaul, MPH; Nisha Alden, MPH; Rachel Herlihy, MD, MPH; William Schaffner, MD; H. Keipp Talbot, MD, MPH; Ruth Lynfield, MD; Kathy Como-Sabetti, MPH; Maria Rosales; Shua Chai, MD, MPH; Sam Sefton, MPH; Jessica R. Howard-Anderson, MD, MSc; Sarah Khanlian, MPH; Jessica Houston, MPH; Susan Petit, MPH; Adam L. Cohen, MD, MPH; Christopher J. Gregory, MD, MPH.

Top

Abstract

Group A Streptococcus (GAS) causes a variety of diseases in humans but is not widely appreciated as a cause of meningitis. During 1997–2022, ten sites participating in the Active Bacterial Core Surveillance network in the United States identified GAS meningitis cases. We calculated annual incidence and case-fatality rates (CFRs) for 320 of those cases and determined antimicrobial resistance by whole-genome sequencing. Annual incidence of GAS meningitis ranged from 0.02 to 0.07 cases/100,000 persons. Children <1 year of age had the highest average annual incidence, 0.23 cases/100,000 children. GAS meningitis had a higher CFR (19.4%) than meningitis caused by group B Streptococcus, Streptococcus pneumoniae, Neisseria meningitidis, or Haemophilus influenzae. Clindamycin resistance among GAS meningitis isolates increased from 3.2% during 1997–2002 to 17.7% during 2018–2022. Clinicians should be aware that meningitis is an uncommon but severe manifestation of invasive GAS and has a higher CFR than more established meningitis etiologies.

Group A Streptococcus (GAS) infections include invasive GAS (iGAS) infections, which are associated with high case-fatality rates (CFRs) (1). Clinical manifestations of iGAS disease include cellulitis, bacteremia, pneumonia, necrotizing fasciitis, and streptococcal toxic shock syndrome (STSS) (1,2). Treatment for iGAS infection includes supportive care and antimicrobial treatment, including combination therapy with penicillin and clindamycin in severe infections (3). GAS vaccine candidates in development include a 30-valent M protein–based vaccine (4).

Meningitis is an uncommonly reported but severe manifestation of iGAS infection (1). Among 91 pediatric intracranial GAS infections in the United States during 1997–2014, meningitis was the most common illness and was associated with the highest CFR (5). Meningitis was responsible for 2% of severe GAS disease cases in Europe during 2003–2004 (6), and GAS was responsible for 2% of community-acquired bacterial meningitis cases in the Netherlands during 2006–2013 (7). Analyses from several countries have identified recent increases in GAS meningitis, potentially associated with changes in strain characteristics (8,9).

In contrast to other bacterial pathogens such as Streptococcus pneumoniae (pneumococcus), group B Streptococcus (GBS), Haemophilus influenzae, Neisseria meningitidis (meningococcus), and Listeria monocytogenes (10), GAS has not been widely recognized as a cause of meningitis. Thus, GAS infection has not been included in clinical practice guidelines for central nervous system infections (11) or recent reviews of bacterial meningitis (12). Trends in incidence rates and clinical and microbiological characteristics of GAS meningitis cases in the United States have not been as thoroughly described as other meningitis etiologies (10). We used active laboratory- and population-based GAS surveillance to describe incidence, demographic and clinical characteristics, and associated emm types and antimicrobial resistance profiles for GAS meningitis in the United States during 1997–2022. We compared those findings to other manifestations of GAS disease and other bacterial meningitis etiologies to more thoroughly describe epidemiology of GAS-related meningitis.

Materials and Methods

Surveillance

The Active Bacterial Core surveillance (ABCs) system (13), within the Emerging Infections Program Network of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, identifies GAS meningitis cases and other invasive bacterial infections. From 1997 to 2015, areas covered under the ABCs system expanded (Appendix Table). By 2022, ABCs areas included ≈34.9 million residents in 10 states.

ABCs defines iGAS as GAS isolated from a normally sterile site, or from a wound culture if accompanied by a diagnosis of necrotizing fasciitis or STSS, in a resident of a surveillance area (13). Consistent with previous ABCs reports (13), we defined a meningitis case as an ABCs pathogen (S. pneumoniae, GAS, GBS, H. influenzae, N. meningitidis) isolated from cerebrospinal fluid in any patient or from another sterile site in a patient with a clinical diagnosis of meningitis in the medical record (8). For this study, we included all ABCs cases identified during January 1, 1997–December 31, 2022.

Laboratory Testing

We performed whole-genome sequencing (WGS) on all available isolates from GAS meningitis cases, as previously described (14,15). We analyzed sequences by using a previously validated bioinformatics pipeline to identify emm type and multilocus sequence type (ST), predict antimicrobial resistance, and determine the presence of select virulence factors (14,15).

Before 2015, we performed antimicrobial susceptibility testing by using broth microdilution, as previously described (14). Starting in 2015, we predicted susceptibility by WGS, on the basis of detection of resistance determinants (14,15), or by using a penicillin-binding protein 2× typing scheme for β-lactams (14). Those methods are comparable, as previously reported (15).

Statistical Analyses

We calculated annual GAS meningitis incidence, expressed as the number of cases per 100,000 persons, stratified by age (<18 years and >18 years), by using US Census annual population estimates for ABCs catchment areas. We also calculated average annual incidence of meningitis caused by each ABCs pathogen, stratified by age group (0–11 months, 1–4 years, 5–17 years, 18–64 years, >65 years), during 3 time periods: before the meningococcal conjugate vaccine (MCV4) was introduced (1997–2005); after MCV4 was introduced, and during introduction of pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV) 7, but before introduction the meningococcal B (MenB) vaccine (2006–2015); and after introduction of both meningococcal vaccines and 2 pneumococcal vaccines (PCV7, PCV13) (2016–2022). All time periods occurred after introduction of the H. influenza type b (Hib) vaccine. For that comparison, we limited catchment areas to the areas common to all ABCs pathogens. To estimate the national burden of GAS meningitis in the United States, we applied age- and race-specific observed incidence of GAS meningitis from the ABCs data to the total US population.

We calculated CFR on the basis of outcome at discharge. We compared categorical variables by using Fisher exact test or χ2 test and considered p<0.05 statistically significant. We examined linear trends by using linear regression and a t-test or by using the Cochran-Armitage test for binomial proportions.

We defined an isolate as covered by the 30-valent vaccine when its emm types were included in the vaccine, that is, emm types 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 11, 12, 14, 18, 19, 22, 24, 28, 29, 44, 49, 58, 73, 75, 77, 78, 81, 82, 83, 87, 89, 92, 114, and 118 (4). We calculated changes in the percentage of clindamycin-resistant isolates and distribution of emm types over 5 time periods of similar length: 1997–2002, 2003–2007, 2008–2012, 2013–2017, and 2018–2022.

Results

Demographic and Clinical Characteristics of GAS Meningitis Case-Patients

During 1997–2022, we identified a total of 38,262 cases of iGAS infection through ABCs, among which 320 (0.84%) met our meningitis definition. Most (69.3%) GAS meningitis cases occurred during December–May annually (Appendix Figure 1).

Of the 320 GAS meningitis cases, 112 (35.0%) occurred in children (persons <18 years of age) (Table 1). During the same timeframe, children accounted for only 8.8% (n = 3,342) of nonmeningitis iGAS cases (n = 37,935). The median age of patients with GAS meningitis was 41 (range 0–92, IQR 8–58) years, significantly lower than the median age of 53 (range 0–107, IQR 36–68) years among nonmeningitis iGAS patients (p<0.001). We saw no statistically significant difference in sex, race, or ethnicity between iGAS patients with and without meningitis (Tables 1, 2).

Of 112 pediatric patients with GAS meningitis, only 6.2% had >1 underlying condition, compared with 15.3% of pediatric iGAS cases with nonmeningitis syndromes (p<0.01) (Table 1). Among adults (persons >18 years of age), 70.7% of GAS meningitis patients and 78.8% of nonmeningitis iGAS patients had >1 underlying condition (Table 2).

Across all age groups, 40.3% of patients with GAS meningitis had >1 additional iGAS clinical syndrome, such as otitis media, pneumonia, abscess, septic shock, cellulitis, or STSS, documented in ABCs. The most common clinical syndromes co-occurring with GAS meningitis were pneumonia (9.8%) among children and otitis media (18.3%) among adults (Tables 1, 2). The CFR in adults increased from 20.7% (43/208) to 51.6% (16/31) when meningitis was complicated by septic shock or STSS (p<0.01).

The overall CFR for GAS meningitis was 19.4%; CFR was 20.8% among persons <1 year of age, 24.0% among persons 1–4 years of age, 12.7% among persons 5–17 years of age, 20.9% among persons 18–64 years of age, and 20.0% among persons >65 years of age. We saw no statistically significant variation in CFR across the years of the study in any of the age groups. Overall, 4,104 iGAS case-patients died during the study period, and 62 (1.5%) of those deaths were caused by meningitis. Of the 125 deaths among pediatric iGAS cases, 19 (15.2%) were caused by meningitis.

GAS Meningitis Incidence Trends and National Estimates

Annual GAS meningitis incidence fluctuated little across the study period, from 0.02 to 0.07 cases/100,000 persons, representing 0.3%–1.9% of iGAS infections in ABCs each year (Appendix Figure 2). In contrast, the incidence of all iGAS infections in ABCs remained stable during 1997–2013 (3.1 to 4.2 cases/100,000 persons), before beginning to rise in 2014, reaching 8.2 cases/100,000 persons in 2022.

GAS meningitis incidence was higher in younger age groups, representing 3.2% of all pediatric iGAS cases and with an annual average incidence of 0.06 cases/100,000 children. GAS meningitis represented 0.6% of adult iGAS cases and had an average annual incidence of 0.03 cases/100,000 adults (Figure 1). Children <1 year of age had the highest GAS meningitis incidence, an average annual incidence of 0.23 cases/100,000 children, representing 4.8% of iGAS cases in patients <1 year of age. Adults 18–64 years of age had the lowest GAS meningitis incidence, an average annual incidence of 0.03 cases/100,000 persons. Extrapolating those incidences to the entire country, we estimated 3,528 cases of meningitis caused by GAS in the United States during the 26-year period of 1997–2022, ranging from 49 to 239 cases annually, including 686 fatal cases.

GAS Meningitis Incidence Compared with Other Bacterial Meningitis Etiologies

During 1997–2022, ABCs received 11,026 reported cases of bacterial meningitis caused by GAS, GBS, S. pneumoniae, N. meningitidis, or H. influenzae. The percentage of meningitis cases caused by GAS increased over time (p<0.001) (Appendix Figure 3).

The average annual incidence of GAS meningitis across all ages (0.04 cases/100,000 persons) was lower than that of meningitis caused by the other pathogens in the 1997–2005 and 2006–2015 periods (Table 3) but similar to the incidence of meningococcal meningitis (0.04 cases/100,000 persons) in 2016–2022. However, the overall CFR of GAS meningitis for each age group was higher (13.1%–26.1%) than that of the other pathogens, except for GBS in the >65 years of age group (Table 3). When stratified by age group (Appendix Figure 4), the percentage of GAS meningitis among all meningitis cases in ABCs was highest (8.7%) in the 5–17 years of age group and lowest (1.1%) in the 0–11 months of age group.

emm Types and Vaccine Targets

Among GAS meningitis cases, 263 (82.2%) had isolates available for emm typing; 153 (58.0%) were cultured from cerebrospinal fluid, 106 (40.1%) from blood, and 5 (1.9%) from other sources. We identified 41 emm types among GAS meningitis isolates; the 10 most common emm types covered 76.0% of isolates. Overall, nonmeningitis isolates had higher emm diversity than meningitis isolates; 136 different emm types were identified, and 64.6% of isolates were covered by the 10 most common emm types (Appendix Figure 5).

The 2 most common emm types among meningitis cases were emm1 (31.9%) and emm12 (12.2%), accounting for 48.9% of isolates from children and 41.4% from adults. emm6 (9.6%) was the third most common type among children and emm28 (5.9%) was the third most common among adults. CFR among case-patients with an emm1 isolate (26.2%) was significantly higher than CFR among case-patients with other emm types (13.3%) (p<0.05). Of the 84 emm1 GAS meningitis isolates, 2 isolates identified in 2020 belonged to the M1UK lineage. Among nonmeningitis cases, the most common types were emm1 (16.5%) and emm89 (7.5%).

Among children with GAS meningitis, the percentage of emm1 isolates ranged from 21.7% during 2008–2012 to 46.7% during 2018–2022; the percentage of isolates belonging to the 7 most common emm types (1, 3, 4, 6, 12, 28, and 89) increased from 37.5% (6/16) during 1997–2002 to 93.5% (14/15) during 2018–2022 (Figure 2). Among meningitis isolates from adult patients, the percentage of isolates belonging to the 7 most common emm types ranged from 41.3% (19/46) during 2018–2022 to 90.5% (38/42) during 2008–2012. The emm types included in the 30-valent vaccine candidate represented 91.5% of isolates from pediatric meningitis cases and 89.9% of isolates from adult meningitis cases.

Antimicrobial Resistance

Among meningitis cases, 259 (80.9%) had isolates available for antimicrobial drug susceptibility testing. We determined or predicted 25 (10.0%) isolates were resistant to erythromycin, of which 21 (84.0%) were also resistant to clindamycin, 1 (4.0%) was also resistant to levofloxacin, and 1 (4.0%) was also resistant to chloramphenicol. We did not detect β-lactam, linezolid, or vancomycin resistance among available isolates. Of the 21 clindamycin-resistant isolates, 8 (38.1%) were emm92 and 4 (19.1%) were emm12 type; all emm92 isolates were part of the same ST82 lineage. The percentage of clindamycin-resistant isolates among GAS meningitis cases increased over time (Figure 3), from 3.2% (n = 1) during 1997–2002 to 17.7% (n = 11) during 2018–2022 (p<0.05), but remained lower than rates among nonmeningitis cases, from which clindamycin resistance increased from 0.6% (n = 10) during 1997–2002 to 29.0% (n = 3,088) during 2018–2022 (p<0.05).

Discussion

We explored trends in GAS meningitis in the United States over 26 years and demonstrated that meningeal infection is an uncommon but severe manifestation of iGAS and that GAS meningitis incidence is similar to that of more widely recognized meningitis etiologies. Although the incidence of bacterial meningitis in the United States has decreased overall since 2008 (10), driven largely by decreases in S. pneumoniae and N. meningitidis, the incidence of GAS meningitis remained stable across the years of the study. However, the percentage of bacterial meningitis caused by GAS in the United States has substantially increased over time. Starting in 2022, multiple countries reported increases in iGAS disease and meningitis (2,8,9), suggesting that GAS could further expand as a meningitis etiology. Although the overall incidence of GAS meningitis remains lower than those for meningitis caused by S. pneumoniae, H. influenzae, and GBS, the CFR was 1.5–4 times higher for GAS meningitis. In this large cohort, the 19.4% CFR for GAS meningitis closely approximates that seen in prior studies (16,17), and CFR did not decrease over time.

In our study, children <1 year of age had the highest incidence of GAS meningitis and the second highest CFR, consistent with previous reports of GAS meningitis in young children (18–20). Preliminary ABCs data for 2023 (P.A. Hawkins et al., unpub. data) showed the incidence of GAS meningitis in that age group increased from 0.15 (95% CI 0.04–0.37) cases/100,000 children during 2016–2022 to 1.06 (95% CI 0.26–2.38) cases/100,000 children, even though the overall incidence of GAS meningitis remained stable. Compared with other etiologies of bacterial meningitis in ABCs among children <1 year of age, GAS still represents a small percentage of meningitis cases, most of which are caused by GBS.

We observed a seasonal pattern of GAS meningitis cases, and a peak in winter and early spring; that same pattern has been reported for GAS pharyngitis and iGAS infections in the United States and Europe (1,5,6,14). One study proposed that the seasonal pattern might be explained by concurrently circulating viral infections during high-incidence periods, along with effects of crowding and close contact because of increased time spent indoors during cold months (1).

We also noted that the percentage of GAS meningitis patients with underlying conditions was low, particularly among pediatric patients, and that >90% of cases occurring in children without underlying medical conditions, potentially reflecting the severity of emm1 infections, as previously documented (1). Although most GAS meningitis cases in our study occurred in previously healthy children, nearly 1 in 5 pediatric GAS meningitis cases were fatal. We noted otitis media in ABCs for 13.8% of all GAS meningitis cases, consistent with previous reports that found that GAS meningitis was often preceded or accompanied by otitis media or sinusitis (16,17,20–23) and likely resulted from continuous spread of the infection rather than particular virulence factors (24)

The 2 most common emm types we identified among GAS meningitis isolates, emm1 and emm12, belonged to the emm pattern A-C, which has a strong preference for infection at the throat (25,26). emm1 and emm12 are among the most common emm types in pharyngitis isolates reported across the United States, Canada, and Europe (15,27–30). emm1 has also been documented as the predominant strain from GAS meningitis cases in small studies from several countries in Europe, which identified increases in overall iGAS and GAS meningitis incidence associated with emm1, particularly the M1UK lineage (1,8,9,16,17,20,31–33). However, despite a substantial increase in M1UK isolates in ABCs sites in the United States from 2015–2018 to 2019–2021 (34), only 2 of 263 meningitis isolates typed in our study belonged to the M1UK lineage. Isolates from GAS meningitis cases in this study were less diverse overall than those from other iGAS infections, highlighting the potential for vaccines in development to provide substantial protection against this disease manifestation.

The first-line antimicrobial regimen used in the empiric treatment of bacterial meningitis is typically a combination of vancomycin plus a third-generation cephalosporin, or a fluoroquinolone for patients who might have a severe allergy to β-lactams (35). Clindamycin combined with β-lactams has been associated with improved survival in severe iGAS infections (36) and is frequently used as part of combination antimicrobial therapy in intracranial GAS infections (21,22). We did not observe any β-lactam or vancomycin resistance among the 259 isolates tested and found only 1 isolate resistant to fluoroquinolones. On the other hand, clindamycin resistance among GAS meningitis isolates substantially increased across the years of this study, consistent with a reported 3-fold increase in macrolide and clindamycin resistance from 2013 to 2022 among iGAS isolates in ABCs (2). The poor diffusion of clindamycin over the meningeal membranes is an additional challenge and has led to recommendations to use high-dose clindamycin or linezolid as an adjunctive antibiotic (37,38).

One limitation of our study was the low incidence of GAS meningitis reported in ABCs, which made it difficult to detect patterns from year to year; however, we were able to show trends in the epidemiology of GAS meningitis in the United States over time. A limitation posed by ABCs data is the focus on invasive disease, which does not fully capture concurrent noninvasive GAS disease syndromes such as otitis media and pharyngitis; those syndromes have been reported in a high percentage of GAS meningitis cases in previous studies. Another limitation of ABCs is that it does not collect outcome data after discharge, which is necessary to assess long-term sequelae and delayed death. Neurologic sequelae occur in a large percentage of patients who survive GAS meningitis (7,16,17). Finally, we did not collect antibiotic use history and thus were unable to determine any correlation between antibiotic use and antimicrobial resistance or outcome in GAS meningitis cases.

In summary, we assessed 26 years of clinical, epidemiologic, and molecular data available from the well-established and robust ABCs system, which provided a large collection of GAS meningitis cases. Our findings provide insights into GAS meningitis, its epidemiology and clinical manifestations, and its contribution to the overall burden of bacterial meningitis in the United States since evolution of bacterial meningitis epidemiology after introduction and sustained use of vaccines against other pathogens causing meningitis, including S. pneumoniae, N. meningitidis, and H. influenzae. Our findings highlight the need for including GAS in future meningitis studies and reviews and in updated meningitis clinical practice guidelines and can help inform clinical practice, vaccine design, and public health interventions in the United States. Clinicians should be aware that meningitis is an uncommon but severe manifestation of invasive GAS and has a higher CFR than other meningitis etiologies and, therefore, should consider GAS in the differential diagnosis of meningitis.

Top

Acknowledgments

We thank all persons in the ABCs areas involved in surveillance activities and maintenance of the ABCs system. We also thank the laboratory staff at the 10 sites who isolate ABCs pathogens and make tracking those infections possible. We also thank the Streptococcus Laboratory of the Pneumonia & Streptococcus Laboratory Branch, Division of Bacterial Diseases, National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) for isolate characterization and the Minnesota Department of Public Health laboratory for performing phenotypic antimicrobial susceptibility testing of all isolates from Minnesota.

This activity was reviewed by CDC, was deemed not research, and was conducted consistent with applicable federal law and CDC policy, including 45 C.F.R. part 46.102(l)(2), 21 C.F.R. part 56; 42 U.S.C. 241(d); 5 U.S.C. 552a; 44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.

Funding for Active Bacterial Core surveillance is provided by the Emerging Infections Program of the CDC.

Author contributions: P.A.H. and C.J.G. conceived and designed the study. P.A.H., C.J.G., and A.L.C. analyzed and interpreted data and drafted the article. S.C. and Y.L. acquired, analyzed, and interpreted data. N.P. analyzed and interpreted data. J.O.O., T.M., A.T., B.J.A., K.E.B., L.H., Sh.S., N.A., R.H., W.S., H.K.T., R.L., K.C.-S., M.R., S.C., Sa.S., J.R.H.-A., S.K., J.H., and S.P. acquired data.

Top

References

  1. Nelson  GE, Pondo  T, Toews  KA, Farley  MM, Lindegren  ML, Lynfield  R, et al. Epidemiology of invasive group A streptococcal infections in the United States, 2005–2012. Clin Infect Dis. 2016;63:478–86. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Gregory  CJ, Okaro  JO, Reingold  A, Chai  S, Herlihy  R, Petit  S, et al. Invasive group A streptococcal infections in 10 US states. JAMA. 2025;333:1498–507. DOIGoogle Scholar
  3. Allen  U, Moore  D. Invasive group A streptococcal disease: Management and chemoprophylaxis. Paediatr Child Health. 2010;15:295–302. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Pastural  É, McNeil  SA, MacKinnon-Cameron  D, Ye  L, Langley  JM, Stewart  R, et al. Safety and immunogenicity of a 30-valent M protein-based group a streptococcal vaccine in healthy adult volunteers: a randomized, controlled phase I study. Vaccine. 2020;38:1384–92. DOIGoogle Scholar
  5. Link-Gelles  R, Toews  KA, Schaffner  W, Edwards  KM, Wright  C, Beall  B, et al. Characteristics of intracranial group A streptococcal infections in US children, 1997–2014. J Pediatric Infect Dis Soc. 2020;9:30–5. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Lamagni  TL, Darenberg  J, Luca-Harari  B, Siljander  T, Efstratiou  A, Henriques-Normark  B, et al.; Strep-EURO Study Group. Epidemiology of severe Streptococcus pyogenes disease in Europe. J Clin Microbiol. 2008;46:2359–67. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Bijlsma  MW, Brouwer  MC, Kasanmoentalib  ES, Kloek  AT, Lucas  MJ, Tanck  MW, et al. Community-acquired bacterial meningitis in adults in the Netherlands, 2006-14: a prospective cohort study. Lancet Infect Dis. 2016;16:339–47. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. van der Putten  BCL, Vlaminckx  BJM, de Gier  B, Freudenburg-de Graaf  W, van Sorge  NM. Group A streptococcal meningitis with the M1UK variant in the Netherlands. JAMA. 2023;329:1791–2. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Nielsen  H, Storgaard  M, Helweg-Larsen  J, Larsen  L, Jepsen  MPG, Hansen  BR, et al. Group A streptococcus meningitis in adults, Denmark. Emerg Infect Dis. 2023;29:1937–9. DOIGoogle Scholar
  10. Prasad  N, Kobayashi  M, Collins  JP, Rubis  AB, Derado  G, Delahoy  MJ, et al. The epidemiology of bacterial meningitis in the United States during 2008–2023: an analysis of active, laboratory, population-based, multistate surveillance data. Lancet Reg Health Am. 2025;47:101120. DOIGoogle Scholar
  11. Sigfrid  L, Perfect  C, Rojek  A, Longuere  KS, Lipworth  S, Harriss  E, et al. A systematic review of clinical guidelines on the management of acute, community-acquired CNS infections. BMC Med. 2019;17:170. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Hasbun  R. Initial therapy and prognosis of community-acquired bacterial meningitis in adults [cited 2024 Sep 19]. https://www.uptodate.com/contents/initial-therapy-and-prognosis-of-community-acquired-bacterial-meningitis-in-adults
  13. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Active bacterial core surveillance (ABCs) [cited 2026 Jan 5]. https://www.cdc.gov/abcs/index.html
  14. Chochua  S, Metcalf  BJ, Li  Z, Rivers  J, Mathis  S, Jackson  D, et al. Population and whole genome sequence based characterization of invasive group A streptococci recovered in the United States during 2015. mBio. 2017;8:e01422–17. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Li  Y, Rivers  J, Mathis  S, Li  Z, Velusamy  S, Nanduri  SA, et al. Genomic surveillance of Streptococcus pyogenes strains causing invasive disease, United States, 2016–2017. Front Microbiol. 2020;11:1547. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Lucas  MJ, Brouwer  MC, Bovenkerk  S, Man  WK, van der Ende  A, van de Beek  D. Group A streptococcal meningitis in adults. J Infect. 2015;71:37–42. DOIGoogle Scholar
  17. Drost  EHGM, Chekrouni  N, van Soest  TM, Schipper  K, van Sorge  NM, Brouwer  MC, et al. Increasing incidence of community-acquired adult group A streptococcal meningitis in the Netherlands. J Infect. 2024;88:68–70. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. de Almeida Torres  RS, Fedalto  LE, de Almeida Torres  RF, Steer  AC, Smeesters  PR. Group A streptococcus meningitis in children. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2013;32:110–4. DOIGoogle Scholar
  19. Shetty  AK, Frankel  LR, Maldonado  Y, Falco  DA, Lewis  DB. Group A streptococcal meningitis: report of a case and review of literature since 1976. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2001;17:430–4. DOIGoogle Scholar
  20. Dou  ZZ, Li  W, Hu  HL, Guo  X, Hu  B, Chen  TM, et al. Group A Streptococcal meningitis in children: a short case series and systematic review. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2024;43:1517–31. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Cobo-Vázquez  E, Aguilera-Alonso  D, Grandioso-Vas  D, Gamell  A, Rello-Saltor  V, Oltra-Benavent  M, et al. PedGAS-net Working Group. Central nervous system infection by group A streptococcus in children in Spain (2019–2023): a nationwide multicenter study. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2025;159:107982. DOIGoogle Scholar
  22. Hutton  D, Kameda-Smith  M, Afshari  FT, Elawadly  A, Hogg  F, Mehta  S, et al. Intracranial invasive group A streptococcus: a neurosurgical emergency in children. J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2023;32:478–87. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Kjærgaard  N, Bodilsen  J, Justesen  US, Schønheyder  HC, Andersen  CØ, Ellermann-Eriksen  S, et al.; DASGIB Study Group. Community-acquired meningitis caused by beta-haemolytic streptococci in adults: a nationwide population-based cohort study. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2019;38:2305–10. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Marquardt  L, Andreoni  F, Boumasmoud  M, Schweizer  TA, Heuberger  DM, Parietti  E, et al. Group A Streptococcus strains causing meningitis without distinct invasive phenotype. Microbiologyopen. 2024;13:e1394. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Bessen  DE, Lizano  S. Tissue tropisms in group A streptococcal infections. Future Microbiol. 2010;5:623–38. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. McGregor  KF, Spratt  BG, Kalia  A, Bennett  A, Bilek  N, Beall  B, et al. Multilocus sequence typing of Streptococcus pyogenes representing most known emm types and distinctions among subpopulation genetic structures. J Bacteriol. 2004;186:4285–94. DOIGoogle Scholar
  27. Shulman  ST, Tanz  RR, Dale  JB, Beall  B, Kabat  W, Kabat  K, et al.; North American Streptococcal Pharyngitis Surveillance Group. Seven-year surveillance of North American pediatric group A streptococcal pharyngitis isolates. Clin Infect Dis. 2009;49:78–84. DOIGoogle Scholar
  28. Virolainen  M, Gröndahl-Yli-Hannuksela  K, Rantakokko-Jalava  K, Seiskari  T, Lönnqvist  E, Kolari  T, et al.; DICAR study group. Epidemiology and emm types among group A streptococcal pharyngitis in Finland: a prospective laboratory-based study. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2024;43:233–41. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Sitkiewicz  I, Borek  A, Gryko  M, Karpińska  A, Kozińska  A, Obszańska  K, et al. Epidemiology of Streptococcus pyogenes upper respiratory tract infections in Poland (2003-2017). J Appl Genet. 2024;65:635–44. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Kailankangas  V, Vilhonen  J, Gröndahl-Yli-Hannuksela  K, Rantakokko-Jalava  K, Seiskari  T, Auranen  K, et al. Presence of Streptococcus pyogenes in the throat in invasive Group A Streptococcal disease: a prospective two-year study in two health districts, Finland. Infect Dis (Lond). 2023;55:405–14. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Gouveia  C, Bajanca-Lavado  MP, Mamede  R, Araújo Carvalho  A, Rodrigues  F, Melo-Cristino  J, et al.; Portuguese Group for the Study of Streptococcal Infections; Portuguese Study Group of Pediatric Invasive Streptococcal Disease; Portuguese Study Group of Paediatric Invasive Streptococcal Disease. Sustained increase of paediatric invasive Streptococcus pyogenes infections dominated by M1UK and diverse emm12 isolates, Portugal, September 2022 to May 2023. Euro Surveill. 2023;28:2300427. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Vieira  A, Wan  Y, Ryan  Y, Li  HK, Guy  RL, Papangeli  M, et al. Rapid expansion and international spread of M1UK in the post-pandemic UK upsurge of Streptococcus pyogenes. Nat Commun. 2024;15:3916. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Rodriguez-Ruiz  JP, Lin  Q, Lammens  C, Smeesters  PR, van Kleef-van Koeveringe  S, Matheeussen  V, et al. Increase in bloodstream infections caused by emm1 group A Streptococcus correlates with emergence of toxigenic M1UK, Belgium, May 2022 to August 2023. Euro Surveill. 2023;28:2300422. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Li  Y, Rivers  J, Mathis  S, Li  Z, Chochua  S, Metcalf  BJ, et al. Expansion of invasive group A Streptococcus M1UK lineage in active bacterial core surveillance, United States, 2019‒2021. Emerg Infect Dis. 2023;29:2116–20. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Tunkel  AR, Hartman  BJ, Kaplan  SL, Kaufman  BA, Roos  KL, Scheld  WM, et al. Practice guidelines for the management of bacterial meningitis. Clin Infect Dis. 2004;39:1267–84. DOIGoogle Scholar
  36. Babiker  A, Li  X, Lai  YL, Strich  JR, Warner  S, Sarzynski  S, et al. Effectiveness of adjunctive clindamycin in β-lactam antibiotic-treated patients with invasive β-haemolytic streptococcal infections in US hospitals: a retrospective multicentre cohort study. Lancet Infect Dis. 2021;21:697–710. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Rezahosseini  O, Roed  C, Gitz Holler  J, Frimodt-Møller  N, Harboe  ZB. Adjunctive antibiotic therapy with clindamycin or linezolid in patients with group A streptococcus (GAS) meningitis. Infect Dis (Lond). 2023;55:751–3. DOIGoogle Scholar
  38. Gatti  G, Malena  M, Casazza  R, Borin  M, Bassetti  M, Cruciani  M. Penetration of clindamycin and its metabolite N-demethylclindamycin into cerebrospinal fluid following intravenous infusion of clindamycin phosphate in patients with AIDS. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1998;42:3014–7. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar

Top

Figures
Tables

Top

Follow Up

Earning CME Credit

To obtain credit, you should first read the journal article. After reading the article, you should be able to answer the following, related, multiple-choice questions. To complete the questions (with a minimum 75% passing score) and earn continuing medical education (CME) credit, please go to https://www.medscape.org/journal/eid. Credit cannot be obtained for tests completed on paper, although you may use the worksheet below to keep a record of your answers.

You must be a registered user on http://www.medscape.org. If you are not registered on http://www.medscape.org, please click on the “Register” link on the right hand side of the website.

Only one answer is correct for each question. Once you successfully answer all post-test questions, you will be able to view and/or print your certificate. For questions regarding this activity, contact the accredited provider, CME@medscape.net. For technical assistance, contact CME@medscape.net. American Medical Association’s Physician’s Recognition Award (AMA PRA) credits are accepted in the US as evidence of participation in CME activities. For further information on this award, please go to https://www.ama-assn.org. The AMA has determined that physicians not licensed in the US who participate in this CME activity are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 Credits™. Through agreements that the AMA has made with agencies in some countries, AMA PRA credit may be acceptable as evidence of participation in CME activities. If you are not licensed in the US, please complete the questions online, print the AMA PRA CME credit certificate, and present it to your national medical association for review.

Article Title: 
Group A Streptococcus Meningitis, United States, 1997–2022
CME Questions

  • What was the most significant difference in the demographic data among patients with meningitis and nonmeningitis invasive group A Streptococcus (iGAS) in the current study?

    • Patients with iGAS with meningitis were more likely to be male

    • Patients with iGAS with meningitis were younger

    • Patients with iGAS with meningitis were more likely to be Black

    • Patients with iGAS with meningitis were more likely to be Latino

  • What were the approximate rates of comorbid conditions among children and adults with group A streptococcal (GAS) meningitis in the current study?

    • Children: 95%. Adults: 92%

    • Children: 81%. Adults: 75%

    • Children: 52%: Adults: 85%

    • Children: 6%; Adults: 70%

  • Which of the following statements regarding clinical GAS syndromes among patients with GAS meningitis in the current study is most accurate?

    • Only 40% of patients had an additional GAS syndrome in addition to meningitis

    • Among children, otitis media was the most common additional GAS syndrome in addition to meningitis

    • Among adults, pneumonia was the most common additional GAS syndrome in addition to meningitis

    • Sepsis shock was the most common additional GAS syndrome in addition to meningitis among both children and adults

  • Antimicrobial resistance was highest for GAS meningitis against which of the following antibiotics in the current study?

    • Erythromycin

    • β-lactams

    • Vancomycin

    • Levofloxacin

Top

Cite This Article

DOI: 10.3201/eid3201.250871

Original Publication Date: January 26, 2026

Related Links

Table of Contents – Volume 32, Number 1—January 2026

EID Search Options
presentation_01 Advanced Article Search – Search articles by author and/or keyword.
presentation_01 Articles by Country Search – Search articles by the topic country.
presentation_01 Article Type Search – Search articles by article type and issue.

Top

Comments

Please use the form below to submit correspondence to the authors or contact them at the following address:

Christopher J. Gregory, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1600 Clifton Rd NE, Mailstop H24-8, Atlanta, GA 30329-4018, USA

Send To

10000 character(s) remaining.

Top

Page created: October 01, 2025
Page updated: January 26, 2026
Page reviewed: January 26, 2026
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.
file_external