Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link

Disclaimer: Early release articles are not considered as final versions. Any changes will be reflected in the online version in the month the article is officially released.

Volume 32, Number 12—December 2026

Research Letter

Detection of Mycobacterium ulcerans DNA in African Fruit Bats, Cameroon, 2024

Figures
Tables
Article Metrics
Author affiliation: Centre Pasteur du Cameroun, Yaoundé, Cameroon (S. Tchatchouang, S. Meyin A Ebong, S. Eyangoh); University of Yaoundé I, Yaoundé (S. Meyin A Ebong); Immunology and New Concepts in Immunotherapy INSERM and Angers University, Angers, France (C. Baumy, M. Robbe-Saule, M. Eveillard, E. Marion, V. Dubée, L. Marsollier); Centre de Recherche sur les Maladies Emergentes et Réémergentes, Yaoundé, (I.W. Ndong Bass, G.F Wougia, F.A. Thomas); University of Abomey-Calavi, Abomey-Calavi, Benin (K. Codjo-Seignon); Angers University Hospital, Angers (M. Eveillard, V. Dubée); Institut Pasteur, Paris, France (Y. Edouard)

Suggested citation for this article

Abstract

In 2024, we detected Mycobacterium ulcerans DNA in 2 of 46 fruit bats in Akonolinga, Cameroon, whereas 111 aquatic macroinvertebrate pools were negative for M. ulcerans. Broader longitudinal surveillance will be needed to clarify the role of fruit bats as a reservoir for M. ulcerans circulation in Cameroon and Africa.

Figure

Number of annual human BU cases in study of Mycobacterium ulcerans DNA in African fruit bats, Cameroon, 2024. Graph indicates the temporal evolution of Buruli ulcer incidence in Africa and the Akonolinga Health District in Cameroon during 2003–2024. BU, Buruli ulcer.

Figure. Number of annual human BU cases in study of Mycobacterium ulceransDNA in African fruit bats, Cameroon, 2024. Graph indicates the temporal evolution of Buruli ulcer incidence in Africa...

Buruli ulcer, caused by Mycobacterium ulcerans, remains endemic in West and Central Africa, although case numbers have declined markedly (1). In Akonolinga, Cameroon, the number of Buruli ulcer cases fell by ≈80% after 2011 (Figure), and M. ulcerans DNA, detected in aquatic invertebrates from the Nyong River in 2008 and 2012, was undetectable at the same sites in 2024 (2,3). In Australia, possums are established mammal reservoirs of M. ulcerans (4). Experimentally infected fruit bats can also recover from M. ulcerans lesions (5). Moreover, several fruit bat lineages have altered or lost G protein–coupled receptor 84 (GPR84), which was recently linked to reduced disease severity (6,7). Those observations prompted us to investigate M. ulcerans in fruit bats in Akonolinga, Cameroon.

In June 2024, we sampled fruit bats and aquatic macroinvertebrates at sites along the Nyong River previously investigated for M. ulcerans (2) (Appendix Figure 1). We captured fruit bats with mist nets, identified them morphologically, and collected oral and rectal swab samples before release (Appendix Figure 2). We collected aquatic macroinvertebrates, as previously described (2), and pooled them according to taxonomic groups.

We extracted DNA and performed quantitative PCR, as previously described (2). We screened samples for insertion sequence (IS)2404 and the ketoreductase (KR) B domain of mycolactone polyketide synthase. We considered samples to be positive when we detected both IS2404 and KR with PCR quantification cycle (Cq) values of <36. We included extraction, amplification, and PCR inhibition controls throughout the procedures. We detailed field procedures, ethical considerations, DNA extraction protocols, assay conditions, and quality-control procedures (Appendix).

We captured 46 fruit bats comprising 5 taxa: Eidolon helvum (n = 24), Epomops franqueti (n = 10), Micropteropus sp. (n = 5), Hypsignathus monstrosus (n = 4), and Nanonycteris sp. (n = 3) (Table; Appendix Table 1, Figure 2). None of the bats had cutaneous lesions compatible with Buruli ulcer. Two (4.2%) bat samples tested positive for M. ulcerans DNA: 1 rectal swab sample from an adult female Micropteropus sp. bat (IS2404 Cq = 28.8; KR Cq = 33.3) and 1 oral swab sample from a juvenile male E. helvum bat (IS2404 Cq = 33.85; KR Cq = 35.76) (Table; Appendix Table 1).

We collected 413 aquatic macroinvertebrates from previously investigated sites (2,3) and grouped them into 111 taxonomically homogeneous pools as follows: 50 Heteroptera pools (179 specimens), 42 Coleoptera pools (180 specimens), 11 Araneae pools (35 specimens), and 8 Odonata pools (19 specimens) (Table; Appendix Table 2, Figure 3). All pools tested negative for M. ulcerans DNA (Table; Appendix Table 2), whereas previous surveys at those sites detected M. ulcerans DNA in ≈5%–10% of aquatic invertebrate samples (2,3). All negative controls remained negative, positive controls amplified as expected, and we did not detect PCR inhibition.

Together, M. ulcerans DNA detection in 2 clinically healthy fruit bats and the absence of detectable DNA in aquatic macroinvertebrates from previously positive sites (2,3) suggest a change in the ecologic context of residual Buruli ulcer transmission in Akonolinga. Our findings do not establish bats as reservoir hosts or demonstrate bacterial viability or transmission. Detection of M. ulcerans in oral and rectal samples could reflect transient exposure through food or water, digestive passage, or more persistent carriage. Because both M. ulcerans–positive bats belonged to frugivorous taxa, the ingestion of contaminated fruits or other plant material cannot be excluded. That possibility is biologically plausible, because plant-derived carbohydrates, particularly glucose polymers, can stimulate M. ulcerans growth in vitro (8). Longitudinal fecal sampling, together with investigation of dietary and environmental sources, could help distinguish exposure from carriage.

M. ulcerans DNA has been detected in lesions from terrestrial mammals in West Africa (9). The absence of visible lesions in fruit bats from Akonolinga is compatible with experimental observations showing that fruit bats can recover from M. ulcerans lesions (5). The absence of lesions is also consistent with our recent findings showing that GPR84 influences disease outcome and is consistent with reports that several fruit bat lineages have altered or lost that receptor (6,7). Those observations provide a biologic rationale for investigating fruit bats as potential permissive hosts, although a role for GPR84 in natural carriage has not been demonstrated.

If fruit bats contribute to M. ulcerans carriage, their high mobility could promote bacterial dissemination among distant environments. That possibility is consistent with a molecular epidemiologic study that reported identical or closely related M. ulcerans genotypes across geographically separated disease endemic regions (10).

An epidemiologic and ecologic shift similar to our findings was recently observed in Benin; ≈80% decline in Buruli ulcer incidence and aging of the affected population coincided with the disappearance of M. ulcerans DNA from previously positive aquatic environments (1). The changing profile resembles that observed in Australia, where Buruli ulcer predominantly affects adults, and mammals are clearly implicated in M. ulcerans ecology. The contributions of aquatic and nonaquatic ecologic compartments to M. ulcerans persistence in Akonolinga appear to change over time. Therefore, broader longitudinal surveillance of M. ulcerans circulation in Cameroon and Africa will be needed.

Dr. Tchatchouang is a researcher in medical microbiology at the Centre Pasteur du Cameroun in Yaoundé, Cameroon. His research focuses on the development of molecular diagnostic tools and the genetic characterization of bacterial pathogens, particularly those responsible for neglected tropical diseases.

Top

Acknowledgment

The Raoul Follereau/ANESVAD Foundation and Dioraphte Foundation provided financial support for this work. S.T. was supported by the World Health Organization, Skin Neglected Tropical Diseases Laboratory Network. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Top

References

  1. Johnson  H, Brou  T, Anagonou  E, Kpoton  G, Robbe-Saule  M, Mignawande  F, et al. PCR-confirmed Buruli ulcer incidence over a 16-year period in Benin: a nationwide, retrospective, observational study. Lancet Glob Health. 2026;14:104017 .DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Garchitorena  A, Roche  B, Kamgang  R, Ossomba  J, Babonneau  J, Landier  J, et al. Mycobacterium ulcerans ecological dynamics and its association with freshwater ecosystems and aquatic communities: results from a 12-month environmental survey in Cameroon. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2014;8:e2879 .DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Marion  E, Eyangoh  S, Yeramian  E, Doannio  J, Landier  J, Aubry  J, et al. Seasonal and regional dynamics of M. ulcerans transmission in environmental context: deciphering the role of water bugs as hosts and vectors. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2010;4:e731 .DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Mee  PT, Buultjens  AH, Oliver  J, Brown  K, Crowder  JC, Porter  JL, et al. Mosquitoes provide a transmission route between possums and humans for Buruli ulcer in southeastern Australia. Nat Microbiol. 2024;9:377–89 .DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Church  JC, Griffin  ER. Mycobacterium buruli lesions in the fruit bat web. J Pathol Bacteriol. 1968;96:508–12 .DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Foulon  MG, Fraga  A, Robbe-Saule  M, Tarnaud  F, Lafont  M, Lebon  G, et al. The orphan receptor GPR84 drives inflammation in Buruli ulcer development. Sci Transl Med. 2026;18:eads8681 .DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Schulze  AS, Kleinau  G, Krakowsky  R, Rochmann  D, Das  R, Worth  CL, et al. Evolutionary analyses reveal immune cell receptor GPR84 as a conserved receptor for bacteria-derived molecules. iScience. 2022;25:105087 .DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Deshayes  C, Angala  SK, Marion  E, Brandli  I, Babonneau  J, Preisser  L, et al. Regulation of mycolactone, the Mycobacterium ulcerans toxin, depends on nutrient source. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2013;7:e2502 .DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Djouaka  R, Zeukeng  F, Bigoga  JD, Kakou-Ngazoa  SE, Akoton  R, Tchigossou  G, et al. Domestic animals infected with Mycobacterium ulcerans—implications for transmission to humans. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2018;12:e0006572 .DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Briand  M, Boccarossa  A, Rieux  A, Jacques  MA, Ganlanon  L, Johnson  C, et al. Emergence and spread of Mycobacterium ulcerans at different geographic scales. Microbiol Spectr. 2024;12:e0382723 .DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar

Top

Figures
Table

Top

Suggested citation for this article: Tchatchouang S, Meyin A Ebong S, Baumy C, Robbe-Saule M, Ndong Bass IW, Woguia GF, et al. Detection of Mycobacterium ulcerans DNA in African fruit bats, Cameroon, 2024. Emerg Infect Dis. 2026 Dec [date cited]. https://doi.org/10.3201/eid3212.261277

DOI: 10.3201/eid3212.261277

Original Publication Date: November 05, 2026

1These first authors contributed equally to this article.

2These senior authors contributed equally to this article.

Table of Contents – Volume 32, Number 12—December 2026

EID Search Options
presentation_01 Advanced Article Search – Search articles by author and/or keyword.
presentation_01 Articles by Country Search – Search articles by the topic country.
presentation_01 Article Type Search – Search articles by article type and issue.

Top

Comments

Please use the form below to submit correspondence to the authors or contact them at the following address:

Laurent Marsollier, INCIT, Inserm U1302, Université d’Angers, CHU Angers, PBH-IRIS, 4 rue Larrey, 49000 Angers, France

Send To

10000 character(s) remaining.

Top

Page created: September 30, 2026
Page updated: November 05, 2026
Page reviewed: November 05, 2026
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.
file_external