Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link

Disclaimer: Early release articles are not considered as final versions. Any changes will be reflected in the online version in the month the article is officially released.

Volume 32, Number 2—February 2026

Research Letter

Monkeypox Virus Antibodies in Healthy Persons after Vaccination with MVA-BN, United Kingdom

Author affiliation: University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK (V.H. Sheridan, C.W. Duffy, L. Turtle, J.A. Hiscox, K.S. Subramaniam); University of Oxford, Oxford, UK (J. Dunning); Royal Liverpool University Hospital, Liverpool (L. Turtle)

Suggested citation for this article

Abstract

A 2-dose regimen of the vaccine modified vaccinia Ankara–Bavarian Nordic (MVA-BN) can generate neutralizing antibodies for monkeypox virus clades Ib and IIb. We observed higher response to clade IIb; that result provides evidence that MVA-BN vaccination can induce cross-neutralizing antibodies for monkeypox virus clade Ib as well as for clade IIb.

Mpox is a zoonotic viral disease caused by monkeypox virus (MPXV), which is divided into clades I and II; clade II is subdivided into subclades IIa and IIb (1,2). In 2023 a new subclade of clade I, termed clade Ib, emerged in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC). Since the first human case identified in August 1970 in DRC, mpox has been reported in 11 countries in Africa; in 2022 a global outbreak occurred in nonendemic areas caused by the clade IIb strain (1). More recently, the emergence of clade Ib, designated a public health emergency of international concern in August 2024 and associated with increased disease severity and mortality rate, particularly among children, posed a substantial public health threat (3). The World Health Organization recommends that persons at high risk of contracting mpox, especially during an outbreak, be vaccinated (2) with the modified vaccinia Ankara-Bavarian Nordic (MVA-BN) smallpox vaccine, a live attenuated vaccine (1).

Evidence demonstrates that vaccination with MVA-BN can generate low levels of neutralizing antibodies for clade IIb and clade Ia (4,5). In the United Kingdom, 1 dose of MVA-BN gives short-term protection of 78% against mpox, predominantly in men who have sex with men (6). Whether vaccination can also induce neutralizing antibodies for clade Ib has not been addressed. We recruited a convenience sample of healthcare workers (n = 25) vaccinated with MVA-BN for occupational exposure to mpox to measure neutralizing antibodies for clades Ib and IIb using a plaque reduction neutralization test (PRNT).

Figure

Titer results in study of monkeypox virus antibodies in healthy persons after MVA-BN vaccination, United Kingdom. PRNT50 titers for participants vaccinated with 2 doses of MVA-BN vaccine demonstrated neutralizing antibody responses to monkeypox virus clade Ib and clade IIb. A) Assessment of the contribution of complement on neutralization illustrating the different conditions tested: purple, HI; red, HI and GPS; blue, non-HI. Mann Whitney U test used to determine p values. B) PRNT50 values for clades Ib and IIb. Wilcoxon matched pairs signed rank test used to determine p values. Blue indicates negative controls; yellow, vaccine recipients; red, participants with underlying conditions. Each data point represents the geometric mean titer of 2 experimental replicates; horizontal black lines indicate medians. PRNT50 values were determined using Probit regression. GPS, guinea pig serum; HI, heat-inactivation; MVA-BN, modified vaccinia Ankara–Bavarian Nordic vaccine; NS, not significant; PRNT50, log of 50% endpoint plaque reduction neutralization test.

Figure. Titer results in study of monkeypox virus antibodies in healthy persons after MVA-BN vaccination, United Kingdom. PRNT50titers for participants vaccinated with 2 doses of MVA-BN vaccine demonstrated neutralizing...

The importance of complement in relation to neutralization levels has been reported for MPXV (7) and other viruses (8). To assess the contribution of complement in our cohort, we exposed serum samples to different conditions: heat inactivation (HI), HI supplemented with guinea pig serum as a complement source, and non-HI. We found, as previously reported (7), that complement is required for neutralization of MPXV in vitro (Figure, panel A). We detected no significant difference in MPXV neutralization between HI serum in the presence of a complement source and non-HI (p = 0.0625 by Wilcoxon signed-rank test). On the basis of those data, we used non-HI serum for the remainder of the experiments.

We measured neutralization of MPXV clade Ib and IIb in non-HI serum samples from 25 vaccine recipients. We included 4 persons who did not receive the MVA-BN vaccine but were immunized with another live attenuated vaccine, IMOJEV (Substipharm, https://www.substipharm.com), as controls. In the MVA-BN vaccine group, 3 participants had underlying conditions of multiple sclerosis, psoriasis, or asthma (Table). The median PRNT50, which is defined as the reciprocal of the serum dilution that results in 50% reduction in virus plaques, was 25.9 (interquartile range [IQR] 10.05–49.7) for clade Ib and 44.8 (IQR 19.55–89.4) for clade IIb. Comparisons across these samples demonstrated that 2 doses of MVA-BN generated greater neutralization of MPXV clade IIb than of clade Ib, a difference we found to be statistically significant (p = 0.0028 by Wilcoxon signed-rank test) (Figure, panel B). The difference in neutralizing antibody titers is small, and the relevance for clinical protection is uncertain. The protective threshold for MPXV neutralizing antibodies is not defined; case–control studies could define antibody-specific correlates of protection. The negative controls did exhibit low levels of nonspecific neutralization (PRNT50 18.5 for clade Ib and 25 for clade IIb), which were lower than those observed in the MVA-BN vaccine group.

Our results showed low levels of MPXV neutralization from MVA-BN vaccination, consistent with previous studies (4,5,9). We found that neutralization of clade Ib was lower than for clade IIb. Although our study is limited by relatively small sample size, we demonstrated neutralization of MPXV clade Ib in vaccine recipients without a history of mpox and compare those results with clade IIb neutralization. Moreover, given that the study cohort included healthcare workers at highest risk for exposure, evidence of vaccine-associated neutralization is relevant to determine policies regarding future vaccine rollouts.

MPXV neutralization is known to require complement (7). We observed low levels of neutralization when guinea pig serum was added to virus and when pooled human plasma was added to virus (data not shown), highlighting the nonspecific effect that foreign complement sources can have on MPXV neutralization; guinea pig serum alone exhibits neutralization activity against mumps virus compared with purified antibodies alone (10). Therefore, our approach was to use non–heat-inactivated serum to measure MPXV neutralization as described previously (9).

The low levels of neutralization we observed, particularly against MPXV clade Ib, suggest that vaccination with MVA-BN can confer moderate protection against disease caused by that clade. The durability of those responses, and whether a third dose is required to enhance protection against mpox clade Ib infections (4,5,9), were beyond the scope of our study.

Dr. Sheridan is a postdoctoral researcher in the laboratory of Julian Hiscox, University of Liverpool. Her research focuses on virus host interactions and the use of medical countermeasures.

Top

Acknowledgment

The International Severe Acute Respiratory and Emerging Infection Consortium (ISARIC) World Health Organization Clinical Characterisation Protocol (CCP-UK) United Kingdom is co-led and maintained by J. Kenneth Baillie (Baillie Gifford Pandemic Science Hub, University of Edinburgh) and Malcolm G. Semple (Liverpool) on behalf of the ISARIC4C investigators (isaric4c.net).

Top

References

  1. Sun  Y, Nie  W, Tian  D, Ye  Q. Human monkeypox virus: Epidemiologic review and research progress in diagnosis and treatment. J Clin Virol. 2024;171:105662. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. World Health Organization. Mpox. 2025[cited 2025 Jul 27]. https://www.who.int/health-topics/mpox
  3. Srivastava  S. Laxmi, Sharma K, Sridhar SB, Talath S, Shareef J, et al. Clade Ib: a new emerging threat in the Mpox outbreak. Front Pharmacol. 2024;15:1504154. DOIGoogle Scholar
  4. Zaeck  LM, Lamers  MM, Verstrepen  BE, Bestebroer  TM, van Royen  ME, Götz  H, et al. Low levels of monkeypox virus-neutralizing antibodies after MVA-BN vaccination in healthy individuals. Nat Med. 2023;29:2708. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Collier  AY, McMahan  K, Jacob-Dolan  C, Liu  J, Borducchi  EN, Moss  B, et al. Decline of mpox antibody responses after modified vaccinia Ankara-Bavarian Nordic vaccination. JAMA. 2024;332:166972. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Bertran  M, Andrews  N, Davison  C, Dugbazah  B, Boateng  J, Lunt  R, et al. Effectiveness of one dose of MVA-BN smallpox vaccine against mpox in England using the case-coverage method: an observational study. Lancet Infect Dis. 2023;23:82835. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Hubert  M, Guivel-Benhassine  F, Bruel  T, Porrot  F, Planas  D, Vanhomwegen  J, et al. Complement-dependent mpox-virus-neutralizing antibodies in infected and vaccinated individuals. Cell Host Microbe. 2023;31:937948.e4. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Mellors  J, Dhaliwal  R, Longet  S, Tipton  T, Barnes  E, Dunachie  SJ, et al.; OCTAVE Consortium; OPTIC Consortium. Complement-mediated enhancement of SARS-CoV-2 antibody neutralisation potency in vaccinated individuals. Nat Commun. 2025;16:2666. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Phipps  K, Yates  J, Pettit  J, Bialosuknia  S, Hunt  D, DuPuis  AP II, et al. Short-lived neutralizing antibody responses to monkeypox virus in smallpox vaccine–naive persons after JYNNEOS vaccination. Emerg Infect Dis. 2025;31:23745. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Brgles  M, Kurtović  T, Lang Balija  M, Hećimović  A, Mušlin  T, Halassy  B. Impact of complement and difference of cell-based assay and ELISA in determination of neutralization capacity against mumps and measles virus. J Immunol Methods. 2021;490:112957. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar

Top

Figures
Table

Top

Suggested citation for this article: Sheridan VH, Duffy CW, Dunning J, Turtle L, Hiscox JA, Subramaniam KS. Monkeypox virus antibodies in healthy persons after vaccination with MVA-BN, United Kingdom. Emerg Infect Dis. 2026 Feb [date cited]. https://doi.org/10.3202/eid3202.251553

DOI: 10.3201/eid3202.251553

Original Publication Date: February 15, 2026

1More information about the group is at the end of this article.

Table of Contents – Volume 32, Number 2—February 2026

EID Search Options
presentation_01 Advanced Article Search – Search articles by author and/or keyword.
presentation_01 Articles by Country Search – Search articles by the topic country.
presentation_01 Article Type Search – Search articles by article type and issue.

Top

Comments

Please use the form below to submit correspondence to the authors or contact them at the following address:

Krishanthi Subramaniam, Department of Clinical Infection, Microbiology and Immunology, Institute of Infection, Veterinary and Ecological Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool L69 7BE, UK

Send To

10000 character(s) remaining.

Top

Page created: January 22, 2026
Page updated: February 15, 2026
Page reviewed: February 15, 2026
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.
file_external