Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link

Disclaimer: Early release articles are not considered as final versions. Any changes will be reflected in the online version in the month the article is officially released.

Volume 32, Number 3—March 2026

Dispatch

Optimal Specimens and Lesions for Mpox Diagnosis Using Real-Time PCR, South Korea

Author affiliation: Chosun University College of Medicine, Gwang-Ju, South Korea (D.-M. Kim, M. Muhammad, C.-M. Kim, J.-W. Seo, D.Y. Kim, N.R. Yun, B. Lee); Hasanuddin University, Makassar, Indonesia (M. Muhammad); Korea Disease Control and Prevention Agency, Cheongju, South Korea (J.W. Kim, M. Lee, J.H. Lee, M.-M. Choi, Y.-S. Chung)

Suggested citation for this article

Abstract

We analyzed 612 specimens from 135 patients with monkeypox virus clade IIb in South Korea by using real-time PCR. Crusted and anogenital skin lesions and rectal swab specimens demonstrated the highest positivity rates. Viral loads varied by lesion type, anatomic site, and time since symptom onset, supporting our specimen selection for clade IIb detection.

Mpox, a zoonotic disease caused by the monkeypox virus (MPXV), a member of the genus Orthopoxvirus, was first reported in South Korea in 2022 and initially involved imported cases and a hospital-acquired infection (1,2). A local outbreak began in April 2022 and peaked in late April to early May 2023, largely affecting young adult men (mostly men who have sex with men); most transmission events were linked to sexual contact (2,3,4). Genomic analysis revealed that circulating strains in 2023 belonged to MPXV clade IIb, with the B.1.3 lineage predominating (4).

As the outbreak evolved, understanding the MPXV transmission dynamics and diagnostic accuracy became increasingly crucial. Although mpox is primarily transmitted by symptomatic persons, presymptomatic transmission occurring 1–4 days before symptom onset has been reported (5). Accurate diagnosis relies on appropriate specimen selection and timing of sample collection. However, relatively few studies have systematically compared viral loads across specimen types, and we did not find published studies that comprehensively evaluated differences between anogenital and nonanogenital skin lesions. To address those gaps, we assessed MPXV viral loads and positivity rates in South Korea by specimen type and time since symptom onset by using real-time quantitative PCR (qPCR).

The Study

We conducted a retrospective observational study to analyze demographic characteristics, symptom onset, specimen types, qPCR results, and cycle threshold (Ct) values of suspected MPXV cases in South Korea referred to the Korea Disease Control and Prevention Agency (KDCA). Clinical specimens were collected by trained healthcare personnel and included skin lesions, upper respiratory tract swab specimens, blood, and rectal swab specimens. We categorized skin lesions by type (crusted, vesicular, papular, pustular, or unknown) and site (anogenital, nonanogenital, or unknown), including the anus, perineum, penis, and vulva. We grouped samples by days since symptom onset (0–1, 2–3, 4–10, and >10 days). We considered Ct values >40 or undetectable negative and Ct values <40 positive.

We extracted viral DNA from 200 µL of clinical specimens by using the QIAamp Blood Mini Kit (QIAGEN, https://www.qiagen.com) following the manufacturer’s protocol. qPCR targeted F3L and A39R genes by using the following primers and probes: F3L forward 5′-CATCTATTATAGCATCAGCATCAGA-3′, reverse 5′-GATACTCCTCCTCGTTGGTCTAC-3′, probe 5′-FAM-TGTAGGCCGTGTATCAGCATCCATT-IBFQ-3′; A39R forward 5′-TGGGATAACGAATCCAATGTCA-3′, reverse 5′-GCGTGCTTCCAGCAACACT-3′, probe 5′-FAM-AGCGCCTAGCACAGAACACATTTACGA-IBFQ-3.

For group comparisons, we used χ2 or Fisher exact test for categorical variables and the Kruskal-Wallis test or analysis of variance for Ct value comparisons. We conducted analyses by using SPSS Statistics 29.0.10 (IBM, https://www.ibm.com) and GraphPad Prism version 8 (https://www.graphpad.com). This study was approved by the KDCA institutional review board (approval no. 2020-03-01-P-A), which waived written informed consent.

During August 28, 2022–October 3, 2023, the KDCA received 1,668 specimens from 379 patients with suspected mpox. After we excluded 244 patients (1,056 specimens) because of missing clinical data (999 samples from 231 patients) and unclear onset times (57 samples from 13 patients), we analyzed 612 specimens from 135 patients. Most (97.7%) specimens were from men. Median patient age was 31.7 (interquartile range [IQR] 27.7–37.1) years, and median collection time was 6 (IQR 2.0–8.0) days after onset. Specimens were 362 skin lesions, 109 upper respiratory tract swab specimens, 135 blood samples, and 6 rectal swab specimens; 445 samples were PCR-positive.

Figure 1

Comparison of Ct values of real-time PCR at each lesion and time point of each specimen after symptom onset in patients with mpox, South Korea, 2022–2023. Horizontal lines within boxes represent medians, box tops and bottoms represent interquartile ranges, and error bars represent minimum and maximum values. Ct, cycle threshold.

Figure 1. Comparison of Ct values of real-time PCR at each lesion and time point of each specimen after symptom onset in patients with mpox, South Korea, 2022–2023. Horizontal lines within boxes...

MPXV DNA was more frequently detected from skin lesions (92.8%, n = 336/362) and rectal swab specimens (100%, n = 6/6) than from upper respiratory tract (68.8%, n = 75/109) and blood samples (28.2%, n = 38/135) (Table 1; Appendix Figure 1). Median Ct values were significantly lower for skin lesions (median 22.01, IQR 19.25–28.19) and rectal swab specimens (median 20.19, IQR 18.85–24.23) than in the upper respiratory tract (median 33.61, IQR 29.09–40.00) and blood samples (median 40.00, IQR 38.61–40.00; p<0.001); we found no significant difference between skin lesions and rectal swab specimens (p = 0.36) (Table 1; Figure 1). Among skin lesions, crusted types demonstrated the highest positivity rate (93.3%, n = 70/75) and the lowest median Ct value (median 20.63, IQR 18.30–24.48), significantly lower than for other lesion types (median 23.33, IQR 19.74–30.00; p<0.001). Anogenital lesions had lower Ct values (median 20.78, IQR 17.91–25.65) than lesions at other sites (median 22.82, IQR 19.91–29.94; p = 0.018). Positivity rates (p = 0.556) and Ct values (p = 0.351) did not differ significantly between oropharyngeal and nasopharyngeal specimens; however, oropharyngeal samples tended toward higher positivity (64.3%) and lower Ct values (median 34.37, IQR 29.78–40.00) compared with nasopharyngeal samples (50.0%, n = 2/4; median Ct 37.14, IQR 32.45–40.00), despite the limited sample size.

Figure 2

Monkeypox viral loads given as Ct values in patients with mpox, according to sampled sites and time of onset, South Korea, 2022–2023. Blue dots indicate Ct results for each sample. Red dashed lines represent median values. Ct, cycle threshold.

Figure 2. Monkeypox viral loads given as Ct values in patients with mpox, according to sampled sites and time of onset, South Korea, 2022–2023. Blue dots indicate Ct results for each sample....

Positivity and Ct values varied over time after symptom onset (Table 2; Figure 2). The Ct values of the skin lesions changed significantly (p<0.001), whereas positivity remained high (≈90%) for up to 60 days (p = 0.142). Upper respiratory tract specimens showed no significant changes in positivity (p = 0.738) or Ct values (p = 0.369), with peak positivity (75%) on day 1, lasting until day 30. Blood samples had low positivity (28.2%) and no great variation over time, peaking in the first 3 days (32%), and were detectable for ≈20 days.

Mpox is primarily transmitted through direct contact with body fluids, respiratory droplets, or contaminated surfaces (6). Increasing evidence indicates that sexual contact is the dominant transmission route during outbreaks, particularly among men who have sex with men (7). This evidence is supported by frequent anogenital lesions and the detection of culturable viruses in saliva, the nasopharynx, and semen (7). The high positivity and low Ct values observed in anogenital lesions in our study further support that finding.

After inoculation, MPXV replicates in the skin, spreads to the lymph nodes, and causes viremia and systemic dissemination (8). Skin lesions progress through macules, papules, vesicles or pustules, and crusts (6). Crusted lesions have historically been regarded as less infectious, but accumulating evidence indicates that viral DNA and infectious virus might persist until crust detachment (9,10). Consistent with that persistence of infectious virus, we observed high MPXV DNA levels in crusted lesions, indicating its potential infectivity. MPXV also demonstrates strong tropism for keratinocytes. Skin specimens, particularly anogenital lesions and rectal swab specimens, exhibit higher viral loads than blood or respiratory specimens, underscoring the central role of the skin in viral replication and direct contact transmission (11,12).

Ct values in skin lesions decreased significantly over time, consistent with reports from China demonstration high viral DNA detection for up to 3 weeks (13). Upper respiratory tract samples peaked in positivity 1 day after symptom onset and then declined, similar to the oropharyngeal patterns reported in China (13). Blood samples demonstrated low positivity, which increased slightly in the first 3 days and then declined, consistent with reports of plasma and serum viral DNA peaking before day 10 (13). Our findings support evidence that skin and rectal swab specimens yield higher viral loads than blood or respiratory swab specimens (14,15).

The limitations of our study include incomplete clinical data and a small number of rectal swabs. Many patients relied on referral records that lacked detailed lesion or location data. Prospective studies are necessary to clarify the links between symptoms, severity, duration, and outcomes.

Conclusions

Our study of MPXV clade IIb infection during the 2022–2023 outbreak in Korea found that crusted and anogenital skin lesions and rectal swab specimens demonstrated the highest PCR positivity, followed by upper respiratory tract and blood samples. Peak positivity occurred around day 1 in the respiratory tract and on day 3 in blood. The Ct values differed significantly by lesion type and anatomic location, highlighting the importance of targeted specimen collection and the appropriate sampling timing in MPXV clade IIb infection.

Dr. Kim is a professor in the Department of Internal Medicine of Chosun University Hospital and Chosun University College of Medicine, Korea. His research interests include emerging infectious diseases, particularly vector-borne diseases.

Top

References

  1. Shim  M, Cho  SH, Lee  SE, Kim  T. Epidemiological characteristics and risk factors of suspected and confirmed mpox cases during the 2022-2023 epidemic in the Capital Region, Korea. Epidemiol Health. 2024;46:e2024092. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Kim  T, Park  E, Eun  JS, Lee  EY, Mun  JW, Choi  Y, et al. Detecting mpox infection in the early epidemic: an epidemiologic investigation of the third and fourth cases in Korea. Epidemiol Health. 2023;45:e2023040. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Kwon  SL, Song  M, Lee  W, Shin  J, Lee  SY, Yeo  SG, et al. First nationwide mpox vaccination program in the Republic of Korea: implications for an enhanced public health response. J Korean Med Sci. 2024;39:e235. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Choi  CH, Lee  M, Lee  SE, Kim  JW, Shin  H, Choi  MM, et al. Genomic analysis of monkeypox virus during the 2023 epidemic in Korea. J Korean Med Sci. 2024;39:e165. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Rossotti  R, Calzavara  D, Cernuschi  M, D’Amico  F, De Bona  A, Repossi  R, et al. Detection of asymptomatic mpox carriers among high-risk men who have sex with men: a prospective analysis. Pathogens. 2023;12:798. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Jezek  Z, Grab  B, Szczeniowski  MV, Paluku  KM, Mutombo  M. Human monkeypox: secondary attack rates. Bull World Health Organ. 1988;66:46570.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Pan  D, Nazareth  J, Sze  S, Martin  CA, Decker  J, Fletcher  E, et al. Transmission of monkeypox/mpox virus: A narrative review of environmental, viral, host, and population factors in relation to the 2022 international outbreak. J Med Virol. 2023;95:e28534. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Niu  L, Liang  D, Ling  Q, Zhang  J, Li  Z, Zhang  D, et al. Insights into monkeypox pathophysiology, global prevalence, clinical manifestation and treatments. Front Immunol. 2023;14:1132250. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Ng  OT, Lee  V, Marimuthu  K, Vasoo  S, Chan  G, Lin  RTP, et al. A case of imported Monkeypox in Singapore. Lancet Infect Dis. 2019;19:1166. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Ouafi  M, Regueme  A, Alcaraz  I, Riviere  P, Bazus  H, Salmon-Rousseau  A, et al. Oropharyngeal samples versus lesion specimens at diagnosis in patients infected with monkeypox virus in Northern France. J Med Virol. 2023;95:e28276. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Li  P, Pachis  ST, Xu  G, Schraauwen  R, Incitti  R, de Vries  AC, et al. Mpox virus infection and drug treatment modelled in human skin organoids. Nat Microbiol. 2023;8:206779. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Yang  S, Xia  C, Zhang  Y, Shen  Y, Xia  C, Lu  Y, et al. Clinical features and viral load variations of Mpox: a retrospective study in Chongqing, China. BMC Infect Dis. 2024;24:641. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Guo  L, Song  R, Zhang  Q, Li  D, Chen  L, Fang  M, et al. Profiling of viral load, antibody and inflammatory response of people with monkeypox during hospitalization: a prospective longitudinal cohort study in China. EBioMedicine. 2024;106:105254. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Hasso  M, Perusini  S, Eshaghi  A, Tang  E, Olsha  R, Zhang  H, et al. Monkeypox virus detection in different clinical specimen types. Emerg Infect Dis. 2022;28:25135. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Cordeiro  R, Pelerito  A, de Carvalho  IL, Lopo  S, Neves  R, Rocha  R, et al. An overview of monkeypox virus detection in different clinical samples and analysis of temporal viral load dynamics. J Med Virol. 2024;96:e70104. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar

Top

Figures
Tables

Top

Suggested citation for this article: Kim D-M, Muhammad M, Kim JW, Kim C-M, Seo J-W, Kim DY, et al. Optimal specimens and lesions for mpox diagnosis using real-time PCR, South Korea. Emerg Infect Dis. 2026 Mar [date cited]. https://doi.org/10.3201/eid3203.250582

DOI: 10.3201/eid3203.250582

Original Publication Date: March 03, 2026

Table of Contents – Volume 32, Number 3—March 2026

EID Search Options
presentation_01 Advanced Article Search – Search articles by author and/or keyword.
presentation_01 Articles by Country Search – Search articles by the topic country.
presentation_01 Article Type Search – Search articles by article type and issue.

Top

Comments

Please use the form below to submit correspondence to the authors or contact them at the following address:

Yoon-Seok Chung, Korea Disease Control and Prevention Agency, Cheongju 28159, South Korea

Send To

10000 character(s) remaining.

Top

Page created: February 13, 2026
Page updated: March 03, 2026
Page reviewed: March 03, 2026
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.
file_external