Disclaimer: Early release articles are not considered as final versions. Any changes will be reflected in the online version in the month the article is officially released.
Volume 32, Number 6—June 2026
Dispatch
Emergence of Ceftriaxone-Resistant Neisseria gonorrhoeae penA-60–Carrying Strains, Thailand, 2025
Table 2
Diagnostic testing, treatment, and antimicrobial susceptibility of ceftriaxone-resistant Neisseria gonorrhoeae isolates, Thailand, January–April 2025*
| Case no. | Syphilis rapid test | HIV testing | NAAT testing† | Treatment | MIC, µg/mL (R/S)‡ | TOC, culture and NAAT† | Sexual partner testing |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Negative |
Negative |
Pooled specimen from urine and OP site: positive |
IM ceftriaxone 1 g + oral azithromycin 1 g |
CRO 0.25 (R); CFM 1 (R); AZM 256 (R) |
OP and urethral specimens: negative |
Regular female partner (NG detected in pooled cervical and oropharyngeal specimens by Xpert CT/NG assay, but cervical and oropharyngeal cultures negative) |
| 2 |
Negative |
Negative |
Not tested |
IM ceftriaxone 1 g + oral doxycycline (200 mg/day for 7 d) |
CRO 0.5 (R); CFM 2 (R); AZM 256 (R) |
OP and urethral specimens: negative |
One-night-stand partner (contact tracing not possible) |
| 3 |
Not tested |
Not tested |
Pooled specimen from urine and OP site: positive |
IM ceftriaxone 1 g |
CRO 0.25 (R); CFM 2 (R); AZM 256 (R) |
Not conducted |
No partner reported |
| 4 |
Negative |
Negative |
Not tested |
IM ceftriaxone 1 g + oral doxycycline (200 mg/d for 7 d) |
CRO 0.5 (R); CFM 1 (R); AZM 1 (S) |
OP and urethral specimens: negative |
FSW (contact tracing not possible) |
| 5 | Not tested | Not tested | Not tested | IM ceftriaxone 1 g + oral doxycycline (200 mg/d for 7 d) | CRO 0.5 (R); CFM 2 (R); AZM 0.125 (S) | Not conducted | Casual female partner (contact tracing not possible) |
*AZM, azithromycin; CFM, cefixime; CRO, ceftriaxone; IM, intramuscular; NAAT, nucleic acid amplification test; NG, Neisseria gonorrhoeae; OP, oropharyngeal; R, resistant; S, susceptible; TOC, test-of-cure. †NAAT testing using Xpert CT/NG assay (Cepheid, https://www.cepheid.com). ‡Based on European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility testing breakpoints (10).
References
- US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Antibiotic resistance threats in the United States, 2013. 2013 [cited 2025 Nov 2]. https://stacks.cdc.gov/view/cdc/20705
- Unemo M, Lahra MM, Cole MJ, Marcano Zamora D, Jacobsson S, Galarza P, et al. WHO global gonococcal antimicrobial surveillance programmes, 2019–22: a retrospective observational study. Lancet Microbe. 2025;6:
101181 . DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar - Jensen JS, Unemo M. Antimicrobial treatment and resistance in sexually transmitted bacterial infections. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2024;22:435–50. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Eyre DW, Sanderson ND, Lord E, Regisford-Reimmer N, Chau K, Barker L, et al. Gonorrhoea treatment failure caused by a Neisseria gonorrhoeae strain with combined ceftriaxone and high-level azithromycin resistance, England, February 2018. Euro Surveill. 2018;23:
1800323 . DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar - Fifer H, Doumith M, Rubinstein L, Mitchell L, Wallis M, Singh S, et al. Ceftriaxone-resistant Neisseria gonorrhoeae detected in England, 2015–24: an observational analysis. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2024;79:3332–9. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sangprasert P, Golparian D, Paopang P, Girdthep N, Lawung R, Gopinath D, et al. Complete reference genomes of two ceftriaxone-resistant Neisseria gonorrhoeae strains identified in routine surveillance in Bangkok, Thailand, using Nanopore Q20+ chemistry, VolTRAX V2b, and Illumina sequencing. Microbiol Resour Announc. 2024;13:
e0123123 . DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar - Whiley DM, Mhango L, Jennison AV, Nimmo G, Lahra MM. Direct detection of penA gene associated with ceftriaxone-resistant Neisseria gonorrhoeae FC428 strain by using PCR. Emerg Infect Dis. 2018;24:1573–5. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kittiyaowamarn R, Girdthep N, Cherdtrakulkiat T, Sangprasert P, Tongtoyai J, Weston E, et al. Neisseria gonorrhoeae antimicrobial susceptibility trends in Bangkok, Thailand, 2015–21: Enhanced Gonococcal Antimicrobial Surveillance Programme (EGASP). JAC Antimicrob Resist. 2023;5:
dlad139 . DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar - Maatouk I, Vumbugwa P, Cherdtrakulkiat T, Heng LS, Hoffman I, Palaypayon N, et al.; WHO EGASP Study Group. Antimicrobial resistance in Neisseria gonorrhoeae in nine sentinel countries within the World Health Organization Enhanced Gonococcal Antimicrobial Surveillance Programme (EGASP), 2023: a retrospective observational study. Lancet Reg Health West Pac. 2025;61:
101663 . DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar - European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing. Breakpoint tables for interpretation of MICs and zone diameters. Version 15.0. 2025 [cited 2025 Nov 2]. https://www.eucast.org/fileadmin/eucast/pdf/breakpoints/v_15.0_Breakpoint_Tables.pdf
- Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing. Thirty-third edition (M100–ED33). Wayne (PA): The Institute; 2023. p. 132–4.
- Lan PT, Phan Nguyen TT, Anh VT, Golparian D, Thuy Van NT, Maatouk I, et al.; WHO EGASP-Viet Nam WGS study group. The World Health Organization (WHO) Enhanced Gonococcal Antimicrobial Surveillance Programme (EGASP) reports continuously high levels of ceftriaxone resistance across Viet Nam, 2024. Lancet Reg Health West Pac. 2025;63:
101709 . DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar - Ouk V, Heng LS, Virak M, Deng S, Lahra MM, Frankson R, et al.; EGASP Cambodia Working Group. High prevalence of ceftriaxone-resistant and XDR Neisseria gonorrhoeae in several cities of Cambodia, 2022–23: WHO Enhanced Gonococcal Antimicrobial Surveillance Programme (EGASP). JAC Antimicrob Resist. 2024;6:
dlae053 . DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar - Ministry of Public Health. Thailand. STI management guidelines 2024 [in Thai]. 2024 [cited 2025 Nov 2]. https://stisqsa.ddc.moph.go.th/app-assets/manual/2567/%E0%B9%81%E0%B8%99%E0%B8%A7%E0%B8%97%E0%B8%B2%E0%B8%87%E0%B8%81%E0%B8%B2%E0%B8%A3%E0%B8%94%E0%B8%B9%E0%B9%81%E0%B8%A5%E0%B8%A3%E0%B8%B1%E0%B8%81%E0%B8%A9%E0%B8%B2%E0%B9%82%E0%B8%A3%E0%B8%84%E0%B8%95%E0%B8%B4%E0%B8%94%E0%B8%95%E0%B9%88%E0%B8%AD%E0%B8%97%E0%B8%B2%E0%B8%87%E0%B9%80%E0%B8%9E%E0%B8%A8%E0%B8%AA%E0%B8%B1%E0%B8%A1%E0%B8%9E%E0%B8%B1%E0%B8%99%E0%B8%98%E0%B9%8C_2567.pdf
- Siltrakool B, Berrou I, Griffiths D, Alghamdi S. Antibiotics’ use in Thailand: community pharmacists’ knowledge, attitudes and practices. Antibiotics (Basel). 2021;10:137. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
1These authors contributed equally to this article.
Page created: April 08, 2026
Page updated: May 08, 2026
Page reviewed: May 08, 2026
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.