Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link
Volume 5, Number 4—August 1999

View from the Hill: Congressional Efforts to Address Bioterrorism

Article Metrics
citations of this article
EID Journal Metrics on Scopus
S. Anthony McCann
Author affiliation: U.S. House of Representatives, Washington, D.C., USA

Cite This Article

In government—and particularly in the federal government—ideas normally come from the bottom up. When finally approved, proposals are reasonably well thought out in terms of what we are going to do and why we are going to do it. Sometimes knowledge of "what" we are going to do far exceeds the ability to explain why we are going to do it. However, for bioterrorism we are better able to talk about the "why" than the "what." When Congress received a request from the administration to address bioterrorism, we had only the vaguest idea what they wanted to do. As a result, the availability of funds was delayed until an operating plan was in place. We are still fleshing out exactly how to approach this problem, what the roles of the various agencies are, and what the legal issues are.

It is incumbent upon the community to spend more time studying the proposal and coming back to Congress with more detail.

As the scientific community examines the issues involved in bioterrorism, an education campaign should be undertaken to inform the public and the members of Congress at the local and national levels. Many people equate bioterrorism with chemical or explosive accidents that are obvious and identifiable. The insidious nature of bioterrorist attacks should be better explored and communicated.

Finally, over the last 20 or 25 years, efforts to bring about structural reform in state and local governments and in local public health departments have eroded. Efforts by Congress to fund the bioterrorism initiative may have a dual effect: they may not only improve our ability to respond to a bioterrorist incident but also may strengthen state and local health departments.

S. Anthony McCann is Staff Director for the House Appropriations Subcommittee handling the budgets for the Departments of Labor, Health and Human Services, and Education. In this capacity, Mr. McCann provides support and makes policy recommendations to the Chairman and majority members for over $70 billion in discretionary programs under the subcommittee's jurisdiction. Mr. McCann also served under the Bush Administration as Assistant Secretary for Finance and IRM and Chief Financial Officer of the Department of Veterans Affairs.


Cite This Article

DOI: 10.3201/eid0504.990404

Table of Contents – Volume 5, Number 4—August 1999

EID Search Options
presentation_01 Advanced Article Search – Search articles by author and/or keyword.
presentation_01 Articles by Country Search – Search articles by the topic country.
presentation_01 Article Type Search – Search articles by article type and issue.


Page created: December 13, 2010
Page updated: December 13, 2010
Page reviewed: December 13, 2010
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.