Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link
Volume 6, Number 4—August 2000

Male-Killing Bacteria in Insects: Mechanisms, Incidence, and Implications

Gregory D.D. Hurst and Francis M. Jiggins

Author affiliations: University College London, United Kingdom

Article in Chinese

Cite This Article


Bacteria that are vertically transmitted through female hosts and kill male hosts that inherit them were first recorded in insects during the 1950s. Recent studies have shown these "male-killers" to be diverse and have led to a reappraisal of the biology of many groups of bacteria. Rickettsia, for instance, have been regarded as human pathogens transmitted by arthropods. The finding of a male-killing Rickettsia obligately associated with an insect suggests that the genus' members may be primarily associated with arthropods and are only sometimes pathogens of vertebrates. We examined both how killing of male hosts affects the dynamics of inherited bacteria and how male-killing bacteria affect their host populations. Finally, we assessed the potential use of these microorganisms in the control of insect populations.

Female insects commonly interact with bacteria they pass on to their progeny. These inherited bacteria are often beneficial symbionts that play a key role in host metabolism. In many cases (e.g., the aphid symbiont Buchnera), the bacteria are maintained in a special host organ, the bacteriome, with the host controlling transmission to progeny, and show evidence of cospeciation (1,2). In these cases, destroying the bacteria (e.g., through antibiotic treatment) causes a profound loss of host performance. In other cases, inherited bacteria are not integrated into host physiology and anatomy and do not show long-lived relationships with their host, as indicated by a lack of cospeciation (3). These bacteria may be broadly separated into two classes. First, bacteria maintained through a phase of horizontal transmission (e.g., Rickettsia prowazekii), with transmission to other arthropod hosts often occurring through a vertebrate or plant intermediate host (infection of the intermediate host and new acquisition of infection follow from host feeding); second, bacteria that rarely show horizontal transmission, but are maintained because they manipulate host reproduction. One set of manipulations manifested by these bacteria is increasing investment in daughters at the expense of sons. In these cases, particular host lines produce female-biased sex ratios, a trait that is inherited but curable with antibiotics. We considered one class of these, the male-killing bacteria, in which infection of a female results in the production of female-biased broods because male progeny die during embryogenesis.

Systematics of male-killing bacteria


Thumbnail of Phylogenetic relationship of male-killers and a selection of other eubacteria inferred from 16S rDNA sequences, using maximum likelihood implemented on PAUP*. The male-killing bacteria (underlined) have been labeled with the name of their insect host if a species name is not available. The relationships of the major bacterial groups are uncertain.

Figure. Phylogenetic relationship of male-killers and a selection of other eubacteria inferred from 16S rDNA sequences, using maximum likelihood implemented on PAUP*. The male-killing bacteria (underlined) have been labeled with the name...

Molecular systematic approaches have shown that male-killing bacteria derive from many different clades. In most cases, the data come from DNA sequencing of bacteria associated with the trait and confirmation of the trait association by polymerase chain reaction across infected and uninfected lines. Because inherited microorganisms are difficult to culture, Koch's postulates have been fulfilled formally in only two cases (4,5). Given this caveat, male-killing bacteria have been found within the genus Spiroplasma (Mollicutes) (4,6), the Flavobacteria-Bacteroides group (7), and the gamma and alpha subdivisions of the proteobacteria (5,8,9) (Figure).

Male-killing bacteria derive from arthropod-associated bacterial clades that are not themselves male-killers. The clades can be separated into two types according to the transmission mechanisms of bacteria within them: first, entirely horizontal transmission or a mix of horizontal and vertical transmission; and second, horizontal transmission that is not epidemiologically important. In the first type of clade are the genera Spiroplasma and Rickettsia. In Spiroplasma, most members have either horizontal transmission only (after feeding on a plant host) or a mix of horizontal and vertical transmission between arthropod hosts (10). Rickettsia most commonly have a mix of horizontal and vertical transmission, with horizontal transmission occurring after feeding on a vertebrate host. As recently as 10 years ago, Rickettsia was regarded as one of vertebrate pathogens borne by arthropods. However, Rickettsia that show transmission after feeding on plant hosts are increasingly being recognized (11), and the finding of a male-killing Rickettsia in ladybird beetles (8) suggests that the group is associated with arthropods, some members of which cause disease in vertebrates. Other male-killing strains of Rickettsia will most likely be found. However, whether a bacterium from these groups could evolve male-killing yet retain horizontal transmission between females via feeding on a plant or vertebrate host has not been established. The fact that male-killers derive from such groups suggests this possibility.

In the second type of clade, vertical transmission rates far exceed those of horizontal transmission. Wolbachia and the flavobacterial lineage associated with arthropods are in this group. Wolbachia are usually maintained through manipulation of their host's reproduction (12). The closest relative of the flavobacterial male-killer is Blattabacterium, the beneficial inherited bacterium of cockroaches and termites (13).

Male-killing, a trait that evolves in bacteria already maternally inherited in arthropods, can occur if the ancestral agent is obligately vertically transmitted or a mix of vertical and horizontal transmission is present. Therefore, male-killing strains are likely to be common in the genus Spiroplasma and the alpha group of proteobacteria. Furthermore, the diversity of agents suggests that there is no taxonomic bar to where the transition to male-killing can take place. Thus male-killing strains are also likely to be found in the spirochetes and perhaps the beta and delta divisions of the proteobacteria, as these groups are known to be vertically transmitted within arthropods.

Although vertical transmission of male-killing bacteria is the rule, transmission between host species has occurred. In Spiroplasma, the relatives of S. ixodetis cause male-killing in distantly related hosts (a butterfly and a ladybird beetle) (6,14). The evolutionary distance between beetles and butterflies indicates that the bacteria do cross between host species over evolutionary time.

Host species affected

The incidence of male-killing bacteria varies with host ecology and biology. The trait of male-killing is adaptive when the death of males promotes the survival of female siblings. If the bacteria can be transmitted only vertically, the death of male hosts can at worst be neutral (i.e., they cannot transmit the bacterium). Death of males is adaptive if it increases the survival of sibling females, who bear the same bacterium by virtue of common descent.

The features of host biology and ecology that increase the benefit to the bacterium of killing male embryos are sibling egg consumption (females eat their dead brothers), antagonistic interactions between siblings (male-killing may reduce both cannibalism of females and the intensity of competition between siblings), and deleterious inbreeding (15-17). These observations explain why male-killer hosts commonly lay eggs in clutches. Incidence is highest where there is also sibling egg consumption, as with coccinellid (ladybird) beetles. Approximately half of aphidophagous species bear male-killers, and one species (Adalia bipunctata) is host to at least three male-killing bacteria (6,8,9).

Male-killing bacteria have been recorded only in insects. However, the range of insect hosts is wide, with a variety of different sex determination systems. Given that close relatives of male-killing bacteria are found in noninsect arthropods (e.g., Spiroplasma and Rickettsia in ticks) and the conditions for the spread of male-killing strains are met outside insect hosts, cases of male-killing are likely to occur in species other than insects. Two examples merit particular examination. First, infection with Orientia tsutsugamushi is associated with production of all-female broods in the trombiculid mite, Leptotrombidium fletcheri (18,19); in this example, the nature of the resultant sex-ratio distortion (primary vs. secondary bias) needs to be assessed. Second, in the case of Spiroplasma ixodetis and its tick host Ixodes pacificus, the association of closely related bacteria with male-killing in insects needs to be assessed.

Prevalence of male-killers in natural populations

The prevalence of male-killers in natural populations varies with host species (Table 1). A prevalence value of 5%-50% might be "normal" among female hosts; however, in some cases prevalence is very low (e.g., 1% in D. willistoni [20]), and in some exceptional species > 90% of females are infected (e.g., the butterfly Acraea encedana [21]). However, there is likely to be study bias towards high-prevalence infections, and all very low-prevalence infections occur in drosophilids, where large samples can easily be bred. Infection prevalence also commonly varies between populations within a host, and prevalence can vary on a remarkably small scale. In the walnut leaf beetle (Gastrolina depressa) in Japan, male-killers are absent in populations at the north and south of the islands but present in 50%-80% of females in the center of the islands (22). Prevalence variation on a kilometer scale exists in Acraea encedon (21).

Prevalence is determined by the physiologic effect of infection on female host performance, the transmission efficiency of the bacterium from mother to progeny, and the level of advantage to male-killing (determined by host factors such as sibling egg consumption) (Table 2). Transmission efficiency may be influenced by the environment (e.g., high temperatures may lower transmission efficiency), the bacterium, and the host. Selection favors host genes that impede the transmission of the bacteria from mother to progeny. The spread of host resistance genes may prevent infections from commonly reaching the high prevalence achieved by other inherited bacteria.

 Mechanism of male-killing

Little is known about how male-killing is achieved. Neither the cue used to detect sex nor the mechanism by which death is brought about is known in any detail. Indeed, rather than two steps (detection then virulence) there may be only one (constitutive production of a factor that causes death in males only). What we know derives almost exclusively from study of the interaction between Spiroplasma poulsonii with Drosophila.

Studies of embryos from D. willistoni lines infected with S. poulsonii show that death occurs at two stages (23): 1) before gastrulation, associated with abnormal cleavage patterns; in particular, achromatic spindles, with other abnormalities of the mitotic process, which account for most embryonic deaths in male-killed lines. 2) After gastrulation, not associated with the normal brown coloration of necrotic embryos; rather, the embryo blackens as a result of breakdown of internal structures and pycnosis of nuclei.

The points of interaction between host and bacterium have been investigated in D. melanogaster lines transfected with S. poulsonii. In Drosophila, sex is determined by the ratio of the X chromosomes to autosomes. In females, which are 2X:2n, the peptide Sxl is produced. Sxl induces female development of the soma and the germ line. In males, which are X:2n, Sxl is not produced. Absence of Sxl is associated with upregulation of genes on the single X chromosome (dosage compensation), male somatic development, and male germ line development. In Drosophila, the male-killer does not interact with any part of the somatic sex development pathway. Mutants of the tra gene bear two X chromosomes and produce Sxl but develop as somatic males. They are not, however, killed by S. poulsonii (24). Thus, the interaction between male-killer and host is not associated with somatic sex, so the target of detection and virulence is either before Sxl is produced, Sxl itself, or the dosage compensation or germ-line determination pathways.

Although the interaction between Drosophila and S. poulsonii is the only one studied in any detail, it appears that the mechanism of sex determination exhibited by different male-killer hosts varies widely. Male-killing bacteria have been observed in male heterogametic, female heterogametic, and haplodiploid hosts. Furthermore, members of the same clade of male-killers can be found in hosts of different sex determination systems. The same Spiroplasma kills males in ladybirds (male heterogametic) and butterflies (male homogametic). Similarly, male-killing Wolbachia have been observed in both male and female heterogametic species (9). Given that male and female heterogametic systems count chromosomes in opposite directions and show different patterns of dosage compensation, the fact that male-killers operate in both these hosts suggests that the X:autosome counting mechanism and the dosage compensation pathway may not be the focus of male-killing activity; rather, somatic sex determination or germ-line sex determination may be the focus.

Experiments with S. poulsonii demonstrate that the somatic sex determination system is not the focus of male-killing behavior. In the case of the other male-killing Spiroplasma, the presence of the bacterium in species of different sex determination systems suggests that the focus is either the somatic sex determination or the germ-line determination system. Two conclusions are therefore possible: germ-line determination is the focus of male-killing in all cases, or male-killing has more than one basic mechanism. Further research is clearly warranted.

Direct effects on female hosts

The interaction between male-killing bacteria and their female hosts is interesting. On the one hand, there is selection for a reduction in the number of bacteria present in the host (minimizing virulence) and for a direct physiologic contribution to host metabolism. On the other hand, their fitness is also associated with the fidelity of their transmission to progeny. There may be a trade-off between minimizing virulence and maximizing vertical transmission efficiency, especially if vertical transmission efficiency is positively related to bacterial number. Thus these bacteria can be either detrimental (if the density of bacteria is high to ensure vertical transmission) or beneficial to the host (if the bacteria play a role in host metabolism).

Empiric studies have suggested that infection usually decreases the performance of female hosts (25,26). The one exception is the interaction between Spiroplasma poulsonii and members of the Drosophila willistoni group, in which larval development is accelerated by infection (27,28). However, infection is also associated with increased sterility and decreased longevity among adult females (28). Male-killing bacteria, unlike beneficial symbionts, are spread throughout host tissues, and the bacteria may be present in very high numbers. Drosophila are infected with extremely high titers of S. poulsonii within the hemolymph (29). Adalia bipunctata hemocytes are regularly infected with Rickettsia (30).

Beneficial effects of male-killing bacteria on host performance cannot yet be ruled out. However, positive effects may be fewer than those found in the "classical" beneficial agents, which typically perform a vital metabolic function that insects are unable to perform. Male-killers infect a minority of females and are rarely carried by larval or adult males. Thus, although they may add to host performance, they cannot substitute for any part of it. A host cannot be dependent on a male-killer for a physiologic function as it can on a beneficial symbiont.

Population and evolutionary effects on hosts

Invasion of a host population by male-killing bacteria affects the dynamics of the host population and alters the pattern of selection on the population to ameliorate the effects of the parasite (Table 3). A high prevalence of male-killers may increase the proportion of female hosts that fail to mate (31), potentially reducing the population size of the host. A dearth of males can subtly alter the mating system of the host. Choice by females of male mates and competition among males for mating opportunities are the rule in insects. However, the biased population sex ratios that result from the spread of male-killing bacteria can reverse this pattern (31). Male choice of females and competition among females for males is expected, with a relaxation of selection on males to ensure paternity.

Male-killers that have invaded populations may cause changes to host biology. Theory predicts selection for an increase in the size of clutch produced (32). Most importantly, genes that prevent the action or transmission of the parasite will be favored. The presence of these genes has been reported (33), but their nature and mode of action are unknown. The means by which insects exclude bacteria is clearly of great import in our understanding of insect-borne diseases, and the nature of resistance genes is expected to be an important focus of future research.

One of the issues to be determined relates to whether male-killing bacteria can cause the extinction of their host. The case of the butterflies Acraea encedon and A. encedana is suggestive. The Wolbachia male-killer in these species is at high prevalence and clearly has some impact on the host population (21,31). If a male-killing bacterium showed perfect vertical transmission, host extinction would be likely. However, selection on the host acts to lower bacterial transmission efficiency, which may ultimately limit the frequency of extinction.

Conclusions: implications and uses of male-killing bacteria

Male-killing is an adaptive trait that aids the spread of inherited bacteria through natural populations. The presence of male-killing strains in many bacterial taxa clearly indicates that male-killing should be considered in epidemiologic investigations of vertically transmitted bacteria. Male-killing is perhaps most important in interactions between arthropods and Rickettsia and Spiroplasma. Members of these genera frequently show horizontal transmission between arthropod hosts (after host-feeding), as well as vertical transmission in the arthropod host. Given that some bacteria in these groups induce male-killing, testing for the presence or absence of this trait should be a part of future investigations of their epidemiology.

The potential usefulness of male-killing bacteria in pest control has yet to be properly assessed. Male-killers may be used on their own to reduce host population size. Alternatively, they may be integrated into management schemes based on release of sterile males, so that they may amplify the effect of sterile releases on the population size of adult males. In addition, the recent discovery of male-killing in the clade Wolbachia adds an extra dimension to the use of this organism in direct and transgenic control of disease transmission.

The usefulness of male-killers in reducing pest damage on their own is debatable. Insect population size and population persistence are largely a function of female, not male, number. Thus, although the presence of a male-killer may reduce larval density, it is unlikely to decrease the population size of breeding females. Furthermore, the presence of density dependence during the larval stages is likely to reduce the effect of male death on numbers of larvae.

Perhaps a more realistic use of male-killing bacteria in pest management would be in conjunction with sterile male release systems of control. In sterile male release, control is achieved through release into the environment of mass-produced sterile males, which mate with females and lower their fertility (34). The success of sterile male release depends on maintaining a high ratio of sterile to normal males in the population. The presence of a male-killer in the host population lowers the number of fertile males and thus increases the effectiveness of any release. The effects of male-killing bacteria at different prevalences on sterile male release, in conjunction with the effects on host population dynamics, need to be investigated. However, direct use of male-killing bacteria as an aid to controlling host numbers is only achievable as a long-term stratagem. Following release of infected hosts into natural populations, spread will occur only in hosts with suitable ecologies and significant prevalence levels will be achieved over a period of years rather than weeks. Another potential application of male-killing bacteria in the sphere of pest and disease vector control may occur indirectly through study of the virulence mechanisms of male-killers.

Dr. Hurst has been a BBSRC David Phillips Fellow at University College London since 1997. His research interests center on the dynamics and importance of parasites that affect insect reproduction.



The authors thank Andrew Pomiankowski and two anonymous reviewers for their comments on the manuscript.

In conducting this study, Greg Hurst was supported by a BBSRC D Phillips Fellowship and Frank Jiggins by a BBSRC studentship.



  1. Moran  N, Baumann  P. Phylogenetics of cytoplasmically inherited microorganisms of arthropods. Trends Ecol Evol. 1994;9:1520. DOIGoogle Scholar
  2. Baumann  P, Lai  C-Y, Baumann  L, Rouhbakhsh  D, Moran  NA, Clark  MA. Mutualistic associations of aphids and prokaryotes: biology of the genus Buchnera. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1995;61:17.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. O'Neill  S, Giordano  R, Colbert  AME, Karr  TL, Robertson  HM. 16S rRNA phylogenetic analysis of the bacterial endosymbionts associated with cytoplasmic incompatability in insects. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1992;89:2699702. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Hackett  KJ, Lynn  DE, Williamson  DL, Ginsberg  AS, Whitcomb  RF. Cultivation of the Drosophila spiroplasma. Science. 1986;232:12535. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Werren  JH, Skinner  SW, Huger  AM. Male-killing bacteria in a parasitic wasp. Science. 1986;231:9902. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Hurst  GDD, vd Schulenburg  HG, Majerus  TMO, Bertrand  D, Zakharov  IA, Baungaard  J, . Invasion of one insect species, Adalia bipunctata, by two different male-killing bacteria. Insect Mol Biol. 1999;8:1339. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Hurst  GDD, Hammarton  TC, Majerus  TMO, Bertrand  D, Bandi  C, Majerus  MEN. Close relationship of the inherited parasite of the ladybird, Coleomegilla maculata, to Blattabacterium, the beneficial symbiont of the cockroach. Genet Res. 1997;70:16. DOIGoogle Scholar
  8. Werren  JH, Hurst  GDD, Zhang  W, Breeuwer  JAJ, Stouthamer  R, Majerus  MEN. Rickettsial relative associated with male killing in the ladybird beetle (Adalia bipunctata). J Bacteriol. 1994;176:38894.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Hurst  GDD, Jiggins  FM, vd Schulenburg  JHG, Bertrand  D, West  SA, Goriacheva  II, . Male-killing Wolbachia in two species of insect. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1999;266:73540. DOIGoogle Scholar
  10. Whitcomb  RF. The genus Spiroplasma. Annu Rev Microbiol. 1980;34:677709. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Davis  MJ, Ying  Z, Brunner  BR, Pantoja  A, Ferwerda  FH. Rickettsial relative associated with papaya bunchy top disease. Curr Microbiol. 1998;36:804. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Stouthamer  R, Breeuwer  JAJ, Hurst  GDD. Wolbachia pipientis: microbial manipulator of arthropod reproduction. Annu Rev Microbiol. 1999;53:71102. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Bandi  C, Damiani  G, Magrassi  L, Grigolo  A, Fani  R, Sacchi  L. Flavobacteria as intracellular symbionts in cockroaches. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1994;257:438. DOIGoogle Scholar
  14. Jiggins  FM, Hurst  GDD, Jiggins  CD. vd Schulenburg JHG, Majerus MEN. The butterfly Danaus chrysippus is infected by a male-killing Spiroplasma bacterium. Parasitology. 2000;120:43946. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Skinner  SW. Son-killer: a third extrachromosomal factor affecting sex ratios in the parasitoid wasp Nasonia vitripennis. Genetics. 1985;109:74554.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Werren  JH. The coevolution of autosomal and cytoplasmic sex ratio factors. J Theor Biol. 1987;124:31734. DOIGoogle Scholar
  17. Hurst  GDD, Majerus  MEN. Why do maternally inherited microorganisms kill males? Heredity. 1993;71:8195. DOIGoogle Scholar
  18. Roberts  LW, Rapmund  G, Cadigan  FCJ. Sex ratio in Rickettsia tsutsugamushi infected and non-infected colonies of Leptotrombidium (Acari: Trombiculidae). J Med Entomol. 1977;14:8992.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Takahashi  M, Urakami  H, Yoshida  Y, Furuya  Y, Misumi  H, Hori  E, Occurrence of high ratio of males after introduction of minocycline in a colony of Leptotrombidium fletcheri infected with Orientia tsutsugamushi. Eur J Epidemiol. 1997;13:7986. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Williamson  DL, Poulson  DF. Sex ratio organisms (Spiroplasmas) of Drosophila. In Sex ratio organisms (Spiroplasmas) of Drosophila, ed. RF Whitcomb, JG Tully. Vol. III. 1979; New York: Academic Press. pp. 175-208.
  21. Jiggins  FM, Hurst  GDD, Dolman  CE, Majerus  MEN. High prevalence of male-killing Wolbachia in the butterfly Acraea encedana. J Evol Biol. 2000;13:495501. DOIGoogle Scholar
  22. Chang  KS, Shiraishi  T, Nakasuji  F, Morimoto  N. Abnormal sex ratio condition in the walnut leaf beetle, Gastrolina depressa (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae). Appl Entomol Zool (Jpn). 1991;26:299306.
  23. Counce  SJ, Poulson  DF. Developmental effects of the sex-ratio agent in embryos of Drosophila willistoni. J Exp Zool. 1962;151:1731. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Sakaguchi  B, Poulson  DF. Interspecific transfer of the "sex-ratio" condition from Drosophila willistoni to D. melanogaster. Genetics. 1963;48:84161.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Hurst  GDD, Purvis  EL, Sloggett  JJ, Majerus  MEN. The effect of infection with male-killing Rickettsia on the demography of female Adalia bipunctata L. (two spot ladybird). Heredity. 1994;73:30916. DOIGoogle Scholar
  26. Ikeda  H. The cytoplasmically inherited 'sex-ratio' condition in natural and experimental populations of Drosophila bifasciata. Genetics. 1970;65:31133.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Malogolowkin-Cohen  C, Rodriguez-Pereira  MAQ. Sexual drive of normal and SR flies of Drosophila nebulosa. Evolution. 1975;29:57980. DOIGoogle Scholar
  28. Ebbert  M. The interaction phenotype in the Drosophila willistoni - spiroplasma symbiosis. Evolution. 1991;45:97188. DOIGoogle Scholar
  29. Sakaguchi  B, Poulson  DF. Distribution of "sex-ratio" agent in tissues of Drosophila willistoni. Genetics. 1961;46:166576.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Hurst  GDD, Walker  LE, Majerus  MEN. Bacterial infections of hemocytes associated with the maternally inherited male-killing trait in British populations of the two spot ladybird, Adalia bipunctata. J Invertebr Pathol. 1996;68:28692. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Jiggins  FM, Hurst  GDD, Majerus  MEN. Sex ratio distorting Wolbachia causes sex role reversal in its butterfly host. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2000;267:6973. DOIGoogle Scholar
  32. Hurst  GDD, McVean  GAT. Parasitic male-killing bacteria and the evolution of clutch size. Ecol Entomol. 1998;23:3503. DOIGoogle Scholar
  33. Cavalcanti  AGL, Falcao  DN, Castro  LE. "Sex-ratio" in Drosophila prosaltans-a character due to interaction between nuclear genes and cytoplasmic factors. Am Nat. 1957;91:3279. DOIGoogle Scholar
  34. Robinson  AS. Sex Ratio manipulation in relation to insect pest control. Annu Rev Genet. 1983;17:191214. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Majerus  TMO, Majerus  MEN, Knowles  B, Wheeler  J, Bertrand  D, Kuznetsov  VN, Extreme variation in the prevalence of inherited male-killing microorganisms between three populations of Harmonia axyridis (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae). Heredity. 1998;81:68391. DOIGoogle Scholar
  36. Jiggins  FM, Hurst  GDD, Majerus  MEN. Sex ratio distortion in Acraea encedon (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae) is caused by a male-killing bacterium. Heredity. 1998;81:8791. DOIGoogle Scholar
  37. Hurst  GDD, Hammarton  TC, Obrycki  JJ, Majerus  TM, Walker  LE, Bertrand  D, Male-killing bacteria in a fifth ladybird beetle, Coleomegilla maculata (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae). Heredity. 1996;77:17785. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Hurst  GDD, Bandi  C, Sacchi  L, Cochrane  A, Bertrand  D, Karaca  I, Adonia variegata (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) bears maternally inherited Flavobacteria that kill males only. Parasitology. 1999;118:12534. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Hurst  GDD, Majerus  MEN, Walker  LE. The importance of cytoplasmic male killing elements in natural populations of the two spot ladybird, Adalia bipunctata (Linnaeus) (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae). Biol J Linn Soc Lond. 1993;49:195202.
  40. Geier  PW, Briese  DT, Lewis  T. The light brown apple moth Epiphyas postvittana (Walker). 2. Uneven sex ratios and a condition contributing to them in the field. Aust J Ecol. 1978;3:46788. DOIGoogle Scholar
  41. Clarke  C, Sheppard  PM, Scali  V. All female broods in the butterfly Hypolimnas bolina (L.). Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1975;189:2937. DOIGoogle Scholar
  42. Brimacombe  LC. All-female broods in field and laboratory populations of the Egyptian cotton leafworm, Spodoptera littoralis (Boisduval) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Bull Entomol Res. 1980;70:47581. DOIGoogle Scholar
  43. Higashiru  Y, Ishihara  M, Schaefer  PW. Sex ratio distortion and severe inbreeding depression in the gypsy moth Lymantria dispar L. in Hokkaido, Japan. Heredity. 1999;83:2907. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar




Cite This Article

DOI: 10.3201/eid0604.000402

Table of Contents – Volume 6, Number 4—August 2000

EID Search Options
presentation_01 Advanced Article Search – Search articles by author and/or keyword.
presentation_01 Articles by Country Search – Search articles by the topic country.
presentation_01 Article Type Search – Search articles by article type and issue.


Page created: December 16, 2010
Page updated: December 16, 2010
Page reviewed: December 16, 2010
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.