Volume 6, Number 4—August 2000
Research
Dual Captures of Colorado Rodents: Implications for Transmission of Hantaviruses
Table 1
Speciesa |
||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Site (trap nights) | P. man S (D) | P. truei S (D) | R. meg. S (D) | S. hisp. S (D) | T. min. S (D) | C. hisp. S (D) | Pe. flav. S (D) | Otherb S |
Fort Lewis (10440) | 505 (5) | 6 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 71 (1) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 2 |
Molina (9135) | 566 (8) | 217 (0) | 2 (0) | 0 (0) | 132 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 12 |
Pinon Canyon (24375) | 829 (10c) | 561 (0) | 562 (15) | 259 (2) | 1 (0) | 23 (1) | 195 (1) | 520 |
Total | 1900 (23) | 784 (0) | 564 (15) | 259 (2) | 204 (1) | 23 (1) | 195 (1) | 534 |
aNumbers of single (S) and dual (D) captures are listed by species at each study site. P. man = Peromyscus maniculatus; P. truei = Peromyscus truei; R. meg. = Reithrodontomys megalotis; S. hisp. = Sigmodon hispidus; T. min. = Tamias minimus; C. hisp. = Chaetodipus hispidus; Pe. flav. = Perognathus flavus.
b 534 rodents from 12 other species; no dual captures.
cOne of these pairs was adult male deer mouse and an adult male pinyon mouse.
Page created: December 16, 2010
Page updated: December 16, 2010
Page reviewed: December 16, 2010
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.