Volume 6, Number 4—August 2000
Research
Dual Captures of Colorado Rodents: Implications for Transmission of Hantaviruses
Table 1
Rodents involved in dual captures from three Colorado study sites (two western, one eastern)
Speciesa |
||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Site (trap nights) | P. man S (D) | P. truei S (D) | R. meg. S (D) | S. hisp. S (D) | T. min. S (D) | C. hisp. S (D) | Pe. flav. S (D) | Otherb S |
Fort Lewis (10440) | 505 (5) | 6 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 71 (1) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 2 |
Molina (9135) | 566 (8) | 217 (0) | 2 (0) | 0 (0) | 132 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 12 |
Pinon Canyon (24375) | 829 (10c) | 561 (0) | 562 (15) | 259 (2) | 1 (0) | 23 (1) | 195 (1) | 520 |
Total | 1900 (23) | 784 (0) | 564 (15) | 259 (2) | 204 (1) | 23 (1) | 195 (1) | 534 |
aNumbers of single (S) and dual (D) captures are listed by species at each study site. P. man = Peromyscus maniculatus; P. truei = Peromyscus truei; R. meg. = Reithrodontomys megalotis; S. hisp. = Sigmodon hispidus; T. min. = Tamias minimus; C. hisp. = Chaetodipus hispidus; Pe. flav. = Perognathus flavus.
b 534 rodents from 12 other species; no dual captures.
cOne of these pairs was adult male deer mouse and an adult male pinyon mouse.