Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link
Volume 7, Number 7—June 2001

Waterborne Outbreak of Tularemia Associated with Crayfish Fishing

Pedro Anda*Comments to Author , Javier Segura del Pozo*†, José María Díaz García‡, Raquel Escudero*, F. Javier García Peña§, M. Carmen López Velasco‡, Ricela E. Sellek*, M. Rosario Jiménez Chillarón‡, Luisa P. Sánchez Serrano*, and J. Fernando Martínez Navarro*
Author affiliations: *Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Majadahonda, Madrid, Spain; †Public Health Department, Alcalá de Henares, Madrid, Spain; ‡Cuenca Public Health Department, Cuenca, Spain; §Ministry of Agriculture and Fisheries, Algete, Madrid, Spain

Main Article

Table 1

Polymerase chain reaction results of crayfish and water samples tested for Francisella tularensisa

Crayfish, Batch A
Crayfish, Batch B
Water SP
Water R
B S H G W B S H G W I 1 2 3 1-8 LNA
- + + - - - - - - - - + - 3 - +

Batch A = crayfish collected from a patient's house; Batch B = crayfish collected from the river; SP = sewage plant; R = river; LNA = lymph node aspirate; B = branchia; S = stomach; G = gonads; H = hepatopancreas; W = washed pellet; I = intestines.
aSeveral annealing temperatures were tested, from 60°C to 68°C for the 25 cycles of the first round. The second round consisted of 45 cycles with an annealing temperature of 60°C. The rest of the parameters were as described (21). All reagents were from Perkin Elmer (Foster City, CA); the cycling was done in a PCT-100 thermocycler (MJ Research Inc., Watertown, MA). The PCR products, with a size of 1550 bp and 950 bp for the first and second rounds of amplification, respectively, were visualized in 1% low-melt agarose gels (Pronadisa, Alcobendas, Madrid, Spain) stained with ethidium bromide (Sigma-Aldrich). Cross-contamination was avoided by using standard methods. Half the samples studied were kept unprocessed and frozen in a different area. A positive result was confirmed by processing the rest of the sample. To assess the sensitivity of our system, 10 L of serial twofold dilutions of an aqueous suspension of bacteria, ranging from 104 CFU to 102 mL was added to 1-mL volumes of distilled water. These samples were subjected to DNA extraction and PCR as above. Negative controls (autoclaved distilled H2O) were included in all extractions at a ratio of a negative control for each five samples. The specificity was checked against DNA from Salmonella Typhimurium, Escherichia coli, Legionella pneumophila, Yersinia enterocolitica, and Proteus vulgaris.

Main Article

Page created: April 27, 2012
Page updated: April 27, 2012
Page reviewed: April 27, 2012
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.