Volume 10, Number 8—August 2004
Dispatch
Hantavirus Infection in Anajatuba, Maranhão, Brazil
Table 2
Variables | PRR (95% CI)a | p | |
---|---|---|---|
First stepb |
|||
Illiterate |
0.001 |
||
No |
1 |
||
Yes |
2.49 (1.45–4.26) |
||
Farm worker |
0.025 |
||
No |
1 |
||
Yes |
2.44 (1.12–5.32) |
||
Living with a companion |
0.022 |
||
Yes |
1 |
||
No |
2.05 (1.10–3.80) |
||
Second stepc |
|||
Seeing rats in the field |
0.013 |
||
No |
1 |
||
Yes |
4.22 (1.36–13.11) |
||
Third stepd |
|||
Age group |
< 0.001 |
||
<18 y |
1 |
||
18–40 y |
3.65 (1.34–9.94) |
||
41–64 y |
9.56 (3.65–25.04) |
||
>65 y | 13.43 (4.86–37.10) |
aPRR, prevalence rate ratio; CI, confidence interval.
bAdjusted PRR of socioeconomic variables (block 1).
ePRR of behavioral variables (block 2), adjusted for statistically significant variables in the first step.
dPRR of demographic variables (block 3), adjusted for statistically significant variables in the second step.
Page created: March 03, 2011
Page updated: March 03, 2011
Page reviewed: March 03, 2011
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.