Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link
Volume 14, Number 3—March 2008
Research

Exposure to Novel Parainfluenza Virus and Clinical Relevance in 2 Bottlenose Dolphin (Tursiops truncatus) Populations

Stephanie Venn-Watson*Comments to Author , Rebecca Rivera‡, Cynthia R. Smith*, Jeremiah T. Saliki§, Shannon Caseltine§1, Judy A. St. Leger¶, Pam Yochem‡, Randall S. Wells#, and Hendrik Nollens‡**
Author affiliations: *US Navy Marine Mammal Program, San Diego, California, USA; ‡G2 Software Systems, Inc., San Diego, California, USA; ‡Hubbs-SeaWorld Research Institute, San Diego, California, USA; §Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, Oklahoma, USA; ¶SeaWorld, San Diego, California, USA; #Chicago Zoological Society c/o Mote Marine Laboratory, Sarasota, Florida, USA; **University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA;

Main Article

Table 4

Comparisons of age, sex, and PIV antibody levels among 2 healthy bottlenose dolphin (Tursiops truncatus) populations (n = 114)

Descriptor Free-ranging dolphins, Sarasota, Florida (n = 56) Managed dolphins,
San Diego, California (n = 58) p value
Mean age, y
11.5
20.7
<0.0001
Sex, %
Female 45.6 54.7 0.3
Male
54.4
45.3

Mean PIV antibody OD405 ratio*
0.42
0.36
0.6
PIV result, % 0.5
Negative 33.9 25.9
Equivocal 58.9 58.6
Positive 7.1 15.5

*PIV, parainfluenza virus; OD405, optical density at 405 nm.

Main Article

1Current affiliation: University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia, USA.

Page created: July 07, 2010
Page updated: July 07, 2010
Page reviewed: July 07, 2010
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.
file_external