Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link
Volume 3, Number 2—June 1997
Dispatch

Seroepidemiologic Studies of Hantavirus Infection Among Wild Rodents in California

Michele Jay*, Michael S. Ascher†, Bruno B. Chomel‡, Minoo Madon§, David Sesline†, Barryett A. Enge†, Brian Hjelle¶, Thomas G. Ksiazek¥, Pierre E. Rollin¥, Philip H. Kass‡, and Kevin Reilly*
Author affiliations: *California Department of Health Services, Sacramento, California, USA; †Viral and Rickettsial Diseases Laboratory, Berkeley, California, USA; ‡University of California, Davis, California, USA; §California Department of Health Services, Ontario, California, USA; ¶University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA; ¥Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA

Main Article

Table 2

Prevalence of antibodies to Sin Nombre virus among Peromyscus maniculatus by county, California, 1975-1995

County No. survey
sites No.tested No.pos. % pos.
COASTAL
Alameda 2 6 1 16.7
Contra Costa 1 36 0 0.0
Del Norte 2 19 0 0.0
Los Angeles 10(8) 112(71) 13(11) 11.6(15.5)
Marin 2 153 3 2.0
Mendocino 1 13 0 0.0
Monterey 2 52 5 9.6
Orange 8 52 3 5.8
San Diego 32 131 7 5.3
San Francisco 1 30 0 0.0
San Luis Obispo 2 4 0 0.0
San Mateo 1 40 8 20.0
Santa Barbara 6(2) 294(81) 86(7) 29.3(8.6)
Sonoma 1 7 0 0.0
Ventura 5(3) 137(9) 0(0) 0.0(0.0)
SUBTOTAL 76(68) 1086(704) 126(45) 11.6(6.4)
INLAND/VALLEY
Imperial 1 2 1 50.0
Riverside 10 57 0 0.0
Sacramento 1 36 0 0.0
San Bernardino 4 49 0 0.0
San Joaquin 1 7 0 0.0
SUBTOTAL 17 151 1 0.7
FOOTHILLS/MOUNTAINS
Butte 12 115 14 12.2
El Dorado 1 25 0 0.0
Glenn 1 4 0 0.0
Inyo 2 3 1 33.3
Kern 5 66 7 10.6
Mariposa 1 46 7 15.2
Mono 8 107 17 15.9
Nevada 1 52 26 50.0
Placer 2 29 2 6.9
Plumas 4 35 1 2.9
Shasta 3 30 4 13.3
Siskiyou 4 117 12 10.3
Tehama 1 35 5 14.3
Tulare 1 20 2 10.0
SUBTOTAL 46 684 99 14.5
TOTAL 139 1921 226 11.8

*Numbers in parentheses exclude the Channel Islands in Los Angeles (Catalina, San Clemente), Santa Barbara (San Miguel, Santa Barbara, Santa Cruz, Santa Rosa), and Ventura (Anacapa, San Nicolas) counties.

Main Article

Page created: December 21, 2010
Page updated: December 21, 2010
Page reviewed: December 21, 2010
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.
file_external