Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link
Volume 10, Number 10—October 2004

Fluoroquinolone Resistance in Penicillin-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae Clones, Spain

Article Metrics
citations of this article
EID Journal Metrics on Scopus
Adela G. de la Campa*Comments to Author , Luz Balsalobre*, Carmen Ardanuy†, Asunción Fenoll*, Emilio Pérez-Trallero‡, Josefina Liñares†, and the Spanish Pneumococcal Infection Study Network G03/103
Author affiliations: *Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Majadahonda, Madrid, Spain; †Hospital de Bellvitge, L’Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain; ‡Hospital Donostia, San Sebastian, Guipúzcoa, Spain

Cite This Article


Among 2,882 Streptococcus pneumoniae sent to the Spanish Reference Laboratory during 2002, 75 (2.6%) were ciprofloxacin-resistant. Resistance was associated with older patients (3.9% in adults and 7.2% in patients >65 years of age), with isolation from noninvasive sites (4.3% vs. 1.0%), and with penicillin and macrolide resistance. Among 14 low-level resistant (MIC 4–8 μg/mL) strains, 1 had a fluoroquinolone efflux phenotype, and 13 showed single ParC changes. The 61 high-level ciprofloxacin-resistant (MIC ≥16 μg/mL) strains showed either two or three changes at ParC, ParE, and GyrA. Resistance was acquired either by point mutation (70 strains) or by recombination with viridans streptococci (4 strains) at the topoisomerase II genes. Although 36 pulsed-field gel electrophoresis patterns were observed, 5 international multiresistant clones (Spain23F-1, Spain6B-2, Spain9V-3, Spain14-5 and Sweden15A-25) accounted for 35 (46.7%) of the ciprofloxacin-resistant strains. Continuous surveillance is needed to prevent the dissemination of these clones.

Resistance of Streptococcus pneumoniae to multiple antibacterial agents, including β-lactams, macrolides, tetracyclines, and co-trimoxazole, has emerged worldwide in the 1980s and 1990s (13) and has emphasized the need for new therapeutic alternatives, such as newer fluoroquinolones. Older fluoroquinolones, such as ciprofloxacin and ofloxacin, have been widely used in the last 2 decades, but their activity against gram-positive pathogens is limited. Newer fluoroquinolones, such as levofloxacin, gatifloxacin, moxifloxacin, and gemifloxacin, have enhanced activity against most respiratory pathogens, and some are being more widely used to treat respiratory tract infections. Therefore, the emergence of fluoroquinolone-resistant S. pneumoniae strains, although worldwide prevalence is low, is a concern to clinicians who manage respiratory tract infections. A global surveillance study from 1998 to 2000 included 8,882 pneumococci isolated from blood and sputum samples that were collected from centers in 26 countries. The study showed a 1.1% prevalence of ofloxacin-resistant strains, although in some places higher values of nonsusceptible ofloxacin strains were observed: 10.1% in Israel, 14.1% in Japan, and 22.3% in Hong Kong (1). Ciprofloxacin-resistant strains isolated from patients with community-acquired respiratory tract infections have been reported in Spain (3.0% [4] and 7.1% [5]), Canada (1.7% [6]), and the United States (1.4% [7]).

Fluoroquinolone resistance is higher among related viridans group streptococci (VGS) isolated from blood (8). Increased fluoroquinolone use correlates with an increase in the prevalence of ciprofloxacin resistance (4,6). Prior fluoroquinolone administration is a risk factor for resistant strain selection, as observed for infections caused by S. pneumoniae (912) and VGS (13). A study from our group showed ciprofloxacin-resistant pneumococci emerging in a patient who had received long-term ciprofloxacin therapy to treat persistent bronchiectasis with Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection (14).

Bacterial resistance to quinolones occurs mainly by alteration of their intracellular drug targets, the DNA topoisomerase IV (ParC2ParE2) and DNA gyrase (GyrA2GyrB2) enzymes. The pneumococcal parC and parE genes are homologous to gyrA and gyrB, respectively (15,16). Genetic and biochemical studies have shown that fluoroquinolones target primarily topoisomerase IV and secondarily DNA gyrase in S. pneumoniae (1619). Resistance mutations are localized in the quinolone resistance-determining regions (QRDRs) of ParC, ParE, and GyrA. Low-level ciprofloxacin-resistant strains had mutations altering the QRDR of one of the two subunits of topoisomerase IV: S79 or D83 of ParC (16,17,20) or D435 of ParE (21). High-level ciprofloxacin-resistant strains had changes affecting both QRDRs of ParC and GyrA (S81, E85) (16,17) or ParE and GyrA (21). Genetic transformation experiments showed that single parC mutations confer low-level ciprofloxacin resistance, and that once the cells have acquired this phenotype, transforming to a higher level of resistance was possible by using DNA containing the gyrA QRDR from the high-level ciprofloxacin-resistant strains (16,17). The description of recombinant strains with a mosaic structure in their DNA topoisomerase genes (2224) has established that fluoroquinolone resistance in S. pneumoniae can be acquired by horizontal gene transfer as well as by point mutation. VGS, which share the same mechanisms of resistance (13), are donors in the horizontal transfer to pneumococci (25) and act as a reservoir of fluoroquinolone resistance. To investigate the epidemiology of fluoroquinolone-resistant pneumococci, ascertain the possible dissemination of international clones, and determine the incidence of resistant strains originated by interspecific horizontal transfer, we characterized all ciprofloxacin-resistant S. pneumoniae strains sent to Spanish Reference Laboratory during 2002.

Materials and Methods

Bacterial Strains, Serotyping, and Susceptibility Tests

We studied 2,882 S. pneumoniae strains submitted from 78 hospitals nationwide to the Spanish Reference Laboratory during 2002. Of the submitted strains, 1,904 (66.1%) were isolated from adults and 978 (39.1%) from children. The origin of isolates was as follows: 1,453 (50.4%) from blood or other sterile sites, 691 (24.0%) from respiratory tract, 231 (8.0%) from eye swabs, 205 (7.1%) from ear swabs, and 302 (10.5%) from other sites. Strains were confirmed as S. pneumoniae by standard methods, and serotypes were determined by a quellung reaction. Susceptibility tests, performed initially by the agar-dilution method, selected 85 strains (one isolate per patient) with ciprofloxacin MIC ≥ 4 μg/mL. The susceptibility of these 85 strains was repeated twice by microdilution (Sensititre commercial plates) according to the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards (NCCLS) methods (26). S. pneumoniae ATCC 49619 and strain R6 were used for quality control. Fluoroquinolone efflux was determined (27).

Genetic Transformation

S. pneumoniae strain R6 was grown in a casein hydrolysate-based medium (AGCH) with 0.2% sucrose and used as recipient in transformation experiments (20). Cultures containing 4 x 106 CFU/mL were treated with DNA at 0.15 μg/mL for 40 min at 30°C, then at 37°C for 90 min before plating on media plates containing 2.5 μg/mL of ciprofloxacin. Colonies were counted after 24 h growth at 37°C in a 5% CO2 atmosphere in AGCH medium with 1% agar.

Southern Blot Analysis

Probes for parC and parE were amplified by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) of the R6 strain with oligonucleotides parCUP and parCDOWN, parEUP and parEDOWN, respectively (25). The ant probe was obtained by amplifying strain 3870 DNA (22) with oligonucleotides antUP and antDOWN (25). All probes were labeled with the Phototope-Star Detection Kit (New England Biolabs, Beverly, MA). Southern blot and hybridization followed the manufacturer’s instructions.

Pulsed-field Gel Electrophoresis (PFGE)

Genomic DNA embedded in agarose plugs was restricted with SmaI, and fragments were separated by PFGE in a CHEF-DRIII apparatus (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA) (28). PFGE patterns were compared to 14 representative international pneumococcal clones of the Pneumococcal Molecular Epidemiology Network (28). Strains with patterns varying by three or fewer bands were considered to represent the same PFGE type (29).

PCR Amplifications and DNA Sequence Determination

Oligonucleotides gyrA44 and gyrA170 (13) were used to amplify and sequence the gyrA QRDRs from chromosomal DNA. Amplifications were performed with 0.5 U of Thermus thermophilus thermostable DNA polymerase (Biotools, Madrid, Spain), 0.1 μg of chromosomal DNA, 1 μmol/L (each) of the synthetic oligonucleotide primers, and 0.2 mmol/L of each deoxynucleoside triphosphate (dNTP) in the buffer recommended by the manufacturers. Amplification was achieved with an initial cycle of 1 min denaturation at 94°C; 25 cycles of 30 s at 94°C, 45 s at 55°C, and 90 s polymerase extension step at 72°C; and a final 3-min 72°C extension step, followed by slow cooling to 4°C. Fragments including ParE residues 398–647, the intergenic parEparC region, and ParC residues 1–152 were amplified from genomic DNA with oligonucleotides parE398 (13) and parC152 (16) in PCR reactions performed as previously described, except that 30 cycles of amplification with an extension step of 3 min were applied. All strains, except three, CipR-73, CipR-74, and CipR-75, which yielded fragments of 2.4, 3.0, and 2.9 kb, respectively, yielded 1.6-kb fragments. Those PCR fragments that contained both parE and parC QRDRs were purified by using MicroSpin S400 HR columns (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech, Pistcatway, NJ) and sequenced on both strands with oligonucleotides parE398, parE483 (13), parC50, and parC152 (16) with an Applied Biosystems Prism 377 DNA sequencer, according to protocols provided by the manufacturer.

Statistical Analysis

The Fisher exact test (χ2 test) was used when appropriate. Comparisons were considered significant at p < 0.05.


Among 2,882 strains, 75 (2.6%) had ciprofloxacin MIC ≥ 4 μg/mL by microdilution and were considered ciprofloxacin-resistant. Ten strains with initial ciprofloxacin MIC 4 μg/mL by agar-dilution showed MIC 1–2 μg/mL by microdilution. Among the 75 ciprofloxacin-resistant strains, 67% were isolated from sputum, whereas 19% were from blood, 13% from lower respiratory tract samples, and 1.3% from pus. Although ciprofloxacin-resistant strains belonged to 17 different serotypes, 6 serotypes accounted for 55 (73.3%) of the strains: 14 (14 strains), 23F (11 strains), 19F (11 strains), 6B (8 strains), 3 (6 strains), and 15A (5 strains). These serotypes were also the most frequent among the 2,807 ciprofloxacin-susceptible strains. No ciprofloxacin-resistance was found among isolates from pediatric patients <15 years, whereas the prevalence of resistance was 75 (3.9%) of 1,904 isolates from adult patients (>15 years), and 53 (7.2%) of 738 isolates from patients ≥65 years (p < 0.001). The frequencies of ciprofloxacin resistance were higher among noninvasive pneumococci than among invasive strains (61 [4.3%] of 1,429 vs. 14 [1.0%] of 1,453, p < 0.001).

An association between penicillin and ciprofloxacin resistance was observed, with ciprofloxacin-resistant strains distributed as follows: 17 (1.0%) of 1,658 penicillin-susceptible, 39 (4.1%) of 961 intermediate-resistant, and 19 (7.2%) of 263 resistant isolates (p < 0.001). Ciprofloxacin-resistant pneumococci were also more represented among macrolide-resistant isolates: 22 (1.2%) ciprofloxacin-resistant strains among 1,833 erythromycin-susceptible and 53 (5.1%) ciprofloxacin-resistant strains among 1,049 erythromycin-resistant (p < 0.001). Antimicrobial-drug resistance among the 2,807 ciprofloxacin-susceptible pneumococci was lower than those of ciprofloxacin-resistant strains (penicillin 41.4% vs. 73.3%, erythromycin 35.5% vs. 70.7%, tetracycline 33.6% vs. 69.3%, and chloramphenicol 15.4% vs. 44.0%, p < 0.001). Fifty-five (73.3%) of ciprofloxacin-resistant strains showed multidrug resistance (resistant to more than three chemically unrelated drugs), among them, 26 strains were resistant to six antimicrobial agents (penicillin, tetracycline, chloramphenicol, erythromycin, clindamycin, and co-trimoxazole).

Fourteen (18.7%) ciprofloxacin-resistant (MIC 4–8 μg/mL) strains were classified as low-level ciprofloxacin-resistant, and 61 (81.3%) strains were classified as high-level ciprofloxacin-resistant (MIC 16–128 μg/mL). The comparative in vitro activity of five fluoroquinolones (MIC90) against the ciprofloxacin-resistant strains was the following: gemifloxacin (0.5 μg/mL) > moxifloxacin (4 μg/mL) > gatifloxacin (8 μg/mL) > levofloxacin (32 μg/mL) > ciprofloxacin (64 μg/mL) (Table 1). Gemifloxacin was the most active fluoroquinolone tested by using the NCCLS breakpoint (26), 49.3% of ciprofloxacin-resistant strains were nonsusceptible to this antimicrobial drug. Among the 14 low-level ciprofloxacin-resistant isolates, 12 were susceptible to levofloxacin, 13 to gatifloxacin, and all were susceptible to moxifloxacin and gemifloxacin according to NCCLS criteria (26). However, all but one of these low-level ciprofloxacin-resistant strains had first-step parC mutations that would favor the appearance of high-level resistant strains. Among the 61 high-level ciprofloxacin-resistant strains, all showed cross-resistance to levofloxacin and gatifloxacin and all but one to moxifloxacin. Twenty four (39.3%) of 61 high-level ciprofloxacin-resistant strains had gemifloxacin MIC 0.12 μg/mL, which could be considered susceptible according to NCCLS (26), although they showed double mutations (parC or parE and gyrA). One of 75 ciprofloxacin-resistant strains, strain CipR-71, with MIC 8μg/mL, had an efflux mechanism as the single cause of resistance (see below).


Thumbnail of Genetic organization of the parE–parC region of Streptococcus pneumoniae mosaic strains and nucleotide sequence variations in the ParC, ParE, and GyrA quinolone resistance-determining regions. A) Structure as deduced from Southern blot experiments and nucleotide sequence analyses. E, EcoRV; N, NcoI. The parE and parC genes with a mosaic structure are shown with striped arrows. B) Nucleotides present at each polymorphic site are shown for strain R6, but only sites that differ are sho

Figure. Genetic organization of the parEparC region of Streptococcus pneumoniae mosaic strains and nucleotide sequence variations in the ParC, ParE, and GyrA quinolone resistance-determining regions. A) Structure as deduced from Southern blot...

The parC, parE, and gyrA QRDRs of 85 strains (75 ciprofloxacin-resistant strains and 10 strains with ciprofloxacin MIC 1–2 μg/mL) were characterized. Most resistant strains (70 of 75) showed low nucleotide sequence variations (<1%), but five strains had high variations (>4%) in at least one of their QRDRs (Figure). These strains would have a mosaic structure in those genes showing such a QRDR sequence variation (25): two strains in parC, one in parC + parE, and two in parC + parE + gyrA. Mosaic parC genes had the N91D change, and mosaic gyrA genes had the S114G GyrA change (Figure) that is also present in other ciprofloxacin-resistant S. pneumoniae strains with mosaic genes and in both ciprofloxacin-susceptible and -resistant VGS (25), which indicates their recombinational origin. As expected (25), strains with mosaic parE + parC genes had also an ant-like gene in the intergenic parEparC region (Figure).

All low-level ciprofloxacin-resistant strains had mutations producing amino acid changes in ParC, whereas 92% of high-level resistant strains had double (ParC + GyrA or ParE + GyrA) and 8% had triple mutations (two changes in ParC + GyrA, ParC + ParE + GyrA, ParC + two changes in GyrA). Classical mutations known to be involved in fluoroquinolone resistance were found in all but two resistant strains with mosaic parC genes (Table 2): D78A (strain CipR-71) and S79R (strain CipR-75). Genetic transformation experiments showed that the S79R change was involved in ciprofloxacin resistance and that the D78A change was not. CipR-71 and CipR-75 chromosomal DNA transformed the susceptible R6 strain to resistance with high efficiency (>1 x 104 transformants per microgram of DNA). The analysis of two transformants of each experiment showed that, while transformants obtained with CipR-71 DNA (ParC D78A) did not carry parC mutations, those obtained with CipR-75 (ParC S79R) carried the same nucleotide changes in parC as the donor strain.

When PCR products carrying ParE residues 398–647, the intergenic parEparC region, and ParC residues 1–152 (including ParE and ParC QRDRs) were used as DNA donors, only those obtained from strain CipR-75 were able to transform R6 to ciprofloxacin resistance. The two transformants selected carried the ParC S79R change, and one of them also had the N91D change. These results showed that the S79R change is involved in the resistance phenotype of strain CipR-75 and that the D78A change of strain CipR-71 is not involved in resistance. Determining MIC to ciprofloxacin, norfloxacin, ethidium bromide, and acriflavine in the presence or absence of reserpine showed greater than fourfold MIC decreases in the presence of reserpine, both in the CipR-71 strain and in the two transformants obtained when chromosomal DNA was used as donor, which indicates the existence of an efflux mechanism (data not shown).

Although 36 different PFGE patterns were observed in the 75 ciprofloxacin-resistant strains, 48 strains can be grouped into nine PFGE patterns (Table 3): 11 strains belonged to Spain23F-1 clone, 8 strains to Spain14-5 clone, 6 strains to Spain9V-3 clone, 5 strains to Spain6B-2 clone, 5 strains to Sweden15A-25 clone, 4 strains to clone C of serotype 19F, 4 strains to clone D of serotype 19F, 3 strains to clone A of serotype 3 related to multilocus sequence type (MLST) 260 (30), and 2 strains to clone B of serotype 3 related to MLST 180 (30). Among 14 blood isolates, 12 different PFGE types were observed. Only three of these strains (CipR-1, -2, and -15) shared an identical PFGE (clone A of serotype 3), although they had different parE polymorphisms and different resistance patterns (Table 2).

One of the strains with a mosaic parC gene belonged to the Spain6B-2 clone, and one strain with mosaic parC and parE genes belonged to the Spain23F-1 clone. Capsular switching was observed in three strains of serotype 14 with the Spain9V-3 clone, one strain of serotype 19F with Spain9V-3 clone, and two strains of serotype 19A with Spain23F-1 clone. In general, strains that shared the same PFGE pattern shared identical polymorphisms on their DNA topoisomerase QRDRs with respect to the sequence of the R6 strain (Table 3). For instance, all strains of the Spain9V-3 clone had identical polymorphisms, the same found in the ATCC 700671 strain representative of this clone (14). All but one of the strains belonging to the Spain23F-1 clone had two polymorphisms in ParC (K137N and a change in codon G128: GGT instead of GGC), two polymorphisms in ParE (I460V and a change in codon I476: ATT instead of ATC), and a change in codon Y75 of GyrA (TAT instead of TAC). Identical polymorphisms were found in the ATCC 700669 strain representative of the Spain23F-1 clone (data not shown); the only exception was the Spain23F-1 strain CipR-73 that had parC and parE mosaic genes (Table 3). Other exceptions were three strains of the Spain14-5 clone (CipR-38, CipR-39, and CipR-40) that had an additional GyrA polymorphism (V88I), which were isolated from three patients temporally related in the same hospital, and two other strains, CipR-1 of clone A of serotype 3 and CipR-57 of clone D of serotype 19F that showed different polymorphisms in ParE (Table 3).


The worldwide prevalence of fluoroquinolone resistance in S. pneumoniae is low, although it varies over time, geographic region, age group, and origin of isolates (1,4,6,31). The overall incidence of ciprofloxacin-resistant S. pneumoniae strains in this study was 2.6%, lower than that reported in previous studies (3%–7%) (4,5) conducted in Spain in which noninvasive isolates were predominant. In agreement with those previous studies, noninvasive isolates in this study displayed ciprofloxacin resistance as high as 4.3%. A higher prevalence (7.2%) was seen in patients >65 years, which also agreed with previous reports (4,6), and which possibly reflects increased fluoroquinolone use in this group of patients. The prevalence of ciprofloxacin resistance seen in this study (2.6%) is similar to the 2.5% found among unselected isolates of Bellvitge Hospital (Barcelona) in 2002 (J. Liñares, pers. comm.), but it is lower than the 6.3% found in Donostia Hospital (San Sebastian) (E. Pérez-Trallero, pers. comm.).

A significant relation between resistance to penicillin or macrolides and resistance to ciprofloxacin was observed (Table 1), in agreement with previous reports (4,6). Penicillin- and multidrug-resistant pneumococci have been common in Spain since the 1980s; these strains primarily belong to serogroup 19 and to four multiresistant epidemic clones: Spain23F-1, Spain6B-2, Spain9V-3, and Spain14-5 (30,32,33). The emergence of fluoroquinolone resistance among strains of these clones has been described (3336), and in our study, resistance occurred mainly among those four widely disseminated clones (Table 3). Since neither temporal nor geographic relationships were found among most patients infected by these four clones, this finding could reflect the high prevalence of these clones in the Spanish population, as suggested previously (36), rather than the spreading of resistant clones. Exceptions were five strains of the Spain14-5 clone that could be grouped in two temporal clusters. One cluster accounted for two strains (CipR-66 and -67) collected in the same laboratory, with identical polymorphisms and triple mutations in QRDRs. The second cluster accounted for three identical strains of the Spain14-5 clone (CipR-38, -39 and -40), which were recovered from three patients at a laboratory from San Sebastian in a 29-day period. These strains had an additional GyrA polymorphism (V88I) not present in other Spain14-5 clone strains and may represent a variant of this clone (34). Nevertheless, the epidemiologic features of these international clones (2,37,38) suggest that dissemination of ciprofloxacin resistance through these isolates is a plausible scenario and may predict a rapid increase of resistance in S. pneumoniae in countries with an increasing use of fluoroquinolones. Also plausible is that recombinant ciprofloxacin-resistant isolates with mosaic DNA topoisomerase genes belonging to the Spain23F-1 and Spain6B-2 international clones (Table 3) have disseminated and that these isolates have acquired resistance mutations by horizontal transfer from VGS. Although a low prevalence (5 [6.7%] of 75) of S. pneumoniae strains with mosaic parC genes among the ciprofloxacin-resistant strains was observed, the existence of these kind of strains (Figure) is an indication that recombination has occurred between resistant VGS and S. pneumoniae, including the prevalent pneumococcal clones. In addition, five resistant strains of the Sweden15A-25 clone, another multiresistant clone previously reported as susceptible (28), were found (Table 3).

Although newer fluoroquinolones have enhanced in vitro activity against S. pneumoniae and are less likely to select for resistant isolates, their use to treat respiratory tract infections merits special attention. More than 20 reports of levofloxacin treatment failure have been concurrent with the development of resistance during or after therapy. In some cases, strains susceptible to levofloxacin but with a first-step parC mutation, as a consequence of previous quinolone use, were present before therapy was initiated. Identifying these strains will help avoid therapeutic failures. Since fluoroquinolone resistance is more frequent in the elderly with chronic respiratory diseases who have had long-term quinolone therapy (4,6,1012,14), recent use of these drugs should contraindicate further fluoroquinolone treatment.

The use of NCCLS susceptibility breakpoints for newer fluoroquinolones underestimates a high proportion of low-level ciprofloxacin-resistant strains with first-step mutations whose detection should be improved by decreasing those breakpoints as previously suggested (11,39). In the present study, which followed NCCLS criteria (26), 12 (85%) of 14 low-level ciprofloxacin-resistant strains with a single parC mutation were susceptible to levofloxacin (MIC 1–2 μg/mL). These data agree with those of other authors who found parC mutations in 59% of the strains with levofloxacin MIC 2 μg/mL (39). Using a ciprofloxacin resistance breakpoint MIC ≥4 μg/mL, as was used by Chen et al. (6), would improve detection of these mutant strains. In fact, in our study, no strains with first-step mutations and ciprofloxacin MIC 2 μg/mL were detected, although other authors have found these mutations in up to 29% of this type of strain (39). Although gemifloxacin was the most active quinolone studied, and 39.3% of high-level ciprofloxacin resistance with double mutations were gemifloxacin-susceptible with the NCCLS breakpoint, a patient infected by such strains should not be treated with any quinolone. To avoid treatment failures, using microbiologic breakpoints for quinolone susceptibility would be more prudent than using clinical breakpoints. If fluoroquinolones are widely and indiscriminately used, resistance to fluoroquinolones in S. pneumoniae may become a problem in the near future.

Dr. de la Campa is a research scientist at the Centro Nacional de Microbiología, Instituto de Salud Carlos III in Madrid, Spain. Her research interest focuses on the molecular basis of antimicrobial resistance in bacteria.



We thank all Spanish microbiologists who sent strains to Laboratorio de Referencia de Neumococos.

L.B. was supported by a fellowship from Instituto de Salud Carlos III. This work was supported by grant BIO2002-01398 from Ministerio de Ciencia y Tecnología, by grant 01/1267 from Fondo de Investigación Sanitaria (FIS), and by Red Temática de Investigación Cooperativa G03/103 from FIS.



  1. Jacobs  MR, Felmingham  D, Appelbaum  PC, Grüneberg  RN. the Alexander Project Group. The Alexander Project 1998–2000: susceptibility of pathogens isolated from community-acquired respiratory tract infection to commonly used antimicrobial agents. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2003;52:22946. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Muñoz  R, Coffey  TJ, Daniels  M, Dowson  CG, Laible  G, Casal  J, Intercontinental spread of a multiresistant clone of serotype 23F Streptococcus pneumoniae. J Infect Dis. 1991;164:3026. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Fenoll  A, Jado  I, Vicioso  D, Pérez  A, Casal  J. Evolution of Streptococcus pneumoniae serotypes and antibiotic resistance in Spain: update (1990–1996). J Clin Microbiol. 1998;36:344754.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Liñares  J, de la Campa  AG, Pallares  R. Fluoroquinolone resistance in Streptococcus pneumoniae. N Engl J Med. 1999;341:15467. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Pérez-Trallero  E, Fernádez-Mazarrasa  C, García-Rey  C, Bouza  E, Aguilar  L, García de Lomas  J, Antimicrobial susceptibilities of 1,684 Streptococcus pneumoniae and 2,039 Streptococcus pyogenes isolates and their ecological relationships: results of a 1-year (1998–1999) multicenter surveillance study in Spain. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2001;45:333440. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Chen  DK, McGeer  A, de Azavedo  JC, Low  DE. Decreased susceptibility of Streptococcus pneumoniae to fluoroquinolones in Canada. N Engl J Med. 1999;341:2339. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Doern  GV, Heilmann  KP, Huynh  HK, Rhomberg  PR, Coffman  SL, Brueggemann  AB. Antimicrobial resistance among clinical isolates of Streptococcus pneumoniae in the United States during 1999–2000, including a comparison of resistance rates since 1994–1995. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2001;45:17219. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. de Azevedo  JCS, Trpeski  L, Pong-Porter  S, Matsumura  S, Network  TCBS, Low  DE. In vitro activity of fluoroquinolones against antibiotic-resistant blood culture isolates of viridans group streptococci across Canada. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1999;43:2299301.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Pérez-Trallero  E, García-Arenzana  JM, Jiménez  JA, Peris  A. Therapeutic failure and selection of resistance to quinolones in a case of pneumococcal pneumonia treated with ciprofloxacin. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 1990;9:9056. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Urban  C, Rahman  N, Zhao  X, Mariano  N, Segal-Maurer  SA, Drlica  K, Fluoroquinolone-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae associated with levofloxacin therapy. J Infect Dis. 2001;184:7948. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Davidson  R, Cavalcanti  R, Brunton  JL, Darrin  J, Bast  DJ, de Azevedo  JCS, Resistance to levofloxacin and failure of treatment of pneumococcal pneumonia. N Engl J Med. 2002;346:74750. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Pérez-Trallero  E, Marimon  JM, Iglesias  L, Larruskain  J. Fluoroquinolone and macrolide treatment failure in pneumococcal pneumonia and selection of multidrug-resistant isolates. Emerg Infect Dis. 2003;9:115962.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. González  I, Georgiou  M, Alcaide  F, Balas  D, Liñares  J, de la Campa  AG. Fluoroquinolone resistance mutations in the parC, parE, and gyrA genes of clinical isolates of viridans group streptococci. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1998;42:27928.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. de la Campa  AG, Ferrándiz  MJ, Tubau  F, Pallares  R, Manresa  F, Linares  J. Genetic characterization of fluoroquinolone-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae strains isolated during ciprofloxacin therapy from a patient with bronchiectasis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2003;47:141922. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Balas  D, Fernández-Moreira  E. de l a Campa AG. Molecular characterization of the gene encoding the DNA gyrase A subunit of Streptococcus pneumoniae. J Bacteriol. 1998;180:285461.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Muñoz  R, de la Campa  AG. ParC subunit of DNA topoisomerase IV of Streptococcus pneumoniae is a primary target of fluoroquinolones and cooperates with DNA gyrase A subunit in forming resistance phenotype. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1996;40:22527.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Janoir  C, Zeller  V, Kitzis  M-D, Moreau  NJ, Gutmann  L. High-level fluoroquinolone resistance in Streptococcus pneumoniae requires mutations in parC and gyrA. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1996;40:27604.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Pan  X-S, Ambler  J, Mehtar  S, Fisher  LM. Involvement of topoisomerase IV and DNA gyrase as ciprofloxacin targets in Streptococcus pneumoniae. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1996;40:23216.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Fernández-Moreira  E, Balas  D, González  I, de la Campa  AG. Fluoroquinolones inhibit preferentially Streptococcus pneumoniae DNA topoisomerase IV than DNA gyrase native proteins. Microb Drug Resist. 2000;6:25967. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Martín-Galiano  AJ. de l a Campa AG. High-efficiency generation of antibiotic-resistant strains of Streptococcus pneumoniae by PCR and transformation. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2003;47:125761. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Perichon  B, Tankovic  J, Courvalin  P. Characterization of a mutation in the parE gene that confers fluoroquinolone resistance in Streptococcus pneumoniae. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1997;41:1667.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Ferrándiz  MJ, Fenoll  A, Liñares  J, de la Campa  AG. Horizontal transfer of parC and gyrA in fluoroquinolone-resistant clinical isolates of Streptococcus pneumoniae. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2000;44:8407. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Bast  DJ, de Azevedo  JCS, Tam  TY, Kilburn  L, Duncan  C, Mandell  LA, Interspecies recombination contributes minimally to fluoroquinolone resistance in Streptococcus pneumoniae. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2001;45:26314. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Yokota  S, Sato  K, Kuwahara  O, Habadera  S, Tsukamoto  N, Ohuchi  H, Fluoroquinolone-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae occurs frequently in elderly patients in Japan. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2002;46:33115. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Balsalobre  L, Ferrandiz  MJ, Linares  J, Tubau  F, de la Campa  AG. Viridans group streptococci are donors in horizontal transfer of topoisomerase IV genes to Streptococcus pneumoniae. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2003;47:207281. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards. Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing. Fourteenth informational supplement. NCCLS document M100-S14. Wayne (PA): The Committee; 2004.
  27. Ferrándiz  MJ, Oteo  J, Aracil  B, Gómez-Garcés  JL, de la Campa  AG. Drug efflux and parC mutations are involved in fluoroquinolone resistance in viridans group streptococci. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1999;43:25203.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. McGee  L, McDougal  L, Zhou  J, Spratt  BG, Tenover  FC, George  R, Nomenclature of major antimicrobial-resistant clones of Streptococcus pneumoniae defined by the pneumococcal molecular epidemiology network. J Clin Microbiol. 2001;39:256571. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Tenover  FC, Arbeit  R, Goering  RV, Mickelsen  PA, Murray  BE, Persing  DH, Interpreting chromosomal DNA restriction patterns produced by pulse-field gel electrophoresis: criteria for bacterial strain typing. J Clin Microbiol. 1995;33:22339.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Enright  MC, Fenoll  A, Griffiths  D, Spratt  BG. The three major Spanish clones of penicillin-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae are the most common clones recovered in recent cases of meningitis in Spain. J Clin Microbiol. 1999;37:32106.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Daily  P, Gelling  L, Rothrock  G, Reingold  A, Vugia  D, Barrett  NL, Resistance of Streptococcus pneumoniae to fluoroquinolones—United States, 1995–1999. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2001;50:8004.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Coffey  T, Berron  S, Daniels  M, García-Leoni  M, Cercenado  E, Bouza  E, Multiply antibiotic-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae recovered from Spanish hospitals (1988–1994): novel major clones of serotypes 14, 19F and 15F. Microbiol. 1996;142:274757. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Pérez-Trallero  E, Marimón  JM, González  A, Iglesias  L. Spain14-5 international multiresistant Streptococcus pneumoniae clone resistant to fluoroquinolones and other families of antibiotics. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2003;51:7159. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Ho  PL, Yung  RWH, Tsang  DNC, Que  TL, Ho  M, Seto  WH, Increasing resistance of Streptococcus pneumoniae to fluoroquinolones: results of a Hong Kong multicentre study in 2000. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2001;48:65965. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. McGee  L, Goldsmith  CE, Klugman  KP. Fluoroquinolone resistance among clinical isolates of Streptococcus pneumoniae belonging to international multiresistant clones. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2002;49:1736. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Alou  L, Ramirez  M, García-Rey  C, Prieto  J, de Lencastre  H. Streptococcus pneumoniae isolates with reduced susceptibility to ciprofloxacin in Spain: clonal diversity and appearance of ciprofloxacin-resistant epidemic clones. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2001;45:29557. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Corso  A, Severina  EP, Petruk  VF, Mauriz  YR, Tomasz  A. Molecular characterization of penicillin-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae isolates causing respiratory disease in the United States. Microb Drug Resist. 1998;4:32537. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Shi  ZY, Enright  MC, Wilkinson  P, Griffiths  D, Spratt  BG. Identification of three major clones of multiply antibiotic-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae in Taiwanese hospitals by multilocus sequence typing. J Clin Microbiol. 1998;36:35149.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Lim  S, Bast  D, McGeer  A, de Azavedo  J, Low  DE. Antimicrobial susceptibility breakpoints and first-step parC mutation in Streptococcus pneumoniae: redefining fluoroquinolone resistance. Emerg Infect Dis. 2003;9:8337.PubMedGoogle Scholar




Cite This Article

DOI: 10.3201/eid1010.040382

1Spanish Pneumococcal Infection Study Network—general coordination: Román Pallarés; participants and centers: Ernesto García (Centro de Investigaciones Biológicas, Madrid); Julio Casal, Asuncion Fenoll, Adela G. de la Campa (Centro Nacional de Microbiología, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid); Emilio Bouza, (Hospital Gregorio Marañon, Madrid); Fernando Baquero (Hospital Ramón y Cajal, Madrid); Francisco Soriano, José Prieto (Fundación Jiménez Díaz y Hospital Clínico, Madrid); Román Pallarés, Josefina Liñares (Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge, Barcelona); Javier Garau, Javier Martínez Lacasa (Hospital Mutua de Terrassa, Barcelona); Cristina Latorre (Hospital Sant Joan de Deu, Barcelona); Emilio Pérez-Trallero, Alberto González (Hospital Donostia, San Sebastian); Juan García de Lomas (Hospital Clínico, Valencia); and Ana Fleites (Hospital Central de Asturias).

Table of Contents – Volume 10, Number 10—October 2004

EID Search Options
presentation_01 Advanced Article Search – Search articles by author and/or keyword.
presentation_01 Articles by Country Search – Search articles by the topic country.
presentation_01 Article Type Search – Search articles by article type and issue.



Please use the form below to submit correspondence to the authors or contact them at the following address:

Adela G. de la Campa, Unidad de Genética Bacteriana, Centro Nacional de Microbiología, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, 28220 Majadahonda, Madrid, Spain; fax: +34-91-509-79-19

Send To

10000 character(s) remaining.


Page created: April 11, 2011
Page updated: April 11, 2011
Page reviewed: April 11, 2011
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.