Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link
Volume 10, Number 3—March 2004
Perspective

The RUsick2 Foodborne Disease Forum for Syndromic Surveillance

Holly Wethington*Comments to Author  and Paul Bartlett*
Author affiliations: *National Food Safety and Toxicology Center, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, USA

Main Article

Figure 3

Comparison of foodborne disease reports from Ingham, Eaton, and Clinton Counties before and after implementing the RUsick2 Forum; MDA, Michigan Department of Agriculture.

Figure 3. Comparison of foodborne disease reports from Ingham, Eaton, and Clinton Counties before and after implementing the RUsick2 Forum; MDA, Michigan Department of Agriculture.

Main Article

Page created: February 08, 2011
Page updated: February 08, 2011
Page reviewed: February 08, 2011
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.
file_external