Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link
Volume 10, Number 5—May 2004

Causative Agent of Pogosta Disease Isolated from Blood and Skin Lesions

Article Metrics
citations of this article
EID Journal Metrics on Scopus
Satu Kurkela*†Comments to Author , Tytti Manni*, Antti Vaheri*†, and Olli Vapalahti*†‡
Author affiliations: *Haartman Institute, Helsinki, Finland; †HULAB, Helsinki, Finland; ‡University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland

Cite This Article


Pogosta disease is a mosquito-borne viral disease in Finland, which is clinically manifested by rash and arthritis; larger outbreaks occur in 7-year intervals. The causative agent of the disease has been suspected of being closely related to Sindbis virus (SINV). We isolated SINV from five patients with acute Pogosta disease during an outbreak in fall 2002 in Finland. One virus strain was recovered from a whole blood sample and four other strains from skin lesions. The etiology of Pogosta disease was confirmed by these first Finnish SINV strains, which also represent the first human SINV isolates from Europe. Phylogenetic analysis indicates that the Finnish SINV strains are closely related to the viral agents isolated from mosquitoes and that cause clinically similar diseases in nearby geographic areas.

Sindbis virus (SINV), a member of the Western equine encephalomyelitis virus complex of the genus Alphavirus in the family Togaviridae, was first isolated in 1952 in the Nile River delta in Egypt from a pool of Culex pipiens and Cx. univittatus mosquitoes (1). SINV is an enveloped virus with a genome of single-stranded, positive-polarity 11.7-kb RNA (2). The genomic 49S RNA also serves as mRNA in the infected cell. Translation of the genomic RNA produces the four nonstructural proteins nsP1–4. The 26S subgenomic mRNA is translated to produce the polyprotein from which E1, E2, and C structural proteins are processed.

The seroprevalence of SINV antibodies among the Finnish population is approximately 2% (3); however, the prevalence varies considerably between different parts of the country. The typical clinical picture of Pogosta disease includes arthritis, maculopapular rash, and sometimes low fever, fatigue, and muscle pain (4; Kurkela et al., unpub. data). Clinically similar or identical diseases are Ockelbo disease (known as August–September disease) in Sweden and Karelian fever in Russian Karelia (57). Ockelbo disease was first found in Sweden in 1967 (8). A larger Pogosta disease outbreak has occurred every 7th year in Finland since 1974, with hundreds or thousands of patients (3). The 7-year cycle occurred again in August through September 2002 as well, with 597 serodiagnosed cases reported. The area of highest incidence (8.0/10 000 person-years) was, as in previous epidemic years, the province of North Karelia in eastern Finland, with an incidence almost eight times higher than in the whole country in general. The cause for this geographic distribution is not known. In Sweden, the seroprevalence of SINV antibodies has been highest in the central parts of the country (9). Since all the clinical cases in Finland occur in late July through early October, the virus is most likely carried and transferred to humans by the late summer mosquito species Culex and Culiseta, from which SINV has previously been isolated in Sweden (10). Possible viral reservoirs of SINV are tetraonid and migratory birds, which are a major blood source for mosquitoes and have been shown to harbor SINV antibodies (3,11,12).

Figure 1

Thumbnail of Sindbis virus isolates around the world. Each dot represents either one strain (isolated from insect or vertebrate) or several strains isolated from specific Diptera genus (e.g., Culex or Aedes) at the same time and place. The strains included in the phylogenetic analyses are indicated with arrows. The enlarged map presents the new Sindbis virus isolates introduced in this study.

Figure 1. Sindbis virus isolates around the world. Each dot represents either one strain (isolated from insect or vertebrate) or several strains isolated from specific Diptera genus (e.g., Culex or Aedes) at the...

SINV has been isolated from various insects and vertebrates around the world (Figure 1). From a human sample, however, SINV isolation has previously been documented twice. South African Girdwood strain was recovered in 1963 from the vesicle fluid of skin lesions taken from a 45-year-old woman with acute rash-arthritis (13), and Chinese YN87448 strain was isolated from the serum of a febrile patient in 1992 (14). Viral RNA has been detected from skin lesions with the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) method in Sweden (15), but no genetic sequence is available. No virus isolations or detections have previously taken place in Finland. The aim of this study was to isolate the causative agent of Pogosta disease directly from human samples.

Patients and Methods

Clinical Samples

We collected samples from the health districts where the incidence of Pogosta disease had been highest during previous epidemic years, North Karelia and Kuopio. When acute SINV infection was suspected on clinical examination, whole blood samples in tubes containing ethane diamine tetraacetic acid (EDTA) as anticoagulant and skin lesion biopsy specimens were collected, if possible. The skin biopsy specimens were taken from one papulopustule with a punch or a surgical knife into a dry tube, usually by a local physician. The samples were kept at +4°C, and transported to the local central hospital usually within the next 24 hours to be frozen at –70°C. All samples were kept frozen until they were processed at the department of Virology, University of Helsinki. Informed consent was obtained from all patients. The study was carried out under the permission of the coordinating ethical committee of the Hospital District of Helsinki and Uusimaa.

Representative Case Report

A 35-year-old man was most probably exposed to SINV in August 2002, in Ilomantsi, a province of North Karelia. Typical Pogosta disease symptoms began with polyarthritis, first affecting the fingers, wrists, and the left shoulder, then extending to the left elbow, and finally both knees and the right ankle. Joint symptoms were often aggravated by exertion. At the acute phase, the patient also had fatigue, nausea, muscle pain, headache, low fever, and itchy rash throughout the body. A skin biopsy was taken from one papulopustule (see also Table; patient 1). Basic blood parameters at the acute phase were within normal range, including blood cell counts, hemoglobin, platelets, and the erythrocyte count indices. The joint symptoms lasted for 3 to 4 months. Besides these symptoms, no other residual symptoms were encountered.

Serodiagnostic Methods

All patients were screened for SINV immunoglobulin (Ig) M and IgG with enzyme immunoassay (EIA) and for total antibodies with the hemagglutination inhibition test (HI). EIA was performed with purified SINV antigen, directly coated on microtiter well plates (16). For HI microtitration, serum samples were absorbed with kaolin and male goose erythrocytes and tested against SINV (grown in BHK21/WI-2 cell monolayers) and 0.2% suspension of goose erythrocytes (3). For the diagnosis, either a positive result in EIA for SINV IgM in a single sample or seroconversion (or greater than fourfold increase in titer) between paired serum specimens was required.

Virus Isolation

The frozen skin samples were cut into small pieces, then homogenized in a mortar, and suspended in 100–150 μL Dulbecco’s minimal essential medium plus 0.2% bovine serum albumin. A total of 50–100 μL of this suspension diluted in 500 μL of culture medium, containing minimal essential medium and 2% fetal calf serum with a mixture of glutamine, ampicillin, and penicillin, was added to confluent Vero cells in 25-cm2 cell culture flasks. Whole blood samples were diluted 1:10 in culture medium, and confluent Vero cell cultures were injected with the final volume of 500 μL. The cells were incubated for 1 h at 37°C, then 3–4 mL culture medium was added, and the cultures were kept at 37°C. The toxicity of EDTA-anticoagulant on Vero cells could be avoided by completely removing the blood dilution from cells after the 1-h incubation and also by changing the culture medium the day after the injection and then twice a week. All cell cultures were inspected daily. When cytopathic effect (CPE) was apparent, immunofluorescence assay (IFA) was performed, and the cells were passaged.

Several measures were undertaken to avoid laboratory contamination. SINV was not handled in the two laboratories where the samples were prepared and the cells were cultured, and separate sets of instruments were always used. Samples were handled and cells cultured in separate laboratories. Cross-contamination was avoided by culturing in cell culture flasks instead of culture plates. At least two flasks of noninfected Vero cells were cultured in the same incubator every time and went through the same procedures as the potentially infected cells.


An IFA was developed to confirm SINV infection of the cells. Cells were harvested in 600 μL phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), washed, and centrifuged at 1,800 rpm for 3 min five times and dried on a slide. For immunofluorescence staining the slides were fixed for 7 min in ice-cold acetone. A pool of 10 SINV IgG–positive serum samples were diluted 1:20 in PBS, added to slides, and incubated in a moist chamber at 37°C for 30 min. The slides were washed three times in PBS and once in water, then incubated at 37°C for 30 min with fluorescein isothiocyanate–conjugated F(ab')2 goat anti-human IgG diluted 1:100 in PBS. After another wash, the slides were dried, mounted, and screened with a fluorescence microscope.

RNA Extraction and Reverse Transcription (RT)-PCR

Viral RNA was extracted from culture supernatant with TriPure Isolation Reagent (Roche Diagnostics [Roche Molecular Biochemicals, Espoo, Finland]) by following the manufacturer’s instructions. The primers used in RT-PCR were 5′-tttagcggatcggacaattc-3′ and 5′-gcggtgacgaactcagtag-3′. The RT reaction was carried out as follows: 10 μL of RNA dissolved in water was mixed with 2 μL of each primer (10 pmol/μL), 2 μL of M-MuLV reverse transcriptase (20 U/μL [MBI Fermentas, Vilnius, Lithuania]), 5 μL of 5 x RT-buffer (MBI Fermentas), 2 μL of dNTP-mix (2.5mM dATP, dTTP, dGTP, and dCTP [Finnzymes, Espoo, Finland]), and 2 μL of Ribonuclease inhibitor (40 U/μL; MBI Fermentas). The mixture was incubated at 37°C for 90 min.

For the PCR 7 μL of cDNA were incubated at 95°C for 5 min, cooled immediately on ice, and mixed with 2 μL of each primer (10 pmol/μL), 10 μL of 10 x Taq Extender PCR Buffer (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA), 8 μL of dNTP mix (2.5 mM; Finnzymes), 1 μL of Taq DNA Polymerase (recombinant) (5 U/μL; MBI Fermentas), 1 μL of Taq Extender PCR Additive (Stratagene), and 69 μL of water. The reactions were amplified through 35 cycles using a DNA thermal cycler with the following steps: denaturation at 95°C for 45 s, annealing at 55°C for 2 min, and elongation at 72°C for 3 min, followed by a final extension at 72°C for 10 min.


The PCR amplicons were purified with QIAquick gel extraction kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). The amplicons were cloned with TOPO TA Cloning Kit for Sequencing (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA), following the manufacturer’s instructions, and transformed into TOP10 chemically competent Escherichia coli cells on bacterial plates containing x-gal (5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl-β-D-galactoside) and IPTG (isopropylthio-β-D-galactoside) for blue-white screening. The plasmid DNA was isolated with QIAprep Miniprep kit (Qiagen). and restriction analysis was performed. Vector-based primers M13 Reverse and T7 were used for automatic sequencing with ABI PRISM (Perkin-Elmer, Foster City, CA).

Sequence Analysis and Phylogenetic Analysis

Sequences were aligned with Clustal W1.75 program (17) into MSF-format and edited with GeneDoc Multiple Sequence Alignment (available from: editor program. Sequence was confirmed from at least three different clones. PHYLIP program package (Felsenstein, 1993) was used to create 5,000 bootstrap replicates on the sequence data (SEQBOOT). Distance matrices were calculated with DNADIST program with Kimura’s two-parameter model of substitutions and analyzed by Neighbor-joining tree-fitting algorithm with NEIGHBOR program. The bootstrap support values were calculated with CONSENSE program.


Altogether 131 patients with suspected acute Pogosta disease were recruited to the study in 11 different health stations in the province of North Karelia and in Kuopio University Hospital, Finland, during July through October of 2002. A total of 86 patients had acute, serologically confirmed SINV infection. Twenty-three skin biopsy specimens and 73 whole-blood samples (treated with EDTA) were collected from patients with acute SINV infection and used in this study for isolation attempts.

A physician examined all patients at the acute phase. To determine the most likely place and time of exposure to SINV, background information about the physical location of the patients before the onset of symptoms was also collected by using questionnaires. The exact incubation period in Pogosta disease is unknown, and determining the time and place of exposure was difficult.

Virus isolation was successful from 4 of 23 skin samples and 1 of 73 whole blood samples (Table) (Figure 1). All isolates induced a strong CPE in cell culture, featuring round-shaped, interconnected cells and cell death within 72 hours of culturing. Infected cells from all isolates were shown to give a strong positive signal with IFA with human SINV IgG–positive sera. All noncytopathic cell cultures were also screened and found negative with IFA, e.g., no discrepancy between the isolation method and immunofluorescence staining was encountered.

The median and average number of days of rash for patients with the positive skin samples before sampling were 1.5 and 2.5, respectively, and SINV IgM antibodies were not detectable (IgM status for patient 4 at the time of sampling was not available) (Table). The median and average days of rash for the negative skin samples until sampling were 2.0 and 1.7, respectively (data available from 17 of 19 patients). In all, 37% of the patients who gave a skin biopsy sample had detectable SINV IgM antibodies: 16% had a borderline result at the time of sampling (data available from 19 of 23 patients). The median and average number of disease days before collecting the whole blood samples were 3.0 and 4.5, respectively (data available from 65 of 73 patients). The only blood sample from which SINV could be isolated had a borderline SINV IgM result; the exact time of onset of symptoms is not available for this case.

Figure 2

Thumbnail of Phylogenetic tree is based on the nucleotide sequences of 1,178–1,281 bp from nsP3 and nsP4 region, nucleotides 5,258-6,510; the genome position is given according to the published sequence of the strain AR339 (HRsp variant) (2). The tree was constructed by using Neighbor-joining algorithms (NEIGHBOR). 5,000 bootstrap replicates were calculated. Only those bootstrap support values that exceed 50% are shown. The following sequences available in GenBank were included into the comparis

Figure 2. Phylogenetic tree is based on the nucleotide sequences of 1,178–1,281 bp from nsP3 and nsP4 region, nucleotides 5,258-6,510; the genome position is given according to the published sequence of the strain...

The nucleotide sequences of 1,178–1,281 bp from nsP3 and nsP4 region of the new strains were determined for the phylogenetic analysis and submitted to GenBank. The strains were given the following accession numbers: Ilomantsi-2002A (AY532322), Ilomantsi-2002B (AY532326), Ilomantsi-2002C (AY532324), Kiihtelysvaara-2002 (AY532325), and Johannes-2002 (AY532323). In addition, we sequenced from this region the LEIV-9298-strain (AY532321), isolated from Aedes mosquitoes in 1983 in central Russian Karelia, approximately 200 km north of Ilomantsi, Finland (6). The following sequences available in GenBank were included in the comparison: AR339 (HRsp variant), Girdwood S.A., MRE16, Ockelbo (Edsbyn 82), S.A.AR86, SW6562, YN87448, and XJ-160. See Figure 1 for the geographic location and Figure 2 for the phylogenetic tree of the strains. Sequence comparisons and phylogenetic analysis show that the northern European (e.g, Finnish, Russian, and Swedish) SINV strains analyzed in this study are closely related, with a percentage difference of 0.1% to 1.4% on nucleotides and 0% to 2.1% on amino acids. The Russian Karelian LEIV-9298 and Johannes differ by one nucleic acid, and their amino acid sequences are identical. Malaysian MRE16 is furthest from Finnish strains when both nucleic and amino acids are compared, differences are 35.6% to 35.8% and 28.3% to 28.5% difference, respectively.


This study describes the first human SINV isolates from Europe, one strain from blood and four from skin lesions. One of the strains (Johannes-2002) is apparently Russian, since the Finnish patient most likely was exposed to SINV in Russian Karelia. The four other strains represent the first SINV isolates from Finland. Phylogenetic analysis of the strains shows a close relationship to Swedish and Russian SINV strains, isolated approximately 20 years ago from mosquitoes.

The possibility of laboratory contamination was minimized by various measures as described in Methods. Only a few samples were prepared at the same time; each new virus strain was isolated from separate set of samples. No CPE was apparent in the negative control cells at any stage and they were all negative in immunofluorescence staining as well.

SINV could be recovered from one blood sample of 73. This sample was positive by nested RT-PCR method as well; full characterization of clinical and laboratory data will be presented later (Kurkela et al., unpub. data). As now proven, SINV is present in the blood during acute infection. The most viremic window appears to be very narrow and the level of viremia can vary considerably between persons. These presumptions make future laboratory diagnostics based on viral detection challenging, and serology likely will remains the method of choice for diagnosis.

In skin tissue, the viral persistence seems to last for several days, if not weeks. The Johannes-2002 strain was isolated from a biopsy specimen taken 7 days after the onset of rash. SINV could be recovered from 17% of the skin biopsy samples. Whether the virus persists in synovial fluid and whether this could explain the prolonged joint symptoms in a substantial proportion of Pogosta disease patients (Kurkela et al., unpub. data) remain to be determined. Some patients have had borderline results in IgM serologic testing even months or years after the onset of disease (18), although no correlation between prolonged joint symptoms and elevated IgM levels in serum has been observed. In experiments with mice, evidence indicates that viral replication can take place in the periosteum or endosteum (19). Efforts to detect SINV or SINV RNA from human synovial fluids have failed (20). Clinical indications to retrieve synovial fluid samples rarely occur in Pogosta disease, and therefore no synovial fluids were available in this study.

The cell type in which the virus replicates in skin tissue is not known. In histopathologic examination of skin lesions of Pogosta disease patients, a pronounced lymphohistiocytic inflammatory infiltrate and lymphoblast-like cells have been described (21). Since the virus is present in the skin during acute infection before the onset of antibody response (Table), the cutaneous manifestations in Pogosta disease may be due to a direct viral effect; however, a more complex immunologic reaction behind the pathogenesis can certainly not be excluded.

Four patients were serodiagnosed with acute SINV infection in Sweden during the Finnish outbreak in 2002 (Sirkka Vene, pers. comm.), which suggests that local ecologic and environmental factors are involved in the epidemiology of Pogosta disease in Finland. Data are not available about whether the epidemics in northern Karelia were accompanied by similar epidemics on the Russian side of the Finnish-Russian border, although one of our patients (Table; patient 4) was most probably exposed while traveling in Russian Karelia. Ecologic circumstances likely alter the viral cycle in nature, and the prevalence of mosquitoes carrying SINV varies. However, differences in the pathogenicity of viral strains cannot be excluded. In Australia, for instance, SINV is the most common arbovirus isolated from mosquitoes (22), but human infections have often been either subclinical or mild (2325). Furthermore, the virus has been isolated from different animals have also taken place in central Europe without any reported human cases.

Phylogenetic analysis of the Finnish SINV strains for a 1.2-kb genome segment indicates that Finnish SINV strains are closely related to each other and to the Swedish and Russian strains, isolated 2 decades ago (Figure 2). Within this genome segment, Johannes-2002 strain is almost identical to LEIV-9298 strain, isolated 20 years earlier, ≈500 km north of Johannes. Northern European SINV strains might constitute a restricted geographic area of viral emergence, which suggests that the virus is maintained locally in disease-endemic regions. However, viral redistribution over long distances is possible, which would introduce new, distinct SINV strains to northern Europe. Viral recombination could also account for further variation, but more sequence information from other gene regions and SINV strains is required to define its role.

South African SINV strains have been shown to not vary substantially from Swedish strains (26). Therefore, the question still remains how and from where the viral importation to Finland has taken place. One possibility could be through mosquitoes carried by air currents. Migratory birds would be plausible viral carriers from further distances, such as Africa. Up to 50% of migratory and tetraonid birds have been shown to carry SINV antibodies in Finland (3); birds could function both as viral importers and amplifying hosts (11,12). Resident and migratory birds have recently been shown to carry SINV antibodies also in the United Kindom (26). The phylogenetic analysis in this study supports this concept by suggesting that redistribution of SINV tends to occur in a longitudinal, not latitudinal, direction. Contrary to the above, the strain YN87448, which originates from eastern China, is positioned in the phylogenetic tree close to the African strains (Figure 1). Indications of periodic redistribution of SINV strains over long distances and within a short time have previously been demonstrated in Australia (28), a finding consistent with the involvement of migratory birds. SINV could be frequently introduced to Finland or hide locally through winter in some natural reservoir, to emerge again in August through September. The available data favor maintenance of SINV in a local endemic cycle but the extent to which new introductions of SINV may play a role remains a subject for further investigation.

Ms. Kurkela is a doctoral student at the department of Virology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland. Her primary research interest is the molecular epidemiology of Sindbis virus and the clinical features, residual effects, and laboratory diagnostics of Pogosta disease.



We thank the staff at North Karelian health stations involved in material collection; Suvi-Sirkku Kaukoranta and Camilla Jokinen for essential organizing support; Kimmo Linnavuori for expert advice regarding cell culture experiments; and Sirkka Vene for important information and for providing the LEIV-9298 virus strain.

This study was supported by an EVO grant from the Hospital District of Helsinki and Uusimaa (TYH2277).



  1. Taylor  RM, Hurlbut  HS, Work  TH, Kingsbury  JR, Frothingham  TE. Sindbis virus: a newly recognized arthropod-transmitted virus. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1955;4:8446.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Strauss  EG, Rice  CM, Strauss  JH. Complete nucleotide sequence of the genomic RNA of Sindbis virus. Virology. 1984;133:92110. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Brummer-Korvenkontio  M, Vapalahti  O, Kuusisto  P, Saikku  P, Manni  T, Koskela  P, Epidemiology of Sindbis virus infections in Finland 1981–96: possible factors explaining a peculiar disease pattern. Epidemiol Infect. 2002;129:33545. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Turunen  M, Kuusisto  P, Uggeldahl  PE, Toivanen  A. Pogosta disease: clinical observations during an outbreak in the province of North Karelia, Finland. Br J Rheumatol. 1998;37:117780. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Lvov  DK, Vladimirtseva  EA, Butenko  AM, Karabatsos  N, Trent  DW, Calisher  CH. Identity of Karelian fever and Ockelbo viruses determined by serum dilution-plaque reduction neutralization tests and oligonucleotide mapping. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1988;39:60710.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Lvov  DK, Skvortsova  TM, Berezina  LK, Gromashevsky  VL, Yakovlev  BI, Gushchin  BV, Isolation of Karelian fever agent from Aedes communis mosquitoes. Lancet. 1984;2:399400. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Shirako  Y, Niklasson  B, Dalrymple  JM, Strauss  EG, Strauss  JH. Structure of the Ockelbo virus genome and its relationship to other Sindbis viruses. Virology. 1991;182:75364. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Skogh  M, Espmark  A. Ockelbo disease: epidemic arthritis-exanthema syndrome in Sweden caused by Sindbis-virus like agent. Lancet. 1982;1:7956. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Lundstrom  JO, Vene  S, Espmark  A, Engvall  M, Niklasson  B. Geographical and temporal distribution of Ockelbo disease in Sweden. Epidemiol Infect. 1991;106:56774. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Niklasson  B, Espmark  Å, LeDuc  JW, Gargan  TP, Ennis  WA, Tesh  RB, Association of a Sindbis-like virus with Ockelbo disease in Sweden. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1984;33:12127.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Lundström  JO, Lindström  KM, Olsen  B, Dufva  R, Krakower  DS. Prevalence of Sindbis virus neutralizing antibodies among Swedish passerines indicates that thrushes are the main amplifying hosts. J Med Entomol. 2001;38:28997. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Lundström  JO, Turell  MJ, Niklasson  B. Viremia in three orders of birds (Anseriformes, Galliformes and Passeriformes) inoculated with Ockelbo virus. J Wildl Dis. 1993;29:18995.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Malherbe  H, Strickland-Cholmley  M, Jackson  AL. Sindbis virus infection in man. Report of a case with recovery of virus from skin lesions. S Afr Med J. 1963;37:54752.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Zhou  G, Liang  G, Li  L. Complete nucleotide sequence of the nonstructural gene of alphavirus YN87448 strain isolated in China and its relationship to other Sindbis viruses. Zhonghua Shi Yan He Lin Chuang Bing Du Xue Za Zhi. 1999;13:31420.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Hörling  J, Vene  S, Franzen  C, Niklasson  B. Detection of Ockelbo virus RNA in skin biopsies by polymerase chain reaction. J Clin Microbiol. 1993;31:20049.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Vene  S, Franzen  C, Niklasson  B. Development of specific antibody patterns and clinical symptoms following Ockelbo virus infection. Arch Virol. 1994;134:6171. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Thompson  JD, Higgins  DG, Gibson  TJ. CLUSTAL W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, positions-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Res. 1994;22:467380. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Niklasson  B, Espmark  A, Lundstrom  J. Occurrence of arthralgia and specific IgM antibodies three to four years after Ockelbo disease. J Infect Dis. 1998;157:8325.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Heise  MT, Simpson  DA, Johnston  RE. Sindbis-group alphavirus replication in periosteum and endosteum of long bones in adult mice. J Virol. 2000;74:92949. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Luukkainen  R, Laine  M, Nirhamo  J. Chronic arthritis after Sindbis-related (Pogosta) virus infection. Scand J Rheumatol. 2000;29:399400. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Autio  P, Niemi  KM, Kariniemi  AL. An eruption associated with alphavirus infection. Br J Dermatol. 1996;135:3203. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Mackenzie  JS, Lindsay  MD, Coelen  RJ, Broom  AK, Hall  RA, Smith  DW. Arboviruses causing human disease in the Australasian zoogeographic region. Arch Virol. 1994;136:44767. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Doherty  RL, Bodey  AS, Carew  JS. Sindbis virus infection in Australia. Med J Aust. 1969;2:10167.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Guard  RW, McAuliffe  MJ, Stallman  ND, Bramston  BA. Haemorrhagic manifestations with Sindbis infection. Case report. Pathology. 1982;14:8990. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Boughton  CR, Hawkes  RA, Naim  HM, Wild  J, Chapman  B. Arbovirus infections in humans in New South Wales. Seroepidemiology of the alphavirus group of togaviruses. Med J Aust. 1984;141:7004.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Norder  H, Lundstrom  JO, Kozuch  O, Magnius  LO. Genetic relatedness of Sindbis virus strains from Europe, Middle East, and Africa. Virology. 1996;222:4405. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Buckley  A, Dawson  A, Moss  SR, Hinsley  SA, Bellamy  PE, Gould  EA. Serological evidence of West Nile virus, Usutu virus and Sindbis virus infection of birds in the UK. J Gen Virol. 2003;84:280717. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Sammels  LM, Lindsay  MD, Poidinger  M, Coelen  RJ, Mackenzie  JS. Geographic distribution and evolution of Sindbis virus in Australia. J Gen Virol. 1999;80:73948.PubMedGoogle Scholar




Cite This Article

DOI: 10.3201/eid1005.030689

Table of Contents – Volume 10, Number 5—May 2004

EID Search Options
presentation_01 Advanced Article Search – Search articles by author and/or keyword.
presentation_01 Articles by Country Search – Search articles by the topic country.
presentation_01 Article Type Search – Search articles by article type and issue.



Please use the form below to submit correspondence to the authors or contact them at the following address:

Satu Kurkela, Department of Virology, Haartman Institute, Faculty of Medicine, P.O. Box 21 (Haartmaninkatu 3); 00014 University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland; fax: +358-9-191-26491

Send To

10000 character(s) remaining.


Page created: February 22, 2011
Page updated: February 22, 2011
Page reviewed: February 22, 2011
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.