Volume 10, Number 8—August 2004
Dispatch
Spotted-Fever Group Rickettsia in Dermacentor variabilis, Maryland
Table 1
Characteristic | N | % infection with any Rickettsia organisms (95% CI) | % infection with SFG Rickettsia (%) (95% CI) |
---|---|---|---|
All ticks |
392 |
6.1 (4.0–9.0) |
3.8 (2.2–6.3) |
Sex |
pb = 1.000 |
p = 1.000 |
|
Male |
185 |
5.9 (3.0–10.4) |
3.8 (1.5–7.6) |
Female |
207 |
6.3 (3.3–10.5) |
3.9 (1.7–7.4) |
County of collection |
p = 0.052 |
p = 0.024 |
|
Anne Arundel |
1 |
0 (0–97.5) |
0 (0–97.5) |
Baltimore |
342 |
6.1 (3.8–9.2) |
3.5 (1.8–6.0) |
Calvert |
17 |
0 (0–19.5) |
0 (0–19.5) |
Charles |
18 |
0 (0–18.5) |
0 (0–18.5) |
Prince George’s |
1 |
100 (2.5–100) |
100 (2.5–100) |
Saint Mary’s |
13 |
15.4 (1.9–45.4) |
15.4 (1.9–45.4) |
Month collected |
p = 0.007 |
p = 0.101 |
|
April |
146 |
4.8 (1.9–9.6) |
4.8 (1.9–9.6) |
May |
108 |
4.6 (1.5–10.5) |
1.9 (0.2–6.5) |
June |
78 |
2.6 (0.3–9.0) |
1.3 (0.03–6.9) |
July/August |
58 |
17.2 (8.6–29.4) |
8.6 (2.9–19.0) |
Unknownc | 2 | 0 | 0 |
aCI, confidence interval; SFG, spotted fever group.
bFisher exact p values.
cTicks with unknown month of collection were excluded from the statistical analyses for this characteristic.
Page created: March 01, 2011
Page updated: March 01, 2011
Page reviewed: March 01, 2011
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.