Volume 11, Number 1—January 2005
Dispatch
Mosquitoborne Viruses, Czech Republic, 2002
Zdenek Hubálek*
, Petr Zeman†, Jiří Halouzka*, Zina Juřicová*, Eva Šťovíčková‡, Helena Bálková†, Silvie Šikutová*, and Ivo Rudolf*
, Petr Zeman†, Jiří Halouzka*, Zina Juřicová*, Eva Šťovíčková‡, Helena Bálková†, Silvie Šikutová*, and Ivo Rudolf*
Table 2
Prevalence of neutralizing antibodies to Tahyna virus after the 2002 flood, Central Bohemia*
| n† | % positive | |
|---|---|---|
| Risk zone | ||
| A | 75 | 28.0 |
| B | 83 | 20.5 |
| C | 279 | 14.7 |
| D | 60 | 5.0 |
| Distance to FPF (km) | ||
| <1.0 | 78 | 28.2 |
| 1.0–2.9 | 75 | 21.3 |
| 3.0–5.9 | 70 | 17.1 |
| ≥6.0 | 214 | 13.6 |
*As related to the residence location: risk zones A to D; and distance to floodplain forest (FPF, within zones A, B, and C only).
†n, number of residents examined.
Page created: April 14, 2011
Page updated: April 14, 2011
Page reviewed: April 14, 2011
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.