Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link
Volume 12, Number 10—October 2006
Dispatch

Scrub Typhus in Himalayas

Sanjay K. Mahajan*Comments to Author , Jean-Marc Rolain†, Rajesh Kashyap*, Diprabhanu Bakshi‡, Vijay Sharma*, Bhupalngh Prasher*, Lalngh Pal*, and Didier Raoult†
Author affiliations: *IG Medical College, Shimla, Himachal Pradesh, India; †Université de la Méditerranée, Marseille, France; ‡Defence Research and Development Establishment, Gwalior, Madhya Pradesh, India

Main Article

Table 1

MIF assay results from 21 patients with suspected scrub typhus, Himalayas, 2004*

Patient no. MIF titers (IgG/IgM)
 Outcome
Orientia Kato/Gilliam Orientia Kawasaki
1 128/0 512/0 Died†
2 128/0 256/0 Improved†
3 1,024/0 1,024/0 Improved
4 128/64 256/64 Improved
5 2,048/0 2,048/0 Improved
6 2,048/1024 2,048/1,024 Improved
7 1,024/128 512/128 Improved
8 2,048/64 512/0 Improved
9 512/0 512/0 Died†
10 2,048/0 2,048/0 Improved
11 1,024/256 1,024/256 Improved
12 256/128 512/256 Improved
13 2,048/0 2,048/0 Improved
14 0/128 0/128 Improved
15 512/256 256/256 Died
16 64/128 128/128 Improved
17 512/0 512/0 Improved
18 2,048/0 2,048/0 Improved
19 512/64 0/64 Improved
20 64/64 0/64 Improved
21 128/256 0/256 Improved

*MIF, microimmunofluorescence; Ig, immunoglobulin. IgM was considered positive at a titer of 64; IgG was considered positive at a titer of 128.
†Positive PCR result.

Main Article

Page created: November 10, 2011
Page updated: November 10, 2011
Page reviewed: November 10, 2011
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.
file_external