Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link
Volume 13, Number 7—July 2007

Effects of Internal Border Control on Spread of Pandemic Influenza

James G. Wood*†Comments to Author , Nasim Zamani†, C. Raina MacIntyre*†, and Niels G. Becker‡
Author affiliations: *National Centre for Immunisation Research and Surveillance of Vaccine Preventable Diseases, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; †The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; ‡Australian National University, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia;

Main Article

Table 1

Summary of parameter values, assumptions, and sources used in models of the effect of travel restrictions on pandemic influenza in Australia*

Variable/concept Value (range)/assumption Source/interpretation
Reproduction no. (R0) 1.5–3.5 Mills (14)
Infectivity function (ρ) Flat or peaked† Longini, Ferguson (7,8)
Latent period 1 (1–2 in sensitivity analysis) d(s) Ferguson (6)
Infectious period 5 d Literature suggests 4–7 d in adults (6,7)
Mixing Homogenous (within city) Modeling literature (15)
Propensity to travel Everyone equal Assumption
Populations Sydney (4.2 million), Melbourne 
(3.6 million), Darwin (110,000) ABS figures (16)
Travel rate‡ Sydney ↔ Melbourne (weighted by stay length) (4.7 × 103, 8.9 × 103) BTRE figures (17,18), NSW, and 
Victoria Tourism reports (19,20)
Travel rate‡ Sydney ↔ Darwin 
(weighted by stay length) (9.2 × 104, 4.4 × 103) BTRE figures (17,18), NSW, and 
NT Tourism reports (19,21)
Travel restrictions 20%,10%, or 1% of current levels Assumption
Time between 20 current cases 
in city 1 and city 2 (T20) Random variable (T20), different for 
each simulation. Median value over 
all simulations is given by m20. Output variables used to measure 
effect of travel restrictions

*ABS, Australian Bureau of Statistics; BTRE, Bureau of Transport and Regional Economics; NSW, New South Wales; NT, Northern Territory.
†See Figure 1, panel C, for shapes used.
‡This assumes a constant travel rate over the year with no seasonal variation in travel volumes.

Main Article

  1. Gezairy  HA. Travel epidemiology: WHO perspective. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2003;21:868. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. World Tourism Organization. Tourist arrivals by means of transport (2004). Nov 2005. [cited 2006 Feb 2]. Available from
  3. Australian Bureau of Transport and Regional Economics. Australian domestic airline activity 2004–05. Aviation statistics 102. [cited 2005 Dec 15]. Available from
  4. U.S. Bureau of Transportation Statistics. 2005 domestic airline passenger traffic up 4.1 percent from 2004. 2006. [cited 2006 Mar 24]. Available from
  5. The Committee to Advise on Tropical Medicine and Travel (CATMAT) and the National Advisory Committee on Immunization. (NACI). Statement on travel, influenza, and prevention. [Erratum in: Can Commun Dis Rep. 2005;31:115. PMID: 15895509]. Can Commun Dis Rep. 2005;31:18.
  6. Ferguson  NM, Cummings  DAT, Cauchemez  S, Fraser  C, Riley  S, Meeyai  A, Strategies for containing an emerging influenza pandemic in Southeast Asia. Nature. 2005;437:20914. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Longini  IM, Nizam  A, Xu  S, Ungchusak  K, Hanshaoworakul  W, Cummings  DAT, Containing pandemic influenza at the source. Science. 2005;309:10837. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Ferguson  NM, Cummings  DAT, Fraser  C, Cajka  JC, Cooley  PC, Burke  DS. Strategies for mitigating an influenza pandemic. Nature. 2006;442:44852. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Cooper  BS, Pitman  RJ, Edmunds  WJ, Gay  NJ. Delaying the international spread of pandemic influenza. PLoS Med. 2006;3:e212. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Hollingsworth  TD, Ferguson  NM, Anderson  RM. Will travel restrictions control the international spread of pandemic influenza? Nat Med. 2006;12:4979. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Markel  H, Stern  AM, Navarro  JA, Michalsen  JR, Monto  AS, DiGiovanni  C Jr. Nonpharmaceutical influenza mitigation strategies, US communities, 1918–1920 pandemic. Emerg Infect Dis. 2006;12:19614.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. NSW Legislative Assembly. Report of the Director-General of Public Health NSW for the year 1919 and the report on the influenza epidemic 1919. Gullick (Australia): Sydney William Applegate; 1920.
  13. Grais  RF, Ellis  JH, Glass  GE. Assessing the impact of airline travel on the geographic spread of pandemic influenza. [Erratum in: Eur J Epidemiol. 2004;19:395]. Eur J Epidemiol. 2003;18:106572. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Mills  CE, Robins  JM, Lipsitch  M. Transmissibility of 1918 pandemic influenza. Nature. 2004;432:9046. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Anderson  R, May  R. Infectious diseases of humans. Oxford (UK): Oxford University Press; 1991.
  16. Australian Bureau of Statistics. Population projections, Australia 2002 to 2101. [cited 2005 Jan 12]. Available from
  17. Australian Bureau of Transport and Regional Economics. Australian domestic airline activity. Aviation Statistics Domestic Monthly. 2005;102. [cited 2005 Dec 15]. Available from
  18. Australian Bureau of Transport and Regional Economics. Passenger movements between Australian cities, 1970–71 to 2030–31. [cited 2006 Dec 13]. Available from
  19. Tourism New South Wales. Travel to Sydney: year ended June 2005. [cited 2006 Jan 12]. Available from
  20. Tourism Victoria. Domestic visitation to regions of Victoria: year ending June 1999–2005. 2005. [cited 2005 Jan 12]. Available from
  21. Northern Territory Tourism. Darwin tourism region, results for the year ending June 2005. [cited 2005 Jan 12]. Available from:
  22. Hayden  FG, Fritz  R, Lobo  MC, Alvord  W, Strober  W, Straus  SE. Local and systemic cytokine responses during experimental human influenza a virus infection. Relation to symptom formation and host defense. J Clin Invest. 1998;101:6439. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Fraser  C, Riley  S, Anderson  RM, Ferguson  NM. Factors that make an infectious disease outbreak controllable. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004;101:614651. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Gani  R, Hughes  H, Fleming  D, Griffin  T, Medlock  J, Leach  S. Potential impact of antiviral drug use during influenza pandemic. Emerg Infect Dis. 2005;11:135562.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Smith  DR, Sommers  T. Assessing the economic impact of public health emergencies in international concerns: the case of SARS. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2003.

Main Article

Page created: June 24, 2010
Page updated: June 24, 2010
Page reviewed: June 24, 2010
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.