Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link

Volume 13, Number 9—September 2007

Dispatch

Equine Rhinosporidiosis in United Kingdom

Gail Leeming*Comments to Author , Ken C. Smith†1, Mark E. Bestbier†2, Annalisa Barrelet‡, and Anja Kipar*
Author affiliations: *University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom; †Animal Health Trust, Newmarket, Suffolk, United Kingdom; ‡Beaufort Cottage Laboratories, Newmarket, Suffolk, United Kingdom;

Main Article

Figure 2

Agarose gel electrophoresis of PCR products from Rhinosporidium seeberi–specific primers (A) and β-actin primers (B). The left lane contains a 100-bp ladder. Samples 1–4, from horses with histologic diagnoses of rhinosporidiosis; sample 5, from the skin of a noninfected horse; sample 6, negative control (water).

Figure 2. Agarose gel electrophoresis of PCR products from Rhinosporidium seeberi–specific primers (A) and β-actin primers (B). The left lane contains a 100-bp ladder. Samples 1–4, from horses with histologic diagnoses of rhinosporidiosis; sample 5, from the skin of a noninfected horse; sample 6, negative control (water).

Download

Main Article

1Current affiliation: The Royal Veterinary College, Hatfield, United Kingdom

2Current affiliation: Rest Associates, Swaffham Prior, Cambridge, United Kingdom

Page created: July 01, 2010
Page updated: July 01, 2010
Page reviewed: July 01, 2010
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.
file_external