Skip directly to search Skip directly to A to Z list Skip directly to page options Skip directly to site content

Volume 14, Number 5—May 2008

Policy Review

Public Response to Community Mitigation Measures for Pandemic Influenza

Robert J. Blendon*Comments to Author , Lisa M. Koonin†, John M. Benson*, Martin S. Cetron†, William E. Pollard†, Elizabeth W. Mitchell†, Kathleen J. Weldon*, and Melissa J. Herrmann‡
Author affiliations: *Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA; †Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA; ‡International Communications Research, Media, Pennsylvania, USA;

Main Article

Table 6

Responses to questions about potential problems adhering to public health recommendations by health, chronic illness, and disability status*

Question Total 
(n = 1,697) Health status
(n = 196) Excellent/very good/good 
(n = 1,481) Chronic illness
(n = 355) No 
(n = 1,317) Yes 
(n = 323) No
(n = 1,354)
If public health officials recommended, would not be able to take care of sick household member for 7–10 d at home 13 25† 11 16 12 21‡ 10
Do not have someone who could care for you at home if you were sick


If asked to stay home 7–10 days, likely that:
You or a member of your 
household might lose pay and 
have money problems 48 55 48 47 49 49 48
You or a member of your 
household might be unable to get 
the health care or prescription 
drugs that you need 43 55† 40 50§ 40 48 41
You or a member of your 
household might lose your job or 
business as a result of having to 
stay home 27 38† 25 24 28 31 26

*From the Harvard School of Public Health, Pandemic Influenza Survey, 2006. Numbers represent percentage of responses to each question.
†Statistically higher proportion than Excellent/very good/good health status.
‡Statistically higher proportion than those who are not disabled.
§Statistically higher proportion than those who do not have a chronic illness.

Main Article