Volume 15, Number 3—March 2009
Dispatch
Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus in Poultry
Davy Persoons1, Sebastiaan Van Hoorebeke1
, Katleen Hermans, Patrick Butaye, Aart de Kruif, Freddy Haesebrouck, and Jeroen Dewulf
, Katleen Hermans, Patrick Butaye, Aart de Kruif, Freddy Haesebrouck, and Jeroen Dewulf
Table
Comparison of spa type methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolated from pigs and poultry*
| Source | spa type | Composition† |
|---|---|---|
| Pig | t011 | 008 – 16 – 02 – 25 – – – – – 34 – 24 – 25 |
| Pig | t034 | 008 – 16 – 02 – 25 – 02 – 25 – 34 – 24 – 25 |
| Pig | t108 | 008 – 16 – 02 – 25 – – – – – – – 24 – 25 |
| Pig | t567 | 008 – – – 02 – 25 – – – – – – – 24 – 25 |
| Pig | t943 | 008 – 16 – 02 – 25 – – – 25 – – – 24 – 25 |
| Pig | t1254 | 106 – 16 – 02 – 25 – – – – – 34 – 24 – 25 |
| Pig | t1255 | 008 – 16 – – – – – – – – – 34 – 24 – 25 |
| Poultry | t1456 | 008 – 16 – 02 – 25 |
*All spa types isolated from pigs were described in de Neeling AJ, van den Broek MJM, Spalburg EC, van Santen-Verheuvel MG, Dam-Deisz WDC, Boshuizen HC, et al. High prevalence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in pigs. Vet Microbiol. 2007;122:366–72
†Variable number tandem repeat composition in the 3’ end of the spa gene.
Page created: December 07, 2010
Page updated: December 07, 2010
Page reviewed: December 07, 2010
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.
Content Credential