Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link
Volume 15, Number 9—September 2009
Dispatch

Rickettsia parkeri in Amblyomma americanum Ticks, Tennessee and Georgia, USA

Figures
Article Metrics
41
citations of this article
EID Journal Metrics on Scopus
Sara B. Cohen, Michael J. Yabsley, Laurel E. Garrison, James D. Freye, Brett G. Dunlap, John R. Dunn, Daniel G. Mead, Timothy F. Jones, and Abelardo C. MoncayoComments to Author 
Author affiliations: Tennessee Department of Health, Nashville, Tennessee, USA (S.B. Cohen, J.R. Dunn, T.F. Jones, A.C. Moncayo); University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia, USA (M.J. Yabsley, D.G. Mead); Georgia Department of Community Health, Atlanta, Georgia, USA (L.E. Garrison); United States Department of Agriculture, Madison, Tennessee, USA (J.D. Freye, B.G. Dunlap)

Cite This Article

Abstract

To determine the geographic distribution of the newly recognized human pathogen Rickettsia parkeri, we looked for this organism in ticks from Tennessee and Georgia, USA. Using PCR and sequence analysis, we identified R. parkeri in 2 Amblyomma americanum ticks. This rickettsiosis may be underdiagnosed in the eastern United States.

The most commonly reported rickettsial human pathogen in the United States is Rickettsia rickettsii, the causative agent of Rocky Mountain spotted fever (RMSF). First identified in 1937 (1), R. parkeri has been recognized as a human pathogen only since 2004, when it was isolated from an eschar on a serviceman from Virginia (2), although an Ohio patient suspected to have RMSF died of R. parkeri rickettsiosis in 1990 (3). Little is known about the geographic distribution of R. parkeri in the United States or the epidemiology of the disease it causes. The primary vector of R. parkeri is thought to be the Gulf Coast tick (Amblyomma maculatum), and naturally infected Gulf Coast ticks have been reported in numerous southeastern states (4). Experimentally, A. americanum ticks can maintain and transmit R. parkeri (5); thus, this tick species, which is more abundant than A. maculatum and bites humans aggressively (6), might contribute to R. parkeri transmission. To determine the geographic distribution of R. parkeri, we examined ticks collected in Tennessee and Georgia.

The Study

In Georgia, during 2005–2006, residents were encouraged to submit ticks to the state’s Division of Public Health for identification and testing for various tick-borne pathogens. We studied only ticks that had been attached to persons. Ticks were individually homogenized with metal beads and resuspended in 225 μL of phosphate-buffered saline. DNA was extracted from 100 μL of the homogenate by using a QIAamp DNA Micro Kit (QIAGEN Inc, Valencia, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer's instructions. We conducted a nested PCR targeting the 17-kDa gene (7) and used bidirectional sequencing at the Integrated Biotechnology Laboratories (University of Georgia, Athens, GA, USA) to confirm positive results.

In Tennessee, from April 2007 through September 2008, the United States Department of Agriculture, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, Wildlife Services, and the Tennessee Department of Health collected A. americanum and A. maculatum ticks from 31 counties by examining wild animals and dragging flannel sheets through vegetation. Ticks were stored in 100% ethanol and were sent to the Tennessee Department of Health Vector-Borne Diseases Laboratory for identification of species and life stage and detection of pathogens by molecular testing. A PCR targeting the outer membrane protein A (rOmpA) gene of spotted fever group (SGF) rickettsiae was conducted as previously described, using primers Rr190.602n and Rr190.70p (8). To identify the rickettsiae species, we subjected positive samples to a restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) assay by digestion of the amplicons with RsaI (Promega, Madison, WI, USA) and PstI (Fermentas, Glen Burnie, MD, USA) enzymes at 37°C for 2 h. Digested fragments were subjected to electrophoresis on 10% polyacrylamide gels. To confirm species identification, we purified representative positive PCR products with Exosap-It (USB Corporation, Cleveland, OH, USA), sequenced at the Tennessee Department of Health Laboratory Services (Nashville, TN, USA) and entered into the National Center for Biotechnology Information BLAST database (www.blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi).

Of ticks collected in Georgia, 418 A. americanum ticks (237 adults, 180 nymphs, and 1 unknown) and 19 A. maculatum ticks, were submitted for testing. Of these, 1 A. americanum tick (Fayette County, May 2005) and 1 A. maculatum tick (Morgan County, July 2005) were positive for R. parkeri (100% identity with GenBank accession no. U17008).

Of 611 A. americanum and 2 A. maculatum ticks collected in Tennessee, 446 A. americanum (164 adults and 282 nymphs) and 2 A. maculatum adults were individually tested for Rickettsia spp. An additional 103 A. americanum larvae were divided in 10 pools of 4–19 ticks each according to collection site. A single A. americanum adult male (0.2% of total) had a positive RFLP pattern that matched the previously described rOmpA gene pattern of R. parkeri (8). The sequence of this amplicon (532 bp, GenBank accession no. FJ793521) was 99% similar to that of R. parkeri (EU715288). The positive tick had been collected from a coyote in Knox County, Tennessee, in July 2007.

Conclusions

Figure

Thumbnail of Location of ticks, Rickettsia parkeri in ticks, and human cases of rickettsiosis in the United States. Green shading indicates approximate distribution of Amblyomma americanum ticks, which completely overlaps with the known or suspected distribution of A. maculatum. Yellow circles indicate locations where R. parkeri was detected in A. americanum ticks (this study). Red circles indicate locations of confirmed or suspected cases of R. parkeri infection in humans (11).

Figure. Location of ticks, Rickettsia parkeri in ticks, and human cases of rickettsiosis in the United States. Green shading indicates approximate distribution of Amblyomma americanum ticks, which completely overlaps with the known...

We identified R. parkeri in ticks in Tennessee and Georgia. In Tennessee, our identification of only 2 A. maculatum ticks (the primary vector of R. parkeri) supports previous reports that this tick species is uncommon in Tennessee (9). In Georgia, the 19 A. maculatum ticks identified were <5% of the total number of ticks collected in Georgia. In contrast to these low numbers, A. americanum ticks are ubiquitous in high densities throughout the other southeastern states and readily feed on humans (8). Recently, the range of A. americanum ticks has expanded in the United States and now extends from west-central Texas to the Atlantic Coast, encompassing the entire Southeast and parts of the lower Midwest and coastal New England (10). The distribution of A. americanum ticks completely overlaps the suspected distribution of A. maculatum ticks (Figure). The positive A. americanum tick from Tennessee was collected from a free-ranging coyote, and the detected R. parkeri may have been present in the blood meal taken by the tick. However, A. americanum ticks can maintain and transmit R. parkeri infection both transovarially and transtadially (6). R. parkeri has previously been identified in A. maculatum ticks from Georgia (4), but the identification of R. parkeri in A. americanum ticks renews concerns that this tick species may be involved in the natural history of another zoonotic pathogen. Additional study is needed to determine the extent of the role of A. americanum ticks as a natural vector for R. parkeri.

This study raises concerns about the serologic diagnosis of RMSF. R. parkeri may be the etiologic agent of some rickettsiosis cases in Tennessee and Georgia that have been misdiagnosed as RMSF. Because reliable clinical tests specific for different SFG rickettsiae are not readily available, several different rickettsioses may be serologically cross-reactive, leading to misdiagnosis of RMSF (1114). Reliable diagnosis requires PCR or culture of biopsy specimens from eschars, when present (15). Additional studies characterizing SFG rickettsioses, including development of rickettsial species–specific clinical tests, will assist in attributing rickettsiosis to R. rickettsii, R. parkeri, or other SFG rickettsial infections.

Ms Cohen completed this work as part of an Emerging Infectious Diseases Laboratory Training Fellowship at the Tennessee Department of Health. She is entering a doctoral degree program at Cornell University to pursue her interests in infectious disease.

Top

Acknowledgment

This research was supported by an appointment to the Emerging Infectious Diseases Fellowship Program administered by the Association of Public Health Laboratories and funded by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Top

References

  1. Parker  RR, Hohls  GM, Cox  GW, David  GE. Observations on an infectious agent from Amblyomma maculatum. Public Health Rep. 1939;54:14824.
  2. Paddock  CD, Sumner  JW, Comer  JA, Zaki  SR, Goldsmith  CS, Goddard  J, Rickettsia parkeri: a newly recognized cause of spotted fever rickettsiosis in the United States. Clin Infect Dis. 2004;38:80511. DOIPubMed
  3. Ralph  D, Pretzman  C, Daugherty  N, Poetter  K. Genetic relationships among the members of the family Rickettsiaceae as shown by DNA restriction fragment polymorphism analysis. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1990;590:54152. DOIPubMed
  4. Sumner  JW, Durden  LA, Goddard  J, Stromdahl  EY, Clark  KL, Reeves  WK, Gulf Coast ticks (Amblyomma maculatum) and Rickettsia parkeri, United States. Emerg Infect Dis. 2007;13:7513.PubMed
  5. Goddard  J. Experimental infection of lone star ticks, Amblyomma americanum (L.), with Rickettsia parkeri and exposure of guinea pigs to the agent. J Med Entomol. 2003;40:6869.PubMed
  6. Merten  HA, Durden  LA. A state-by-state survey of ticks recorded from humans in the United States. J Vector Ecol. 2000;25:10213.PubMed
  7. Labruna  MB, Whitworth  T, Bouyer  DH, McBride  JW, Camargo  LMA, Camargo  EP, Rickettsia bellii and Rickettsia amblyommii in Amblyomma ticks from the State of Rondonia, Western Amazon, Brazil. J Med Entomol. 2004;41:107381.PubMed
  8. Eremeeva  M, Yu  X, Raoult  D. Differentiation among spotted fever group rickettsiae species by analysis of restriction fragment length polymorphism of PCR-amplified DNA. J Clin Microbiol. 1994;32:80310.PubMed
  9. Durden  LA, Kollars  TM Jr. An annotated list of the ticks (Acari: Ixodoidea) of Tennessee, with records of four exotic species for the United States. Bulletin of the Society of Vector Ecology. 1992;17:12531.
  10. Childs  JE, Paddock  CD. The ascendancy of Amblyomma americanum as a vector of pathogens affecting humans in the United States. Annu Rev Entomol. 2003;48:30737. DOIPubMed
  11. Paddock  CD, Finley  RW, Wright  CS, Robinson  HN, Schrodt  BJ, Lane  CC, Rickettsia parkeri rickettsiosis and its clinical distinction from Rocky Mountain spotted fever. Clin Infect Dis. 2008;47:118896. DOIPubMed
  12. Apperson  CS, Engber  B, Nicholson  WL, Mead  DG, Engel  J, Yabsley  MJ, Tick-borne diseases in North Carolina: is “Rickettsia amblyommii” a possible cause of rickettsiosis reported as Rocky Mountain spotted fever? Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2008;8:597606. DOIPubMed
  13. Raoult  D, Paddock  CD. Rickettsia parkeri infection and other spotted fevers in the United States. N Engl J Med. 2005;353:6267. DOIPubMed
  14. Parola  P, Paddock  CD, Raoult  D. Tick-borne rickettsioses around the world: emerging diseases challenging old concepts. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2005;18:71956. DOIPubMed
  15. Whitman  TJ, Richards  AL, Paddock  CD, Tamminga  CL, Sniezek  PJ, Jiang  J, Rickettsia parkeri infection after tick bite, Virginia. Emerg Infect Dis. 2007;13:3346. DOIPubMed

Top

Figure

Top

Cite This Article

DOI: 10.3201/eid1509.090330

Table of Contents – Volume 15, Number 9—September 2009

Comments

Please use the form below to submit correspondence to the authors or contact them at the following address:

Abelardo C. Moncayo, Tennessee Department of Health, 630 Hart Ln, Nashville, TN 37216, USA;

Send To

10000 character(s) remaining.

Top

Page created: December 07, 2010
Page updated: December 07, 2010
Page reviewed: December 07, 2010
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.
file_external