Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link
Volume 16, Number 10—October 2010

Effectiveness of Personal Protective Equipment and Oseltamivir Prophylaxis during Avian Influenza A (H7N7) Epidemic, the Netherlands, 2003

Dennis E. te BeestComments to Author , Michiel van Boven, Marian E.H. Bos, Arjan Stegeman, and Marion P.G. Koopmans
Author affiliations: Author affiliations: Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands (D.E. te Beest, M.E.H. Bos, A. Stegeman); National Institute of Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, the Netherlands (D.E. te Beest, M. van Boven, M.P.G. Koopmans)

Main Article

Table 1

Number of infections and use of oseltamivir prophylaxis during avian influenza A (H7N7) epidemic, on the basis of combined conjunctivitis and serology-based case definition, the Netherlands, 2003*

Oseltamivir use No. persons
No. visits
Infected Total By infected persons Total†
Not prescribed 4 16 6 26
Prescribed but not used during visit 9 34 17 64
Prescribed and used consistently 4 41 6 85
Prescribed and used inconsistently 2 18 7 39
Prescribed and consistency of use unknown 2 7 2 18
Prescribed but period of use unknown 2 29 5 64

*Data resulted from a survey conducted among poultry workers after the epidemic.
†Because visits were classified into groups, persons may be in 2 categories (prescribed/not used and prescribed/used).

Main Article

Page created: September 07, 2011
Page updated: September 07, 2011
Page reviewed: September 07, 2011
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.