Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link
Volume 17, Number 10—October 2011

Clinical Implications of Azole Resistance in Aspergillus fumigatus, the Netherlands, 2007–2009

Jan W.M. van der LindenComments to Author , Eveline Snelders, Greetje A. Kampinga, Bart J.A. Rijnders, Eva Mattsson, Yvette J. Debets-Ossenkopp, Ed J. Kuijper, Frank H. Van Tiel, Willem J.G. Melchers, Paul E. Verweij, and Kuijper

Author affiliations: Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (J.W.M. van der Linden, E. Snelders, W.J.G. Melchers, P.E. Verweij); Groningen University Medical Centre, Groningen, the Netherlands (G.A. Kampinga); Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, the Netherlands (B.J.A. Rijnders); Utrecht University Medical Centre, Utrecht, the Netherlands (E. Mattsson); Vrije University Medical Centre, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (Y.J. Debets-Ossenkopp); Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands (E.J. Kuijper); Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, the Netherlands (F.H. van Tiel)

Cite This Article


CME Logo

Medscape, LLC is pleased to provide online continuing medical education (CME) for this journal article, allowing clinicians the opportunity to earn CME credit.

This activity has been planned and implemented in accordance with the Essential Areas and policies of the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education through the joint sponsorship of Medscape, LLC and Emerging Infectious Diseases. Medscape, LLC is accredited by the ACCME to provide continuing medical education for physicians.

Medscape, LLC designates this Journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 Credit(s)TM. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity.

All other clinicians completing this activity will be issued a certificate of participation. To participate in this journal CME activity: (1) review the learning objectives and author disclosures; (2) study the education content; (3) take the post-test with a 70% minimum passing score and complete the evaluation at; (4) view/print certificate.

Release date: September 22, 2011; Expiration date: September 22, 2012

Learning Objectives

Upon completion of this activity, participants will be able to:

  • Describe the prevalence of itraconazole resistance in clinical A. fumigatus isolates on the basis of a prospective, nationwide, multicenter surveillance study in the Netherlands

  • Describe risk factors for development of itraconazole resistance in A. fumigatus isolates on the basis of that study

  • Describe outcomes associated with development of itraconazole resistance in A. fumigatus isolates on the basis of that study


Nancy Mannikko, PhD, Technical Writer/Editor, Emerging Infectious Diseases. Disclosure: Nancy Mannikko, PhD, has disclosed no relevant financial relationships.


Laurie Barclay, MD, freelance writer and reviewer, Medscape, LLC. Disclosure: Laurie Barclay, MD, has disclosed no relevant financial relationships.


Disclosures: Jan W.M. van der Linden, MD; Eveline Snelders, MSc; Greetje A. Kampinga, MD, PhD; Bart J.A. Rijnders, MD, PhD; Eva Mattsson, MD, PhD; Yvette J. Debets-Ossenkopp, MD, PhD; Ed J. Kuijper, MD, PhD; Frank H. Van Tiel, MD, PhD; and Willem J.G. Melchers, PhD, have disclosed no relevant financial relationships. Paul E. Verweij, MD, PhD, has disclosed the following relevant financial relationships: served as an advisor or consultant for Merck & Co., Inc.; Astellas Pharma, Inc.; Gilead Sciences, Inc.; served as a speaker or a member of a speakers bureau for Merck & Co., Inc.; Gilead Sciences, Inc.; Pfizer Inc.; Cephalon, Inc.; received grants for clinical research from Merck & Co., Inc.; Gilead Sciences, Inc.; Pfizer Inc.



The prevalence and spread of azole resistance in clinical Aspergillus fumigatus isolates in the Netherlands are currently unknown. Therefore, we performed a prospective nationwide multicenter surveillance study to determine the effects of resistance on patient management strategies and public health. From June 2007 through January 2009, all clinical Aspergillus spp. isolates were screened for itraconazole resistance. In total, 2,062 isolates from 1,385 patients were screened; the prevalence of itraconazole resistance in A. fumigatus in our patient cohort was 5.3% (range 0.8%–9.5%). Patients with a hematologic or oncologic disease were more likely to harbor an azole-resistant isolate than were other patient groups (p<0.05). Most patients (64.0%) from whom a resistant isolate was identified were azole naive, and the case-fatality rate of patients with azole-resistant invasive aspergillosis was 88.0%. Our study found that multiazole resistance in A. fumigatus is widespread in the Netherlands and is associated with a high death rate for patients with invasive aspergillosis.

Clinical Implications of Azole Resistance in Aspergillus fumigatus, the Netherlands, 2007–2009

Azoles are the primary class of antifungal agents used for evidence-based treatment and prevention of Aspergillus spp. diseases (1). Azoles are the only class of mold-active agents that can be used orally, and voriconazole and posaconazole have improved the survival of patients at risk for invasive aspergillosis (25). However, recent reports describe the emergence of acquired resistance of Aspergillus spp. to azole compounds (616). Azole resistance may develop in patients with cavitary lung lesions, such as aspergilloma, or in patients with allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis who are treated with mold-active azoles, most notably, itraconazole (7,17). In these patients, resistance is most commonly observed in Aspergillus fumigatus, and the isolates may be resistant to only itraconazole (ITZ) or exhibit a multi-azole– or pan-azole–resistant phenotype. The phenotype depends on the underlying resistance mechanism, which commonly involves point mutations in the cyp51A-gene, the target for antifungal azoles (68,10,11,1721). A wide range of mutations was found in azole-resistant Aspergillus spp. isolates that were cultured from clinical samples from patients treated with azoles, and individual azole-resistant Aspergillus spp. colonies harbored different resistance mechanisms (7).

In the Netherlands, a highly dominant resistance mechanism was found in isolates from epidemiologically-unrelated patients (6,9). The dominant resistance mechanism consisted of a substitution of leucine for histidine at codon 98 of the cyp51A-gene in combination with a 34-bp tandem repeat in the promoter region of this gene (TR/L98H) (6,11). The corresponding phenotype showed resistance to itraconazole and intermediate susceptibility or resistance to voriconazole, posaconazole, or both (6,20). TR/L98H isolates were recovered from azole-treated and azole-naive patients with Aspergillus spp. diseases (6,9,10,2224). Azole resistance may be associated with a high probability of azole treatment failure, a possibility that is supported by preclinical evidence (7,9,2226).

On the basis of the above-mentioned observations, we hypothesized that resistance might have emerged as a consequence of exposure of A. fumigatus to azole fungicides in the environment (27). Preliminary studies indeed showed that A. fumigatus isolates harboring TR/L98H could be recovered from the environment (28,29). Furthermore, TR/L98H isolates were cross-resistant to certain azole fungicides (27,28).

The spread and prevalence of azole resistance in clinical A. fumigatus isolates are unknown. Various studies in the Netherlands that have analyzed Aspergillus spp. culture collections indicate that the prevalence ranges from 1.8% to 12.8% (6,30,31). Obtaining insight into the spread of azole resistance is essential for determining the implications of resistance for patient management strategies and public health. We therefore conducted a prospective surveillance study in 7 university medical centers in the Netherlands.


Study Design

All Aspergillus spp. isolates cultured from clinical samples that were processed in the 7 university medical microbiology laboratories were routinely screened for the presence of azole resistance, irrespective of the clinical relevance of the culture result. The University Medical Centers are located in 7 different cities in the Netherlands, and clinical isolates were screened during a 20-month period (June 2007–January 2009). Patient data were recorded in a Web-based database. An online questionnaire was completed for every collected isolate. The questionnaire included questions about isolate characteristics (species identification and date of isolation) and patient characteristics (age, sex, and underlying disease).

Screening ITZ Agar Slants

Aspergillus spp. colonies that grew in primary cultures were subcultured on Sabouraud agar slants supplemented with 4 mg/L of ITZ and incubated at 35°C–37°C. The colonies’ ability to grow on the ITZ agar slants was assessed after 48 hours of incubation. For every isolate that was able to grow on the ITZ agar slants (ITZ positive), the primary culture isolate was sent to the Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Center for further analysis. Isolates that failed to grow on the ITZ agar slants (ITZ negative) were not analyzed. However, for all isolates that were screened, the online questionnaire was completed. At the screening sites, the Aspergillus spp. isolates were identified to species level by conventional methods, i.e., thermotolerance and macroscopic and microscopic assessment of culture morphologic features.

Proficiency Testing

The ITZ agar slants were prepared at the Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Center and distributed to the other medical microbiology laboratories. Each center was provided with a protocol and a set of 6 A. fumigatus isolates. Four isolates were resistant to ITZ (MIC >16 mg/L), while 2 were susceptible (ITZ MICs 0.125 and 0.25 mg/L). The centers were blinded for the resistance profiles and were asked to determine the ability of the isolates to grow on the ITZ agar slants.

Analysis of ITZ-positive Isolates

Every ITZ-positive isolate was analyzed for certain phenotypic and genotypic features. The phenotypic analysis included the morphologic features of the isolate and susceptibility testing according to established standards (32) by using a broth microdilution format. MICs were determined for ITZ, voriconazole, and posaconazole. Genotypic analyses were performed by complete sequencing of the cyp51A gene by using the reference sequence of strain no. AF338659 from GenBank.

For the confirmed ITZ-positive isolates, additional patient data that included azole exposure <3 months before the date of isolation of the resistant isolate and the presence of Aspergillus spp. disease were requested from the treating physician. Patients with cancer and invasive aspergillosis were classified according to the revised European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer/Mycoses Study Group definitions (33). In addition, patient data were collected on treatment and outcome 3 months after diagnosis.

Statistical Analysis

Statistical analyses were performed by using SPSS version 17.0 (IBM, Somers, NY, USA). Analyses consisted of χ2 tests and a calculation of the κ coefficient.


Proficiency Testing

Four of 6 control A. fumigatus isolates were resistant to ITZ and expected to grow on the ITZ agar slants, while the remaining 2 isolates were ITZ susceptible and should not grow on the ITZ agar slants. The 4 isolates with the azole-resistant phenotype harbored the TR/L98H resistance mechanism. For 3 ITZ-positive and the 2 ITZ-negative isolates, 100% agreement was found between the 7 centers. For 1 ITZ-positive isolate, the assessment of growth on the ITZ agar slant was incorrect from 3 centers; this isolate was a slowly sporulating A. fumigatus isolate. The κ coefficient calculated to assess the reproducibility of the method was 0.81 (34).


During June 2007 through January 2009, we screened 2,062 Aspergillus spp. isolates from 1,385 patients for azole resistance using the ITZ agar slants. Most isolates were identified as A. fumigatus (1,792/2,062 [86.9%]) (Table 1). For 50 (2.5%) Aspergillus spp. isolates, species identification was not done. Most Aspergillus spp. isolates were isolated from respiratory samples; 1,461 of 2,062 (70.9%) were from sputum cultures, and 60 (2.9%) were from cultures derived from clinical specimens obtained from sterile sites (i.e., tissue specimens obtained through invasive procedures or at autopsy) (Table 1).

Ninety isolates were able to grow on the ITZ agar slants and were sent to the Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Center for further analyses. In vitro susceptibility testing showed that for 84 (93.3%) of 90 ITZ-positive isolates, the MIC of ITZ was >2 mg/L, which was considered resistant (20). Most ITZ-positive isolates also exhibited non–wild-type susceptibility profiles to voriconazole and posaconazole. A resistant phenotype for voriconazole (>2 mg/L) and posaconazole (>0.5 mg/L) was observed in 67/84 (79.8%) and 14/84 (16.7%) of ITZ-positive isolates, respectively. An intermediate susceptibility profile (2 mg/L for voriconazole and 0.5 mg/L for posaconazole) was observed in 12/84 (14.3%) and 44/84 (52.4%) of ITZ-positive isolates, respectively (Table 2) (20).

Sequence-based identification classified 82 ITZ-positive isolates as A. fumigatus and 2 as A. niger. Sequencing of the cyp51A gene showed a substitution of leucine for histidine at codon 98 in combination with a 34-bp tandem repeat in the gene promoter in 74 (90.2%) of 82 resistant A. fumigatus isolates (Table 2). Other cyp51A mutations were found in 3 isolates (substitutions G54W, P216L, and F219I) (Table 2) (7,8,20,21). In 1 isolate, a series of mutations was found, and in the remaining 4 azole-resistant A. fumigatus isolates (4.9%), no mutations were found in the cyp51A gene (8). Because A. niger has no known resistance mechanisms, the 2 azole-resistant A. niger isolates were not further analyzed.

Prevalence of Azole Resistance

Figure 1

Thumbnail of Number of screened Aspergillus spp. isolates per month (bars) and prevalence (%) of azole resistance (line), the Netherlands, 2007–2009. ITZ, itraconazole.

Figure 1. Number of screened Aspergillus spp. isolates per month (bars) and prevalence (%) of azole resistance (line), the Netherlands, 2007–2009. ITZ, itraconazole.

Figure 2

Thumbnail of Prevalence (%) of azole-resistant Aspergillus fumigatus infections in university medical centers, the Netherlands, 2007–2009.

Figure 2. Prevalence (%) of azole-resistant Aspergillus fumigatus infections in university medical centers, the Netherlands, 2007–2009.

A median of 100 isolates were screened each month, with a range of 78–140 isolates per month. The total number of screened clinical isolates per center ranged from 130 to 449 and were recovered from 84 to 238 patients. The collection of isolates over the study period and the distribution of the recovery of resistant isolates are shown in Figure 1. Overall, 82 (4.6%) of 1,792 screened A. fumigatus isolates were azole resistant. The per-patient analysis showed a prevalence of 5.3%. Figure 2 shows the prevalence of resistance in A. fumigatus per center. The prevalence of azole resistance in A. niger was 3.8%. No seasonal variation was observed.

Patient Characteristics

The screened A. fumigatus isolates were cultured from 1,192 patients, while other Aspergillus spp. isolates were recovered from 193 patients. Among the patients who harbored A. fumigatus isolates, the predominant underlying diseases were cystic fibrosis (382/1,192 [32.1%]) and other pulmonary diseases (265/1,192 [22.2%]) Almost 12% (138/1,192) of the A. fumigatus isolates were from patients who had hematologic/oncologic diseases. The distribution of underlying diseases is shown in Table 3.

Characteristics of Patients with Azole-Resistant Isolates

The 82 confirmed ITZ-resistant A. fumigatus isolates were recovered from 63 patients. The patients’ ages ranged from 1 to 85 years, with a mean age of 48.9 years. The sex distribution was equal.

Overall, the distribution of underlying diseases in patients with an ITZ-resistant isolate was similar to that observed in the group with ITZ-susceptible isolates, with 1 exception. In the group of patients with ITZ-resistant isolates, significantly more patients had hematologic/oncologic diseases than in the group that harbored ITZ-susceptible isolates (13/63 [20.6%] and 125/1,129 [11.1%], respectively; p<0.05; Table 3).

Aspergillus disease caused by an ITZ-resistant isolate was diagnosed in 23 patients (36%). Invasive aspergillosis was diagnosed in 8 patients (13%), 6 with confirmed and 2 with probable cases (Table 4). Four of these patients were azole naive, and 1 patient had been previously treated with fluconazole, which has no activity against Aspergillus species. All A. fumigatus isolates from patients with azole-resistant invasive aspergillosis harbored the TR/L98H resistance mechanism (Table 4). All 5 patients who were treated with voriconazole monotherapy died within 3 months of receiving a positive culture result. For 3 patients, voriconazole therapy was switched to another class of antifungal compounds, i.e., echinocandin, polyene, or both, but only 1 of those 3 patients survived. Overall, 7 (87.5%) of 8 patients with azole-resistant aspergillosis died within 3 months (Table 4).

Noninvasive Aspergillus spp. disease with an ITZ-resistant isolate was diagnosed in 15 patients. Five patients had cystic fibrosis and allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis. Six patients had an aspergilloma; of these patients, 2 were immunocompromised, 1 because of AIDS and 1 because of Job syndrome. Three patients sought treatment for otomycosis; 1 patient had Aspergillus spp. sinusitis. Data on previous exposure to azoles were available for 14 patients with noninvasive Aspergillus spp. disease; and 9 (64.2%) of these patients were azole naive. The TR/L98H mutation was the dominant resistance mechanism, because it was present in 12 (80%) of 15 isolates. Overall, 14 (64.3%) of 22 patients with azole-resistant Aspergillus spp. disease and known status of azole exposure were azole naive at the time the resistant isolate was cultured.


Azole resistance is widespread in clinical A. fumigatus isolates in the Netherlands, and resistant isolates were found at all participating university medical centers. The overall prevalence was 5.3%, which is in a similar range as observed in the fungus culture collection of the Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Center (6). However, the prevalence varied widely between the centers, with 1 center showing azole resistance in 10 (9.5%) of 105 patients with a positive Aspergillus spp. culture. In a previous study, we reported a resistance prevalence of 12.8% among A. fumigatus isolates sent to our department by other hospitals in the Netherlands (6). This higher resistance rate may have been due to a different selection of isolates. In this study, all Aspergillus spp. isolates cultured in the participating laboratories were screened for resistance, irrespective of their clinical relevance, while in our previous study the isolates that were sent to Nijmegen were from patients with Aspergillus spp. diseases for whom antifungal therapy was not successful (6).

Two other studies have investigated the prevalence of azole resistance in Aspergillus spp. in the Netherlands. One study investigated a collection of 170 clinical A. fumigatus isolates recovered from 114 patients from 21 different medical centers in 1945–1998 (30). Three (1.8%) isolates were resistant to ITZ and were later found to harbor the TR/L98H resistance mechanism. These were the first TR/L98H isolates recovered in the Netherlands (6). Another study investigated the prevalence of azole-resistant Aspergillus spp. isolates in the Netherlands by using a collection of 209 unselected clinical A. fumigatus isolates obtained over a 6-month period in 2005 (31). Only 4 azole-resistant isolates were found, which corresponds with a prevalence of 1.9% (31). The low prevalence may be because of the methods used. We used ITZ-containing agar-slants to select for resistant isolates, which enables detection of resistant colonies even in the presence of multiple azole-susceptible colonies. Although Klaassen et al. (31) did not explain how isolates were obtained, azole-resistant colonies could have been missed if regular culture media were used (22,31). A κ coefficient of 0.81 indicates that screening for azole resistance by using agar supplemented with ITZ is a highly reproducible method and appears to be a feasible approach for screening for azole resistance and for surveillance studies (34).

Most (74/82 [90.2%]) of the azole-resistant isolates in our study were found to possess the TR/L98H mutation in the cyp51A-gene, which is a similar proportion as reported previously (6). Previous studies have suggested that the probability of 2 genomic changes developing during azole therapy is highly unlikely and that exposure of A. fumigatus to azoles in the environment may be a possible route of resistance development (6,27,28). A. fumigatus isolates harboring the TR/L98H resistance mechanism were recovered from the environment and were genetically related to TR/L98H-containing clinical isolates (28). This mode of resistance development implies that previous exposure of patients to azole compounds is not a prerequisite. Indeed, our study shows that 64% of patients with an azole-resistant isolate have no history of previous azole exposure during the 3 months before culturing the isolate. This finding supports the proposed environmental route of resistance development.

The prevalence and spread of TR/L98H in A. fumigatus in other countries are largely unknown. A recent study by Mortensen et al. showed that 8% of environmental A. fumigatus isolates in Denmark harbored the TR/L98H resistance mechanism, which indicates that TR/L98H may be spreading (29). Because in vitro susceptibility testing of A. fumigatus is not routinely performed in most laboratories, international surveillance studies are warranted.

Most TR/L98H isolates were resistant to voriconazole (79%), but a broad range of MICs was observed that varied from 1 mg/L to 16 mg/L. Reasons for this variation remain unclear. TR/L98H isolates may have developed additional mutations that confer voriconazole resistance but that are not associated with the cyp51A gene. Another possibility is that the tandem repeat, which serves as a transcriptional enhancer, causes varying levels of up-regulation of the cyp51A gene. This up-regulation may result in differences in the voriconazole phenotype. More research is needed to gain insight into this phenomenon.

The outcome for patients with azole-resistant invasive aspergillosis was dismal, with a mortality rate of 88%. None of the patients who were treated with voriconazole monotherapy were alive at 3 months; of 3 patients whose treatment was switched to another class of antifungal drugs, only 1 survived. A critical issue for future study is whether azole resistance is a determinant of the poor clinical outcome of patients with azole-resistant aspergillosis. A previously reported case series of patients with primarily noninvasive Aspergillus spp. disease indicated that azole resistance was associated with treatment failure (7). However, establishing a relation between resistance and treatment outcome in invasive aspergillosis is complex because of the multiple factors that contribute to treatment outcome, including underlying disease, drug exposure, timing and accuracy of diagnosis, and timing of antifungal therapy. Furthermore, data are lacking on the effects of in vitro susceptibility patterns of Aspergillus spp. isolates on treatment outcomes. This relationship was recently described by using Aspergillus spp. isolates recovered from patients enrolled in the Transplant-Associated Infection Surveillance Network (35). The 12-week mortality rate for patients with culture-positive confirmed or probable invasive aspergillosis was 53% (35). For patients with azole-susceptible A. fumigatus aspergillosis treated with voriconazole, the proportion of deaths was 48% (J.W. Baddley, pers. comm.).

In a study by Herbrecht et al. (2), a subset of 51 modified-intent-to-treat patients with definite (43 patients) or probable (8 patients) invasive aspergillosis had a positive culture with A. fumigatus with a wild-type susceptibility. The all-cause proportion of deaths in this group at 12 weeks was 39% (P. Troke, pers. comm.). Both these analyses show a lower death rate than observed in our study, which indicates that azole resistance may be associated with a poor outcome. The median MIC of voriconazole in the 8 patients with azole-resistant invasive aspergillosis was 4 mg/L, which is resistant (20). Effects of an elevated voriconazole MIC on treatment outcome were supported by preclinical experimental results, in which mice infected with an A. fumigatus isolate that had a voriconazole MIC of 2 mg/L required a 2-fold higher voriconazole dose than did mice infected with a wild-type isolate to achieve a comparable survival rate (25).

The low survival rate of patients whose treatment was switched from azole therapy to nonazole therapy could be due to the delay of initiation of treatment with an effective alternative drug or to the presence of cerebral disease. Overall, the number of patients with azole-resistant aspergillosis in our study was low, and additional studies are needed to confirm the relation between azole resistance and treatment failure.

Because specimens from patients with invasive aspergillosis seldom produce positive cultures, our study underestimates the number of azole-resistant cases. The diagnosis of azole resistance in culture-negative cases is a challenge because current biomarkers, such as galactomannan and 1,3-β-D-glucan, do not enable species identification, let alone in vitro susceptibility testing. Molecular tools have been shown to be able to detect mutations associated with azole resistance directly in tissue (36) or in respiratory specimens (37) but are not yet suitable for use in routine patient care. Molecular tools need to be developed that enable the rapid detection of multiple mutations, although only known mutations can be detected.

Our study shows that azole resistance in clinical A. fumigatus isolates is widespread in the Netherlands and that the survival rate of patients with azole-resistant invasive aspergillosis is low. The dominance of the TR/L98H resistance mechanism and the high proportion of resistant isolates recovered from azole-naive patients support an environmental route of resistance development. We believe that continued surveillance is required in the Netherlands, as well as routine in vitro susceptibility testing of A. fumigatus isolates obtained from patients with Aspergillus spp. disease. International surveillance programs are also warranted to estimate the size of the emerging problem of azole resistance. Furthermore, the first-line therapy of patients with invasive aspergillosis should be reconsidered, at least in those centers with a high prevalence of azole resistance.

Dr van der Linden is a medical doctor and researcher in the departments of Medical Microbiology and Pediatrics at the Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands. He is interested in invasive fungal diseases, especially the epidemiology of azole-resistant Aspergillus diseases.



We thank H.A.L. van der Lee for technical support, M.L. van der Vusse for collection of additional patient data, A.R.T. Donders for statistical support, and J.W. Baddley and P. Troke for providing additional information.

This work was supported by a research grant from the Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development (125010006).



  1. Walsh  TJ, Anaissie  EJ, Denning  DW, Herbrecht  R, Kontoyiannis  DP, Marr  KA, Treatment of aspergillosis: clinical practice guidelines of the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clin Infect Dis. 2008;46:32760. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Herbrecht  R, Denning  DW, Patterson  TF, Bennett  JE, Greene  RE, Oestmann  JW, Voriconazole versus amphotericin B for primary therapy of invasive aspergillosis. N Engl J Med. 2002;347:40815. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Walsh  TJ, Pappas  P, Winston  DJ, Lazarus  HM, Petersen  F, Raffalli  J, Voriconazole compared with liposomal amphotericin B for empirical antifungal therapy in patients with neutropenia and persistent fever. N Engl J Med. 2002;346:22534. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Schwartz  S, Ruhnke  M, Ribaud  P, Corey  L, Driscoll  T, Cornely  OA, Improved outcome in central nervous system aspergillosis, using voriconazole treatment. Blood. 2005;106:26415. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Slobbe  L, Polinder  S, Doorduijn  JK, Lugtenburg  PJ, el Barzouhi  A, Steyerberg  EW, Outcome and medical costs of patients with invasive aspergillosis and acute myelogenous leukemia-myelodysplastic syndrome treated with intensive chemotherapy: an observational study. Clin Infect Dis. 2008;47:150712. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Snelders  E, van der Lee  HAL, Kuijpers  J, Rijs  AJMM, Varga  J, Samson  RA, Emergence of azole resistance in Aspergillus fumigatus and spread of a single resistance mechanism. PLoS Med. 2008;5:e219. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Howard  SJ, Cerar  D, Anderson  MJ, Albarrag  A, Fisher  MC, Pasqualotto  AC, Frequency and evolution of azole resistance in Aspergillus fumigatus associated with treatment failure. Emerg Infect Dis. 2009;15:106876. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Bueid  A, Howard  SJ, Moore  CB, Richardson  MD, Harrison  E, Bowyer  P, Azole antifungal resistance in Aspergillus fumigatus: 2008 and 2009. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2010;65:21168. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Warris  A, Weemaes  CM, Verweij  PE. Multidrug resistance in Aspergillus fumigatus. N Engl J Med. 2002;347:21734. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Verweij  PE, Mellado  E, Melchers  WJ. Multiple-triazole-resistant aspergillosis. N Engl J Med. 2007;356:14813. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Mellado  E, Garcia-Effron  G, Alcázar-Fuoli  L, Melchers  WJ, Verweij  PE, Cuenca-Estrella  M, A new Aspergillus fumigatus resistance mechanism conferring in vitro cross-resistance to azole antifungals involves a combination of cyp51A alterations. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2007;51:1897904. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Lagrou  K, De Vleeschouwer  J, Meerseman  W, Dupont  L, Verleden  G, Melchers  WJG, Triazole resistance among 229 clinical Aspergillus fumigatus isolates. Presented at: 3rd Advances Against Aspergillosis Conference; Miami, Florida, USA; January 16–19, 2008. Abstract 33.
  13. Arendrup  MC, Perkhofer  S, Howard  SJ, Garcia-Effron  G, Vishukumar  A, Perlin  D, Establishing in vitro–in vivo correlations for Aspergillus fumigatus: the challenge of azoles versus echinocandins. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2008;52:350411. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Chryssanthou  E. In vitro susceptibility of respiratory isolates of Aspergillus species to itraconazole and amphotericin B acquired resistance to itraconazole. Scand J Infect Dis. 1997;29:50912. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Dannaoui  E, Borel  E, Monier  MF, Piens  MA, Picot  S, Persat  F. Acquired itraconazole resistance in Aspergillus fumigatus. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2001;47:33340. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Denning  DW, Radford  SA, Oakley  KL, Hall  L, Johnson  EM, Warnock  DW. Correlation between in-vitro susceptibility testing to itraconazole and in-vivo outcome of Aspergillus fumigatus infection. J Antimicrob Chemother. 1997;40:40114. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Chen  J, Li  H, Li  R, Bu  D, Wan  Z. Mutations in the cyp51A gene and susceptibility to itraconazole in Aspergillus fumigatus serially isolated from a patient with lung aspergilloma. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2005;55:317. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Mellado  E, Garcia-Effron  G, Alcazar-Fuoli  L, Cuenca-Estrella  M, Rodriguez-Tudela  JL. Substitutions at methionine 220 in the 14alpha-sterol demethylase (Cyp51A) of Aspergillus fumigatus are responsible for resistance in vitro to azole antifungal drugs. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2004;48:274750. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Diaz-Guerra  TM, Mellado  E, Cuenca-Estrella  M, Rodriguez-Tudela  JL. A point mutation in the 14alpha-sterol demethylase gene cyp51A contributes to itraconazole resistance in Aspergillus fumigatus. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2003;47:11204. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Verweij  PE, Howard  SJ, Melchers  WJG, Denning  DW. Azole resistance in Aspergillus: proposed nomenclature and breakpoints. Drug Resist Updat. 2009;12:1417. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Snelders  E. Karawajczyk, Schaftenaar G, Verweij PE, Melchers WJ. Azole resistance profile of amino acid changes in Aspergillus fumigatus cyp51A based on protein homology modeling. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2010;54:242530. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. van Leer-Buter  C, Takes  RP, Hebeda  KM, Melchers  WJ, Verweij  PE. Aspergillosis–and a misleading sensitivity result. Lancet. 2007;370:102. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. van der Linden  JW, Jansen  RR, Bresters  D, Visser  CE, Geerlings  SE, Kuijper  EJ, Azole resistant central nervous system aspergillosis. Clin Infect Dis. 2009;48:11113. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Hodiamont  CJ, Dolman  KM, ten Berge  RJM, Melchers  WJ, Verweij  PE, Pajkrt  D. Multiple-azole-resistant Aspergillus fumigatus osteomyelitis in a patient with chronic granulomatous disease successfully treated with long-term oral posaconazole and surgery. Med Mycol. 2009;47:21720. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Mavridou  E, Brüggemann  RJ, Melchers  WJ, Verweij  PE, Mouton  JW. Impact of cyp51A mutations on the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of voriconazole in a murine model of disseminated aspergillosis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2010;54:475864. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Mavridou  E, Brüggemann  RJ, Melchers  WJ, Mouton  JW, Verweij  PE. Efficacy of posaconazole against three clinical Aspergillus fumigatus isolates with mutations in the cyp51A gene. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2010;54:8605. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Verweij  PE, Snelders  E, Kema  GH, Mellado  E, Melchers  WJ. Azole resistance in Aspergillus fumigatus: a side-effect of environmental fungicide use? Lancet Infect Dis. 2009;9:78995. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Snelders  E, Huis in ‘t Veld  RAG, Rijs  AJJM, Kema  GHJ, Melchers  WJ, Verweij  PE. Possible environmental origin of resistance of Aspergillus fumigatus to medical triazoles. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2009;75:40537. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Mortensen  KL, Mellado  E, Lass-Flörl  C, Rodriguez-Tudela  JL, Johansen  HK, Arendrup  MC. Environmental study of azole-resistant Aspergillus fumigatus and other aspergilli in Austria, Denmark, and Spain. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2010;54:45459. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Verweij  PE, Te Dorsthorst  DT, Rijs  AJ, De Vries-Hospers  HG, Meis  JF. Nationwide survey of in vitro activities of itraconazole and voriconazole against clinical Aspergillus fumigatus isolates cultured between 1945 and 1998. J Clin Microbiol. 2002;40:264850. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Klaassen  CH, de Valk  HA, Curfs-Breuker  IM, Meis  JF. Novel mixed-format real-time PCR assay to detect mutations conferring resistance to triazoles in Aspergillus fumigatus and prevalence of multi-triazole resistance among clinical isolates in the Netherlands. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2010;65:9015. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. Reference method for broth dilution antifungal susceptibility testing of filamentous fungi; approved standard, 2nd ed. CLSI document M38–A2. Wayne (PA): The Institute; 2008.
  33. De Pauw  B, Walsh  TJ, Donnelly  JP, Stevens  DA, Edwards  JE, Calandra  T, Revised definitions of invasive fungal disease from the EORTC/MSG. Clin Infect Dis. 2008;46:181321. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Landis  JR, Koch  GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 1977;33:15974. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Baddley  JW, Marr  KA, Andes  DR, Walsh  TJ, Kauffman  CA, Kontoyiannis  DP, Patterns of susceptibility of Aspergillus isolates recovered from patients enrolled in the Transplant-Associated Infection Surveillance Network. J Clin Microbiol. 2009;47:32715. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. van der Linden  JW, Snelders  E, Arends  JP, Daenen  SM, Melchers  WJ, Verweij  PE. Rapid diagnosis of azole-resistant aspergillosis by direct PCR using tissue specimens. J Clin Microbiol. 2010;48:147880. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Denning  DW, Park  S, Lass-Florl  C, Fraczek  MG, Kirwan  M, Gore  R, High-frequency triazole resistance found in nonculturable Aspergillus fumigatus from lungs of patients with chronic fungal disease. Clin Infect Dis. 2011;52:11239. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar




Follow Up

Earning MEDSCAPE CME Credit

To obtain credit, you should first read the journal article. After reading the article, you should be able to answer the following, related, multiple-choice questions. To complete the questions (with a minimum 70% passing score) and earn continuing medical education (CME) credit, please go to Credit cannot be obtained for tests completed on paper, although you may use the worksheet below to keep a record of your answers. You must be a registered user on If you are not registered on, please click on the New Users: Free Registration link on the left hand side of the website to register. Only one answer is correct for each question. Once you successfully answer all post-test questions you will be able to view and/or print your certificate. For questions regarding the content of this activity, contact the accredited provider, For technical assistance, contact American Medical Association’s Physician’s Recognition Award (AMA PRA) credits are accepted in the US as evidence of participation in CME activities. For further information on this award, please refer to The AMA has determined that physicians not licensed in the US who participate in this CME activity are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 Credits™. Through agreements that the AMA has made with agencies in some countries, AMA PRA credit may be acceptable as evidence of participation in CME activities. If you are not licensed in the US, please complete the questions online, print the certificate and present it to your national medical association for review.

Article Title: Clinical Implications of Azole Resistance in Aspergillus fumigatus, the Netherlands, 2007–2009


1. Which of the following statements about the prevalence of itraconazole resistance in clinical Aspergillus fumigatus isolates is most likely correct?

A. Overall prevalence was 5.3%

B. Resistant isolates were found in half of participating university medical centers

C. The range of prevalence at participating university medical centers was 0%–6%

D. One quarter of azole-resistant isolates had the TR/L98H mutation in the Cyp51A gene

2. A 34-year-old white woman presents with non-Hodgkin lymphoma, pulmonary symptoms, and positive sputum culture for A. fumigatus. On the basis of the study by van der Linden and colleagues, which of the following statements about risk factors for development of itraconazole resistance in A. fumigatus isolates is most likely correct?

A. History of a hematologic/oncologic disease is not a risk factor

B. Previous azole treatment is necessary for development of resistance

C. Most TR/L98H mutations are resistant to voriconazole and have a narrow range of minimum inhibitory concentrations

D. Azole resistance may develop in patients with cavitary lung lesions such as aspergilloma

3. Which of the following statements about outcomes associated with development of itraconazole resistance in A. fumigatus isolates is most likely to apply to the previously described patient?

A. The mortality rate of patients with azole-resistant invasive aspergillosis is ≈50%

B. Two thirds of patients whose treatment was switched to another class of antifungal survived

C. None of the patients who were treated with voriconazole monotherapy were alive at 3 months

D. This study proved that azole resistance causes poor clinical outcomes in patients with azole-resistant aspergillosis

Activity Evaluation

1. The activity supported the learning objectives.

Strongly Disagree

Strongly Agree






2. The material was organized clearly for learning to occur.

Strongly Disagree

Strongly Agree






3. The content learned from this activity will impact my practice.

Strongly Disagree

Strongly Agree






4. The activity was presented objectively and free of commercial bias.

Strongly Disagree

Strongly Agree







Cite This Article

DOI: 10.3201/eid1710.110226

Related Links

Table of Contents – Volume 17, Number 10—October 2011

EID Search Options
presentation_01 Advanced Article Search – Search articles by author and/or keyword.
presentation_01 Articles by Country Search – Search articles by the topic country.
presentation_01 Article Type Search – Search articles by article type and issue.



Please use the form below to submit correspondence to the authors or contact them at the following address:

Address for correspondence: Jan W.M. van der Linden, Departments of Medical Microbiology and Pediatrics, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, PO Box 9101, 6500 HB Nijmegen, the Netherlands

Send To

10000 character(s) remaining.


Page created: September 22, 2011
Page updated: September 22, 2011
Page reviewed: September 22, 2011
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.