Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link
Volume 17, Number 7—July 2011

Clonal Genotype of Geomyces destructans among Bats with White Nose Syndrome, New York, USA

Sunanda S. Rajkumar, Xiaojiang Li, Robert J. Rudd, Joseph C. Okoniewski, Jianping Xu, Sudha Chaturvedi, and Vishnu ChaturvediComments to Author 
Author affiliations: Author affiliations: New York State Department of Health, Albany, New York, USA (S.S. Rajkumar, X. Li, R.J. Rudd, S. Chaturvedi, V. Chaturvedi); New York State Department of Environmental Conservation, Albany (J.C. Okoniewski); McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada (J. Xu); State University of New York at Albany, Albany (S. Chaturvedi, V. Chaturvedi)

Cite This Article


The dispersal mechanism of Geomyces destructans, which causes geomycosis (white nose syndrome) in hibernating bats, remains unknown. Multiple gene genealogic analyses were conducted on 16 fungal isolates from diverse sites in New York State during 2008–2010. The results are consistent with the clonal dispersal of a single G. destructans genotype.

Geomycosis, or white nose syndrome, is a newly recognized fungal infection of hibernating bats. The etiologic agent, the psychrophilic fungus Geomyces destructans, was first recognized in caves and mines around Albany, New York, USA (1,2). The disease has spread rapidly in New York and other states in the northeastern United States. At least 1 affected bat species is predicted to face regional extinction in the near future (3). Much remains unknown about this fungus, including its ecology and geographic distribution. For example, although hibernacula are high on the list of suspected sites, where the bats acquire this infection is not known. Similarly, although strongly suspected, the role of humans and other animals in the dispersal of G. destructans and the effect of such dispersals in bat infections have not been confirmed. We recently showed that 6 G. destructans strains from sites near Albany were genetically similar (2), raising the possibility of a common source for the spread of this infection. Corollary to this observation and other opinions (3,4), the US Fish & Wildlife Service has made an administrative decision to bar human access to caves as a precautionary measure ( Thus, an understanding of the dispersal mechanism of G. destructans is urgently needed to formulate effective strategies to control bat geomycosis.

The Study

We applied multiple gene genealogic analyses in studying G. destructans isolates; this approach yields robust results that are easily reproduced by other laboratories (5). Sixteen G. destructans isolates recovered from infected bats during 2008–2010 were analyzed. These isolates originated from 7 counties in New York and an adjoining county in Vermont, all within a 500-mile radius (Table 1). The details of isolation and identification of G. destructans from bat samples have been described (2). One isolate of a closely related fungus G. pannorum M1372 (University of Alberta Mold Herbarium, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada) was included as a reference control. To generate molecular markers, 1 isolate, G. destructans (M1379), was grown in yeast extract peptone dextrose broth at 15°C, and high molecular weight genomic DNA was prepared according to Moller et al. (6). A cosmid DNA library was constructed by using pWEB kit (Epicenter Biotechnologies, Madison, WI, USA) by following protocols described elsewhere (7). One hundred cosmid clones, each with ≈40-Kb DNA insert, were partially sequenced in both directions by using primers M13 and T7. The nucleotide sequences were assembled with Sequencher 4.6 (Gene Codes Corp., Ann Arbor, MI, USA) and BLAST ( homology searches identified 37 putative genes. Sequences of 10 genes, including open reading frames, 3′ and/or 5′ untranslated regions, and introns, were evaluated as potential markers for analyzing G. pannorum and G. destructans. Our screening approach indicated that 8 gene targets could be amplified from both G. destructans and G. pannorum by PCR (Table 2).

To obtain DNA sequences from 1 G. pannorum and 16 G. destructans isolates, we prepared genomic DNA from mycelia grown in yeast extract peptone dextrose broth through conventional glass bead treatment and phenol-chloroform extraction and then ethanol precipitation (7). AccuTaq LA DNA Polymerase (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) was used for PCR: 3 min initial denaturation at 94°C, 35 amplification cycles with a 15-sec denaturation at 94°C, 30-sec annealing at 55°C, and 1-min extension at 68°C and a 5-min final extension at 68°C. PCR products were treated with ExoSAP-IT (USB Corp., Cleveland, OH, USA) before sequencing. Both strands of amplicons were sequenced by the same primers used for PCR amplification (Table 2). A database was created by using Microsoft Access (Microsoft, Redmond, WA, USA) to deposit and analyze the sequences. Nucleotide sequences were aligned with ClustalW version 1.4 ( and edited with MacVector 7.1.1 software (Accelrys, San Diego, CA, USA). Phylogenetic analyses were done by using PAUP 4.0 (8) and MEGA 4 (9).

Figure 1

Thumbnail of Consensus maximum-parsimony tree derived from analyzing 8 concatenated gene fragments including a total of 4,470 aligned nucleotides by using PAUP* 4.0 (8). The number 545 on the branch indicates the total number of variable nucleotide positions (out of the 4,470 nt) separating Geomyces pannorum M1372 from the clonal genotype of G. destructans identified here. Fifty of the 545 variable sites correspond to insertions and deletions. Scale bar indicates number of nucleotide substitutio

Figure 1. Consensus maximum-parsimony tree derived from analyzing 8 concatenated gene fragments including a total of 4,470 aligned nucleotides by using PAUP* 4.0 (8). The number 545 on the branch indicates the total...

We cloned and sequenced ≈200 Kb of the G. destructans genome and identified genes involved in a variety of cellular processes and metabolic pathways (Table 2). DNA sequence typing by using 8 gene fragments showed that all 16 G. destructans isolates had identical nucleotide sequences at all 8 sequenced gene fragments but were distinct from G. pannorum sequences. A maximum-parsimony tree generated from the 8 concatenated gene fragments indicated a single, clonal genotype for the 16 G. destructans strains (Figure 1). This consensus tree included 4,470 aligned nucleotides from all targeted gene sequences with 545 variable sites that separate the G. destructans clonal genotype from G. pannorum. Further analyses of the same concatenated gene fragments with exclusion of 50 insertions and deletions between G. destructans and G. pannorum yielded a tree with a shorter length (495 steps instead of 545 steps) but an identical topology (Technical Appendix Figure 1). This pattern remained unchanged when different phylogenetics models were used for analysis (Technical Appendix Figure 2). The lack of polymorphism among the 16 G. destructans isolates was unlikely because of evolutionary constraint at the sequenced gene fragments. We found many synonymous and nonsynonymous substitutions in target genes among a diversity of fungal species, including between G. destructans and G. pannorum (10) (Technical Appendix Figure 3).


Figure 2

Thumbnail of Collection sites in New York counties (A) are color-matched with respective Geomyces destructans isolates in maximum-parsimony tree based on nucleotide sequence of the VPS13 gene (B). The tree was constructed with MEGA4 (9) by using 450 nt and bootstrap test with 500 replicates. In addition to G. destructans and G. pannorum, fungi analyzed were Ajellomyces capsulatus (AAJI01000550.1), Aspergillus clavatus NRRL 1 (AAKD03000035.1), Botryotinia fuckeliana B05.10 (AAID01002173.1), Cocci

Figure 2. Collection sites in New York counties (A) are color-matched with respective Geomyces destructans isolates in maximum-parsimony tree based on nucleotide sequence of the VPS13 gene (B). The tree was constructed with...

Our finding of a single clonal genotype in G. destructans population fits well with the rapid spread of geomycosis in New York (Figure 2). Our sampling population covered both spatial and temporal dimensions, and the numbers of isolates analyzed were adequate in view of difficulties encountered in obtaining pure isolations of G. destructans (11). Although the affected New York sites are separated by sizable distances and include geographic barriers, a role for the natural dissemination of the fungus through air, soil, and water cannot be ruled out. Indeed, several fungi with geographic distributions similar to that in our study have shown major genetic variation among strains (12,13). It is also possible that humans and/or animals contributed to the rapid clonal dispersal. In such a scenario, the diseased or asymptomatic bats might act as carriers of the fungus by their migration into new hibernation sites where new animals get infected and the dissemination cycle continues (4). Similarly, the likely roles played by humans and/or other animals in the transfer of the fungal propagules from an affected site to a clean one cannot be ruled out from our data.

Virulent clones of human and plant pathogenic fungi that spread rapidly among affected populations have been recognized with increasing frequency in recent years (12,14). However, other pathogens, such as the frog-killing fungus Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis, have emerged with both clonal and recombining populations (13). Our data do not eliminate the possibility that the G. destructans population undergoes recombination in nature. This process to generate genetic variability would require some form of sexual reproduction, which remains unknown in G. destructans. In addition, the fungus might have both asexual and sexual modes in its saprobic life elsewhere in nature, but it exists only in asexual mode on bats (15).

In conclusion, our data suggest that a single clonal genotype of G. destructans has spread among affected bats in New York. This finding might be helpful for the professionals involved in devising control measures. Many outstanding questions remain about the origin of G. destructans, its migration, and reproduction, all of which will require concerted efforts if we are to save bats from predicted extinction (3).

Dr Rajkumar is a postdoctoral research affiliate in the Mycology Laboratory at the Wadsworth Center, New York State Department of Health, Albany, New York, USA. His research interests are molecular genetics, genomics, and antifungal drugs.



We acknowledge the Wadsworth Center Applied Genomic Technologies Core for DNA sequencing and Media, Glassware and Tissue Culture Unit for specialized culture media. We thank Jared Mayron for creating a Microsoft Access database.



  1. Blehert  DS, Hicks  AC, Behr  M, Meteyer  CU, Berlowski-Zier  BM, Buckles  EL, Bat white-nose syndrome: an emerging fungal pathogen? Science. 2009;323:227. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Chaturvedi  V, Springer  DJ, Behr  MJ, Ramani  R, Li  X, Peck  MK, Morphological and molecular characterizations of psychrophilic fungus Geomyces destructans from New York bats with white nose syndrome (WNS). PLoS ONE. 2010;5:e10783. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Frick  WF, Pollock  JF, Hicks  AC, Langwig  KE, Reynolds  DS, Turner  GG, An emerging disease causes regional population collapse of a common North American bat species. Science. 2010;329:67982. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Hallam  TG, McCracken  GF. Management of the panzootic white-nose syndrome through culling of bats. Conserv Biol. 2011;25:18994. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Xu  J. Fundamentals of fungal molecular population genetic analyses. Curr Issues Mol Biol. 2006;8:7589.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Möller  EM, Bahnweg  G, Sandermann  H, Geiger  HH. A simple and efficient protocol for isolation of high molecular weight DNA from filamentous fungi, fruit bodies, and infected plant tissues. Nucleic Acids Res. 1992;20:61156. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Ren  P, Roncaglia  P, Springer  DJ, Fan  JJ, Chaturvedi  V. Genomic organization and expression of 23 new genes from MAT alpha locus of Cryptococcus neoformans var. gattii. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2005;326:23341. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Swafford  DL. PAUP*: Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony *and other methods. Sutherland (MA): Sinauer Associates; 2000.
  9. Tamura  K, Dudley  J, Nei  M, Kumar  S. MEGA4: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis (MEGA) software version 4.0. Mol Biol Evol. 2007;24:15969. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Kasuga  T, White  TJ, Taylor  JW. Estimation of nucleotide substitution rates in eurotiomycete fungi. Mol Biol Evol. 2002;19:231824.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Wibbelt  G, Kurth  A, Hellmann  D, Weishaar  M, Barlow  A, Veith  M, White-nose syndrome fungus (Geomyces destructans) in bats, Europe. Emerg Infect Dis. 2010;16:123743. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Hovmøller  MS, Yahyaoui  AH, Milus  EA, Justesen  AF. Rapid global spread of two aggressive strains of a wheat rust fungus. Mol Ecol. 2008;17:381826. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Morgan  JAT, Vredenburg  VT, Rachowicz  LJ, Knapp  RA, Stice  MJ, Tunstall  T, Population genetics of the frog-killing fungus Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007;104:1384550. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Kidd  SE, Hagen  F, Tscharke  RL, Huynh  M, Bartlett  KH, Fyfe  M, A rare genotype of Cryptococcus gattii caused the cryptococcosis outbreak on Vancouver Island (British Columbia, Canada). Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004;101:1725863. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Halkett  F, Simon  J-C, Balloux  F. Tackling the population genetics of clonal and partially clonal organisms. Trends Ecol Evol. 2005;20:194201. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar




Cite This Article

DOI: 10.3201/eid1707.102056

Table of Contents – Volume 17, Number 7—July 2011

EID Search Options
presentation_01 Advanced Article Search – Search articles by author and/or keyword.
presentation_01 Articles by Country Search – Search articles by the topic country.
presentation_01 Article Type Search – Search articles by article type and issue.



Please use the form below to submit correspondence to the authors or contact them at the following address:

Vishnu Chaturvedi, Mycology Laboratory, Wadsworth Center, New York State Department of Health, 120 New Scotland Ave, Albany, NY 12208, USA

Send To

10000 character(s) remaining.


Page created: August 18, 2011
Page updated: August 18, 2011
Page reviewed: August 18, 2011
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.