Volume 18, Number 10—October 2012
Schmallenberg Virus as Possible Ancestor of Shamonda Virus
Highlight and copy the desired format.
|EID||Goller KV, Höper D, Schirrmeier H, Mettenleiter TC, Beer M. Schmallenberg Virus as Possible Ancestor of Shamonda Virus. Emerg Infect Dis. 2012;18(10):1644-1646. https://dx.doi.org/10.3201/eid1810.120835|
|AMA||Goller KV, Höper D, Schirrmeier H, et al. Schmallenberg Virus as Possible Ancestor of Shamonda Virus. Emerging Infectious Diseases. 2012;18(10):1644-1646. doi:10.3201/eid1810.120835.|
|APA||Goller, K. V., Höper, D., Schirrmeier, H., Mettenleiter, T. C., & Beer, M. (2012). Schmallenberg Virus as Possible Ancestor of Shamonda Virus. Emerging Infectious Diseases, 18(10), 1644-1646. https://dx.doi.org/10.3201/eid1810.120835.|
Schmallenberg virus (SBV), an orthobunyavirus of the Simbu serogroup, recently emerged in Europe and has been suggested to be a Shamonda/Sathuperi virus reassortant. Results of full-genome and serologic investigations indicate that SBV belongs to the species Sathuperi virus and is a possible ancestor of the reassortant Shamonda virus.
A novel virus, Schmallenberg virus (SBV), was discovered in Europe in October 2011, and since then, cases of SBV infection have been reported in sheep, cattle, and goats in several European countries (1–4). Preliminary phylogenetic analyses revealed that SBV is a member of the genus Orthobunyavirus within the family Bunyaviridae and is related to Simbu serogroup viruses (1). Similar to Akabane virus (AKAV), another Simbu serogroup virus, SBV can cause fatal congenital defects by infection of fetuses during a susceptible stage in pregnancy (2). Vaccines for SBV are not available. Thus, SBV poses a serious threat to naive populations of ruminant livestock in Europe.
Orthobunyaviruses are arthropod-borne viruses with a negative-stranded tripartite RNA genome comprising large (L), medium (M), and small (S) segments. Genetic reassortment occurs naturally among these viruses, which results in the emergence of new virus strains that have altered biologic properties (5). The L segment encodes the RNA-dependent RNA polymerase; antigenic determinants are the M-encoded viral surface glycoproteins Gn and Gc, which are responsible for viral attachment, cell fusion, hemagglutination, and the induction of neutralizing antibodies, and the S-encoded nucleocapsid protein N, which plays a role in complement fixation (6). In the pregenomics era, orthobunyavirus relationships were determined solely by serologic cross-reactivity analyses (7), but since DNA sequencing became available, phylogenetic relationships have additionally been assessed by comparison of partial genome sequences (8,9). However, published full-length genome sequence information is sparse, which makes in-depth phylogenetic analysis difficult. Therefore, a detailed taxonomic classification of SBV could not be made initially when the virus emerged.
The first report of SBV showed highest similarities of M- and L-segment sequences to partial Aino virus and AKAV sequences, whereas the N gene was most closely related to Shamonda virus (SHAV) (1). Additionally, results of recent investigations on complete N and M genes and partial L genes of SHAV, Douglas virus (DOUV), and Sathuperi virus (SATV) suggested that SBV is a reassortant consisting of the M segment from SATV and the S and L segments from SHAV (9). Conversely, in 2001, SHAV was described as a reassortant virus comprising the S and L segments of SATV and the M segment from the unclassified Yaba-7 virus (8). To clarify the phylogenetic relationships and classification of SBV within the Simbu serogroup, we conducted genetic and serologic investigations of its relationship to 9 other Simbu serogroup viruses.
To enable comparative sequence analysis and phylogenetic investigations, we determined almost full-length S-, M-, and L-segment sequences for 9 Simbu serogroup viruses belonging to 5 species (Table 1): SHAV, Peaton virus, and Sango virus, species Shamonda virus; DOUV and SATV, species Sathuperi virus; Aino virus and Shuni virus, species Shuni virus; Sabo virus, species Akabane virus; and Simbu virus, species Simbu virus. Sample preparation and sequencing were done by using the Genome Sequencer FLX (Roche, Mannheim, Germany) as described (10). Sequence data obtained in this study are archived in the International Nucleotide Sequence Database Collaboration databases (www.insdc.org; accession nos. HE795087–HE795110 and HE800141–HE800143). In addition to the newly determined sequences, published full-genome sequences of AKAV and Oropouche virus (OROV) from the National Center for Biotechnology Information reference genome database (www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/genome) were used for sequence comparisons and the reconstruction of phylogenetic relationships. Coding sequences of each genome segment were aligned by using ClustalW (www.clustal.org) for codons, and phylogenetic analyses were performed by using maximum-likelihood methods in MEGA5 (11). For the N and L gene analysis Tamura-Nei parameter, the M gene analysis Tamura 3-parameter was used. The robustness of the trees was tested by bootstrap analysis by using 1,000 replications. Sequence identities were calculated by using BioEdit version 126.96.36.199 (12).
SBV N gene nucleotide sequence identities to other viruses ranged from 69.8% (OROV; 69.9% aa identity) to 97.7% (SHAV; 100% aa) (Table 2). The L gene sequence of SBV had the lowest identity to OROV (60.4% nt; 57.5% aa) and highest identity to SHAV (92.9% nt; 98.4% aa); the SBV M gene showed the highest sequence identity to SATV (82.1% nt; 90.1% aa), whereas identity of SBV and SHAV M gene was low (48.2% nt; 36.5% aa). In general, identity of the SHAV M gene to the other Simbu serogroup viruses was low, from 45.6% nt (33.4% aa; OROV) to 55.0% nt (47.9% aa; Sango virus), which indicates that its M segment belongs to another virus, as previously suggested (8). On the other hand, the high sequence identity of all SBV genes to SATV and DOUV indicates that SBV belongs to the species Sathuperi virus.
A phylogenetic tree derived from the M gene (Figure, panel A) demonstrates that SBV and DOUV cluster closely with SATV, whereas SHAV was placed distantly from all other viruses. In contrast, phylogenetic trees of the L (Figure, panel B) and N (Figure, panel C) genes showed a close relationship between SBV and SHAV. Results for all genome segments show that SBV should be classified within the species Sathuperi virus and is likely to be the ancestor of SHAV, which is in contrast a reassortant virus comprising the S and L segments from SBV and the M segment from another virus, as proposed previously (8).
To further clarify the placement of SBV within the Simbu serogroup, we determined the ability of SBV antibodies to neutralize other Simbu serogroup viruses. We performed titer reduction assays of the 9 other viruses with anti-SBV serum; the viruses were propagated in BHK-21 cells clone CT (L164, Collection of Cell Lines in Veterinary Medicine, Friedrich-Loeffler-Institute, Riems, Germany). Neutralizing potencies of SBV antibodies against Simbu serogroup virus strains were tested by titrating virus in the presence of anti-SBV serum (neutralizing titer 32); results were expressed as percentage titer reduction in relation to a parallel test without antiserum. Although DOUV and SATV were well neutralized, SHAV titers were not reduced at all (Figure, panel A), which supports the M gene phylogeny. Thus, phylogeny and cross-reactivity identified SHAV, but not SBV, as a reassortant within the Simbu serogroup.
Although our results do not support the suggestions of Yanase et al. (9), they are fully consistent with the conclusions of Saeed et al. (8). On the basis of our results and those of Saeed et al. (8), we suggest that SHAV should be reclassified into the species Sathuperi virus and that the species Shamonda virus should be renamed Peaton virus or Sango virus.
In addition to showing that SBV belongs to the species Sathuperi virus, our results show that the virus is most likely not a reassortant and is likely to be one of the ancestors of SHAV, whereas SHAV is a reassortant comprising the SBV S and L genomic segments and the M segment from an unclassified virus. These detailed insights into the phylogeny of SBV could be the basis for the development of efficient, cross-protective vaccines. Our results also highlight the importance of full-genome analyses to identify potential genetic reassortments and to investigate the evolutionary history of viruses with segmented genomes.
Dr Goller is a molecular biologist and postdoctoral scientist at the Friedrich-Loeffler-Institute, Institute of Diagnostic Virology, Greifswald-Insel Riems, Germany. Her research interests are emerging animal viruses, molecular diagnostics, and epidemiology, as well as phylogenetic analyses.
We thank Robert Tesh and his colleagues at the University of Texas Medical Branch for providing the strains of the Simbu serogroup viruses. We are indebted to Moctezuma Reimann and Bianka Hillmann for excellent technical assistance.
This work was funded by the European Union FP7 projects EMPERIE (no. 223498) and RAPIDIA-Field (no. 289364) and the Federal Ministry of Food, Agriculture and Consumer Protection, Germany.
- Hoffmann B, Scheuch M, Höper D, Jungblut R, Holsteg M, Schirrmeier H, Novel orthobunyavirus in cattle, Europe, 2011. Emerg Infect Dis. 2012;18:469–72.
- Garigliany M-M, Hoffmann B, Dive M, Sartelet A, Bayrou C, Cassart D, Schmallenberg virus in calf born at term with porencephaly, Belgium. Emerg Infect Dis. 2012;18:1005–6.
- Elbers ARW, Loeffen WLA, Quak S, de Boer-Luijtze E, van der Spek AN, Bouwstra R, Seroprevalence of Schmallenberg virus antibodies among dairy cattle, the Netherlands, winter 2011–2012. Emerg Infect Dis. 2012;18:1065–71.
- Friedrich-Loeffler-Institut. FLI: Schmallenberg virus [cited 2012 May 31]. http://www.fli.bund.de/en/startseite/current-news/animal-disease-situation/new-orthobunyavirus-detected-in-cattle-in-germany.html
- Bowen MD, Trappier SG, Sanchez AJ, Meyer RF, Goldsmith CS, Zaki SR, A reassortant bunyavirus isolated from acute hemorrhagic fever cases in Kenya and Somalia. Virology. 2001;291:185–90.
- King AMQ, Adams MJ, Carstens EB, Lefkowitz EJ, editors. Virus taxonomy: classification and nomenclature of viruses. Ninth report of the International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses. San Diego: Elsevier Academic Press; 2011.
- Kinney RM, Calisher CH. Antigenic relationships among Simbu serogroup (Bunyaviridae) viruses. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1981;30:1307–18.
- Saeed MF, Li L, Wang H, Weaver SC, Barrett AD. Phylogeny of the Simbu serogroup of the genus Bunyavirus. J Gen Virol. 2001;82:2173–81.
- Yanase T, Kato T, Aizawa M, Shuto Y, Shirafuji H, Yamakawa M, Genetic reassortment between Sathuperi and Shamonda viruses of the genus Orthobunyavirus in nature: implications for their genetic relationship to Schmallenberg virus. Arch Virol. 2012. Epub ahead of print.
- Becker N, Jöst H, Ziegler U, Eiden M, Höper D, Emmerich P, Epizootic emergence of Usutu virus in wild and captive birds in Germany. PLoS One. 2012;7:e32604-e.
- Tamura K, Peterson D, Peterson N, Stecher G, Nei M, Kumar S. MEGA5: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis using maximum likelihood, evolutionary distance, and maximum parsimony methods. Mol Biol Evol. 2011;28:2731–9.
- Hall TA. BioEdit: a user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/98/NT. Nucleic Acids Symposium Series. 1999;41:95–8.
- Figure. . . . Maximum-likelihood trees showing phylogenetic relationships of Simbu serogroup viruses for the M (A), L (B), and S (C) coding regions. The bar plot in panel A indicates...
- Table 1. Viruses, isolates, and sequence lengths used in classification of Schmallenberg virus within the Simbu serogroup
- Table 2. Pairwise comparison of full N, M, and L gene sequences of SBV with other orthobunyaviruses
1These authors contributed equally to this article.
Please use the form below to submit correspondence to the authors or contact them at the following address:
Martin Beer, Institute of Diagnostic Virology, Friedrich-Loeffler-Institut, Südufer 10, 17493 Greifswald-Insel Riems, Germany
Comment submitted successfully, thank you for your feedback.
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.
- Page created: September 14, 2012
- Page last updated: September 14, 2012
- Page last reviewed: September 14, 2012
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention,
National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases (NCEZID)
Office of the Director (OD)