Volume 18, Number 11—November 2012
Research
Livestock Density as Risk Factor for Livestock-associated Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus, the Netherlands
Table 2
Variable |
Univariate models
|
AIC | |
---|---|---|---|
OR (95% CI) | p value | ||
Contact with pigs | 11.176 (2.76–45.29) | 0.001 | 97.81 |
Contact with cows | 20.65 (2.39–178.31) | 0.006 | 99.42 |
Rural | 11.20 (3.15–39.76) | 0.000 | 95.21 |
Probable source of MRSA | 0.083 | 101.02 | |
Foreign vs health care setting |
6.67 (0.78–57.06) | ||
Unknown vs health care setting |
6.50 (1.64 25.76) | 0.008 | |
Other vs health care setting |
12.86 (2.75–60.22) | 0.001 | |
Livestock density/municipality | |||
Log (pig) |
1.45 (1.13–1.86) | 0.003 | 95.58 |
Log (cow) |
2.25 (1.40–3.60) | 0.001 | 96.32 |
Log (veal calf) |
1.30 (1.11–1.52) | 0.001 | 98.70 |
Log (population) |
0.36 (0.20–0.64) | 0.001 | 94.78 |
*MRSA, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus; LA-MRSA, livestock-associated MRSA; T-MRSA, typeable MRSA; AIC, Akaike information criteria.
Page created: October 15, 2012
Page updated: October 15, 2012
Page reviewed: October 15, 2012
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.