Volume 18, Number 5—May 2012
Research
Transmission Dynamics, Border Entry Screening, and School Holidays during the 2009 Influenza A (H1N1) Pandemic, China
Table 3
Model | OR (95% CrI) | p value |
---|---|---|
Univariable | ||
Fever on arrival | 1.84 (1.04–3.27) | 0.042 |
Onset of symptoms >1 d before arrival | 1.05 (0.91–1.22) | 0.288 |
Age group, y† | 0.126 | |
0–4 | 1 | |
5–24 | 1.67 (0.55–5.03) | |
25–49 | 1.12 (0.36–3.50) | |
50–64 | 0.58 (0.13–2.69) | |
Province‡ | 0.400 | |
44 | 1 | |
31 | 1.05 (0.49–2.23) | |
35 | 0.66 (0.30–1.45) | |
Multivariable§ | ||
Fever on arrival | 1.80 (1.26–2.57) | 0.001 |
Onset of symptoms >1 d before arrival | 2.36 (1.18–4.73) | 0.016 |
Interaction between fever on arrival and onset of symptoms >1 d before arrival | 0.45 (0.22–0.89) | 0.023 |
*OR, odds ratio; CrI, credible interval.
†n = 463. Only 1 such person was >64 y of age, and this person was excluded from this analysis.
‡n = 302. Only 3 provinces had >40 persons so only they are included here.
§Likelihood ratio–based p value for the global hypothesis that all ORs equal 1 (3 df 0.008). The deviance (that is minus twice the log likelihood) for the multivariable model presented was 520.6, whereas the deviance for the model with only an intercept (i.e., no effects of fever or time from onset to arrival) was 532.5.
1These authors contributed equally to this article.
Page created: April 17, 2012
Page updated: April 17, 2012
Page reviewed: April 17, 2012
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.