Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link
Volume 19, Number 1—January 2013

Listeriosis Outbreaks and Associated Food Vehicles, United States, 1998–2008

Emily J. Cartwright, Kelly A. Jackson, Shacara D. Johnson, Lewis M. Graves, Benjamin J. SilkComments to Author , and Barbara E. Mahon
Author affiliations: Author affiliation: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA

Cite This Article


CME Logo

Medscape, LLC is pleased to provide online continuing medical education (CME) for this journal article, allowing clinicians the opportunity to earn CME credit.

This activity has been planned and implemented in accordance with the Essential Areas and policies of the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education through the joint sponsorship of Medscape, LLC and Emerging Infectious Diseases. Medscape, LLC is accredited by the ACCME to provide continuing medical education for physicians.

Medscape, LLC designates this Journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 Credit(s)TM. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity.

All other clinicians completing this activity will be issued a certificate of participation. To participate in this journal CME activity: (1) review the learning objectives and author disclosures; (2) study the education content; (3) take the post-test with a 70% minimum passing score and complete the evaluation at; (4) view/print certificate.

Release date: December 12, 2012; Expiration date: December 12, 2013

Learning Objectives

Upon completion of this activity, participants will be able to:

•     Assess the general epidemiology of listeriosis

•     Analyze the epidemiology of listeriosis in the United States between 1998 and 2008

•     Distinguish the most common food vehicle for listeriosis during the study period

•     Evaluate clinical outcomes of listeriosis

CME Editor

Thomas J. Gryczan, MS, Technical Writer/Editor, Emerging Infectious Diseases. Disclosure: Thomas J. Gryczan, MS, has disclosed no relevant financial relationships.

CME Author

Charles P. Vega, MD, Health Sciences Clinical Professor; Residency Director, Department of Family Medicine, University of California, Irvine. Disclosure: Charles P. Vega, MD, has disclosed no relevant financial relationships.


Disclosures: Emily J. Cartwright, MD; Kelly A. Jackson, MPH; Shacara D. Johnson, MSPH; Lewis M. Graves; Benjamin J. Silk, PhD, MPH; and Barbara E. Mahon, MD, MPH, have disclosed no relevant financial relationships.



Listeria monocytogenes, a bacterial foodborne pathogen, can cause meningitis, bacteremia, and complications during pregnancy. This report summarizes listeriosis outbreaks reported to the Foodborne Disease Outbreak Surveillance System of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention during 1998–2008. The study period includes the advent of PulseNet (a national molecular subtyping network for outbreak detection) in 1998 and the Listeria Initiative (enhanced surveillance for outbreak investigation) in 2004. Twenty-four confirmed listeriosis outbreaks were reported during 1998–2008, resulting in 359 illnesses, 215 hospitalizations, and 38 deaths. Outbreaks earlier in the study period were generally larger and longer. Serotype 4b caused the largest number of outbreaks and outbreak-associated cases. Ready-to-eat meats caused more early outbreaks, and novel vehicles (i.e., sprouts, taco/nacho salad) were associated with outbreaks later in the study period. These changes may reflect the effect of PulseNet and the Listeria Initiative and regulatory initiatives designed to prevent contamination in ready-to-eat meat and poultry products.

Listeria monocytogenes is transmitted predominantly through contaminated food (1). Listeriosis includes a spectrum of clinical illnesses ranging from febrile gastroenteritis to potentially fatal bacteremia and meningitis in groups at higher risk for invasive disease, including older adults and persons with certain medical conditions (2,3). Although pregnant women infected with L. monocytogenes typically experience a mild influenza-like illness or an asymptomatic infection, pregnancy-associated listeriosis can result in fetal loss, preterm delivery, invasive neonatal infection, and infant death.

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) estimates that 1,662 invasive infections with L. monocytogenes occur annually in the United States, causing 1,520 hospitalizations and 266 related deaths (4). Population-based surveillance demonstrated a 24% decrease in the crude incidence of laboratory-confirmed listeriosis from 0.41 to 0.31 cases per 100,000 population during 1996–2003 (5). Since 2003, the incidence of listeriosis has remained stable, with rates ranging from 0.25 to 0.32 cases per 100,000 population during 2004–2009. The 6-year average rates of hospitalization and death were 0.26 hospital admissions and 0.05 deaths or fetal losses per 100,000, respectively (6). Millions of US dollars in health care expenditures and quality-adjusted life years are lost to invasive listeriosis annually (7).

Foodborne transmission of listeriosis was first recognized conclusively after an outbreak in Canada in 1981 that was associated with consumption of contaminated coleslaw (1). In the United States, the first recognized foodborne listeriosis outbreak occurred in 1983 and was associated with pasteurized milk (8). During 1983–1998, outbreaks of foodborne listeriosis associated with Mexican-style cheese (9) and shrimp (10) were subsequently documented; a single case was also attributed to turkey frankfurters (11).

PulseNet, the national molecular subtyping network for enteric bacterial disease surveillance, was established in 1998 ( L. monocytogenes isolates from patients are sent to state public health laboratories for standardized pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE); the PFGE patterns are then uploaded to a central database (PulseNet) for national comparisons (12). When >2 L. monocytogenes isolates with indistinguishable PFGE pattern combinations are uploaded within a 120-day period, this cluster is evaluated. An investigation is initiated if the upload rate for this pattern combination is greater than the historical background or if other epidemiologic indicators suggest a common source.

Invasive listeriosis has been a nationally notifiable disease in the United States since 2001. Although most listeriosis cases are sporadic (i.e., not associated with a recognized cluster of illness), the detection of a listeriosis outbreak is a critical opportunity to prevent additional illness and death by removing a contaminated vehicle from the food supply. In addition, outbreak investigations often provide information about transmission of L. monocytogenes that can be used to improve food safety (13). However, epidemiologic investigations of listeriosis clusters are challenging because they are typically detected as a small number of geographically dispersed case-patients (some of whom may have died), and the incubation period can be lengthy, making patients’ recall of food exposures difficult (14).

Following a 2003 Council of State and Territorial Epidemiologists position statement, the Listeria Initiative was launched in 2004 to address these concerns ( The Listeria Initiative encourages state and local health department officials to routinely interview all patients with culture-confirmed listeriosis as soon as they are reported by using a standardized, extended questionnaire to collect food histories. Concurrently, clinical isolates are submitted to public health laboratories for PFGE subtyping and submission to PulseNet, and PFGE results are linked to epidemiologic information in the Listeria Initiative database. When a cluster is identified in PulseNet, Listeria Initiative data related to that cluster can be reviewed quickly to identify common food exposures. The Listeria Initiative also facilitates case–case studies by comparing exposures reported by cluster-associated cases with information from listeriosis cases that are not associated with the cluster. The effectiveness of the case–case approach has been illustrated repeatedly, for example, during the investigation of large, multistate outbreaks associated with delicatessen turkey meat and cantaloupe (15,16).

This report summarizes single-state and multistate listeriosis outbreaks reported to CDC during 1998–2008. We describe characteristics of the outbreaks and affected patients to summarize outbreak trends, L. monocytogenes serotype distribution, and implicated foods.

Outbreak Identification and Characterization

To identify all listeriosis outbreaks reported during 1998–2008 in the United States, we reviewed data from the CDC Foodborne Disease Outbreak Surveillance System (FDOSS). FDOSS is a national surveillance system through which state, local, tribal, and territorial health departments voluntarily submit to CDC reports of outbreaks by using a standardized form (CDC form 52.13) (17). In 1998, FDOSS surveillance activities were enhanced through the use of an electronic data collection form and other activities to increase reporting. For each outbreak, FDOSS captures information on etiology, food vehicle, outbreak size, duration, geographic location, setting, and selected outcomes (i.e., number of illnesses, hospitalizations, and deaths). Aggregated age group and sex data are also reported. A listeriosis outbreak was defined as >2 listeriosis cases linked to a common source by a public health investigation. A listeriosis outbreak was considered confirmed if the same serotype of L. monocytogenes was isolated from >2 patients exposed to either epidemiologically implicated food or food from which the same serotype was isolated. Outbreaks were considered to be multistate if exposure to the implicated food occurred in >1 state.

Hospitalization (number of hospitalized cases/total cases) and case-fatality rates (CFR) (number of deaths/total cases) were calculated for the study period. When >50% of demographic data were missing, remaining data were not analyzed. Outbreak duration was calculated as the number of days between the dates of illness onset of the first and the last reported cases. To define early (1998–2003) and late (2004–2008) study periods, 2004 was selected as a cutoff point because it coincides with the launch of the Listeria Initiative. Serotyping of outbreak-associated L. monocytogenes isolates was performed by CDC (18). Serotype information was matched to each outbreak reported in FDOSS. In addition, we conducted a systematic literature review of published reports of listeriosis outbreaks by using 5 electronic databases (PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Toxnet, and CAB Direct) and medical subject headings “Listeria monocytogenes,” “Listeria infections,” “listeriosis,” “disease outbreaks,” and “foodborne diseases.” When discrepancies were identified between published reports and FDOSS, the published data were used.

Outbreaks and Associated Food Vehicles

Figure 1

Thumbnail of Reported listeriosis outbreaks by single-state or multistate status and total number of outbreak-associated cases, Foodborne Disease Outbreak Surveillance System, United States, 1998–2008 (n = 24 outbreaks). White bar sections indicate single state-and multistate outbreaks, gray bar sections indicate multistate outbreaks, and black line indicates total ill.

Figure 1. . . . Reported listeriosis outbreaks by single-state or multistate status and total number of outbreak-associated cases, Foodborne Disease Outbreak Surveillance System, United States, 1998–2008 (n = 24 outbreaks). White bar...

Figure 2

Thumbnail of Distribution of single-state single and multistate outbreaks of listeriosis, 1998–2008, Foodborne Disease Outbreak Surveillance System, United States, 1998–2008 (n = 24 outbreaks). Dark gray indicates single-state and multistate outbreaks, and light gray indicates multistate outbreaks. Values indicate total outbreaks in each state. The grand total of outbreaks indicated in each state is greater than 24 because of multistate outbreaks.

Figure 2. . . . Distribution of single-state single and multistate outbreaks of listeriosis, 1998–2008, Foodborne Disease Outbreak Surveillance System, United States, 1998–2008 (n = 24 outbreaks). Dark gray indicates single-state and multistate...

During 1998–2008, a total of 26 listeriosis outbreaks were reported to FDOSS; 24 were confirmed (Figure 1; Table 1). Eight (33%) of these outbreaks were described in the published literature (14,15,1924). The 24 confirmed outbreaks resulted in 359 illnesses, 215 hospitalizations, and 38 deaths. The 11-year hospitalization rate was 60%, and the CFR was 11% (Table 2). Among 16 outbreaks with available data, the median duration was 42 days (range 1–389 days). Seven (29%) multistate outbreaks were reported, and 33 states reported cases in multistate outbreaks (Figure 2). Nine states reported single-state outbreaks. New York reported more listeriosis outbreaks than any other state (n = 6).

Information on the age distribution of ill persons was available for 17 (71%) of the 24 outbreaks. These 17 outbreaks included 238 patients (66% of all illnesses associated with the 24 outbreaks), including 10 (4%) infants, 120 (50%) persons 1–49 years of age, and 108 (45%) >50 years of age. Information on sex was available for 19 (79%) of the 24 outbreaks. Among 296 patients with sex reported, 160 (54%) were female (Table 2).

Although most of the outbreaks occurred in community settings (i.e., foods consumed in private homes, commercial establishments, or both), 2 outbreaks were attributed to foods prepared and served in hospitals. A food vehicle was implicated in 20 (83%) of the 24 confirmed listeriosis outbreaks (Table 2). Six (25%) outbreaks were attributed to delicatessen (deli) meats. Three (13%) outbreaks, including the largest outbreak (n = 108 cases) during the study period, were associated with frankfurters. Mexican-style cheese (queso fresco or queso blanco) was implicated in 4 (17%) outbreaks. Three outbreaks involved Mexican-style cheese made from unpasteurized milk, and 1 outbreak was associated with cheese made from pasteurized milk (24). Outbreaks caused by Mexican-style cheese primarily affected women (84%); most (73%) patients were 1–49 years of age.

Two outbreaks involved other dairy products, including cheese made from pasteurized sheep’s milk and flavored, pasteurized milk. Environmental investigations conducted during these 2 dairy-associated outbreaks (20,24) found that milk had been adequately pasteurized. Thus, postpasteurization contamination was believed to be the contributing factor for both outbreaks. Other implicated food vehicles included taco/nacho salad, tuna salad, and sprouts.

L. monocytogenes serotype information was available for 20 (83%) of the 24 confirmed listeriosis outbreaks (Table 3). Serotype 4b caused the largest number of outbreaks (n = 10) and outbreak-associated cases (n = 218). Serotype 4b was also associated with the highest hospitalization rate (70%) and the highest CFR (13%). Serotype 1/2a was responsible for 8 (40%) outbreaks and 119 (33%) cases. Serotype 1/2b was least common, causing 2 (10%) outbreaks that resulted in 5 (1%) outbreak-associated cases and no deaths (Table 3).

In the early study period (1998–2003), 13 listeriosis outbreaks (4 multistate and 9 single-state) were reported, and in the late study period (2004–2008) 11 (3 multistate and 8 single-state) were reported (Figure 1). Information on outbreak duration was available for 5 (38%) of 13 early study period outbreaks and for all late study period outbreaks. Among outbreaks with information available, those reported in the early study period were generally larger than those in the late study period (median 11 cases [range 2–108 cases] vs. 5 cases [range 2–20 cases]) and longer (122 days vs. 36 days). Among the 11 outbreaks with a food vehicle reported in the early study period, 5 were associated with deli meats and 3 with frankfurters. Novel food vehicles (sprouts and taco/nacho salad) were reported only in the late study period.


Figure 3

Thumbnail of Incidence of all cases (per million) and outbreaks of listeriosis, 1978–2008, United States. White bar sections indicate single-state outbreaks, gray bar sections indicate multisite outbreaks, and black line indicates incidence per million. Data were obtained from the Foodborne Diseases ActiveSurveillance Network (FoodNet) and the Foodborne Disease Outbreak Surveillance System. Data are as of June 2010.

Figure 3. . . . Incidence of all cases (per million) and outbreaks of listeriosis, 1978–2008, United States. White bar sections indicate single-state outbreaks, gray bar sections indicate multisite outbreaks, and black line...

Changes in characteristics of outbreaks reported to CDC during 1998–2008 highlight the successes and continued challenges of listeriosis prevention. During the study period, an average of 2.2 confirmed outbreaks per year were reported. In contrast, an average of 0.25 outbreaks per year was reported during the 20 years before the study period (i.e., the pre-PulseNet era) (Figure 3). We theorize that this 9-fold increase in the number of listeriosis outbreaks reported is predominantly attributed to enhanced detection through PulseNet. Furthermore, outbreaks in the late study period were generally shorter and smaller than those reported in the early study period. This finding suggests that the combined application of PulseNet and the Listeria Initiative was useful for timely outbreak detection and investigation (14).

Participation in the Listeria Initiative, measured by the number of states reporting >1 cases and the percentage of cases reported among all nationally notified cases, has increased steadily from 2004 (no. states reporting = 10, percentage of cases reported = 15%) to 2010 (no. states reporting = 42; percentage of cases reported = 71%) (CDC, unpub. data). The Listeria Initiative has contributed to numerous investigations of outbreaks, including those attributed to pasteurized milk, tuna salad served in a hospital, Mexican-style cheese, and hog head cheese (a meat jelly made from swine heads and feet) (20,2325).

Changes in the size and duration of listeriosis outbreaks occurred during a time when the national incidence of invasive listeriosis decreased by 24% during 1996–2003 (5), and then reached a plateau during 2004–2009 (6). Enhanced regulatory and industry efforts that stemmed from outbreak investigations (15) likely contributed in great part to the observed decrease in invasive listeriosis cases during this earlier time. Notably, 8 of 9 outbreaks associated with frankfurters or deli meat occurred early in the study period. The marked reduction in outbreaks associated with ready-to-eat (RTE) meat and poultry mirrored a decrease in the occurrence of L. monocytogenes contamination in RTE meat and poultry, from 1.0% to 8.1% in the 1990s to 0.3% in 2010 (26).

The reduction in L. monocytogenes–contaminated RTE meat and poultry likely demonstrates the effect of several federal regulatory initiatives. First, the US Department of Agriculture Food Safety and Inspection Service (USDA-FSIS) required in 1999 that hazard analysis and critical control point systems be reassessed to ensure that meat and poultry processing establishments in the United States were adequately addressing risk for infection with L. monocytogenes. Second, in 2003, USDA-FSIS issued the Listeria Rule, which encourages establishments to use combinations of postlethality treatments (i.e., after the product has been cooked), such as inclusion of antimicrobial drugs and bacterial growth inhibitors, to prevent contamination (27). Most large producers of frankfurters and fully cooked sliced meat and poultry products, such as deli meat, use >1 such interventions (USDA-FSIS, unpub. data); establishments that opt to forgo them are subject to requirements for more frequent product and production surface sampling (28). Third, USDA-FSIS implemented a random sampling program in 2004 for L. monocytogenes in production establishments; an additional risk-based, verification sampling program with compliance incentives was started in 2005 (29). Establishments where L. monocytogenes is detected undergo intensive sampling (intensified verification testing) as part of an assessment of the ability of the establishment to manufacture products eligible to bear the mark of inspection (30). Although an outbreak of listeriosis associated with deli meat (hog head cheese) occurred in 2010 (25), the processing establishment was subject only to state, not federal, regulation because it did not distribute its product outside the state.

In contrast, listeriosis outbreaks from dairy products showed no decrease in frequency throughout the study period. Unpasteurized (raw) milk poses a relatively high risk for listeriosis on a per-serving basis. Mexican-style cheese made from raw milk contributed to at least 1 dairy-associated listeriosis outbreak in the study period (22). Although certain cheeses made from raw milk that are aged for >60 days can be sold under Food and Drug Administration regulations (21 CFR Section 133), outbreaks of bacterial, enteric diseases associated with aged cheeses have occurred (31), and microbiologic studies have demonstrated the viability of bacterial pathogens in cheeses made from raw milk that have aged >60 days (32). In addition to outbreaks associated with cheese made from raw milk, listeriosis outbreaks from pasteurized dairy products (20) also occurred during the study period. Although pasteurization is known to adequately eliminate L. monocytogenes from dairy products, postpasteurization contamination can occur and was the likely source of contamination in at least 1 of the listeriosis outbreaks (24) during the study period and at least 4 additional listeriosis outbreaks associated with Mexican-style cheese since the study period (33). To prevent postpasteurization contamination, it is necessary to maintain strict separation of prepasteurized and postpasteurized dairy products and strict sanitation in the postprocessing environment.

The outbreaks associated with Mexican-style cheese primarily affected women 1–49 years of age, which includes the reproductive years. FDOSS does not collect information on ethnicity or pregnancy status, but other surveillance data indicate that pregnant Hispanic women have disproportionately higher rates of listeriosis (6). Investigations of outbreaks associated with Mexican-style cheese have informed recommendations for pregnant women to avoid consumption of unpasteurized dairy products, including Mexican-style cheeses.

The Food Safety Modernization Act provides the Food and Drug Administration with greater authority to prevent and control outbreaks of listeriosis and other foodborne infections through mandatory prevention controls and safety standards, more stringent tools for inspection and compliance, and an enhanced ability to remove contaminated foods from the food supply (e.g., mandatory recalls). However, dairy products imported from countries with different regulatory controls, homemade products or products made by unlicensed manufacturers, and products contaminated after pasteurization continue to pose regulatory and enforcement challenges (22). Therefore, additional prevention and education efforts are still needed to effectively protect susceptible populations.

Several novel food vehicles, including sprouts and taco/nacho salad, were implicated in listeriosis outbreaks described in this review. Three additional novel vehicle outbreaks have since been reported. In 2010, hog head cheese was associated with 8 listeriosis cases in Louisiana (25), and celery in a diced chicken salad was associated with an outbreak of 10 cases among hospitalized patients in Texas (34). Whole cantaloupe from a single farm was associated with a large, multistate outbreak (n = 147 cases) in 2011, and caused the most deaths (n = 33) from an outbreak of foodborne illness in the United States in nearly 90 years (16). Outbreaks that were linked to food vehicles with multiple ingredients are noteworthy because identifying a particular ingredient that is contaminated can be challenging (e.g., celery in chicken salad, taco/nacho salad). Preventing L. monocytogenes contamination of food is difficult; the bacteria proliferate under acidic conditions, high salt concentrations, and low temperatures. We expect that future outbreak investigations will continue to identify new food vehicles that can transmit L. monocytogenes to humans and identify new opportunities for consumer prevention education, industry interventions to reduce contamination, and regulatory control policies.

We found that serotype 4b caused more outbreaks, more outbreak-associated cases, and resulted in higher rates of hospitalization and deaths than serotypes 1/2a and 1/2b. Studies have shown that most isolates from food belong to serogroup 1/2, but most epidemic listeriosis is caused by serotype 4b (35,36). In addition, a study in Denmark suggested that illness caused by serogroup 4 is associated with a higher CFR than serogroup 1/2 (37). Recent research on L. monocytogenes virulence mechanisms has shown that certain mutations in the inlA gene, which encodes for internalin (a membrane-anchored protein responsible for L. monocytogenes invasion into nonprofessional phagocytes), can attenuate virulence (38,39). These virulence-attenuating mutations are prevalent in serogroup 1/2 but have not been observed in serotype 4b isolates (40). Further work is needed to bridge our understanding of L. monocytogenes virulence to epidemiologic trends in sporadic and outbreak-associated listeriosis.

There is wide variation in outbreak reporting practices among FDOSS users. For example, New York reported the largest number of listeriosis outbreaks during the study period, but active, population-based surveillance do not suggest that the incidence of invasive listeriosis was higher in New York than in other states (5). These findings may reflect variable population sizes and composition and differences in resources for investigating and reporting outbreaks among states, but more information is needed to fully understand these differences. Variation in the quality and completeness of FDOSS reports can limit conclusions drawn from the data. For example, demographic information was missing for nearly 30% of the outbreaks we analyzed. Because FDOSS uses the same reporting form for all pathogens, variables of specific interest for listeriosis, such as underlying medical conditions, ethnicity, age categories for older adults, pregnancy status, and clinical outcomes, are not available unless the reporting agency submits supplemental information. For example, the fact that 2 outbreaks occurred in hospital settings suggests that the medical fragility of the outbreak populations was a major contributor to the outbreaks. Although clinical information is not collected in FDOSS, there is a recognized need to improve food safety in hospitals (e.g., avoiding service of higher risk foods to immunocompromised patients) (6,23).

Listeriosis outbreak investigations are crucial to prevent additional illness, hospitalization, and death. They also provide a unique source of information to improve our understanding of L. monocytogenes infections and transmission and to identify gaps in industry and regulatory measures to safeguard against contamination of the food supply. The changes we observed in characteristics of listeriosis outbreaks during 1998–2008 illustrate the contributions of PulseNet and the Listeria Initiative for outbreak detection and investigation and subsequent effects of industry and regulatory efforts to prevent similar contamination from reoccurring. In particular, we found that reports of outbreaks caused by frankfurters and deli meats have become less frequent. Also, outbreaks have generally become smaller in size and shorter in duration.

Nevertheless, listeriosis outbreaks continue to cause considerable illness and death and associated costs. For example, the 2011 outbreak associated with whole cantaloupe (16) demonstrated that large outbreaks can still occur and that work remains to identify and prevent new sources of contamination. Repeated occurrences of outbreaks caused by dairy products, especially Mexican-style cheese, also signal the need for additional work. Although invasive listeriosis is rare (average annual incidence for 2004–2009 was 0.27 cases/100,000 population) (6), US subpopulations at increased risk are growing in size, including adults ≥65 years of age and Hispanics (2010 Census estimates of 40.3 and 50.5 million, respectively). Therefore, a concerted effort from regulatory, industry, and public health authorities will be required to reduce the overall incidence of listeriosis below the Healthy People 2020 goal of 0.2 cases per 100,000 population (

Dr Cartwright is an Infectious Disease fellow at Emory University in Atlanta, Georgia. She was an Epidemic Intelligence Service Officer in the Division of Foodborne, Waterborne and Environmental Diseases at CDC when this study was conducted. Her research interests are using epidemiology to understand infectious diseases in community and health care settings, to reduce disease transmission, and to evaluate public health interventions.



We thank Fred Angulo and Martha Iwamoto for contributing their understanding of listeriosis outbreaks; Peter Evans, Kristin Holt, Janell Kause, David LaBarre, and Obianuju Nso for sharing insights on regulatory efforts; and Todd Ward for providing knowledge of L. monocytogenes virulence mechanisms.



  1. Schlech  WF, Lavigne  PM, Bortolussi  RA, Allen  AC, Haldane  EV, Wort  AJ, Epidemic listeriosis: evidence for transmission by food. N Engl J Med. 1983;308:2036. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Mook  P, O’Brien  SJ, Gillespie  IA. Concurrent conditions and human listeriosis, England, 1999–2009. Emerg Infect Dis. 2011;17:3843. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Goulet  V, Hebert  M, Hedberg  C, Laurent  E, Vaillant  V, De Valk  H, Incidence of listeriosis and related mortality among groups at risk of acquiring listeriosis. Clin Infect Dis. 2012;54:65260. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Scallan  E, Hoekstra  RM, Angulo  FJ, Tauxe  RV, Widdowson  M-A, Roy  RL, Foodborne illness acquired in the United States—major pathogens. Emerg Infect Dis. 2011;17:715 .PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Voetsch  AC, Angulo  FJ, Jones  TF, Moore  MR, Nadon  C, McCarthy  P. Reduction in the incidence of invasive listeriosis in foodborne diseases active surveillance network sites, 1996–2003. Clin Infect Dis. 2007;44:51320. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Silk  BJ, Date  KA, Jackson  KA, Pouillot  R, Holt  KG, Graves  LM, Invasive listeriosis, Foodborne Diseases Active Surveillance Network (FoodNet), 2004–2009: further targeted education needed for prevention among high-risk groups. Clin Infect Dis. 2012;54(suppl 5):S396404. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Scharff  RL. Economic burden from health losses due to foodborne illness in the United States. J Food Prot. 2012;75:12331. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Fleming  DW, Cochi  SL, MacDonald  KL, Brondum  J, Hayes  PS, Plikaytis  BD, Pasteurized milk as a vehicle of infection in an outbreak of listeriosis. N Engl J Med. 1985;312:4047. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Linnan  MJ, Mascola  L, Lou  XD, Goulet  V, May  S, Salminen  C, Epidemic listeriosis associated with Mexican-style cheese. N Engl J Med. 1988;319:8238. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Riedo  FX, Pinner  RW, Tosca  ML, Cartter  ML, Graves  LM, Reeves  MW, A point-source foodborne listeriosis outbreak: documented incubation period and possible mild illness. J Infect Dis. 1994;170:6936. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Listeriosis associated with consumption of turkey franks. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 1989;38:2678 .PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Graves  LM, Hunter  SB, Ong  AR, Schoonmaker-Bopp  D, Hise  K, Kornstein  L, Microbiological aspects of the investigation that traced the 1998 outbreak of listeriosis in the United States to contaminated hot dogs and establishment of molecular subtyping-based surveillance for Listeria monocytogenes in the PulseNet network. J Clin Microbiol. 2005;43:23505. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Swaminathan  B, Gerner-Smidt  P. The epidemiology of human listeriosis. Microbes Infect. 2007;9:123643. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Olsen  SJ, Patrick  M, Hunter  SB, Reddy  V, Kornstein  L, MacKenzie  WR, Multistate outbreak of Listeria monocytogenes infection linked to delicatessen turkey meat. Clin Infect Dis. 2005;40:9627. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Gottlieb  SL, Newbern  EC, Griffin  PM, Graves  LM, Hoekstra  RM, Baker  NL, Multistate outbreak of listeriosis linked to turkey deli meat and subsequent changes in US regulatory policy. Clin Infect Dis. 2006;42:2936. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Multistate outbreak of listeriosis associated with Jensen Farms cantaloupe—United States, August–September 2011. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2011;60:13578 .PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National Outbreak Reporting System (NORS, Food) [cited 2012 Jan 20].
  18. Seeliger  H, Höhne  K. Serotyping of Listeria monocytogenes and related species. Methods in Microbiology. 1979;13:31–49.
  19. Mead  PS, Dunne  EF, Graves  L, Wiedmann  M, Patrick  M, Hunter  S, Nationwide outbreak of listeriosis due to contaminated meat. Epidemiol Infect. 2006;134:74451. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Outbreak of Listeria monocytogenes infections associated with pasteurized milk from a local dairy—Massachusetts, 2007. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2008;57:1097100 .PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Frye  DM, Zweig  R, Sturgeon  J, Tormey  M, LeCavalier  M, Lee  I, An outbreak of febrile gastroenteritis associated with delicatessen meat contaminated with Listeria monocytogenes. Clin Infect Dis. 2002;35:9439. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. MacDonald  PD, Whitwam  RE, Boggs  JD, MacCormack  JN, Anderson  KL, Reardon  JW, Outbreak of listeriosis among Mexican immigrants as a result of consumption of illicitly produced Mexican-style cheese. Clin Infect Dis. 2005;40:67782. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Cokes  C, France  AM, Reddy  V, Hanson  H, Lee  L, Kornstein  L, Serving high-risk foods in a high-risk setting: survey of hospital food service practices after an outbreak of listeriosis in a hospital. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2011;32:3806. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Jackson  KA, Biggerstaff  M, Tobin-D’Angelo  M, Sweat  D, Klos  R, Nosari  J, Multistate outbreak of Listeria monocytogenes associated with Mexican-style cheese made from pasteurized milk among pregnant, Hispanic women. J Food Prot. 2011;74:94953. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Outbreak of invasive listeriosis associated with the consumption of hog head cheese—Louisiana, 2010. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2011;60:4015 .PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. US Department of Agriculture, Food Safety and Inspection Service. The FSIS microbiological testing program for ready-to-eat (RTE) meat and poultry products, 1990–2010 [cited 2012 Mar 20].
  27. US Department of Agriculture, Food Safety and Inspection Service. Control of Listeria monocytogenes in ready-to-eat meat and poultry products [2011 Jun 13].
  28. US Department of Agriculture, Food Safety and Inspection Service. Compliance guidelines to control Listeria monocytogenes in post-lethality exposed ready-to-eat meat and poultry products [cited 2011 Jun 13].
  29. US Department of Agriculture, Food Safety and Inspection Service. Verification procedures for enforcement, investigations, and analysis officers (EIAOs) for the Listeria monocytogenes (Lm) regulation and routine risk-based Listeria monocytogenes (RLm) sampling program [cited 2011 Jun 13].
  30. US Department of Agriculture, Food Safety and Inspection Service. Intensified verification testing (IVT) protocol for sampling of product, food contact surfaces, and environmental surfaces for Listeria monocytogenes [cited2011 Jun 13].
  31. McCollum  JT, Williams  N, Williams  F, Cosgrove  S, Ghosh  T, Vogt  R, Multistate outbreak of Escherichia coli O157:H7 infections associated with in-store sampling of an aged raw-milk gouda cheese, 2010. J Food Prot. 2012;75:175965. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. D’Amico  DJ, Druart  MJ, Donnelly  CW. Behavior of Escherichia coli O157:H7 during the manufacture and aging of Gouda and stirred-curd Cheddar cheeses manufactured from raw milk. J Food Prot. 2010;73:221724 .PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National enteric disease surveillance: Listeria annual summary, 2009 [cited 2012 Feb 13].
  34. US Food and Drug Administration. DSHS orders Sangar Produce to close, recall products [cited 2012 Feb 13].
  35. Gilot  P, Genicot  A, Andre  P. Serotyping and esterase typing for analysis of Listeria monocytogenes populations recovered from foodstuffs and from human patients with listeriosis in Belgium. J Clin Microbiol. 1996;34:100710 .PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Gianfranceschi  M, Gattuso  A, Tartaro  S, Aureli  P. Incidence of Listeria monocytogenes in food and environmental samples in Italy between 1990 and 1999: serotype distribution in food, environmental and clinical samples. Eur J Epidemiol. 2003;18:10016. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Gerner-Smidt  P, Ethelberg  S, Schiellerup  P, Christensen  JJ, Engberg  J, Fussing  V, Invasive listeriosis in Denmark 1994–2003: a review of 299 cases with special emphasis on risk factors for mortality. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2005;11:61824. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Ward  TJ, Evans  P, Wiedmann  M, Usgaard  T, Roof  SE, Stroika  SG, Molecular and phenotypic characterization of Listeria monocytogenes from US Department of Agriculture Food Safety and Inspection Service surveillance of ready-to-eat foods and processing facilities. J Food Prot. 2010;73:8619 .PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Nightingale  KK, Ivy  RA, Ho  AJ, Fortes  ED, Njaa  BL, Peters  RM, inlA premature stop codons are common among Listeria monocytogenes isolates from foods and yield virulence-attenuated strains that confer protection against fully virulent strains. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2008;74:657083. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Van Stelten  A, Simpson  J, Ward  T, Nightingale  K. Revelation by single-nucleotide polymorphism genotyping that mutations leading to a premature stop codon in inlA are common among Listeria monocytogenes isolates from ready-to-eat foods but not human listeriosis cases. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2010;76:278390. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar




Follow Up

Earning CME Credit

To obtain credit, you should first read the journal article. After reading the article, you should be able to answer the following, related, multiple-choice questions. To complete the questions (with a minimum 70% passing score) and earn continuing medical education (CME) credit, please go to Credit cannot be obtained for tests completed on paper, although you may use the worksheet below to keep a record of your answers. You must be a registered user on If you are not registered on, please click on the New Users: Free Registration link on the left hand side of the website to register. Only one answer is correct for each question. Once you successfully answer all post-test questions you will be able to view and/or print your certificate. For questions regarding the content of this activity, contact the accredited provider, For technical assistance, contact American Medical Association’s Physician’s Recognition Award (AMA PRA) credits are accepted in the US as evidence of participation in CME activities. For further information on this award, please refer to The AMA has determined that physicians not licensed in the US who participate in this CME activity are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 Credits™. Through agreements that the AMA has made with agencies in some countries, AMA PRA credit may be acceptable as evidence of participation in CME activities. If you are not licensed in the US, please complete the questions online, print the certificate and present it to your national medical association for review.

Article Title:
Listeriosis Outbreaks and Associated Food Vehicles, United States, 1998–2008

CME Questions

1. You are seeing a 25-year-old woman in her 10th week of pregnancy with a 2-day history of mild fever, loose stools, and vomiting. She reports that she has not eaten unusual foods in the past week. You wonder whether this patient might have listeriosis. What should you consider regarding the epidemiology of listeriosis?

A.        Infection with Listeria is marked by at least mild gastrointestinal symptoms among pregnant women

B.        There are fewer than 200 cases of listeriosis in the United States annually

C.        The incidence of listeriosis increased from 1996 to 2003

D.        The incidence of listeriosis has remained fairly stable since 2003

2. What should you consider regarding listeriosis outbreaks evaluated in the current study?

A.        There were 24 confirmed outbreaks between 1998 and 2008

B.        Less than one third of patients required hospitalization

C.        The median duration of outbreaks was 6 months

D.        Listeriosis most commonly affected infants

3. What was the most common food vehicle for listeriosis in the current study?

A.        Deli meats

B.        Cheese made from unpasteurized milk

C.        Frankfurters

D.        Sprouts and other vegetables

4. What else should you consider regarding outbreaks of listeriosis in the current study?

A.        Serotype 1/2a accounted for most outbreaks of listeriosis

B.        Serotype 4b was associated with the highest hospitalization rate

C.        Outbreaks recorded later in the study period involved more cases

D.        The number of outbreaks associated with processed meats increased throughout the study period

Activity Evaluation

1. The activity supported the learning objectives.

Strongly Disagree

Strongly Agree






2. The material was organized clearly for learning to occur.

Strongly Disagree

Strongly Agree






3. The content learned from this activity will impact my practice.

Strongly Disagree

Strongly Agree






4. The activity was presented objectively and free of commercial bias.

Strongly Disagree

Strongly Agree







Cite This Article

DOI: 10.3201/eid1901.120393

Related Links

Table of Contents – Volume 19, Number 1—January 2013

EID Search Options
presentation_01 Advanced Article Search – Search articles by author and/or keyword.
presentation_01 Articles by Country Search – Search articles by the topic country.
presentation_01 Article Type Search – Search articles by article type and issue.



Please use the form below to submit correspondence to the authors or contact them at the following address:

Benjamin J. Silk, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1600 Clifton Rd NE, Mailstop C09, Atlanta, GA 30333, USA

Send To

10000 character(s) remaining.


Page created: December 21, 2012
Page updated: December 21, 2012
Page reviewed: December 21, 2012
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.