Volume 19, Number 11—November 2013
Dispatch
Tula Hantavirus Infection in Immunocompromised Host, Czech Republic
Table 1
Virus | Serum samples obtained on day |
Positivity range (IP)† | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
11 | 12 | 20 | 39 | ||
Hantavirus IgG ELISA | 0.26 | 0.38 | 2.69 | 2.60 | >1.1 |
Hantavirus IgM ELISA | 1.17 | 3.12 | 4.07 | 2.78 | >1.1 |
Puumala virus IgG Immunoblot | ND | Negative | ND | ND | ND |
Puumala virus IgM Immunoblot | ND | Positive | ND | ND | ND |
Dobrava virus IgG Immunoblot | ND | Negative | ND | ND | ND |
Dobrava virus IgM Immunoblot | ND | Negative | ND | ND | ND |
Hantaan virus IgG Immunoblot | ND | Negative | ND | ND | ND |
Hantaan virus IgM Immunoblot | ND | Negative | ND | ND | ND |
*Bold font indicates positive results. IP, positivity index; ND, not done.
†ELISA serology is considered positive when the index value (optical density divided by the cutoff value) is >1.1.
1The authors contributed equally to this article.
Page created: September 10, 2013
Page updated: September 10, 2013
Page reviewed: September 10, 2013
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.