Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link
Volume 20, Number 10—October 2014

Person-to-Person Household and Nosocomial Transmission of Andes Hantavirus, Southern Chile, 2011

Article Metrics
citations of this article
EID Journal Metrics on Scopus
Constanza Martinez-Valdebenito, Mario Calvo, Cecilia Vial, Rita Mansilla, Claudia Marco, R. Eduardo Palma, Pablo Vial, Francisca Valdivieso, Gregory Mertz, and Marcela FerrésComments to Author 
Author affiliations: Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile (C. Martinez-Valdebenito, R.E. Palma, M. Ferrés); Universidad Austral de Chile, Valdivia, Chile (M. Calvo); Clínica Alemana–Universidad del Desarrollo, Santiago, Chile (C. Vial, C. Marco, P.A. Vial, F. Valdivieso); Secretaría Regional Ministerial, Valdivia, Chile (R. Mansilla); University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA (G. Mertz)

Cite This Article


Andes hantavirus (ANDV) causes hantavirus cardiopulmonary syndrome in Chile and is the only hantavirus for which person-to-person transmission has been proven. We describe an outbreak of 5 human cases of ANDV infection in which symptoms developed in 2 household contacts and 2 health care workers after exposure to the index case-patient. Results of an epidemiologic investigation and sequence analysis of the virus isolates support person-to-person transmission of ANDV for the 4 secondary case-patients, including nosocomial transmission for the 2 health care workers. Health care personnel who have direct contact with ANDV case-patients or their body fluids should take precautions to prevent transmission of the virus. In addition, because the incubation period of ANDV after environmental exposure is longer than that for person-to-person exposure, all persons exposed to a confirmed ANDV case-patient or with possible environmental exposure to the virus should be monitored for 42 days for clinical symptoms.

Hantavirus cardiopulmonary syndrome (HCPS) is caused by infection with New World hantaviruses. First described in 1993 in the southwestern United States, HCPS has been documented throughout the Americas (1,2). For human cases, the mean incubation period of hantavirus infection from exposure to illness onset is 18.5 (range 7–42) days (3). As of December 31, 2013, a total of 848 human HCPS cases had been reported in Chile; the case-fatality rate has ranged from 32% to 35% per year (4).

The sole confirmed etiologic agent of HCPS in Chile is Andes virus (ANDV). Human infection with this virus occurs from exposure to contaminated excreta and secretions of rodents of the family Cricetidae. Transmission of ANDV between rodents has been experimentally documented after exposure of seronegative rodents to inhalation of aerosolized infected rodent secretions (5). ANDV is endemic in Chile and Argentina and is the only hantavirus for which person-to-person transmission has been documented. Person-to-person transmission of ANDV occurs mainly in family clusters or, less commonly, after activities in which close contact with an infected case-patient has occurred, primarily during the disease prodrome (68). A prospective study in Chile found that sexual partners and other close household contacts of ANDV-infected persons showed a 10-fold higher risk of acquiring the virus than household contacts who did not share bed or bedroom with the index case-patient (3,9).

Nosocomial transmission of ANDV has been a matter of concern for infection control practice and for health care workers who provide care for these patients, and in particular for workers who perform invasive procedures. In Argentina, person-to-person transmission of ANDV was documented in a physician who acquired infection after exposure to an ANDV-infected patient shortly after onset of the febrile prodrome (7,8). Although person-to-person transmission in Chile has been epidemiologically documented (10), nosocomial transmission has not been reported. Seroprevalence studies conducted among health care workers in hospitals in Chile where patients with ANDV infection have been treated have reported that health care workers exhibited ANDV IgG antibody at a proportion similar to that of the general population (11,12). Similarly, a study in the southwestern United States found no evidence of nosocomial transmission of another hantavirus, Sin Nombre virus (13).

We describe an outbreak of 5 cases of ANDV infection that occurred in a small, rural community in southern Chile in 2011. We present the epidemiologic and the clinical features of the cases, along with the molecular analysis of the virus strains from each case. Epidemiologic and virus sequence analyses support person-to-person transmission of ANDV in 4 of these cases, including nosocomial transmission in 2 cases.

Materials and Methods

Study Population

A case cluster of 5 human case-patients, including 2 persons involved in health care, occurred in Corral, Los Rios, Chile, during February–April 2011. Clinical history and information from epidemiologic questionnaires were obtained for each patient; all 5 had an acute febrile illness and signs and symptoms compatible with hantavirus infection. Acute infection was confirmed by detection of IgM against viral nucleoprotein antigen and real-time reverse transcription PCR (RT-PCR) targeting the small RNA segment of ANDV in blood samples obtained from these patients during the acute illness (14,15). Samples from 7 additional patients who had had HCPS in the same geographic region in previous years were used as controls for virus sequence analysis. All participants signed an informed consent approved by an ethics committee.

Geographic and Demographic Features of Corral

Corral is a coastal town (39°52′0″ S, 73°25′60″ W) located 15 km west of Valdivia, the capital of the Los Rios region in Chile; the town is in the foothills of a coastal mountain range in the Valdivian rainforest ecoregion (16). The population is ≈5,433 inhabitants. Corral has 1 primary care hospital with 5 beds (hospital I); all patients with complications are transferred to a regional care center in Valdivia that has intensive care facilities (hospital II). Since 1997, a total of 13 cases of hantavirus infection have been reported in Corral, including the 5 cases described in this report (17). Prior to this report, the last 2 confirmed cases were in 2008 and 2010.

Outbreak Description

On March 20, 2011, two suspected cases of hantavirus infection were reported. The patients were a 31-year-old woman (case-patient B) who worked as a nursing assistant at hospital I and a 53-year-old woman (case-patient C). Both lived near Corral. In addition to these cases, in late February, a 73-year-old man (case-patient A), the spouse of case-patient C, had been transferred from hospital I to hospital II for treatment of a pulmonary disease and evaluated for hantavirus infection; initial serologic testing results at a national reference laboratory were negative. On March 22, a fourth patient (case-patient D), a 60-year-old female housekeeper at hospital I, was admitted to hospital II with respiratory failure; she died a few hours later. A fifth patient (case-patient E), a 34-year-old man who was the husband of case-patient B, was hospitalized on April 3 at hospital II. On April 3, an epidemiologic investigation was initiated by the Health and Epidemiology Service, including investigation of infection control measures used at hospital I.

Genetic Characterization of the Virus

RNA was obtained from patients’ leukocytes from diagnostic samples and extracted by using the High Pure Viral RNA Kit (Roche Diagnostic GmbH, Roche Applied Science, Mannheim, Germany), according to the manufacturer’s instructions. For segment amplification, heminested RT-PCR was performed as described previously (16). Two portions of the medium segment, Gn and Gc, were amplified (Table 1), and the amplicons underwent agarose gel purification and sequencing in both directions. The chromatogram of each sequence was analyzed and aligned to generate a consensus sequence by using BioEdit version 7.1.11 ( Twelve sequences were aligned by using ClustalW ( Sequences were phylogenetically analyzed by conducting maximum-likelihood (ML) and Bayesian methodology on the concatenated Gn and Gc sequences. For ML, PAUP* version 4.0 (18) was used for a heuristic search with 100 random additions and branch swapping via tree-bisection-reconnection (19). jModeltest 3.7 was used to choose the best-fitting model of sequence evolution (20). The corrected Akaike information criterion (Akaike 1974) identified the Kimura 81 unequal base frequencies + gamma model (K81uf + Γ) as optimal (−lnL = 1251.2770, Akaike information criterion = 2515.7539, G = 1.5780), with base frequencies A = 0.2868, C = 0.3132, G = 0.0670, and T = 0.3329. Reliability of nodes in the ML tree was estimated by bootstrap analysis (21) obtained after 1,000 pseudo-replicates. The tree was rooted on the basis of the outgroup criterion by using the ANDV sequence available in GenBank (accession no. NC_003467.2). Sequences also were analyzed in a Bayesian framework to estimate the posterior probabilities of phylogenetic trees. Ten million phylogenetic trees were generated; the first 1,000 trees of the sample were removed to avoid including trees before convergence of the Markov Chain. As 2 independent molecular markers were used, a general likelihood–based mixture model of sequence evolution was applied as described (22). This model accommodates cases in which different sites in the alignment evolved in qualitatively distinct ways but does not require prior knowledge of these patterns or partitioning data. These analyses were conducted by using Bayes Phylogenies software (22). To find the best mixture model of evolution, the number of general time reversible matrices was estimated by using a reversible-jump Markov chain Monte Carlo method (23).


Laboratory and Epidemiologic Investigations

Figure 1

Thumbnail of Timelines showing progression and key events related to each case-patient (A–E) in a cluster of 5 Andes hantavirus cases, southern Chile, 2011. Blue boxes along timeline for index case-patient (A) indicate date of illness onset for subsequent case-patients; green boxes indicate environmental exposures (exposure for case-patient A was the same as for case-patient C); red boxes indicate contact with other case-patients.

Figure 1. Timelines showing progression and key events related to each case-patient (A–E) in a cluster of 5 Andes hantavirus cases, southern Chile, 2011. Blue boxes along timeline for index case-patient (A) indicate...

IgM and IgG against ANDV were detected in serum samples, and ANDV RNA was detected by RT-PCR in blood for all 5 patients in the cluster (Table 2; Figure 1). Case-patient A, the 73-year-old man, was identified as the index case-patient of the cluster.

Case-patient A lived in a small settlement near Corral. His main risk activity was the cleaning of a home cellar where he was moving tiles on February 5. The cellar was heavily contaminated with rodent feces. The patient was admitted to hospital I on February 24 after 3 days of fever, dry cough, weakness, and progressive dyspnea. During hospitalization, he experienced progressive respiratory compromise, productive cough, and intense sweating that required frequent changes of gowns, sheets, and blankets. On February 26, he was transferred to the critical care unit at hospital II for mechanical ventilation. Serum samples were sent to the National Reference Laboratory 11 days after onset of his symptoms; results were negative for ANDV IgM. When the epidemiologically related hantavirus case-patients were admitted to hospital II, ANDV IgM testing was repeated, 24 days after onset of his symptoms, and results were positive. Case-patient A died on March 26 after 28 days of mechanical ventilation and use of vasoactive drugs.

Case-patient B, a nursing assistant at hospital I, exhibited a fever on March 17. She was hospitalized on March 20 and the same day was transferred from hospital I to the intensive care unit at hospital II. Severe shock and respiratory failure developed, and high doses of vasopressors and mechanical ventilation were required. A diagnosis of HCPS caused by ANDV infection was confirmed after 8 days of symptoms, and she was discharged on April 11. This patient had direct contact with case-patient A at hospital I from February 24–26, during his febrile prodrome and progression to the cardiopulmonary phase. She changed the patient’s clothes, sheets, and blankets because he perspired profusely. In addition, having met the patient previously, she greeted case-patient A with a kiss on his cheek several times during his hospitalization. She also had close contact with her husband at their home from the time she cared for the index case-patient through the first 3 days of her illness. She recalled possible environmental exposure from camping at 2 local beaches during February 1–4 and February 19–20; she collected wood and cleaned the area to set up tents.

Case-patient C was the spouse of case-patient A. She shared the same bed and cared for him during his febrile prodrome but denied that they had sexual activity after symptom onset. She entered the contaminated cellar with her husband but did not participate actively in his work in this area. On March 18, twenty-five days after her husband’s illness onset and 41 days after they entered the cellar, she exhibited mild fever, severe headache, myalgia, and photophobia . She sought medical attention at hospital II while her husband was still hospitalized, and acute ANDV infection was confirmed on March 24. Her chest radiograph results were normal. Her most remarkable symptoms were headache and irritability, and she had meningeal signs. Testing of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) showed 8 white mononuclear cells, normal glucose levels, and a slightly elevated protein level of 0.5 g/L. CSF testing by RT-PCR for ANDV and ELISA for ANDV-specific IgG yielded negative results.

Case-patient D, a housekeeper at hospital I, had fever, abdominal pain, and vomiting develop on March 18. Two days later, she was hospitalized at hospital I, and 4 days later, she was transferred to hospital II, where severe shock and respiratory failure developed. She died a few hours after admission to hospital II. Her diagnosis was confirmed by positive results of serologic testing and RT-PCR for ANDV. She had direct and indirect contact with case-patient A while he was at hospital I. She entered his room and helped the nursing assistant (case-patient B) change his clothes and remove his sheets and bedclothes for washing.

Case-patient E, the husband of case-patient B, had fever, headache, myalgia, and back pain develop on April 2, and he was admitted to hospital II on April 3. Serologic testing for ANDV IgM and IgG after 5 days of symptoms yielded negative results, but results of RT-PCR for ANDV RNA were positive. IgM and IgG seroconversion were confirmed 10 days after symptom onset. The person-to-person exposure period for this patient was March 6–20; his possible environmental exposure exceeded the known incubation period for ANDV (11). Shock and respiratory failure developed, and he required mechanical ventilation and vasopressors but survived.

Environmental Investigation

Rodent trapping was performed for 2 and 3 nights, respectively, at the 2 sites where case-patients reported possible environmental exposure: the cellar of the home of case-patients A and C and a camping area used by case-patients B and E (Table 3). Rodent serum samples were tested for ANDV antibodies by strip immunoblot assay (24); results were positive for 1 Abrothrix longipilis rodent trapped at the camping site. However, RT-PCR results for this sample were negative, and testing of rodents trapped at the home of case-patients A and C yielded negative results.

Viral Molecular Analysis

A portion of 942 bp of the ANDV small RNA segment was amplified and sequenced from samples of each of the 5 patients in the case cluster. Sequences aligned by using ClustalW showed 100% identity (data not shown), an observation consistent with the high degree of conservation of the small segment among hantaviruses (7,25).

Virus variability was established by comparing a portion of 914 bp of the highly variable ANDV medium RNA segment. The sequences obtained for the 2 medium segments encoding the ANDV glycoproteins Gn and Gc were compared separately (data not shown) and concatenated. Results were visualized in the identity matrix of concatenated sequences and showed that the concatenated sequences derived from the 5 cases in the cluster were similar to each other but differed from viral sequences from 7 patients who acquired ANDV in the same community in previous years (Table 4). The molecular identity of the concatenated Gn and Gc sequences between cases ranged from 99% to 100%, whereas the comparison with control sequences from the same geographic region ranged from 97% to 99%. These values show higher identity between the sequences derived from the cluster cases compared with other human cases from the same geographic region from previous years. All sequences obtained in this study have been deposited in GenBank (accession nos. KC567258–KC567281).

Figure 2

Thumbnail of Phylogenetic analyses of the medium RNA segment (Gc and Gn) of concatenated sequences of Andes hantavirus (ANDV). Isolates from the case-patients (A–E) from the 2011 outbreak in Chile were compared with control samples from the same geographic region (indicated by year isolated; number in parentheses indicates multiple isolates from the same year) and an ANDV sequence from GenBank (bottom isolate on tree; accession no. NC_003467.2). Scale bar indicates substitutions per site.

Figure 2. Phylogenetic analyses of the medium RNA segment (Gc and Gn) of concatenated sequences of Andes hantavirus (ANDV). Isolates from the case-patients (A–E) from the 2011 outbreak in Chile were compared with...

The phylogenetic analyses through ML and Bayesian methods revealed similar topologic results; thus, a single tree is shown (Figure 2). Results show 2 major groups with strong support provided by the bootstrap and posterior probability values. The group of samples that included the Corral cases is clearly separated from other major clustering that includes ANDV sequences from other localities in Chile.


ANDV is the only hantavirus for which person-to-person transmission has been reported (7). Our study of a case cluster in Chile provides epidemiologic and molecular evidence that strongly supports the conclusion that 4 of 5 cases resulted from person-to-person transmission of ANDV, including 2 cases of nosocomial transmission.

Most of the reports of person-to-person transmission of ANDV share common traits that constitute potential risk factors for virus spread (79). These features were also observed in this cluster. First, the period of the disease during which the acute case-patient and the household contact or health care personnel have close contact is primarily the febrile prodrome phase, when symptoms are nonspecific for hantavirus. Second, the number of days from exposure to an index case-patient and the onset of symptoms among additional cases ranges from 12 to 27 days (7,26), consistent with the intervals observed in our report. In the 2 cases for which environmental exposure was reported, the estimated incubation period after that exposure exceeded the longest reported incubation range of 42 days for ANDV (3,11). In contrast, in these 2 cases the estimated incubation periods from exposure to a case-patient to onset of symptoms was 13–27 days. Finally, the viral genetic characterization established that viruses from the case cluster shared a high nucleotide sequence identity in Gn and Gc fragments, the most variable viral genomic regions (6).

During the prodrome, when symptoms are nonspecific, consideration of ANDV infection and early diagnosis might be triggered by a history of environmental exposure (1,2) or close exposure to another confirmed case-patient within the known incubation period (3,6). In this cluster, all the cases appeared in a geographic region that is considered an endemic risk area for hantavirus (26,27). However, no other cases had occurred in this town since 2010, and our epidemiologic and virus sequence analysis showed that the main risk factor for all the 4 additional cases was the patient’s close contact with a symptomatic, HCPS case-patient (6,28).

One case of nosocomial transmission of the virus has been previously reported in Argentina (7), and evidence of this transmission has been sought in Chile (12). We document 2 cases of nosocomial transmission of ANDV, from the index case-patient to a nursing assistant and to a housekeeper, even though their contact with the patient was limited to kissing the patient on the cheek and to handling bedding and gowns (no invasive procedures). Two seroprevalence studies performed soon after recognition of hantavirus in Chile did not reveal a higher proportion of antibodies against ANDV among hospital personnel when compared with the general population (11,12).

In our study, ANDV infection was not diagnosed in the index case-patient until he had been ill for 31 days, which resulted in a wider time frame of exposure for health care personnel. The patient had a history of diabetes mellitus but no history of any other immunodeficiency that might explain his initial negative serologic test. However, the initial testing was not repeated, so we cannot rule out the possibility of a false-negative result.

For case-patient C, the clinical manifestation of illness was unusual because she lacked respiratory symptoms and showed meningeal irritability as the main sign of the infection. Viral RNA and specific antibodies were not detected, but a slight elevation in the CSF white blood count and protein level were seen. It is possible that viral RNA was present before CSF testing or that it was below the level of detection by RT-PCR, but the timing of her symptoms is probably inconsistent with a postinfectious process.

It is not clear why person-to-person transmission has been documented for ANDV but not for other hantaviruses. Risk factors associated with close contact, including sexual contact, deep kissing, or sleeping in the same bed or room, have been identified in a prospective study of household contacts of index case-patients with HCPS (9). As such, respiratory secretions, saliva, or both may be involved in transmission. Puumala virus RNA has been detected by RT-PCR but not by cell culture in saliva from patients who had hemorrhagic fever with renal syndrome (29). The antiviral activity of different human saliva concentrations has been experimentally tested against Hantaan virus, Puumala virus, and ANDV; ANDV was least sensitive to the antiviral effect of saliva (30). RT-PCR testing has found ANDV RNA in previous and ongoing studies in blood and in body fluids, including gingival crevicular fluid, saliva, endotracheal fluid, and urine (31). ANDV was isolated from blood obtained from a child in Chile before the onset of symptoms or development of ANDV antibodies (32), and studies are ongoing to determine which, if any, of the body fluids positive by RT-PCR also contain infectious virus.

To characterize and compare the outbreak viral sequences, we used as reference material a selection of sequences from strains obtained 2 or 3 years earlier in the same ecogeographic region near Corral. All 5 medium fragments obtained from case-patient isolates in this cluster were highly similar to each other but were more distantly related to the reference sequences. The strong relatedness of the viruses in the Corral cluster is supported by high bootstrap and posterior probability values in the phylogenetic analyses. Furthermore, the small segment showed 100% identity between the 5 sequences in this cluster. The dates of exposure to high-risk environments or to persons with ANDV infection, known incubation periods, and 100% sequence identify all support a conclusion of person-to-person transmission (7). Our data showed 99%–100% identity for a fragment of 913 bp of the medium segment, supporting identity using different sequences. However, we did not include noncoding region fragments, which might provide additional confirmation of identity.

Our study documents a small but definite risk of nosocomial acquisition of ANDV infection for personnel who care for patients, including handling of bedding and gowns. After this investigation, the Ministry of Health of Chile has recommended, in addition to strict adherence to universal precautions, the use of droplet precautions when ANDV infection is suspected. Use of N95 respirator masks, designed to prevent the inhalation of airborne particles, is recommended for those procedures associated with aerosolization of viral contaminated secretions (e.g., respiratory, saliva) when procedures such as suction or intubation are performed. However, this recommendation should be extended to all personnel who have any kind of direct contact with patients or body fluids, including bedding and gowns.

Finally, all close household contacts and health care personnel exposed to a confirmed ANDV case-patient should be closely monitored for signs and symptoms of infection, such as fever, myalgia, headache, and abdominal pain, during the entire documented incubation period of 42 days, even though in person-to-person transmission of ANDV, the onset of symptoms has usually occurred 12–27 days after close contact with a sick patient (6,9). ANDV RT-PCR should be performed in addition to testing for specific IgM in any exposed contact in whom fever develops within the incubation period, particularly if testing is done within a few days of the onset of fever and before onset of the cardiopulmonary phase. Results of ANDV RT-PCR on blood cells may be positive as early as 5–15 days before onset of symptoms or detection of ANDV antibody (9). As we have documented, RT-PCR can detect ANDV RNA in the rare, symptomatic patient in whom seroconversion is delayed.

Ms Martínez-Valdebenito is a research assistant in the Infectious Diseases and Molecular Virology Laboratory, at Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile School of Medicine. Her research interests focus on understanding the pathogenicity of hantavirus infection and development of novel approaches for prevention and treatment of viral infections.



We thank Viviana Sotomayor and Andrea Olea for facilitating communication with local authorities from Corral.

Support for this research was provided by the National Institutes of Health “Andes virus transmission and pathogenesis in Chile” (NIH 2UO1AI045452) and Fondecyt “Evolutionary dynamics of Andes virus in Chile” (1110664).



  1. Pini  N. Hantavirus pulmonary syndrome in Latin America. Curr Opin Infect Dis. 2004;17:42731. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Schmaljohn  C, Hjelle  B. Hantaviruses: a global disease problem. Emerg Infect Dis. 1997;3:95104. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Vial  PA, Valdivieso  F, Mertz  G, Castillo  C, Belmar  E, Delgado  I, Incubation period of hantavirus cardiopulmonary syndrome. Emerg Infect Dis. 2006;12:12713. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Chile Ministry of Health. Resumen ejecutivo de Hantavirus, semana epidemiológica 1 a 52, dic 2012 [cited 2014 Feb 28].
  5. Padula  P, Figueroa  R, Navarrete  M, Pizarro  E, Cadiz  R, Bellomo  C, Transmission study of Andes hantavirus infection in wild sigmodontine rodents. J Virol. 2004;78:119729. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Martinez  VP, Bellomo  C, San Juan  J, Pinna  D, Forlenza  R, Elder  M, Person-to-person transmission of Andes virus. Emerg Infect Dis. 2005;11:184853. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Padula  PJ, Edelstein  A, Miguel  SD, Lopez  NM, Rossi  CM, Rabinovich  RD. Hantavirus pulmonary syndrome outbreak in Argentina: molecular evidence for person-to-person transmission of Andes virus. Virology. 1998;241:32330. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Wells  RM, Sosa Estani  S, Yadon  ZE, Enria  D, Padula  P, Pini  N, An unusual hantavirus outbreak in southern Argentina: person-to-person transmission? Hantavirus Pulmonary Syndrome Study Group for Patagonia. Emerg Infect Dis. 1997;3:1714. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Ferrés  M, Vial  P, Marco  C, Yanez  L, Godoy  P, Castillo  C, Prospective evaluation of household contacts of persons with hantavirus cardiopulmonary syndrome in Chile. J Infect Dis. 2007;195:156371. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Toro  J, Vega  JD, Khan  AS, Mills  JN, Padula  P, Terry  W, An outbreak of hantavirus pulmonary syndrome, Chile, 1997. Emerg Infect Dis. 1998;4:68794. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Castillo  C, Villagra  E, Sanhueza  L, Ferres  M, Mardones  J, Mertz  GJ. Prevalence of antibodies to hantavirus among family and health care worker contacts of persons with hantavirus cardiopulmonary syndrome: lack of evidence for nosocomial transmission of Andes virus to health care workers in Chile. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2004;70:3024 .PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Chaparro  J, Vega  J, Terry  W, Vera  JL, Barra  B, Meyer  R, Assessment of person-to-person transmission of hantavirus pulmonary syndrome in a Chilean hospital setting. J Hosp Infect. 1998;40:2815. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Vitek  CR, Breiman  RF, Ksiazek  TG, Rollin  PE, McLaughlin  JC, Umland  ET, Evidence against person-to-person transmission of hantavirus to health care workers. Clin Infect Dis. 1996;22:8246. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Kramski  M, Meisel  H, Klempa  B, Kruger  DH, Pauli  G, Nitsche  A. Detection and typing of human pathogenic hantaviruses by real-time reverse transcription-PCR and pyrosequencing. Clin Chem. 2007;53:1899905. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Padula  PJ, Rossi  CM, Della Valle  MO, Martinez  PV, Colavecchia  SB, Edelstein  A, Development and evaluation of a solid-phase enzyme immunoassay based on Andes hantavirus recombinant nucleoprotein. J Med Microbiol. 2000;49:14955 .PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Medina  RA, Torres-Perez  F, Galeno  H, Navarrete  M, Vial  PA, Palma  RE, Ecology, genetic diversity, and phylogeographic structure of Andes virus in humans and rodents in Chile. J Virol. 2009;83:244659. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Sotomayor Proschle  V. Enfrentamiento de una enfermedad emergente: hantavirus en Corral equipo respuesta rápida. Santiago (Chile): Ministerio de Salud; 2011.
  18. Swofford  DL, Waddell  PJ, Huelsenbeck  JP, Foster  PG, Lewis  PO, Rogers  JS. Bias in phylogenetic estimation and its relevance to the choice between parsimony and likelihood methods. Syst Biol. 2001;50:52539. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Takahashi  K, Nei  M. Efficiencies of fast algorithms of phylogenetic inference under the criteria of maximum parsimony, minimum evolution, and maximum likelihood when a large number of sequences are used. Mol Biol Evol. 2000;17:12518. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Posada  DC, Crandall  KA. MODELTEST: testing the model of DNA substitution. Bioinformatics. 1998;14:8178. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Felsenstein  J. Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution. 1985;39:78391. DOIGoogle Scholar
  22. Meade  A. A phylogenetic mixture model for detecting pattern-heterogeneity in gene sequence or character-state data. Syst Biol. 2004;53:57181. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Pagel  M, Venditti  C, Meade  A. Large punctuational contribution of speciation to evolutionary divergence at the molecular level. Science. 2006;314:11921. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Hjelle  B, Jenison  S, Torrez-Martinez  N, Herring  B, Quan  S, Polito  A, Rapid and specific detection of Sin Nombre virus antibodies in patients with hantavirus pulmonary syndrome by a strip immunoblot assay suitable for field diagnosis. J Clin Microbiol. 1997;35:6008 .PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Cao  ZW, Zuo  SQ, Gong  ZD, Zhan  L, Bian  CL, Zhang  PH, Genetic analysis of a hantavirus strain carried by Niviventer confucianus in Yunnan province, China. Virus Res. 2010;153:15760. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Murúa  R, Navarrete  M, Cadiz  R, Figueroa  R, Padula  P, Zaror  L, Hantavirus pulmonary syndrome: current situation among rodent reservoirs and human population in the 10th region, Chile [in Spanish]. Rev Med Chil. 2003;131:16976.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Pedrosa  PB, Cardoso  TA. Viral infections in workers in hospital and research laboratory settings: a comparative review of infection modes and respective biosafety aspects. Int J Infect Dis. 2011;15:e36676. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Padula  PJ, Colavecchia  SB, Martinez  VP, Gonzalez Della Valle  MO, Edelstein  A, Miguel  SD, Genetic diversity, distribution, and serological features of hantavirus infection in five countries in South America. J Clin Microbiol. 2000;38:302935 .PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Pettersson  L, Klingstrom  J, Hardestam  J, Lundkvist  A, Ahlm  C, Evander  M. Hantavirus RNA in saliva from patients with hemorrhagic fever with renal syndrome. Emerg Infect Dis. 2008;14:40611. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Hardestam  J, Lundkvist  A, Klingstrom  J. Sensitivity of Andes hantavirus to antiviral effect of human saliva. Emerg Infect Dis. 2009;15:11402. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Ferres  M, Martinez  C, Godoy  P, Cuiza  A, Valdivieso  F, Hjelle  B, Presence of Andes virus genome in gingival crevicular fluid during acute hantavirus infection. Abstract presented at: VIII International Conference on HFRS, HPS & Hantavirures; May 22, 2010; Athens, Greece.
  32. Galeno  H, Mora  J, Villagra  E, Fernandez  J, Hernandez  J, Mertz  GJ, First human isolate of hantavirus (Andes virus) in the Americas. Emerg Infect Dis. 2002;8:65761. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar




Cite This Article

DOI: 10.3201/eid2010.140353

Table of Contents – Volume 20, Number 10—October 2014

EID Search Options
presentation_01 Advanced Article Search – Search articles by author and/or keyword.
presentation_01 Articles by Country Search – Search articles by the topic country.
presentation_01 Article Type Search – Search articles by article type and issue.



Please use the form below to submit correspondence to the authors or contact them at the following address:

Marcela Ferrés, Escuela de Medicina, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Marcoleta 391, Santiago, 8320000, Chile

Send To

10000 character(s) remaining.


Page created: September 12, 2014
Page updated: September 12, 2014
Page reviewed: September 12, 2014
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.