Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link
Volume 20, Number 10—October 2014

Marburgvirus Resurgence in Kitaka Mine Bat Population after Extermination Attempts, Uganda

On This Page
Article Metrics
citations of this article
EID Journal Metrics on Scopus

Cite This Article

To the Editor: Marburg virus (MARV) and Ravn virus (RAVV), collectively called marburgviruses, cause Marburg hemorrhagic fever (MHF) in humans. In July 2007, 4 cases of MHF (1 fatal) occurred in miners at Kitaka Mine in southern Uganda. Later, MHF occurred in 2 tourists who visited Python Cave, ≈50 km from Kitaka Mine. One of the tourists was from the United States (December 2007) and 1 was from the Netherlands (July 2008); 1 case was fatal (1,2,3). The cave and the mine each contained 40,000–100,000 Rousettus aegyptiacus bats (Egyptian fruit bats).

Longitudinal investigations of the outbreaks at both locations were initiated by the Viral Special Pathogens Branch of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC, Atlanta, GA, USA, and Entebbe, Uganda) in collaboration with the Uganda Wildlife Authority (UWA) and the Uganda Virus Research Institute (UVRI). During these studies, genetically diverse MARVs and RAVVs were isolated directly from bat tissues, and infection levels of the 2 viruses were found to increase in juvenile bats on a predictable bi-annual basis (4,5). However, investigations at Kitaka Mine were stopped when the miners exterminated the bat colony by restricting egress from the cave with papyrus reed barriers and then entangling the bats in fishing nets draped over the exits. The trapping continued for weeks, and the entrances were then sealed with sticks and plastic. These depopulation efforts were documented by researchers from UVRI, the CDC, the National Institute of Communicable Diseases (Sandringham, South Africa), and UWA during site visits to Kitaka Mine (Technical Appendix Figure). In August 2008, thousands of dead bats were found piled in the forest, and by November 2008, there was no evidence of bats living in the mine; whether 100% extermination was achieved is unknown. CDC, UVRI, and UWA recommended against extermination, believing that any results would be temporary and that such efforts could exacerbate the problem if bat exclusion methods were not complete and permanent (6,7).

In October 2012, the most recent known marburgvirus outbreak was detected in Ibanda, a town in southwest Uganda. Ibanda is ≈20 km from the Kitaka Mine and is the urban center that serves smaller communities in the Kitaka area. This MHF outbreak was the largest in Ugandan history: 15 laboratory-confirmed cases occurred (8). In November 2012, an ecologic investigation of the greater Ibanda/Kitaka area was initiated. The investigation included interviews with local authorities to locate all known R. aegyptiacus colonies in the area. Although minor colonies of small insectivorous bats were found, the only identifiable colony of R. aegyptiacus bats was found inside the re-opened Kitaka Mine, albeit at much reduced size, perhaps 1%–5% of that found before depopulation efforts.

To determine whether the R. aegyptiacus bats that had repopulated Kitaka Mine were actively infected with marburgviruses, we tested 400 bats by using previously described methods (4,5). Viral RNA was extracted from ≈100 mg of liver and spleen tissue by using the MagMAX Total Nucleic Acid Isolation Kit (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s recommended protocol. The Fisher exact test was conducted by using IBM SPSS Statistics, version 19.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA).


Thumbnail of Phylogeny of concatenated marburgvirus nucleoprotein (NP) and viral protein 35 (VP35) gene fragments as determined by using the maximum-likelihood method. Sequences from the NP (289–372 nt) and VP35 (203–213 nt) genes were amplified and determined from viral RNA and then sequenced as described elsewhere (4). Sequence names shown in red font represent those generated from samples collected from bats during the November 2012 outbreak investigation at Kitaka Mine, Uganda. Sequence name

Figure. Phylogeny of concatenated marburgvirus nucleoprotein (NP) and viral protein 35 (VP35) gene fragments as determined by using the maximum-likelihood method. Sequences from the NP (289–372 nt) and VP35 (203–213 nt) genes...

Of the 400 R. aegyptiacus bats collected, 53 (13.3%) were positive for marburgvirus RNA by quantitative reverse transcription PCR (32/233 [13.7%] adults and 21/167 [12.6%] juveniles; Technical Appendix Table); marburgvirus was isolated from tissue samples from 9 of the 400 bats. The overall level of active infection was significantly higher than that found in Kitaka Mine during 2007–2008 (5.1%) (5) (Fisher exact test, p<0.001) and in other studies in Uganda (Python Cave [2.5%]) and Gabon (4.8%) (4,9). The reason for the increase is not clear, but it may be related to the effects of the extermination and subsequent repopulation. Increases in disease prevalence in wildlife populations after culling are not unprecedented (6,7). We speculate that after the depopulation attempt, a pool of susceptible bats became established over time and was subjected to multiple marburgvirus introductions, as evidenced by the genetic diversity of viruses isolated from the bats (Figure). A pool of susceptible bats would have led to higher levels of active infection within the colony, thereby increasing the potential for virus spillover into the human population. A significant sex and age bias was not detected with respect to active infection during the breeding season (Fisher exact test, p>0.5 for both), and overall, the presence of virus-specific IgG among the bats was 16.5%, a finding consistent with that in previous studies (4,5).

Phylogenetic analysis of viral RNA genome fragment sequences in this study showed high marburgvirus genetic diversity, including the presence of RAVVs and MARVs. Sequences for isolates from 3 bats were nearly identical to those of the MARV isolates obtained from patients in the 2012 Ibanda outbreak (8), suggesting that bats from Kitaka Mine were a likely source of the virus.



We thank UVRI, the Uganda Ministry of Health, and UWA for their assistance during the outbreak investigation. We also thank R. Swanepoel and S. Balinandi for the photographs used in this publication.

Funding for this study was provided by the United States Department of Health and Human Services.


Brian Amman, Luke Nyakarahuka, Anita K. McElroy, Kimberly A. Dodd, Tara Sealy, Amy J. Schuh, Trevor R. Shoemaker, Stephen Balinandi, Patrick Atimnedi, Winyi Kaboyo, Stuart T. Nichol, and Jonathan S. TownerComments to Author 
Author affiliations: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA (B.R. Amman, A.K. McElroy, K.A. Dodd, T.K. Sealy, A.J. Schuh, S.T. Nichol, J.S. Towner); Uganda Virus Research Institute, Entebbe, Uganda (L. Nyakarahuka); Emory University, Atlanta (A.K. McElroy); University of California, Davis, California, USA (K.A. Dodd); Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Entebbe (T.R. Shoemaker, S. Balinandi); Uganda Wildlife Authority, Kampala, Uganda (P. Atimnedi); Uganda Ministry of Health, Kampala (W. Kaboyo)



  1. Adjemian  J, Farnon  EC, Tschioko  F, Wamala  JF, Byaruhanga  E, Bwire  GS, Outbreak of Marburg hemorrhagic fever among miners in Kamwenge and Ibanda Districts, Uganda, 2007. J Infect Dis. 2011;204(Suppl 3):S7969 . DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Timen  A, Koopmans  MP, Vossen  AC, van Doornum  GJ, Gunther  S, van den Berkmortel  F, Response to imported case of Marburg hemorrhagic fever, the Netherlands. Emerg Infect Dis. 2009;15:11715 . DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Imported case of Marburg hemorrhagic fever–Colorado, 2008. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2009;58:137781 .PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Amman  BR, Carroll  SA, Reed  ZD, Sealy  TK, Balinandi  S, Swanepoel  R, Seasonal pulses of Marburg virus circulation in juvenile Rousettus aegyptiacus bats coincide with periods of increased risk of human infection. PLoS Pathog. 2012;8:e1002877 . DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Towner  JS, Amman  BR, Sealy  TK, Carroll  SA, Comer  JA, Kemp  A, Isolation of genetically diverse Marburg viruses from Egyptian fruit bats. PLoS Pathog. 2009;5:e1000536 . DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Donnelly  CA, Woodroffe  R, Cox  DR, Bourne  J, Gettinby  G, Le Fevre  AM, Impact of localized badger culling on tuberculosis incidence in British cattle. Nature. 2003;426:8347. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Swanepoel  R. Rabies. In: Coetzer JAW, Tustin RC, editors. Infectious diseases of livestock. 2nd ed. Cape Town (South Africa): Oxford University Press Southern Africa; 2014. p. 1123–82.
  8. Albariño  CG, Shoemaker  T, Khristova  ML, Wamala  JF, Muyembe  JJ, Balinandi  S, Genomic analysis of filoviruses associated with four viral hemorrhagic fever outbreaks in Uganda and the Democratic Republic of the Congo in 2012. Virology. 2013;442:97100. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Maganga  GD, Bourgarel  M, Ella  GE, Drexler  JF, Gonzalez  JP, Drosten  C, Is Marburg virus enzootic in Gabon? J Infect Dis. 2011;204(Suppl 3):S8003 . DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Gouy  M, Guindon  S, Gascuel  O. SeaView version 4: a multiplatform graphical user interface for sequence alignment and phylogenetic tree building. Mol Biol Evol. 2010;27:2214. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar




Cite This Article

DOI: 10.3201/eid2010.140696

Related Links


Table of Contents – Volume 20, Number 10—October 2014


Please use the form below to submit correspondence to the authors or contact them at the following address:

Jonathan S. Towner, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1600 Clifton Rd NE, Mailstop G14, Atlanta, GA 30329-4027, USA

Send To

10000 character(s) remaining.


Page created: September 23, 2014
Page updated: September 23, 2014
Page reviewed: September 23, 2014
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.