Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link
Volume 20, Number 11—November 2014
Dispatch

Mycobacterium ulcerans Infection Imported from Australia to Missouri, USA, 2012

Figures
Tables
Altmetric
5
citations of this article
EID Journal Metrics on Scopus
Benjamin Stuart ThomasComments to Author , Thomas C. Bailey, Julu Bhatnagar, Jana M. Ritter, Brian D. Emery, Omar W. Jassim, Ian Kerst Hornstra, and Sarah L. George
Author affiliations: Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA (B.S. Thomas, T.C. Bailey, I.K. Hornstra); Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA (J. Bhatnagar, J.M. Ritter, B.D. Emery); John Cochran Veterans Affairs Medical Center, St. Louis (O.W. Jassim, I.K. Hornstra, S.L. George); Saint Louis University, St. Louis (S.L. George)

Cite This Article

Abstract

Buruli ulcer, the third most common mycobacterial disease worldwide, rarely affects travelers and is uncommon in the United States. We report a travel-associated case imported from Australia and review 3 previous cases diagnosed and treated in the United States. The differential diagnoses for unusual chronic cutaneous ulcers and those nonresponsive to conventional therapy should include Mycobacterium ulcerans infection.

Buruli ulcer disease, caused by Mycobacterium ulcerans, is the third most common mycobacterial disease worldwide. Cases are concentrated in sub-Saharan Africa but also occur in subtropical and nontropical regions (e.g., Australia and Japan) (1). M. ulcerans disease is not endemic to the United States, but rare cases have been reported in travelers returning from regions where the organism is endemic (24). We describe M. ulcerans infection in a man who returned to the United States after living abroad and review M. ulcerans cases reported in 3 travelers.

The Case

Figure

Thumbnail of Progression of lesions caused by Mycobacterium ulcerans infection before, during, and after treatment. A–C) Left foot before treatment. D) Left lower leg during treatment. E) Right calf before treatment. F) Right calf after treatment. G, H) Left foot after treatment.

Figure. Progression of lesions caused by Mycobacterium ulcerans infection before, during, and after treatment. A–C) Left foot before treatment. D) Left lower leg during treatment. E) Right calf before treatment. F) Right...

In December 2012, after unsuccessful treatment elsewhere, a 63-year-old white man was referred to the Veterans Affairs Medical Center, St. Louis, Missouri, USA, for evaluation of skin ulcers. Previous medical history indicated hypertension and hyperlipidemia. The patient sought care in April 2012 for a persistent, nonpainful ulcer (1-cm diameter) on his right medial calf (Figure). No previous episodes or other symptoms of infection were reported. The patient had lived abroad for >10 years and had recently returned to the United States from Queensland, Australia, where he spent his last month hiking in the Daintree Rainforest. His health care providers recommended topical antimicrobial drugs and wound care, and a punch biopsy was obtained but the specimen was not stained or cultured for acid-fast bacilli (AFB). Pathologic findings on the biopsy specimen were nonspecific (reactive epidermal changes and ulceration).

Between April and July 2012, the ulcer increased to 4 cm despite multiple debridements. In September a painful, warm, erythematous lesion developed on the patient’s left great toe. He consulted physicians in numerous subspecialties and underwent 2 more biopsies; specimens were not initially stained or cultured for AFB. Pathologic findings from the specimens showed extensive necrosis without granulomas. The ulcers were diagnosed as pyoderma gangrenosum with bacterial superinfection, and treatment was initiated with oral antimicrobial drugs (amoxicillin/clavulanate 875/125 mg twice daily) and prednisone (60 mg/day). Transient improvement occurred, but in late November, the toe lesion worsened.

When the patient was referred to the Veteran’s Affairs Medical Center in December 2012, biopsies were again obtained; pathologic evaluation showed extensive necrosis (without granulomas) and numerous AFB. Fresh frozen tissue was sent to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC; Atlanta, GA, USA) for mycobacterial testing. Empiric treatment with levofloxacin, doxycycline, and azithromycin was initiated for nontuberculous mycobacterial infection, and the previously prescribed prednisone was rapidly tapered and stopped. At CDC, immunohistochemical testing of tissue for mycobacteria showed extensive bacilli. DNA extracted from biopsy samples was evaluated by PCR targeting 16s rRNA and the IS2402 insertion element (5). Sequences of IS2404 amplicons were 100% identical with those for Mycobacterium ulcerans. Tissue cultured (30°C) at CDC grew AFB after 3 months (toe specimen) and 4 months (calf specimen); 16S rRNA gene sequencing confirmed a Mycobacterium species, most closely matching M. marinum or M. ulcerans.

Therapy, guided by World Health Organization recommendations (1), was changed to rifampin (900 mg/day or 10 mg/kg bodyweight), clarithromycin (1,000 mg/day), and moxifloxacin (400 mg/day). In February 2014, after 15 months’ of antimicrobial drug treatment, debridement, and skin grafting to the left foot, the lesions were completely healed.

Conclusions

Imported M. ulcerans disease is exceedingly rare, even in today’s age of global travel. When the infection does occur, diagnosis is often delayed. In addition to the case reported here, 3 other cases imported to the United States have been reported in the literature since 1967 (24).

The 4 M. ulcerans cases diagnosed in the United States were in men (median age 35 years, range 20–63) (Table). Lesions were located on the upper (25%) and lower (75%) extremities, similar to cases in Africa, where lesions commonly develop on the extremities of adults and on the trunk, head, neck, and upper limbs of children (6). Specific exposures were not identified in 3 of the US patients; the fourth had exposure to fresh water, a known risk factor (6). The 2012 imported US case is similar to cases in Australia, where patients have a median age of 61 years at diagnosis, and most have single lesions (95%) involving lower limbs (61%). However, in Australia, the median time from symptom onset to diagnosis is 42 days, consistent with greater familiarity with the disease (7).

The 3 persons with the prior cases of imported M. ulcerans disease in the United States had traveled to western Africa; the case-patient described herein had returned from Australia. Most M. ulcerans cases in Australia are linked to temperate, coastal Victoria and tropical, northern Queensland (8). Persons with cases imported to other M. ulcerans–nonendemic countries mostly traveled to Africa (1 traveled to South America), where the disease is present but uncommon (912).

In regions where M. ulcerans disease is endemic, it is readily recognized on the basis of lesion appearance and chronicity. In areas of Australia where Buruli ulcer disease is nonendemic, diagnosis is delayed (13). A hallmark of imported cases is the difficulty in arriving at a diagnosis due to nonfamiliarity with the disease. For the 4 imported US cases, the median time to empiric antimycobacterial therapy was 20 weeks, and the median time to definitive diagnosis was 8 months. The differential diagnosis for M. ulcerans disease is broad, spanning infectious and noninfectious etiologies, including filariasis, phycomycosis, resolving furuncle, and pyoderma gangrenosum. Samples from the case-patients were uniformly AFB smear-positive, and for 1 case in which the culture failed to grow M. ulcerans, diagnosis was made by clinical and epidemiologic history and presence of AFB in tissue. Because the organism is slow growing, prolonged culture (>3 months) at low temperatures is required. A hallmark of M. ulcerans histopathology is the absence of granulomas and presence of extensive necrosis caused by the organism’s secretion of mycolactone toxin, which suppresses the host’s immune response (7). The absence of granulomas on hematoxylin and eosin staining may result in tissue not being stained for AFB unless clinicians have a high index of suspicion. Furthermore, depending on the bacterial load and focal distribution, bacteria may not be detected by AFB staining. Molecular analysis of tissue is the most sensitive and specific method for rapid and confirmatory diagnosis of M. ulcerans and should be pursued when disease is suspected (14).

Treatment of M. ulcerans disease has changed markedly over the last several decades. Prior to the early 2000s, availability of effective drugs was limited, so surgery was the primary treatment. However, combination therapy with streptomycin, rifampin, and surgery (including skin grafting) has been shown to be effective (1), and some cases can be managed with medical therapy alone. Standard antimicrobial treatment, according to World Health Organization guidelines, consists of administering rifampin (10 mg/kg body weight daily by mouth) for 8 weeks and streptomycin (15 mg/kg body weight daily by intramuscular injection) for 8 weeks (1). Extensive clinical experience has also shown a combination of oral antimicrobial drugs (rifampin with clarithromycin or moxifloxacin) to be effective against Buruli ulcer disease (15). Of the 4 reported US cases, 1 required surgery alone and 3 required drug treatment and surgery. Response to therapy has been favorable: 2 US cases were cured by treatment with oral antimicrobial drugs.

Because awareness of Buruli ulcer disease is limited in regions where M. ulcerans is nonendemic, the potential for delayed diagnosis in such areas is increased. For persons with recent travel from M. ulcerans–endemic regions, Buruli ulcer disease should be considered in the differential diagnoses of unusual chronic cutaneous ulcers and skin ulcers nonresponsive to conventional therapy.

This work was supported by a grant (UL1 TR000448) from the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences to the Washington University Institute of Clinical and Translational Sciences.

Dr Thomas is a fellow in the Division of Infectious Diseases at the Washington University School of Medicine. His primary research interest is in hospital-acquired infections and health care epidemiology.

Top

References

  1. World Health Organization. Treatment of Mycobacterium ulcerans disease (Buruli ulcer): guidance for health workers. 2012 Apr 1 [cited 2014 Mar 01]. http://www.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/77771/http://apps.who.int//iris/bitstream/10665/77771/1/9789241503402_eng.pdf
  2. Semret  M, Koromihis  G, MacLean  JD, Libman  M, Ward  BJ. Mycobacterium ulcerans infection (Buruli ulcer): first reported case in a traveler. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1999;61:68993 .PubMed
  3. Lindo  SD, Daniels  FJ. Buruli ulcer in New York City. JAMA. 1974;228:11389. DOIPubMed
  4. Farber  ER, Tsang  A. Mycobacterial (”Buruli”) ulcer in a Peace Corps worker. Arch Surg. 1967;95:297300. DOIPubMed
  5. Phillips  RO, Sarfo  FS, Osei-Sarpong  F, Boateng  A, Tetteh  I, Lartey  A, Sensitivity of PCR targeting Mycobacterium ulcerans by use of fine-needle aspirates for diagnosis of Buruli ulcer. J Clin Microbiol. 2009;47:9246. DOIPubMed
  6. Jacobsen  KH, Padgett  JJ. Risk factors for Mycobacterium ulcerans infection. Int J Infect Dis. 2010;14:e67781. DOIPubMed
  7. Boyd  SC, Athan  E, Friedman  ND, Hughes  A, Walton  A, Callan  P, Epidemiology, clinical features and diagnosis of Mycobacterium ulcerans in an Australian population. Med J Aust. 2012;196:3414. DOIPubMed
  8. Steffen  CM, Smith  M, McBride  WJ. Mycobacterium ulcerans infection in North Queensland: the ‘Daintree ulcer.’. ANZ J Surg. 2010;80:7326. DOIPubMed
  9. McGann  H, Stragier  P, Portaels  F, Gascoyne Binzi  D, Collyns  T, Lucas  S, Buruli ulcer in United Kingdom tourist returning from Latin America. Emerg Infect Dis. 2009;15:18279. DOIPubMed
  10. Ezzedine  K, Pistone  T, Guir  V, Malvy  D. Painful Buruli ulcer in a Malian visitor to France. Acta Derm Venereol. 2010;90:424. DOIPubMed
  11. Ezzedine  K, Pistone  T, Cottin  J, Marsollier  L, Guir  V, Malvy  D. Buruli ulcer in long-term traveler to Senegal. Emerg Infect Dis. 2009;15:1189. DOIPubMed
  12. Evans  MR, Mawdsley  J, Bull  R, Lockwood  DN, Thangaraj  H, Shanahan  D, Buruli ulcer in a visitor to London. Br J Dermatol. 2003;149:9079. DOIPubMed
  13. Quek  TY, Henry  MJ, Pasco  JA, O’Brien  DP, Johnson  PD, Hughes  A, Mycobacterium ulcerans infection: factors influencing diagnostic delay. Med J Aust. 2007;187:5613 .PubMed
  14. Herbinger  KH, Adjei  O, Awua-Boateng  NY, Nienhuis  WA, Kunaa  L, Siegmund  V, Comparative study of the sensitivity of different diagnostic methods for the laboratory diagnosis of Buruli ulcer disease. Clin Infect Dis. 2009;48:105564. DOIPubMed
  15. Friedman  ND, Athan  E, Hughes  AJ, Khajehnoori  M, McDonald  A, Callan  P, Mycobacterium ulcerans disease: experience with primary oral medical therapy in an Australian cohort. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2013;7:e2315. DOIPubMed

Top

Figure
Table

Top

Cite This Article

DOI: 10.3201/eid2011.131534

Table of Contents – Volume 20, Number 11—November 2014

Comments

Please use the form below to submit correspondence to the authors or contact them at the following address:

Benjamin Stuart Thomas, Washington University School of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, 660 S Euclid Ave, Campus Box 8051, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA

Send To

character(s) remaining.

Comment submitted successfully, thank you for your feedback.

Top

Page created: October 15, 2014
Page updated: October 15, 2014
Page reviewed: October 15, 2014
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.
file_external