Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link
Volume 20, Number 3—March 2014
Dispatch

IgG Against Dengue Virus in Healthy Blood Donors, Zanzibar, Tanzania

Francesco VairoComments to Author , Emanuele Nicastri, Salma Masauni Yussuf, Angela Cannas, Silvia Meschi, Mwanakheir AA Mahmoud, Azza H. Mohamed, Paul Mohamed Maiko, Pasquale De Nardo, Nazario Bevilacqua, Concetta Castilletti, Antonino Di Caro, Vincenzo Racalbuto, and Giuseppe Ippolito
Author affiliations: “L. Spallanzani” National Institute for Infectious Diseases, Rome, Italy (F. Vairo, E. Nicastri, A. Cannas, S. Meschi, P. De Nardo, N. Bevilacqua, C. Castilletti, A. Di Caro, G. Ippolito); Directorate General of Development Cooperation, Rome (F. Vairo, V. Racalbuto); Ministry of Health, Unguja, Zanzibar, Tanzania (M.A.A. Mahmoud, A.H. Mohamed, S.M. Yussuf); Mnazi Mmoja Hospital, Unguja, Tanzania (P.M. Maiko)

Main Article

Table 1

Univariate analysis of characteristics of 500 blood donors according to IgG positivity against dengue virus, Zanzibar, 2011*

Characteristic IgG positive, 
n = 253, no. (%) IgG negative, 
n = 247, no (%) Total, N = 500 OR (95% CI) p value
Age, mean (±SD) 34 (±9) 30 (±8) 32 (±9) <0.001
Age, for 5-y increase† 1.32 (1.19–1.47) <0.001
Age, y
≥36 57 (39.6) 87 (60.4) 144 1
≤25 81 (43.8) 104 (56.2) 185 1.19 (0.76–1.85) 0.444
26–35
115 (67.3)
56 (32.7)
171
3.13 (1.97–4.98)
<0.001
Sex
M 243 (50) 243 (50) 486 1
F
10 (71.4)
4 (28.6)
14
2.5 (0.77–8.07)
0.126
Work
Yes 172 (52.4) 156 (47.6) 328 1
No
80 (47.1)
90 (52.9)
170
0.8 (0.55-1.16)
0.254
Persons in household
1-4 80 (47.1) 90 (52.9) 170 1
5–8 129 (53.8) 111 (46.2) 240 1.3 (0.88–1.93) 0.182
>9
44 (48.9)
46 (51.1)
90
1.07 (0.64–1.79)
0.779
Bed net use
Yes 146 (49.2) 151 (50.8) 297 1
No
107 (52.7
96 (47.3)
203
1.15 (0.80–1.64)
0.436
Insecticide-spraying home
Yes 107 (53.5) 93 (46.5) 200 1
No
146 (48.7)
154 (51.3)
300
0.82 (0.57–1.17)
0.290
Flu
Yes 40 (48.8) 42 (51.2) 82 1
No
213 (51)
205 (49)
418
1.09 (0.67–1.75)
0.719
Resting water‡
Yes 223 (50.7) 217 (49.3) 440 1
No
30 (50.8)
29 (49.2)
59
1.00 (0.58–1.73)
0.981
Water storage§
Yes 172 (48.3) 184 (51.7) 356 1
No
82 (56.9)
62 (43.1)
144
1.39 (0.94–2.06)
0.093
Area of living
Rural 119 (39.4) 183 (60.6) 302 1
Urban 134 (67.7) 64 (32.3) 198 3.18 (2.21-4.69) <0.001

*OR, odds ratio.
†Age, 5-y increase is defined as the odds ratio for every 5 years of increase.
‡Resting water is defined as any presence of water resting around the house (i.e.. ponds, puddles).
§Water storage is defined as any container used to collect rain water with no mention of the size and type of container.

Main Article

Page created: February 19, 2014
Page updated: February 19, 2014
Page reviewed: February 19, 2014
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.
file_external