Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link
Volume 20, Number 9—September 2014
Dispatch

Incidence of Cronobacter spp. Infections, United States, 2003–2009

Mary E. PatrickComments to Author , Barbara E. Mahon, Sharon A. Greene, Joshua Rounds, Alicia Cronquist, Katie Wymore, Effie Boothe, Sarah Lathrop, Amanda Palmer, and Anna Bowen
Author affiliations: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA (M.E. Patrick, B.E. Mahon, S.A. Green, A. Bowen); Minnesota Department of Health, St. Paul, Minnesota, USA (J. Rounds); Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment, Denver, Colorado, USA (A. Cronquist); California Emerging Infections Program, Oakland, California, USA (K. Wymore); Tennessee Department of Health, Nashville, Tennessee, USA (E. Boothe); New Mexico Emerging Infections Program, Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA (S. Lathrop); Maryland Department of Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA (A. Palmer)

Main Article

Figure 2

A) Cronobacter spp. incidence rates, by age group (overall and range by site) in the Foodborne Diseases Active Surveillance Network (FoodNet), 2003–2009. B) Cronobacter spp. incidence rates for invasive isolates by age group (overall and range by site), FoodNet, 2003–2009. Data are based on a sample from laboratories in 6 states (California, Colorado, Maryland, Minnesota, New Mexico, and Tennessee) in the FoodNet catchment area and are reported for 535 of 544 patients (age information missing fo

Figure 2. A) Cronobacter spp. incidence rates, by age group (overall and range by site) in the Foodborne Diseases Active Surveillance Network (FoodNet), 2003–2009. B) Cronobacter spp. incidence rates for invasive isolates by age group (overall and range by site), FoodNet, 2003–2009. Data are based on a sample from laboratories in 6 states (California, Colorado, Maryland, Minnesota, New Mexico, and Tennessee) in the FoodNet catchment area and are reported for 535 of 544 patients (age information missing for 9 patients).

Main Article

Page created: August 13, 2014
Page updated: August 13, 2014
Page reviewed: August 13, 2014
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.
file_external