Volume 21, Number 2—February 2015
Research
Novel Reassortant Influenza A(H5N8) Viruses among Inoculated Domestic and Wild Ducks, South Korea, 2014
Table 1
Virus | Group | Illness† | Weight loss, %‡ | Deaths (%) | HI titer§ (log2, mean±SD) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
A/breeder duck/Kr/Gochang1/2014 (H5N8) |
Inoculated | 3/5 | 32 | 1/5 (20) | 2/5 (5.5 ± 0.7) |
Contact¶ |
2/3 |
21 |
0/3 |
1/3 (5) |
|
A/broiler duck/Kr/Buan2/2014 (H5N8) |
Inoculated | 2/5 | 28 | 0/5 | 4/5 (7.5 ± 0.6) |
Contact¶ |
1/3 |
26 |
0/3 |
1/3 (6) |
|
A/Baikal teal/Kr/Donglim3/2014 (H5N8) |
Inoculated | 3/5 | 34 | 1/5 (20) | 3/5 (7.3) |
Contact¶ |
2/3 |
28 |
0/3 |
0/3 |
|
Controls (no virus exposure) | 0/3 | – | 0/3 | 0/3 |
*Unless indicated otherwise, data represent the number of affected animals/ animals in the group. Animals were inoculated by the intranasal route with 106.5 egg-infective dose50/0.1 mL of the selected viruses; HI, hemagglutination inhibition.
†Severe depression, cloudy eye, and intermittent head-shaking.
‡Weight loss was measured at 11 d postinoculation and is expressed as a percentage of the weight of preinoculation ducks.
§HI titer was assayed in serum samples taken at 14 d postinoculation. Data show the ratio of antibody-positive animals to the number of virus-inoculated animals.
¶Three uninoculated birds were co-housed with infected birds as a contact group 8 h after inoculation.
Page created: January 20, 2015
Page updated: January 20, 2015
Page reviewed: January 20, 2015
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.