Volume 21, Number 4—April 2015
Research
Norovirus Genotype Profiles Associated with Foodborne Transmission, 1999–2012
Table
Genotype |
Database
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
FBVE/Noronet, n = 1,715 | ESR-EpiSurv, –n = 584 | CaliciNet, –n = 3,094 | Systematic literature review, n = 8 | Global profile, –n = 5,393 | |
GII.4 | 0.07 (0.06–0.09) | 0.09 (0.06–0.11) | 0.12 (0.10–0.14) | 0.12 (0.00–0.40) | 0.10 (0.09–0.11) |
Other genotypes | 0.31 (0.25–0.37) | 0.25 (0.17–0.33) | 0.26 (0.23–0.30) | 0.67 (0.16–0.97) | 0.27 (0.25–0.30) |
Mixed outbreaks | 0.75 (0.48–0.94) | 0.50 (0.20–0.75) | 0.16 (0.05–0.33) | CNBC | 0.37 (0.24–0.52) |
Foodborne proportion† | 0.12 | 0.13 | 0.16 | CNBC | 0.14 |
*FBVE/Noronet polymerase profile was used to compare with ESR-EpiSurv polymerase, systematic literature review polymerase, and CaliciNet capsid profiles. CNBC, could not be calculated; ESR, Institute of Environmental Science and Research; FBVE, Foodborne Viruses in Europe. Estimates in italics do not statistically differ from the FBVE/Noronet polymerase profile as a reference; estimates in boldface do statistically differ. †Proportion of outbreaks with an unknown mode of transmission estimated to be attributed to food.
1These authors contributed equally to this article.
Page created: March 11, 2015
Page updated: March 11, 2015
Page reviewed: March 11, 2015
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.