Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link
Volume 21, Number 8—August 2015
Dispatch

Enterovirus A71 Meningoencephalitis Outbreak, Rostov-on-Don, Russia, 2013

Ludmila V. Akhmadishina, Marina V. Govorukhina, Evgeniy V. Kovalev, Svetlana A. Nenadskaya, Olga E. Ivanova, and Alexander N. LukashevComments to Author 
Author affiliations: Chumakov Institute of Poliomyelitis and Viral Encephalitides, Moscow, Russia (L.V. Akhmadishina, O.E. Ivanova, A.N. Lukashev); Center of Hygiene and Epidemiology of Rostov Region, Rostov-on-Don, Russia (M.V. Govorukhina); Administration of Russian Federal Consumer Rights Protection and Human Health Control Service of Rostov Region, Rostov-on-Don (E.V. Kovalev, S.A. Nenadskaya)

Main Article

Figure 2

Phylogenetic tree comparing sequences of outbreak and other enterovirus A type 71 (EV-A71) subgenogroup C4 strains isolated in Russia during 2012–2013 with the most closely related sequences in GenBank. Complete viral protein 1 genome regions (891 nt) were compared. The tree was reconstructed by using a coalescent Bayesian algorithm implemented in BEAST 1.7.5 (11) with the SRD06 substitution model, relaxed exponential clock, and constant population prior. The dataset included 63 GenBank sequence

Figure 2. Phylogenetic tree comparing sequences of outbreak and other enterovirus A type 71 (EV-A71) subgenogroup C4 strains isolated in Russia during 2012–2013 with the most closely related sequences in GenBank. Complete viral protein 1 genome regions (891 nt) were compared. The tree was reconstructed by using a coalescent Bayesian algorithm implemented in BEAST 1.7.5 (11) with the SRD06 substitution model, relaxed exponential clock, and constant population prior. The dataset included 63 GenBank sequences that were most similar to the outbreak virus, as determined by using BLAST (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/blast/Blast.cgi), and 22 EV-A71 subgenogroup C4 sequences obtained elsewhere in Russia, Kazakhstan, and Kyrgyzstan during 2011–2013 (10). Only the part of the tree that is relevant to the discussion is shown. Strain names contain the GenBank or internal reference number, country of isolation, city code for Russian isolates, and year of isolation. City codes: CEK, Chelyabinsk; CHN, China; KAZ, Kazakhstan; KGZ, Kyrgyzstan; KHV, Khabarovsk; MOW, Moscow; OMS, Omsk; ROV, Rostov; RUS, Russia; STW, Stavropol; SVX, Yekaterinburg; UFA, Ufa. GenBank accession numbers for previously unpublished viruses (KM023173–KM023191‏) are shown in the tree. The dotted line shows the outbreak onset on May 31 (some strains were isolated after that date). Circled letters indicate sequences for viruses isolated in Rostov-on-Don and the Rostov Region of Russia (A); Stavropol region of Russia, which neighbors Rostov Region (B); Siberia, the Pacific region of Russia, Kazakhstan, and Kyrgyzstan (C); and Stavropol, central Russia and Ural Region (D). Scale bar indicates year before the 2013 outbreak.

Download

Main Article

References
  1. McMinn  PC. Recent advances in the molecular epidemiology and control of human enterovirus 71 infection. Curr Opin Virol. 2012;2:199–205. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Schuffenecker  I, Mirand  A, Antona  D, Henquell  C, Chomel  JJ, Archimbaud  C, Epidemiology of human enterovirus 71 infections in France, 2000–2009. J Clin Virol. 2011;50:50–6. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Bible  JM, Iturriza-Gomara  M, Megson  B, Brown  D, Pantelidis  P, Earl  P, Molecular epidemiology of human enterovirus 71 in the United Kingdom from 1998 to 2006. J Clin Microbiol. 2008;46:3192–200. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Witsø  E, Palacios  G, Ronningen  KS, Cinek  O, Janowitz  D, Rewers  M, Asymptomatic circulation of HEV71 in Norway. Virus Res. 2007;123:19–29. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Vallet  S, Legrand Quillien  MC, Dailland  T, Podeur  G, Gouriou  S, Schuffenecker  I, Fatal case of enterovirus 71 infection, France, 2007. Emerg Infect Dis. 2009;15:1837–40. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Chumakov  M, Voroshilova  M, Shindarov  L, Lavrova  I, Gracheva  L, Koroleva  G, Enterovirus 71 isolated from cases of epidemic poliomyelitis-like disease in Bulgaria. Arch Virol. 1979;60:329–40. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Nagy  G, Takatsy  S, Kukan  E, Mihaly  I, Domok  I. Virological diagnosis of enterovirus type 71 infections: experiences gained during an epidemic of acute CNS diseases in Hungary in 1978. Arch Virol. 1982;71:217–27. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Simovanian  EN, Denisenko  VB, Bovtalo  LF, Belugina  LV, Kim  MA, Kukhol  YS. Enterovirus infection–71 in children: clinics, diagnostics and management [in Russian]. In: Abstracts of the VI annual All-Russian Congress on Infectious Diseases; Moscow; 2014 Mar 24–26. Moscow: the Congress; 2014. p. 286–7.
  9. Ho  M, Chen  ER, Hsu  KH, Twu  SJ, Chen  KT, Tsai  SF, An epidemic of enterovirus 71 infection in Taiwan. Taiwan Enterovirus Epidemic Working Group. N Engl J Med. 1999;341:929–35. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Akhmadishina  LV, Eremeeva  TP, Trotsenko  OE, Ivanova  OE, Mikhailov  MI, Lukashev  AN. Seroepidemiology and molecular epidemiology of enterovirus 71 in Russia. PLoS ONE. 2014;9:e97404. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Drummond  AJ, Rambaut  A. BEAST: Bayesian evolutionary analysis by sampling trees. BMC Evol Biol. 2007;7:214. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. McWilliam Leitch  EC, Cabrerizo  M, Cardosa  J, Harvala  H, Ivanova  OE, Koike  S, The association of recombination events in the founding and emergence of subgenogroup evolutionary lineages of human enterovirus 71. J Virol. 2012;86:2676–85. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Lukashev  AN, Shumilina  EY, Belalov  IS, Ivanova  OE, Eremeeva  TP, Reznik  VI, Recombination strategies and evolutionary dynamics of the human enterovirus A global gene pool. J Gen Virol. 2014;95:868–73. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar

Main Article

Page created: July 15, 2015
Page updated: July 15, 2015
Page reviewed: July 15, 2015
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.
file_external