Volume 21, Number 8—August 2015
Synopsis
Underrecognition of Dengue during 2013 Epidemic in Luanda, Angola
Table 2
Characteristic | Participants with evidence of recent DENV infection, N = 41 | Participants without evidence of recent DENV infection, N = 379 | p value |
---|---|---|---|
Demographic | |||
Age, median (range) | 14 (4–65) | 24 (0–94) | 0.002 |
Male sex, no (%) | 19 (49) | 157 (43) | 0.65 |
Time in Luanda, y (range) | 13 (3–58) | 20 (0–80) | 0.01 |
Medical history, no. (%) | |||
Fever in past 30 d | 13 (33) | 109 (29) | 0.89 |
Sought medical care | 7 (54) | 62 (57) | 0.42 |
Hospitalized | 1 (14) | 6 (10) | 0.21 |
Diagnosis of dengue | 0 (0) | 4 (6) | – |
Diagnosis of malaria | 5 (71) | 36 (58) | 0.09 |
Diagnosis of typhoid fever | 1 (14) | 4 (6) | – |
Other†/unknown diagnosis | 1 (14) | 18 (29) | – |
Minor bleeding‡ | 2 (15) | 6 (10) | 0.13 |
Dengue with warning signs | 6 (46) | 23 (37) | 0.57 |
Severe dengue | 1 (8) | 5 (8) | 0.86 |
Behavioral, no. (%) | |||
Traveled outside of Luanda in past 30 d | 0 (0) | 24 (6) | 0.07 |
Used bed net in past 30 d | 2 (5) | 69 (19) | 0.05 |
Used repellent in past 30 d | 2 (5) | 46 (12) | 0.03 |
Household, no. (%) | |||
Water supply | |||
Piped water supply | 28 (76) | 186 (67) | 0.77 |
Public water truck | 4 (11) | 84 (30) | 0.04 |
Other§/unknown | 5 (14) | 59 (21) | 0.81 |
Had febrile household member in past 30 d | 19 (56) | 176 (56) | 0.98 |
Has screened windows | 1 (3) | 46 (15) | 0.14 |
Usually leave windows open | 30 (79) | 258 (78) | 0.39 |
Has air conditioning | 15 (39) | 142 (43) | 0.72 |
Use mosquito coils in house or yard | 23 (62) | 176 (53) | 0.87 |
*Thirty-five participants with equivocal anti-DENV IgM ELISA results were excluded from analysis. DENV, dengue virus; –, insufficient numbers for permutation test. Boldface type indicates significance.
†Influenza, arterial hypertension, diabetes, abortion.
‡Petechiae, epistaxis, gingival bleed.
§Well, rain water.
Page created: July 14, 2015
Page updated: July 14, 2015
Page reviewed: July 14, 2015
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.