Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link
Volume 22, Number 11—November 2016
Dispatch

Novel Levofloxacin-Resistant Multidrug-Resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae Serotype 11A Isolates, South Korea

Miey Park, Hyun Soo Kim, Han-Sung Kim, Ji Young Park, Wonkeun Song, Hyoun Chan Cho, and Jae-Seok KimComments to Author 
Author affiliations: Hallym University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea

Cite This Article

Abstract

Of 608 Streptococcus pneumoniae clinical strains isolated at a hospital in South Korea during 2009–2014, sixteen (2.6%) were identified as levofloxacin resistant. The predominant serotype was 11A (9 isolates). Two novel sequence types of multidrug-resistant S. pneumoniae with serotype 11A were identified, indicating continuous diversification of resistant strains.

Streptococcus pneumoniae is a common respiratory pathogen that is the leading cause of community-acquired pneumonia (1). Although β-lactam antibiotics have long been used for the treatment of respiratory diseases, the increasing prevalence of antibiotic-resistant S. pneumoniae strains has hampered treatment in recent decades (2,3). Resistance to fluoroquinolones has emerged in S. pneumoniae and is caused by mutations within short DNA sequences of gyrA and parC genes that encode the type II topoisomerase subunits known as quinolone-resistance determining regions (QRDRs) (1). Previous studies have shown that most of the S. pneumoniae strains with reduced susceptibility to the fluoroquinolone levofloxacin exhibit a multidrug-resistant (MDR) phenotype (2,4). Levofloxacin resistance was closely associated with epidemic MDR clones (3). Although fluoroquinolone resistance rates remain low in S. pneumoniae in most countries, some extensively drug-resistant (XDR) S. pneumoniae isolates have emerged; this resistance is defined as nonsusceptibility to >1 agent in all but <2 antimicrobial categories (2,4). We examined S. pnemoniae isolates from patients in South Korea to determine antimicrobial resistance. We found novel sequence types (STs) of MDR serotype 11A S. pneumoniae that exhibit resistance to second-line antibiotics such as levofloxacin, ceftriaxone, and meropenem.

The Study

During January 2009–December 2014, we isolated 608 S. pneumoniae clinical strains at a 698-bed, university-affiliated hospital in South Korea. We determined MICs by using the broth microdilution method according to Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute guidelines (5). We performed antimicrobial resistance tests for levofloxacin, ofloxacin, ciprofloxacin, penicillin, amoxicillin, ceftriaxone, meropenem, erythromycin, clindamycin, vancomycin, linezolid, tetracycline, and tigecycline. We used S. pneumoniae ATCC 49619 as a control strain. We defined MDR as resistance or intermediate resistance to >3 antimicrobial agents.

We determined serotypes by using the multiplex PCR assay recommended by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (http://www.cdc.gov/ncidod/biotech/strep/pcr.htm). Reactions also included an internal positive control targeting all known pneumococcal cpsA regions (6). We sequenced QRDRs of the gyrA, gyrB, parC, and parE genes in each isolate (7). We performed multilocus sequence typing to investigate the genetic backgrounds of fluoroquinolone-resistant pneumococci (8) and assigned allele numbers and STs by using the PubMLST database (http://pubmlst.org/spneumoniae).

Of the 608 clinical S. pneumoniae isolates, 16 (2.6%) were levofloxacin resistant (MIC >8 μg/mL). We collected 1 resistant isolate in 2009, 3 in 2012, 5 in 2013, and 7 in 2014. Thirteen isolates were from sputum, and 3 isolates were from bronchial lavage. The mean age of patients was 71 years; 14 were male, and 2 were female.

Serotype 11A (n = 9) was most common among the levofloxacin-resistant isolates, followed by serotypes 13 (n = 2), 19F (n = 2), 23F (n = 2), and 6B (n = 1) (Table 1). The most common STs were ST9875 (n = 5), ST8279 (n = 3), and ST9876 (n = 3), which together accounted for 11 of the 16 levofloxacin-resistant isolates. Nine isolates of ST9875, ST9876, and ST10300 were novel STs and had not been identified before this study.

All 16 levofloxacin-resistant isolates contained at least 2 amino acid alterations in the QRDRs of the gyrA, parC, and parE genes. Four QRDR mutations occurred with high frequency: Ser81Phe in gyrA was present in all 16 isolates; Ser79Phe and Lys137Asn in parC were present in 14 and 11 isolates, respectively; and Ile460Val in parE was found in 15 isolates. However, Lys137Asn in parC and Asp435Val and Ile460Val in parE are mutations not involved in resistance, according to previous reports (9,10). Isolate HM-854, which was penicillin susceptible, had Ser81Phe in gyrA and Asp79Asn in parC mutations. All isolates had >1 mutation in parC. The 2 isolates without the Ser79Phe mutation in parC instead carried Asp83Gly or Asp83Asn. The 4 isolates without the Lys137Asn mutation in parC instead carried the Asn91Asp mutation. Isolate HM-1017 (serotype 11A, ST-8279) had 7 QRDR mutations and exhibited the highest resistance against all antimicrobial agents, including levofloxacin (MIC 64 μg/mL). ST-8279 was associated with 2 different serotypes, 11A (n = 2) and 13 (n = 1). The 3 isolates of novel ST-9876 had the same QRDR amino acid changes but had different serotypes, 19F (n = 2) and 23F (n = 1).

The 16 levofloxacin-resistant isolates were also resistant to ofloxacin (MIC >8 μg/mL) and ciprofloxacin (MIC >8 μg/mL) (Table 2). All isolates except 3 had MICs >16 μg/mL against amoxicillin and ceftriaxone. Fourteen isolates were meropenem-resistant (MIC >1 μg/mL); all these isolates were susceptible to vancomycin and linezolid. Only 3 STs (ST-99, ST-189, and ST-3173) exhibited the lowest levofloxacin MIC (8 μg/mL); all these isolates were susceptible to amoxicillin (MIC <2 μg/mL).

Most of the 16 isolates in our study were of serotype 11A (n = 9): 5 isolates of ST-9875, 2 of ST-8279, and 1 each of ST-10300 and ST-99. An XDR ST-8279 (serotype 13) clone described in 2014 (2) was closely related to the 9 serotype 11A isolates in our study. ST-8279 is a double-locus (aroE and xpt) variant of ST-156, which is closely related to global clone Spain9V-3 (2). Spain9V-3 is related to 3 ST-3642 isolates (serotype 11A) reported in Taiwan in 2010 (11) and to 3 MDR ST-166 isolates (serotype 11A) reported in South Korea in 2013 (12). In our study, 3 novel STs of MDR S. pneumoniae were identified (ST-9875, ST-9876, and ST-10300). All the ST-8279, ST-9875, and ST-10300 isolates in our study were serotype 11A, with the exception of 1 of the ST-8279 isolates. The ST-9875 and ST-10300 isolates were single-locus variants (in the spi and gki genes, respectively) of ST-8279. ST-9876 is a 1-locus (aroE) variant of an ST-3384 (serotype 9V) clone registered in the PubMLST database.

Serotypes 19F and 23F are included in the 13-valent pneumococcal conjugated vaccine (PCV13), but serotype 11A is not included in PCV13. Serotype 11A is, however, included in the 23-valent pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine (PPSV23). The US CDC currently recommends the PPSV23 for all adults >65 years of age and all persons 2–64 years of age who are at high risk for pneumococcal disease (13). Through national vaccine programs in South Korea, since 2013, PPSV23 has been provided to all adults >65 years of age, and since 2014, 10-valent pneumococcal conjugated vaccine or PCV13 have been provided to young children free of charge (14).

Conclusions

In South Korea, serotype 11A was the most predominant serotype of the 16 levofloxacin-resistant and XDR S. pneumoniae isolates we found. Seven levofloxacin-resistant S. pneumoniae strains were isolated in 2014 alone; the dominant serotype was again 11A (n = 5). All except 1 of these 7 serotype 11A isolates were resistant to the 9 different antimicrobial agents tested. We identified 3 novel STs of MDR serotype 11A S. pneumoniae in our study. S. pneumoniae serotype 11A isolates with novel STs require careful monitoring to combat the increasing prevalence and diversification of MDR pneumococcal strains, especially those with resistance to fluoroquinolones, β-lactams, and third-generation cephalosporins.

Dr. Park is a senior researcher at Hallym University’s Kangdong Sacred Heart Hospital in Seoul, South Korea. Her primary research interests include clinical research on emerging infections, vaccine-preventable diseases, and foodborne pathogens.

Top

Acknowledgment

This research was supported by Hallym University Research Fund 2015 (HURF-2015-37).

Top

References

  1. Redgrave  LS, Sutton  SB, Webber  MA, Piddock  LJ. Fluoroquinolone resistance: mechanisms, impact on bacteria, and role in evolutionary success. Trends Microbiol. 2014;22:43845.DOIPubMed
  2. Cho  SY, Baek  JY, Kang  CI, Kim  SH, Ha  YE, Chung  DR, Extensively drug-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae, South Korea, 2011-2012. Emerg Infect Dis. 2014;20:86971.DOIPubMed
  3. Kim  SH, Song  JH, Chung  DR, Thamlikitkul  V, Yang  Y, Wang  H, ; ANSORP Study Group. Changing trends in antimicrobial resistance and serotypes of Streptococcus pneumoniae isolates in Asian countries: an Asian Network for Surveillance of Resistant Pathogens (ANSORP) study. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2012;56:141826.DOIPubMed
  4. Kang  CI, Baek  JY, Jeon  K, Kim  SH, Chung  DR, Peck  KR, Bacteremic pneumonia caused by extensively drug-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae. J Clin Microbiol. 2012;50:41757.DOIPubMed
  5. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. Performance standard for antimicrobial susceptibility testing. Twenty-fourth informational supplement. M100–S24. Wayne (PA): The Institute; 2014.
  6. Pai  R, Gertz  RE, Beall  B. Sequential multiplex PCR approach for determining capsular serotypes of Streptococcus pneumoniae isolates. J Clin Microbiol. 2006;44:12431.DOIPubMed
  7. Pan  XS, Ambler  J, Mehtar  S, Fisher  LM. Involvement of topoisomerase IV and DNA gyrase as ciprofloxacin targets in Streptococcus pneumoniae. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1996;40:23216.PubMed
  8. Enright  MC, Spratt  BG. A multilocus sequence typing scheme for Streptococcus pneumoniae: identification of clones associated with serious invasive disease. Microbiology. 1998;144:304960.DOIPubMed
  9. Richter  SS, Heilmann  KP, Beekmann  SE, Miller  NJ, Rice  CL, Doern  GV. The molecular epidemiology of Streptococcus pneumoniae with quinolone resistance mutations. Clin Infect Dis. 2005;40:22535.DOIPubMed
  10. Duesberg  CB, Welte  T, Pletz  MW. The Lys137Asn mutation as surrogate marker for developing fluoroquinolone resistance in Streptococcus pneumoniae? J Chemother. 2007;19:7501, discussion 751–2.DOIPubMed
  11. Hsieh  YC, Chang  LY, Huang  YC, Lin  HC, Huang  LM, Hsueh  PR. Circulation of international clones of levofloxacin non-susceptible Streptococcus pneumoniae in Taiwan. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2010;16:9738.DOIPubMed
  12. Lee  S, Kim  SH, Park  M, Bae  S. High prevalence of multiresistance in levofloxacin-nonsusceptible Streptococcus pneumoniae isolates in Korea. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2013;76:22731.DOIPubMed
  13. Nuorti  JP, Whitney  CG; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Prevention of pneumococcal disease among infants and children - use of 13-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine and 23-valent pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine - recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP). MMWR Recomm Rep. 2010;59(RR-11):118.PubMed
  14. Yang  TU, Kim  E, Park  YJ, Kim  D, Kwon  YH, Shin  JK, Successful introduction of an underutilized elderly pneumococcal vaccine in a national immunization program by integrating the pre-existing public health infrastructure. Vaccine. 2016;34:16239.DOIPubMed

Top

Tables

Top

Cite This Article

DOI: 10.3201/eid2211.151450

Table of Contents – Volume 22, Number 11—November 2016

Comments

Please use the form below to submit correspondence to the authors or contact them at the following address:

Jae-Seok Kim, Department of Laboratory Medicine, Kangdong Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University College of Medicine, 445 Gil-dong, Kangdong-gu, Seoul 134-701, South Korea

Send To

character(s) remaining.

Comment submitted successfully, thank you for your feedback.

Top

Page created: October 19, 2016
Page updated: October 19, 2016
Page reviewed: October 19, 2016
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.
file_external