Skip directly to search Skip directly to A to Z list Skip directly to page options Skip directly to site content

Volume 23, Number 2—February 2017

Research Letter

Diphyllobothrium nihonkaiense Tapeworm Larvae in Salmon from North America

Roman KuchtaComments to Author , Mikuláš Oros, Jayde Ferguson, and Tomáš Scholz
Author affiliations: Biology Centre, Czech Academy of Sciences, České Budějovice, Czech Republic (R. Kuchta, T. Scholz); Slovak Academy of Sciences, Košice, Slovak Republic (M. Oros); State of Alaska Department of Fish and Game, Anchorage, Alaska, USA (J. Ferguson)

Cite This Article

Close

Highlight and copy the desired format.

EID Kuchta R, Oros M, Ferguson J, Scholz T. Diphyllobothrium nihonkaiense Tapeworm Larvae in Salmon from North America. Emerg Infect Dis. 2017;23(2):351-353. https://dx.doi.org/10.3201/eid2302.161026
AMA Kuchta R, Oros M, Ferguson J, et al. Diphyllobothrium nihonkaiense Tapeworm Larvae in Salmon from North America. Emerging Infectious Diseases. 2017;23(2):351-353. doi:10.3201/eid2302.161026.
APA Kuchta, R., Oros, M., Ferguson, J., & Scholz, T. (2017). Diphyllobothrium nihonkaiense Tapeworm Larvae in Salmon from North America. Emerging Infectious Diseases, 23(2), 351-353. https://dx.doi.org/10.3201/eid2302.161026.

Abstract

Diphyllobothriosis is reemerging because of global importation and increased popularity of eating raw fish. We detected Diphyllobothrium nihonkaiense plerocercoids in the musculature of wild pink salmon (Oncorhynchus gorbuscha) from Alaska, USA. Therefore, salmon from the American and Asian Pacific coasts and elsewhere pose potential dangers for persons who eat these fish raw.

The Japanese broad tapeworm, Diphyllobothrium nihonkaiense (Yamane, Kamo, Bylund et Wikgren, 1986) (Cestoda: Diphyllobothriidea) is the second most common causative agent of diphyllobothriosis in humans; ≈2,000 cases have been reported, mainly from northeastern Asia (1). However, recent studies that used molecular methods indicate that the number of human cases caused by this tapeworm may have been highly underestimated (1). In addition, increasing popularity of eating raw fish is probably responsible for the increased number of imported cases in regions where this infection is not endemic (1).

In 1986, the Japanese broad tapeworm was recognized as a human parasite separate from the most common broad fish tapeworm, Diphyllobothrium latum, in Japan (2). The validity of the Japanese broad tapeworm was later confirmed by molecular data, especially the cox1 gene sequences (1). Evidence indicates that virtually all previous cases of diphyllobothriosis in humans in Japan, South Korea, and the Pacific coast of Russia that were attributed to D. latum tapeworms were caused by D. nihonkaiense tapeworms (1,3). Moreover, D. klebanovskii (Muratov et Posokhov, 1988) from the Pacific coast of Russia was recently synonymized with the Japanese broad tapeworm (1,4).

Studies on the transmission of the Japanese broad tapeworm in Japan and eastern Russia (Primorsky Region) have identified 4 species of Pacific salmon as the principal sources of human infection: chum salmon (Oncorhynchus keta), masu salmon (O. masou), pink salmon (O. gorbuscha), and sockeye salmon (O. nerka). These anadromous fish become infected in brackish water along the coast of the North Pacific Ocean (1,5). Tapeworm larvae infective for humans (plerocercoids) have been described in only a few studies performed in eastern Russia and Japan, (e.g., as plerocercoids type F from the musculature of chum salmon in Kamchatka, Russia) (2,6,7).

For decades, the possible occurrence of the Japanese broad tapeworm on the Pacific coast of North America was ignored, but since 2008, human infection with adult tapeworms and natural infection of carnivores (wolves and bears) with adult tapeworms have been confirmed by use of molecular markers (1,810). We report finding Japanese broad tapeworm plerocercoids in North America. Our main intent is to alert parasitologists and medical doctors about the potential danger of human infection with this long tapeworm resulting from consumption of infected salmon imported (on ice) from the Pacific coast of North America and elsewhere.

Figure

Thumbnail of A) Pink salmon (Oncorhynchus gorbuscha) from Alaska, USA. B) Plerocercoid of Japanese broad tapeworm (Diphyllobothrium nihonkaiense) (arrow) deep in the muscles of the salmon. C) Live D. nihonka plerocercoid in saline (inset) and scanning electron micrograph after fixation with hot water; note the scolex with a long, slit-like bothrium opened anteriorly.

Figure. A) Pink salmon (Oncorhynchus gorbuscha) from Alaska, USA. B) Plerocercoid of Japanese broad tapeworm (Diphyllobothrium nihonkaiense) (arrow) deep in the muscles of the salmon. C) Live D. nihonka plerocercoid in saline...

Video

Thumbnail of Live plerocercoid of the Japanese broad tapeworm (Diphyllobothrium nihonkaiense) obtained from the musculature of pink salmon (Oncorhynchus gorbuscha) from Alaska, USA.

Video. (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3-1dd17LHmw) Live plerocercoid of the Japanese broad tapeworm (Diphyllobothrium nihonkaiense) obtained from the musculature of pink salmon (Oncorhynchus gorbuscha) from Alaska, USA.

In July 2013, we examined 64 wild Pacific salmon of 5 species:1 chinook salmon (O. tshawytscha), 1 coho salmon (O. kisutch), 23 pink salmon, 8 rainbow trout (O. mykiss), and 31 sockeye salmon in south-central Alaska, USA. The salmon were collected by angling (under permit no. SF2013–218) or obtained from local fishermen. The musculature was filleted to narrow slices, and internal organs were observed under a magnifying glass. Several morphotypes of diphyllobothriid plerocercoids were found, including a single larva in the musculature of pink salmon collected in Resurrection Creek (near Hope, Alaska). This plerocercoid, which was later identified as that of the D. nihonkaiense tapeworm, was found unencysted, deep in the musculature of the anterior part of the fish, near the spinal cord (Figure). It was highly motile, had a retracting scolex, and was 8–15 mm long, depending on the state of elongation or contraction (Figure; Video). After fixation with hot water, the plerocercoid was 10 mm long, had an elongate scolex 1.05 mm long and 0.60 mm wide, and possessed 2 narrow bothria opened on the apical end (Figure). The sequences of the cox1 and 28S rRNA genes (lsrDNA) were almost identical to those of the Japanese broad tapeworm available in the GenBank database (sequence similarities of 99% [GenBank accession no. KY000483] and 100% [KY000484], respectively), thus providing unequivocal support that this plerocercoid was a larva of the D. nihonkaiense tapeworm reported from North America.

This report provides additional evidence that salmon from the Pacific coast of North America may represent a source of human infection. Because Pacific salmon are frequently exported unfrozen, on ice, plerocercoids may survive transport and cause human infections in areas where they are not endemic, such as China, Europe, New Zealand, and middle and eastern United States (1). It is probable that most diphyllobothriosis cases originally attributed to D. latum may have been caused by D. nihonkaiense tapeworms. For more effective control of this human foodborne parasite, detection of the sources of human infection (i.e., host associations), and critical revision of the current knowledge of the distribution and transmission patterns of individual human-infecting tapeworms are needed.

Dr. Kuchta is a researcher at the Institute of Parasitology, Czech Academy of Sciences. His research interests include biology, phylogeny, and molecular diagnosis of parasitic helminths, mainly those that cause diphyllobothriosis and sparganosis.

Acknowledgments

We thank Jan Brabec for the new sequences of studied material.

This work was supported by the Czech Science Foundation (grant no. P506/12/1632); the Institute of Parasitology, Biology Centre of the Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic (RVO: 60077344); the Grant Agency VEGA (no. 2/0159/16); and the Slovak Research and Development Agency (no. APVV-15-0004).

References

  1. Kuchta R, Scholz T, Brabec J, Narduzzi-Wicht B. Diphyllobothrium, Diplogonoporus and Spirometra. In: Xiao L, Ryan U, Feng F, editors. Biology of Foodborne Parasites Section III. Important Foodborne Helminths. Boca Raton (FL): CRC Press; 2015. p. 299–326.
  2. Yamane Y, Kamo H, Bylund G, Wikgren BJP. Diphyllobothrium nihonkaiense sp. nov. (Cestoda: Diphyllobothriidae): revised identification of Japanese broad tapeworm. Shimane J Med Sci. 1986;10:2948.
  3. Choi S, Cho J, Jung B-K, Kim D-G, Jeon SJ, Jeon H-K, et al. Diphyllobothrium nihonkaiense: wide egg size variation in 32 molecularly confirmed adult specimens from Korea. Parasitol Res. 2015;114:212934. DOIPubMed
  4. Arizono N, Shedko M, Yamada M, Uchikawa R, Tegoshi T, Takeda K, et al. Mitochondrial DNA divergence in populations of the tapeworm Diphyllobothrium nihonkaiense and its phylogenetic relationship with Diphyllobothrium klebanovskii. Parasitol Int. 2009;58:228. DOIPubMed
  5. Muratov IV. [A new type of diphyllobothriasis foci in the Far East] [in Russian]. Med Parazitol (Mosk). 1992;61:257.PubMed
  6. Gorman-Kadoshnikov PB, Chizhova TP, Iakovleva TA. [A new type of Diphyllobothria plerocercoids from salmon of Kamchatka] [in Russian]. Med Parazitol (Mosk). 1970;39:2379.PubMed
  7. Dovgalev AS, Valovaya MA, Piskunova YA, Romanenko NA, Khobakova VI, Artamoshin AS. The morphology of human diphyllobothriasis agent in the Far East [in Russian]. Med Parazitol (Mosk). 1991;60:426.PubMed
  8. Bryan HM, Darimont CT, Hill JE, Paquet PC, Thompson RC, Wagner B, et al. Seasonal and biogeographical patterns of gastrointestinal parasites in large carnivores: wolves in a coastal archipelago. Parasitology. 2012;139:78190. DOIPubMed
  9. Catalano S, Lejeune M, Tizzani P, Verocai GG, Schwantje H, Nelson C, et al. Helminths of grizzly bears (Ursus arctos) and American black bears (Ursus americanus) in Alberta and British Columbia, Canada. Can J Zool. 2015;93:76572. DOI
  10. Fang FC, Billman ZP, Wallis CK, Abbott AN, Olson JC, Dhanireddy S, et al. Human Diphyllobothrium nihonkaiense infection in Washington State. J Clin Microbiol. 2015;53:13557. DOIPubMed

Figures

Cite This Article

DOI: 10.3201/eid2302.161026

Table of Contents – Volume 23, Number 2—February 2017

Comments

Please use the form below to submit correspondence to the authors or contact them at the following address:

Roman Kuchta, , Institute of Parasitology, Biology Centre of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Branišovská 31 370 05, České Budějovice, Czech Republic


character(s) remaining.

Comment submitted successfully, thank you for your feedback.

TOP