Volume 24, Number 10—October 2018
Research
Evaluation of Nowcasting for Detecting and Predicting Local Influenza Epidemics, Sweden, 2009–2014
Table 3
Influenza virus active |
Time-of-peak predictions† | Peak intensity predictions | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Date when prediction made |
Time to peak, d |
Prediction error |
Interpretation |
Category (cases/d/100,000 population) |
Interpretation |
|||
Predicted |
Factual |
|||||||
2009 pH1N1 | 2009 Sep 27 | 8 | −28 | Poor | Medium (3.3) | Medium (2.9) | Successful | |
2010–11 B and pH1N1 | 2011 Feb 11 | 10 | 0 | Excellent | Medium (4.5) | Medium (4.9) | Successful | |
2011–12 A(H3N2) | 2012 Feb 25 | 9 | 7 | Good | Medium (4.5) | Very high (12.4) | Unsuccessful | |
2012–13 A(H3N2), B, and pH1N1 | 2013 Feb 22 | 10 | −7 | Good | Very high (10.1) | Very high (11.7) | Successful | |
2013–14 A(H3N2), B, and pH1N1 | 2014 Feb 17 | 8 | −8 | Acceptable | Nonepidemic (1.0) | Medium (3.4) | Unsuccessful |
*pH1N1, pandemic influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 virus.
†Positive value means that the peak was predicted to be reached before the actual peak occurred; negative value means that the peak was predicted to be reached after the actual peak occurred.
Page created: September 14, 2018
Page updated: September 14, 2018
Page reviewed: September 14, 2018
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.