Volume 24, Number 10—October 2018
Research
Zika Virus Infection during Pregnancy and Effects on Early Childhood Development, French Polynesia, 2013–2016
Table 3
Exposures | Case-patients, no. (%) | Controls, no. (%) | Matched crude OR (95% CI) | Matched adjusted OR† (95% CI) | LRT p value |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Zika virus seropositivity |
20 (95) |
78 (76) |
6.02 (0.77–47.1) |
7.07 (0.86–58.3) |
0.02 |
Reported Zika virus infection | |||||
No infection during pregnancy‡ | 1 (5) | 24 (24) | 1 | 1 | 0.04 |
Asymptomatic (timing unknown)§ | 12 (57) | 61 (60) | 2.05 (0.54–7.80) | 1.93 (0.47–7.96) | |
Symptomatic during pregnancy¶ | 8 (38) | 17 (17) | 6.79 (1.36–33.8) | 7.19 (1.39–37.2) |
*LRT, likelihood ratio test; NA, not applicable; OR, odds ratio.
†Adjusted for maternal socioeconomic status.
‡Seronegative mothers and seropositive mothers who reported Zika-like illness outside pregnancy.
§Seropositive mothers who did not report Zika-like illness during or outside pregnancy.
¶Seropositive mothers who reported Zika-like illness during pregnancy.
1These authors contributed equally to this article.
Page created: September 16, 2018
Page updated: September 16, 2018
Page reviewed: September 16, 2018
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.