Volume 24, Number 12—December 2018
Research
Spatial Analysis of Wildlife Tuberculosis Based on a Serologic Survey Using Dried Blood Spots, Portugal
Table 2
Coefficient (95% CI) | p value | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Intercept | −8.561 (−25.992 to −2.644) | 0.073 | −12.886 (−19.767 to −7.985) | 1.3 | |
Wild boar historical refuge | −0.114 (−0.356 to −0.020) | 0.101 | −0.088 (−0.170 to −0.022) | 1.4 | |
Bovine tuberculosis incidence in cattle | 73.719 (6.919 to 231.075) | 0.126 | 35.797 (−4.396 to 82.742) | −1.6 | |
Management intensity | 29.296 (6.167 to 101.249) | 0.126 | 25.009 (6.510 to 49.979) | −1.3 | |
Red deer hunting bag | 9.391 (1.884 to 34.953) | 0.150 | 6.990 (1.823 to 11.814) | −0.8 | |
Red deer hunting bag × management intensity | −30.922 (−118.421 to −7.887) | 0.162 | −23.221 (−39.083 to −8.343) | 0.9 |
1Current affiliation: Research Centre in Biodiversity and Genetic Resources, University of Porto,Vairão, Portugal.
Page created: November 19, 2018
Page updated: November 19, 2018
Page reviewed: November 19, 2018
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.