Volume 24, Number 6—June 2018
Research
Influenza D Virus Infection in Feral Swine Populations, United States
Table 3
Timeline |
HAI titer |
Nasal titer |
Inoculated swine, dpi, n = 12 | ||
3 | 0 (12) | 7 (12) |
5 | 6 (11) | 6 (11) |
7 | 8 (8) | 0 (8) |
9 | 5 (5) | 0 (5) |
11 | 3 (3) | 0 (3) |
21 |
1 (1) |
0 (1) |
Control swine, dpi, n = 6‡ | ||
3 | 0 (6) | 0 (6) |
5 | 0 (5) | 0 (5) |
7 | 0 (3) | 0 (3) |
9 | 0 (2) | 0 (2) |
11 | 0 (1) | 0 (1) |
21 |
0 (1) |
0 (1) |
Contact swine, dpe, n = 8§ | ||
1 | 0 (8) | 0 (8) |
3 | 0 (7) | 0 (7) |
5 | 0 (6) | 1 (6) |
7 | 0 (5) | 1 (5) |
9 | 0 (4) | 1 (4) |
19 | 1 (3) | 0 (3) |
*HAI titer data indicate number of swine that seroconverted (no. tested). Seropositivity defined as HAI titer >1:40. Nasal titer data indicate number of swine that shed virus (no. tested). Animals with a nasal wash viral titer >0.699 log10 TCID50/mL were considered as shedding virus. dpe, days postexposure; dpi, days postinoculation; HAI, hemagglutination inhibition; TCID50, 50% tissue culture infective dose.
†Feral swine inoculated with influenza D/bovine/C00046N/Mississippi/2014 virus.
‡Feral swine inoculated with sterile phosphate-buffered saline.
§Feral swine with direct-contact exposure to influenza D virus–inoculated swine.
1These authors contributed equally to this article.
2Current affiliation: South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China.