Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link
Volume 24, Number 7—July 2018
Research Letter

Spillover of Swine Coronaviruses, United States

Sarah N. BevinsComments to Author , Mark Lutman, Kerri Pedersen, Nicole Barrett, Tom Gidlewski, Tom J. Deliberto, and Alan B. Franklin
Author affiliations: US Department of Agriculture Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service—Wildlife Services National Wildlife Research Center, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA (S.N. Bevins, M. Lutman, K. Pedersen, N. Barrett, T. Gidlewski, T.J. Deliberto, A.B. Franklin)

Cite This Article


Porcine epidemic diarrhea virus, a pathogen first detected in US domestic swine in 2013, has rapidly spilled over into feral swine populations. A better understanding of the factors associated with pathogen emergence is needed to better manage, and ultimately prevent, future spillover events from domestic to nondomestic animals.

Pathogen spillover mechanisms vary, but one route involves pathogens moving from heavily infected domestic animal hosts to nondomestic hosts (1). These spillover and emergence events create a dynamic landscape for pathogen transmission.

Porcine epidemic virus (PEDV) is an emergent pathogen in the United States. It can cause 90%–95% mortality in young, naive pigs and substantial weight loss and dehydration in adult swine. The virus was first documented in the United States in April 2013 and spread rapidly, leading to loss of 10% of the US commercial swine population in 31 states within 18 months (2), which cost the industry >US $400 million. Horizontal transmission of the virus on shared agricultural resources (3) most likely aided its rapid spread among facilities, demonstrating the difficulty of slowing the spread of robust pathogens.

During October 2012–September 2015, we collected serum from feral swine and analyzed it for PEDV exposure. The United States has ≈5–6 million feral swine, and their populations are expanding rapidly (4). Although opportunities for direct contact between feral swine and pigs in biosecure swine operations are limited, interactions have been documented with smaller backyard operations, and a recent multistate brucellosis outbreak was linked to backyard pigs infected by feral swine (5). Disease spillover into nondomestic hosts can serve as a continuous source for reintroduction into domestic animals, complicating international trade (6).


Thumbnail of Collection locations of feral swine samples tested for exposure to swine coronaviruses, United States. In California, 4 PEDV-positive samples were detected at the same location. Samples that were ELISA-positive, but PEDV-negative probably indicate exposure to transmissible gastroenteritis virus.

Figure. Collection locations of feral swine samples tested for exposure to swine coronaviruses, United States. In California, 4 PEDV-positive samples were detected at the same location. Samples that were ELISA-positive, but PEDV-negative...

Of the 7,997 feral swine samples tested (Figure), 253 tested positive by PEDV ELISA (seroprevalence 3.2% [95% CI 2.8%–3.5%]). Those 253 samples underwent additional screening, and 8 (seroprevalence 0.1% [95% CI 0.03%–0.16%]) were confirmed to be PEDV antibody positive (Technical Appendix Tables 1, 2). Two additional samples were considered suspected positives. The remaining 245 positive samples (seroprevalence 3.1% [95% CI 2.7%–3.4%]) probably represent exposure to transmissible gastroenteritis virus (TGEV) rather than PEDV (Technical Appendix Table 1).

The 8 PEDV-seropositive feral swine samples were from Hawaii and California (Figure). PEDV was first confirmed in California domestic swine in December 2013. The 4 positive feral swine samples from California were collected in September 2014 from adult animals in Santa Clara County. In Hawaii, seropositive feral swine were detected on Oahu and Kauai (Figure). Hawaii confirmed its first case of PEDV in domestic swine on Oahu in November 2014, but our findings identified a PEDV-positive feral swine sample collected in April 2014, before detection in domestic swine on the same island. This finding suggests initial PEDV introduction into domestic pigs in Hawaii might have gone undetected for 7 months before the first confirmed case. The 4 PEDV-positive feral swine samples from Hawaii were collected at 4 different times.

Results indicate that this newly introduced virus spilled over from domestic livestock to a nondomestic species during a relatively short period (<1 year). Prior research suggests directionality (7,8), with the virus moving from domestic swine to feral swine, rather than the reverse. Data presented here support this finding because positive feral swine were not detected until a year after detection in US domestic swine.

Biosecurity in the US commercial swine industry is comprehensive; however, the spread of PEDV demonstrates that a modern and precisely managed livestock industry is still susceptible to emergent pathogens. PEDV is relatively hardy, persisting on fomites for up to 20 days at low (4°C) temperatures (9). Biosecurity designed to prevent transmission of labile pathogens or to prevent introduction of a new pathogen through traditional routes may be insufficient for nonlabile pathogens introduced through new mechanisms.

The transmission pathway from infected facilities to feral swine is unknown. Previous research has detected PEDV in the environment (3,7) but did not differentiate viral RNA from infectious virus. Swine facilities often move waste to holding ponds, and these ponds could be a source of infectious virus. Infected swine in backyard operations also could facilitate spillover.

Our data also demonstrate that 3.1% of feral swine had been exposed to another coronavirus, probably TGEV. TGEV, like PEDV, is found only in swine, can survive on fomites, and can cause high mortality rates in pigs <2 weeks of age. TGEV has been found in the US domestic swine industry since the 1940s. We found TGEV-positive feral swine throughout the entire sampling period and throughout the United States (Figure; Technical Appendix Tables 1, 2), suggesting that TGEV is probably being persistently transmitted among feral swine, although continual spillover from domestic swine cannot be ruled out. Whether PEDV will display a similar pattern of endemicity over time is unknown; however, our data did not suggest continual transmission or high seroprevalence. For example, the most recent PEDV-seropositive feral swine in Hawaii was detected in January 2015. Seventy-six feral swine sampled from the same island after that date were seronegative, suggesting that either seroprevalence was low enough to evade detection or that viral transmission burned out, most likely after initial deaths of susceptible piglets. Research in Asia, however, has found higher PEDV exposure in wild boar, reinforcing that animals can survive infection and raising the possibility of continual transmission in nondomestic swine populations (6).

Dr. Bevins is a research biologist at the US Department of Agriculture Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service—Wildlife Services National Wildlife Research Center and affiliate faculty at Colorado State University. Her primary research interests include disease ecology.



We thank the federal and state biologists, along with technicians at the US Department of Agriculture National Wildlife Research Center, for making this research possible.



  1. Power  AG, Mitchell  CE. Pathogen spillover in disease epidemics. Am Nat. 2004;164(Suppl 5):S7989. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Jung  K, Saif  LJ. Porcine epidemic diarrhea virus infection: Etiology, epidemiology, pathogenesis and immunoprophylaxis. Vet J. 2015;204:13443. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Lowe  J, Gauger  P, Harmon  K, Zhang  J, Connor  J, Yeske  P, et al. Role of transportation in spread of porcine epidemic diarrhea virus infection, United States. Emerg Infect Dis. 2014;20:8724. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Bevins  SN, Pedersen  K, Lutman  MW, Gidlewski  T, Deliberto  TJ. Consequences associated with the recent range expansion of nonnative feral swine. Bioscience. 2014;64:2919. DOIGoogle Scholar
  5. Glazier  N. Brucellosis—USA: (New York) swine, human, 2016. ProMED mail. 2017 Mar 17 [cited 2077 Dec 2]., archive no. 20170321.4912122.
  6. Lee  DU, Kwon  T, Je  SH, Yoo  SJ, Seo  SW, Sunwoo  SY, et al. Wild boars harboring porcine epidemic diarrhea virus (PEDV) may play an important role as a PEDV reservoir. Vet Microbiol. 2016;192:904. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Bowman  AS, Krogwold  RA, Price  T, Davis  M, Moeller  SJ. Investigating the introduction of porcine epidemic diarrhea virus into an Ohio swine operation. BMC Vet Res. 2015;11:38. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Scott  A, McCluskey  B, Brown-Reid  M, Grear  D, Pitcher  P, Ramos  G, et al. Porcine epidemic diarrhea virus introduction into the United States: Root cause investigation. Prev Vet Med. 2016;123:192201. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Kim  Y, Yang  M, Goyal  SM, Cheeran  MC-J, Torremorell  M. Evaluation of biosecurity measures to prevent indirect transmission of porcine epidemic diarrhea virus. BMC Vet Res. 2017;13:89. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar




Cite This Article

DOI: 10.3201/eid2407.172077

Table of Contents – Volume 24, Number 7—July 2018

EID Search Options
presentation_01 Advanced Article Search – Search articles by author and/or keyword.
presentation_01 Articles by Country Search – Search articles by the topic country.
presentation_01 Article Type Search – Search articles by article type and issue.



Please use the form below to submit correspondence to the authors or contact them at the following address:

Sarah N. Bevins, USDA National Wildlife Research Center, 4101 Laporte Ave, Fort Collins, CO 80521, USA

Send To

10000 character(s) remaining.


Page created: June 18, 2018
Page updated: June 18, 2018
Page reviewed: June 18, 2018
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.