Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link
Volume 24, Number 8—August 2018
Dispatch

Therapeutic and Transmission-Blocking 
Efficacy of Dihydroartemisinin/Piperaquine and Chloroquine against Plasmodium vivax Malaria, Cambodia

Jean Popovici, Amelie Vantaux, Lyse Primault, Reingsey Samreth, Eak Por Piv, Sophalai Bin, Saorin Kim, Dysoley Lek, David Serre, and Didier MenardComments to Author 
Author affiliations: Institut Pasteur, Phnom Penh, Cambodia (J. Popovici, A. Vantaux, L. Primault, R. Samreth, E.P. Piv, S. Bin, S. Kim, D. Menard); National Center for Malaria Control, Phnom Penh (D. Lek); University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA (D. Serre); Institut Pasteur, Paris, France (D. Menard)

Main Article

Figure 1

Cumulative proportion of patients with nonrecurrent Plasmodium vivax malaria given a 3-day course of DHA/PPQ and chloroquine detected by PCR within 63 days of follow up, Cambodia. *p<0.01, by log-rank test during Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. DHA/PPQ, dihydroartemisinin/piperaquine.

Figure 1. Cumulative proportion of patients with nonrecurrent Plasmodium vivax malaria given a 3-day course of DHA/PPQ and chloroquine detected by PCR within 63 days of follow up, Cambodia. *p<0.01, by log-rank test during Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. DHA/PPQ, dihydroartemisinin/piperaquine.

Main Article

Page created: July 17, 2018
Page updated: July 17, 2018
Page reviewed: July 17, 2018
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.
file_external