Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link
Volume 24, Number 8—August 2018
Online Report

Case Definition of Chronic Pulmonary Aspergillosis in Resource-Constrained Settings

David W. DenningComments to Author , Iain D. Page, Jeremiah Chakaya, Kauser Jabeen, Cecilia M. Jude, Muriel Cornet, Ana Alastruey-Izquierdo, Felix Bongomin, Paul Bowyer, Arunaloke Chakrabarti, Sara Gago, John Guto, Bruno Hochhegger, Martin Hoenigl, Muhammad Irfan, Nicholas Irurhe, Koichi Izumikawa, Bruce Kirenga, Veronica Manduku, Samihah Moazam, Rita O. Oladele, Malcolm D. Richardson, Juan Luis Rodriguez Tudela, Anna Rozaliyani, Helmut J.F. Salzer, Richard Sawyer, Nasilele F. Simukulwa, Alena Skrahina, Charlotte Sriruttan, Findra Setianingrum, Bayu A.P. Wilopo, Donald C. Cole, and Haileyesus Getahun
Author affiliations: University of Manchester, Manchester, UK (D.W. Denning, I.D. Page, F. Bongomin, P. Bowyer, S. Gago, R.O. Oladele, C. Sriruttan, F. Setianingrum, B.A.P. Wilopo); Wythenshawe Hospital Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester (D.W. Denning, I.D. Page, S. Moazam, M.D. Richardson, R. Sawyer); The Global Action Fund for Fungal Infections, Geneva, Switzerland (D.W. Denning, J. Guto, J.L. Rodriguez Tudela); Kenya Medical Research Institute, Nairobi, Kenya (J. Chakaya, V. Manduku); Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan (K. Jabeen, M. Irfan); Olive View–UCLA Medical Center, Sylmar, California, USA (C.M. Jude); Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble, France (M. Cornet); Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain (A. Alastruey-Izquierdo); Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India (A. Chakrabarti); Federal University of Health Sciences of Porto Alegre, Porto Alegre, Brazil (B. Hochhegger); University of California San Diego, San Diego, California, USA (M. Hoenigl); Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria (M. Hoenigl); Center for Biomarker Research in Medicine, Graz (M. Hoenigl); Lagos University Teaching Hospital, Lagos, Nigeria (N. Irurhe); Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Nagasaki, Japan (K. Izumikawa); Mulago Hospital and Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda (B. Kirenga); University of Lagos, Lagos (R.O. Oladele); Universitas Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia (A. Rozaliyani, F. Setianingrum); Research Center Borstel, Borstel, Germany (H.J.F. Salzer); Royal Liverpool University Hospital, Liverpool, UK (N.F. Simukulwa); The Republican Scientific and Practical Centre for Pulmonology and TB, Minsk, Belarus (A. Skrahina, C. Sriruttan); National Institute for Communicable Diseases, Johannesburg, South Africa (C. Sriruttan); University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg (C. Sriruttan); Universitas Padjadjaran, Bandung, Indonesia (B.A.P. Wilopo); University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (D.C. Cole); World Health Organization, Geneva (H. Getahun)

Suggested citation for this article


Chronic pulmonary aspergillosis (CPA) is a recognized complication of pulmonary tuberculosis (TB). In 2015, the World Health Organization reported 2.2 million new cases of nonbacteriologically confirmed pulmonary TB; some of these patients probably had undiagnosed CPA. In October 2016, the Global Action Fund for Fungal Infections convened an international expert panel to develop a case definition of CPA for resource-constrained settings. This panel defined CPA as illness for >3 months and all of the following: 1) weight loss, persistent cough, and/or hemoptysis; 2) chest images showing progressive cavitary infiltrates and/or a fungal ball and/or pericavitary fibrosis or infiltrates or pleural thickening; and 3) a positive Aspergillus IgG assay result or other evidence of Aspergillus infection. The proposed definition will facilitate advancements in research, practice, and policy in lower- and middle-income countries as well as in resource-constrained settings.

The differential diagnosis for pulmonary tuberculosis (TB) is wide and includes nontuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) infection, endemic fungal infections such as coccidioidomycosis and histoplasmosis, allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis, and chronic pulmonary aspergillosis (CPA) (17). Sequelae of pulmonary TB, such as bronchiectasis and restricted lung capacity, can mimic infection relapse (810). Accurate diagnosis is essential for adequate treatment.

The 2015 World Health Organization annual report notes that ≈2.2 million (≈43%) of 5.2 million cases of incident pulmonary TB were clinically diagnosed or smear-negative (11). Only 21%–40% of smear-negative pulmonary TB cases are culture positive (12,13). Exclusion of alternatives is challenging in many lower- and middle-income countries (14). The World Health Organization report comments, “Most clinical features of TB and abnormalities on X-ray or histology results generally associated with TB have low specificity, which may lead to false diagnoses of TB, and hence to people being enrolled on TB treatment unnecessarily” (11).

Although coccidioidomycosis, histoplasmosis, and paracoccidioidomycosis are regionally confined, aspergillosis is global. Each year, an estimated 373,000 new CPA cases complicate treated pulmonary TB within 12 months of completion of anti-TB therapy; the 5-year period prevalence is 1,174,000 (range 397,000–2,088,000) cases (9). This wide range results from several factors, notably the extrapolation of CPA diagnosis from a limited UK dataset of only 544 patients with pulmonary cavities (15), substantial variability in the published frequency of cavitation after treatment of pulmonary TB, absence of an estimate of CPA prevalence among patients without cavities, and lack of knowledge of the effects of concurrent HIV infection. The incidence and prevalence of CPA are not known but are probably underestimated, in part because CPA occurs in patients with active pulmonary TB, as a sequela of prior pulmonary TB (16), or as a complication of other pulmonary disorders with symptoms similar to those of pulmonary TB, and is incorrectly diagnosed and treated as pulmonary TB (17).

Diagnostic guidelines for CPA have recently been published in English and Japanese, emphasizing the central role of advanced imaging and serologic testing for Aspergillus (1820). Unfortunately, these diagnostics are infrequently available in many resource-constrained settings. In October 2016, the Global Action Fund for Fungal Infections convened an international panel to develop an operational definition of CPA for research and clinical care in resource-constrained settings. The panel’s goals were to adapt the existing European Society for Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases and European Respiratory Society (19) and Infectious Diseases Society of America guideline case definitions of CPA (18) to promote research so that critical data will be available to inform policy and practice, including surveillance, and to enable individualized clinical care for optimal patient management.


Literature and Existing Guidelines

We built on the work of 2 recent CPA expert panels (1820). These panels undertook comprehensive searching, appraisal, and synthesis of the relevant literature, including diagnosis and case definitions. We included these papers in a package of materials relevant to diagnosis in different clinical contexts (i.e., underlying disease in patients in whom CPA is developing, CPA and clinically diagnosed pulmonary TB, radiologic assessment and characteristics of CPA, and comparisons of laboratory diagnosis with different immunoassays).

Workshop Participants

The Global Action Fund for Fungal Infections ( invited 36 experts from all regions of the world, according to expertise. The experts had already implemented CPA diagnostic capacity or were in the process of doing so. Participants also included experts from lower- and middle-income countries that had active clinical and public health programs focused on respiratory diseases including TB. Clinical expertise included internal medicine, pulmonary disease, infectious disease, critical care, thoracic radiology, medical microbiology, and medical mycology, as well as various health system organizational roles and levels (e.g., secondary care consultants, national reference laboratories, national research centers, and international health organizations). Of the 36 invited experts, 33 (the authors) attended a workshop in Liverpool, UK.

Operational Definitions Indicator Selection

Morning presentations and discussions built on prior reading material and provided all participants evidence of CPA burden, risk factors, clinical presentations, diagnostic tools, treatment options, recurrences, and prior case definitions. Three facilitated afternoon breakout groups started with CPA diagnostic indicator types (i.e., clinical presentation, radiology, medical microbiology–mycology–immunology) and discussed options for diagnosis, focusing on secondary care levels and above for lower- and middle-income countries. A recorder took notes, and the pros and cons of different indicators were shared in a plenary session. Subsequently, 3 cross-indicator groups worked to bring the indicators together, constructing key criteria for CPA with different clinical or radiologic presentations.

Development of Case Definitions

Plenary discussion participants compared and contrasted the different approaches and moved toward operational definitions. On the basis of consolidated notes from breakout groups and plenary sessions, descriptions of possible, probable, and confirmed CPA were synthesized to garner consensus on the most critical elements of the diagnosis. Simple graphic representations were developed, shared with breakout group leaders for feedback, and subsequently revised through iteration. Further iteration on the key elements of the algorithms to be used in the field and minimal definitional requirements were conducted via email and online file-sharing services, simplifying the definition to a single, composite definition and algorithm.


Modern diagnostic criteria for CPA date from 2003 (21) and have been used in some prospective clinical trials (Table 1) and refined for specific purposes. The consensus group considered diagnostic criteria in 3 sections: clinical features, radiologic criteria, and microbiological criteria.

Clinical Features
Underlying Diseases

Most CPA patients have prior or concurrent underlying pulmonary disease. Possible risk factors for development of CPA are cavities in the lung caused by pulmonary TB, sarcoidosis, previous Pneumocystis pneumonia, bullae or lung cysts, lung abscess, pulmonary infarction, pulmonary fibrosis, healed abscess cavities, cavitary bronchogenic carcinoma, and infection by NTM (21,2630). In many countries, pulmonary TB is the most common disorder that precedes CPA (9). The most common differential diagnosis is pulmonary mycobacterial infection.


The duration of disease required to define CPA used by previous studies has been 1–6 months, usually 3 months. (Table 1). The expert panel consensus was to endorse a 3-month duration as a criterion for diagnosis of CPA. In patients with preexisting pulmonary disease, who often have chronic signs and symptoms, a change in pattern or severity of clinical presentation is considered the trigger point for the 3-month duration. In patients with few or unchanged signs and symptoms, documentation of 3-month duration may also be confirmed with radiographic findings of progression of cavitation, pericavitary infiltrates or fibrosis, development of a fungal ball (which takes weeks to form), or microbiological data.

Signs and Symptoms

Most patients with CPA experience clinical signs and symptoms, although some are asymptomatic and show progression radiologically only. The most distinctive and alarming sign is hemoptysis/hemosputum. Hemoptysis develops in ≈12%–43% of CPA patients (23,25,31,32) and varies from blood streaking in sputum to massive and fatal hemoptysis. Hemoptysis may occur in patients with TB, but it is only streaking of sputum with blood and usually not severe. Another characteristic symptom is mild but persistent chest pain, discomfort, or tightness, experienced by up to 37% of patients. Weight loss and fatigue are also common, although not universal. Cough (usually productive) and dyspnea are common but not sufficiently distinctive to distinguish CPA from other pulmonary disorders, including pulmonary TB. Fever or pyrexia is uncommon in CPA patients and, if present, may indicate a concurrent or alternative diagnosis or subacute invasive aspergillosis. Night or day sweats are occasionally reported but are not discriminatory.

The consensus of the panel was that the diagnosis of CPA required the presence of >1 symptoms persisting for 3 months and radiologic progression, a scenario present in most cases. Two other clinical scenarios that also qualify for the diagnosis of CPA are radiologic evidence of a simple aspergilloma (with or without symptoms) and characteristic radiologic appearance without symptoms but showing definite radiologic progression.

Radiologic Criteria

The focus of the discussion revolved around use of chest radiographs alone to diagnose CPA; requiring computed tomography (CT), which is often unavailable, might delay diagnosis. Multiple studies have demonstrated that CT is more sensitive than chest radiography for demonstrating several features, namely, >1 fungal balls, pulmonary nodules, multiple cavities, and disease in the apices and retrocardiac space (33). Considering the limited availability of CT in many healthcare settings, the radiologic criteria adopted are based solely on chest radiograph findings. Where available, CT is recommended in the context of clinical and microbiological suspicion of CPA with a nondiagnostic chest radiograph.

Fungal Ball or Aspergilloma, Intracavitary Material, or Fluid Level on Chest Radiograph

Figure 1

Thumbnail of A) Chest radiograph showing aspergilloma (fungal ball) in the left upper lung lobe. B) Axial computed tomography image shows increased density in an irregular left apical cavity, a sequela of pulmonary tuberculosis, consistent with an aspergilloma.

Figure 1. A) Chest radiograph showing aspergilloma (fungal ball) in the left upper lung lobe. B) Axial computed tomography image shows increased density in an irregular left apical cavity, a sequela of pulmonary...

The differential diagnosis for a fungal ball in the lung is limited: echinoccocal cyst, necrotizing bronchogenic carcinoma, or acute or subacute invasive fungal infection. Similar-appearing conditions are lung abscess, Rasmussen aneurysm in a tuberculous cavity, cavitating hematoma, or lung infarct (34). If single and in a localized area of lung, with few or no symptoms, a simple aspergilloma is the most precise diagnosis (Figure 1) and can be resected or observed without antifungal treatment. Although presence of a fungal ball is highly suggestive of an aspergilloma as a manifestation of CPA, microbiological confirmation is required for a definitive diagnosis.

Occasionally, a fluid level is visible in cavities. Few of these cavities have been sampled with aspiration and microbiological analysis, but when done, cultures are usually positive for A. fumigatus or, less commonly, Staphylococcus aureus, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and other pathogens. Therefore, a fluid level in a cavity is entirely consistent with CPA but may also represent co-infection (35).


Figure 2

Thumbnail of Computed tomography images of a patient with chronic pulmonary aspergillosis. A) Left upper lung lobe thick-walled cavity, showing associated pleural thickening. B) Same patient several months later, demonstrating progression of cavitation with increased pericavitary consolidation and formation of a fungal ball within the cavity. Aspergilloma formation is a late feature of chronic pulmonary aspergillosis.

Figure 2. Computed tomography images of a patient with chronic pulmonary aspergillosis. A) Left upper lung lobe thick-walled cavity, showing associated pleural thickening. B) Same patient several months later, demonstrating progression of cavitation...

The cardinal feature of CPA is the presence of >1 cavities. The cavities may be small or large; may have thick or, less commonly, thin walls; and usually abut the pleura (33,36). The cavities expand and may coalesce during progression of infection. In patients with extensive bullous emphysema, inflammation around a bulla may resemble cavitation. The differential diagnosis of chronic cavitary lesions includes mycobacterial infection, endemic fungal infection, and malignancy (37). The cavities seen with CPA are often located in the upper lung zone and may mimic TB; in patients with NTM infection and endemic fungal diseases, the cavities may be located in any lung zone. A distinguishing feature of CPA is slow progression of findings over months or years, whereas active pulmonary TB infection progresses faster (34,38) (Figure 2). Patients with NTM infection may also have cavitary lesions; however, lesions are more common among older white men with underlying lung disease (39). Patients with residual coccidioidal or other infectious cavities are usually asymptomatic unless these conditions are complicated by aspergilloma or superinfected (40). Cavitary bronchogenic carcinoma is usually associated with adenopathy and often pleural effusion.

Pleural Thickening

In the pre-CT era, pleural thickening was regarded as a sign of aspergilloma; indeed, pleural thickening is common in patients with CPA (34,38). For many patients, pleural thickening seen on CT images usually consists of 2 components: fibrosis of the pleura overlying a cavity or area of consolidation and indrawing of extrapleural fat (typically seen in chronic inflammatory processes of the lung). This subtle distinction cannot be made readily from a chest radiograph. Pleural thickening should be regarded as a common feature of CPA and useful for diagnosis. Furthermore, pleural thickening is a specific feature of CPA, rarely seen in patients with TB or chronic coccidioidal or other fungal cavities (40,41). Tuberculous empyema is usually exhibited as a large pleural effusion (42) and is commonly accompanied by interlobular septal thickening and micronodules (43). Cavitating bronchogenic carcinoma may invade the chest wall causing bone destruction or may cause diffuse pleural involvement; however, these manifestations are distinct from the focal pleural thickening associated with CPA.

Pericavitary Infiltration

The inflammatory changes seen adjacent to cavities in patients with CPA are often marked, reflecting inflammation but not hyphal invasion. These areas may merge with localized areas of fibrosis, pleural thickening, or both but are usually obvious on plain chest radiographs (36); they indicate active CPA and are a clear indication for therapy (44). Such pericavitary infiltrates, unless very extensive, are uncommon in reactivation of TB and NTM disease. Pericavitary consolidation may be seen in patients with chronic fibrocavitary coccidioidomycosis (40).

CT Image Features

Figure 3

Thumbnail of Computed tomography images showing early features of fungal ball formation in pulmonary cavities. A) Two left lower lung lobe posterior thick-walled cavities, 1 with a fluid level. B) Two right apical cavities, the larger with an irregular interior wall, most consistent with fungal growth. C) Left apex replaced by an irregular thick-walled cavity with multiple areas of fungal growth on the interior surface of the cavity. D) Substantial volume loss in the right upper lobe with replac

Figure 3. Computed tomography images showing early features of fungal ball formation in pulmonary cavities. A) Two left lower lung lobe posterior thick-walled cavities, 1 with a fluid level. B) Two right apical...

One radiologic aspect of CPA not characterized on a chest radiograph is the interior of a cavity. Aspergillus grows inside the cavity along the wall, resulting in an irregular appearance of the inner border seen on CT images. In addition, the cavity may contain linear opacities representing mats of fungal growth that have detached from the cavity wall (38). These growths often merge to form sponge-like densities, which can be described as a fungal ball containing air (45). These structures may detach from the cavity wall and may be mobile. For purposes of the definitions outlined in this article, all these characteristic features are deemed to be equivalent to a fungal ball (Figure 3). With antifungal therapy, they resolve more readily than an aspergilloma.

One feature for which CT is much more sensitive than chest radiography is the Aspergillus nodule, particularly when the nodule is small (46). These nodules may have a maximum diameter of 5–50 mm, may be single or multiple, and may be solid or have central cavitation. Larger nodules (>3 cm) are more accurately described as masses, which may also be attributable to Aspergillus infection. The differential diagnosis of the Aspergillus nodule is broad and includes carcinoma (primary or secondary), coccidioidomycosis, cryptococcosis, NTM infection, and others.

Establishing a definitive diagnosis of a nodule usually requires resection or biopsy, especially because many patients do not have elevated IgG against Aspergillus or positive sputum cultures (47,48). Because these diagnostic procedures are not available in many medical centers in lower- and middle-income countries, we elected to consider these separately and not include them in our operational definition.

Culture-Based and Non–Culture-Based Evidence of Aspergillosis

The most reliable diagnostic test for CPA is a positive Aspergillus antibody test result, indicative of an immune response to Aspergillus. The second most reliable diagnostic marker for CPA is detection of Aspergillus in the airways by use of culture, antigen, and/or nucleic acid amplification (PCR).

Antibodies against Aspergillus

Elevated circulating levels of Aspergillus antibodies are present in >95% but <100% of patients (4951). Most commercial assays detect A. fumigatus IgG; however, CPA is occasionally caused by other Aspergillus species, resulting in false-negative results. In addition, some patients with CPA are subtly immunocompromised, as has been documented with nonprotective pneumococcal or Haemophilus antibodies (52); low circulating CD4 (T helper), CD19 (B cell), or CD56 (natural killer) cell counts (53); and poor production of gamma interferon interleukin 17A, interleukin 12, or both (54). Such patients may not mount a detectable IgG response. Many patients have detectable A. fumigatus IgE and elevated total IgE in the absence of any other features of allergic Aspergillus disease (21).

Serologic testing for Aspergillus relies mainly on the detection of IgG and of precipitating antibodies (known as precipitins), which may be IgG or IgM. Precipitin detection requires immunodiffusion and electrophoresis migration methods, which lack standardization and are too laborious and time-consuming for resource-constrained settings. Consequently, we focused on commercially available enzyme immunoassay kits that detect IgG. Up to 2015, there were few direct comparisons of A. fumigatus serology (55), but more recently, several have been published (Table 2). Crucial to these comparisons is defining the cutoff values for each assay. The control groups of patients used for such comparisons have included healthy persons or those with pulmonary disease without aspergillosis. Few data on antibody titer associations with age, HIV status, or ethnicity of controls are available. New lateral flow devices for Aspergillus antibody detection are in the final stages of development and, if their performance is good, could greatly facilitate diagnosis. The consensus of the expert panel was that any Aspergillus antibody test performance had to be at least 90% sensitive and 85% specific.

An elevated level of Aspergillus IgG is consistent with several conditions, including Aspergillus rhinosinusitis, allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis, Aspergillus bronchitis (notably in cystic fibrosis and bronchiectasis), subacute invasive aspergillosis, recovery from invasive aspergillosis, and community-acquired Aspergillus pneumonia. Because an elevated level of IgG is highly sensitive but not specific for CPA, the diagnosis of CPA requires the presence of compatible symptoms and radiologic abnormalities.

Respiratory Tract Microscopy and Culture

Microscopy of sputum may show hyphae morphologically consistent with Aspergillus spp. If present, this finding is most consistent with CPA or Aspergillus tracheobronchitis (63). Despite the substantial amount of Aspergillus spp. in the cavities of patients with CPA, culture positivity from sputum samples is lower than expected (41%–81%) and is probably biased toward culture-positive cases (21,22,6467). One reason for this lower sensitivity is the inoculation of culture plates with very small volumes of sputum (65,68) as is done for bacterial culture. Negative cultures might reflect an inability of the fungus to adapt to in vitro conditions, despite the apparent ease with which environmental contamination occurs in the laboratory.

The merits of positive culture results are substantial, notably for identifying the Aspergillus species causing infection and enabling susceptibility testing to be performed. False-positive cultures do occur as a result of laboratory contamination. Although most CPA cases are caused by A. fumigatus complex (probably sensu stricto), A. niger complex and A. flavus complex and rare cases caused by unusual pathogenic species are reported. In countries such as India, where A. flavus infection is much more common, it is not clear what proportion of cases are attributable to non–A. fumigatus species. Most triazole-resistant A. fumigatus isolated from patients with CPA has arisen while the patient was receiving therapy and probably result from large fungal loads or low drug exposure (low dose, drug interactions, poor bioavailability) (69). Isolates may be resistant or have intermediate susceptibility to 1–4 triazoles.

Aspergillus Antigen and β-1,3-D-glucan

Galactomannan is a detectable carbohydrate antigen produced by the growth of Aspergillus spp. Galactomannan detection is useful for the diagnosis of invasive aspergillosis because it is often detectable in serum and bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) fluid. Because tissue invasion does not occur in patients with CPA, galactomannan is not usually detectable in serum and is usually detectable in BAL fluid only (59,70). This finding is of limited utility in lower- and middle-income countries because fiberoptic bronchoscopy is infrequently done. Galactomannan is detectable in sputum or tracheal secretions/aspirates, but the cutoff for positivity is not established (71).

A new simple lateral flow assay for different protein antigens specific to A. fumigatus has been commercialized, but no data are available on sputum detection or its utility for patients with CPA. This assay is unlikely to be useful in serum because of antibody masking but may be useful in BAL fluid (72,73). β-1,3-D-glucan is released by Aspergillus spp. (and many other fungi) during infection but is less specific and probably not more sensitive than serum galactomannan in patients with CPA.

Molecular Detection of Aspergillus

For patients with CPA, PCR detection of Aspergillus spp. in sputum is significantly more sensitive than culture (63). However, the quality and possibly quantity of the sputum sample influence PCR performance (71). Furthermore, studies have shown that the sensitivity of PCR for detection of Aspergillus is ≈80%. Depending on the cutoff value used, low specificity may also be an issue. Molecular assays for Aspergillus spp. are not routinely available in most medical centers worldwide, especially in lower- and middle-income countries.

Consensus Definition and Proposed Algorithm

Figure 4

Thumbnail of Diagnostic algorithm incorporating the chest radiographic appearance and results of rapid TB investigations with the case definition of CPA. ABPA, allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis; CPA, chronic pulmonary aspergillosis; CT, computed tomography; NTM, nontuberculous mycobacteria; TB, tuberculosis. GeneXpert,

Figure 4. Diagnostic algorithm incorporating the chest radiographic appearance and results of rapid TB investigations with the case definition of CPA. ABPA, allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis; CPA, chronic pulmonary aspergillosis; CT, computed tomography; NTM,...

The definition of CPA recommended for use in resource-constrained settings in shown in Table 3. In a patient who has had symptoms consistent with chronic Aspergillus infection for >3 months, a chest radiograph should be obtained (Figure 4). If a chest radiograph is not possible, then pulmonary TB should be excluded by examination of respiratory specimens. The chest radiograph appearance determines the next course of action. If the chest radiograph is not remarkable, the signs and symptoms may be caused by bronchiectasis or systemic disease. If the chest radiograph shows consolidation without cavitation, then other diagnoses such as lung malignancy, airway obstruction, or endemic fungal infections should be considered. If the chest radiograph shows cavitation, then work-up for possible pulmonary TB should be initiated according to national practice and standards. A positive result for pulmonary TB should lead to appropriate treatment. If the pulmonary TB results are negative, and especially if the radiographic findings include pleural thickening, fungal ball, or pericavitary fibrosis or infiltrates, serum should be tested for Aspergillus IgG (Figure 4). If the Aspergillus IgG test result is negative (or unavailable), then sputum microscopy for hyphae or fungal culture should be performed; yield is higher when multiple specimens are tested. If the sputum microscopy for hyphae or fungal culture is negative, then other diagnoses, such as atypical mycobacterial infection or endemic fungal infection, should be considered. If sputum microscopy for hyphae or culture is positive, or if a serum Aspergillus antibody test result is positive, then CPA is confirmed and treatment with itraconazole or voriconazole is advised (19).


We present recommendations for diagnosing CPA, adapted for clinical use and public health surveillance in resource-constrained settings. The adapted definition relies on a combination of signs and symptoms, chest radiograph features, and serologic evidence of Aspergillus infection; it is applicable to almost all patient groups in which CPA occurs. Prospective evaluation of the proposed definition and associated algorithms will be valuable in the contexts of different geographic and HIV and pulmonary TB burdens (74). We believe that the proposed operational definition of CPA in lower- and middle-income countries will facilitate advancements in research and practice (clinical, laboratory, radiologic, and public health) and policy (health services and public health) in these countries and globally in resource-constrained settings.

Dr. Denning, an infectious diseases clinician who is heavily involved in postgraduate teaching and lectures worldwide, leads LIFE (Leading International Fungal Education) and is president of the Global Action Fund for Fungal Infections. His primary research interests are chronic and allergic pulmonary fungal diseases, the global burden of fungal infection, and azole resistance in Aspergillus.



The workshop was funded by the Global Action Fund for Fungal Infections. Contributions toward the workshop were received from the European Confederation for Medical Mycology, European Society for Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, the International Society for Human and Animal Mycology, Miravista Diagnostics, Immy Inc., Pfizer Inc., Basliea Pharmaceutica, Gilead Sciences, Merck Inc., Cidara Therapeutics Inc., Viamet Pharmaceuticals, F2G Ltd., Pulmocide Ltd., and Scynexis Inc. Some workshop expenses were covered by the National Aspergillosis Centre, University Hospital of South Manchester.

D.W.D. and family hold Founder shares in F2G Ltd, a University of Manchester spin-out antifungal discovery company. D.W.D. acts or has recently acted as a consultant to Astellas, Sigma Tau, Basilea, Scynexis, Cidara, Biosergen, Quintiles, Pulmatrix, Fujifilm, Zambon, and Pulmocide. In the past 3 years, he has been paid for talks on behalf of Astellas, Dynamiker, Gilead, Merck, Mylan, and Pfizer. He is a longstanding member of the Infectious Disease Society of America Aspergillosis Guidelines group, the European Society for Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Aspergillosis Guidelines Group, and the British Society for Medical Mycology Standards of Care Committee. I.D.P. has received research grants, test kit donations, or both from Astellas, Siemens, Dynamiker, Serion/Virion, OLM Medical, and Genesis. C.M.J. is a consultant to Canon Medical Research USA and author of UpToDate, Inc. M.C. has been paid for talks on behalf of Astellas, Gilead, and Pfizer. A.A.-I. has received grants from Gilead Sciences, Scynexis, and F2G and has been paid for talks on behalf of Gilead. P.B. is a cofounder of Alergenetica SL and Syngenics Ltd. and has current grant support from Medical Research Council, Fungal Infection Trust, EU Framework 7, and the National Institutes of Health. M.H. has received a research grant from Gilead and served on the speakers’ bureau of Gilead, Basilea, and Merck. K.I. has received research grants and honoraria from Pfizer Japan Inc., MSD K.K., Astellas Pharma Inc., and Dainippon Sumitomo Pharma Co. R.O.O. has received honoraria from Pfizer, Nigeria. M.D.R. acts as a consultant for Gilead Sciences, MSD, Pfizer, Astellas, Basilea, and Pulmocide and is a member of the European Society for Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Aspergillosis Guidelines Group. H.J.F.S. received honoraria from Chiesi and travel grants from Gilead. C.S. has received grants or conference support from the Fungal Infection Trust, European Society for Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, and MSD. None of the other authors report a conflict of interest.



  1. Goodwin  RA Jr, Owens  FT, Snell  JD, Hubbard  WW, Buchanan  RD, Terry  RT, et al. Chronic pulmonary histoplasmosis. Medicine (Baltimore). 1976;55:41352. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Shah  A, Panjabi  C. Allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis: a review of a disease with a worldwide distribution. J Asthma. 2002;39:27389. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Chong  S, Lee  KS, Yi  CA, Chung  MJ, Kim  TS, Han  J. Pulmonary fungal infection: imaging findings in immunocompetent and immunocompromised patients. Eur J Radiol. 2006;59:37183. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Chu  HQ, Li  B, Zhao  L, Huang  DD, Zhang  ZM, Xu  JF, et al. Chest imaging comparison between non-tuberculous and tuberculosis mycobacteria in sputum acid fast bacilli smear-positive patients. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2015;19:242939.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Chiang  CY, Yu  MC, Yang  SL, Yen  MY, Bai  KJ. Surveillance of tuberculosis in Taipei: the influence of nontuberculous mycobacteria. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0142324. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Getahun  H, Harrington  M, O’Brien  R, Nunn  P. Diagnosis of smear-negative pulmonary tuberculosis in people with HIV infection or AIDS in resource-constrained settings: informing urgent policy changes. Lancet. 2007;369:20429. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Schweer  KE, Bangard  C, Hekmat  K, Cornely  OA. Chronic pulmonary aspergillosis. Mycoses. 2014;57:25770. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Pasipanodya  JG, Miller  TL, Vecino  M, Munguia  G, Bae  S, Drewyer  G, et al. Using the St. George respiratory questionnaire to ascertain health quality in persons with treated pulmonary tuberculosis. Chest. 2007;132:15918. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Denning  DW, Pleuvry  A, Cole  DC. Global burden of chronic pulmonary aspergillosis as a sequel to pulmonary tuberculosis. Bull World Health Organ. 2011;89:86472. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Chakaya  J, Kirenga  B, Getahun  H. Long term complications after completion of pulmonary tuberculosis treatment: a quest for a public health approach. J Clin TB Mycobact Dis. 2016;3:102.
  11. World Health Organization. Global Tuberculosis Report. Geneva. Organization. 2015;•••:2015.
  12. Hargreaves  NJ, Kadzakumanja  O, Phiri  S, Lee  CH, Tang  X, Salaniponi  FM, et al. Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia in patients being registered for smear-negative pulmonary tuberculosis in Malawi. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2001;95:4028. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Nakiyingi  L, Ssengooba  W, Nakanjako  D, Armstrong  D, Holshouser  M, Kirenga  BJ, et al. Predictors and outcomes of mycobacteremia among HIV-infected smear- negative presumptive tuberculosis patients in Uganda. BMC Infect Dis. 2015;15:62. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Pohl  C, Jugheli  L, Haraka  F, Mfinanga  E, Said  K, Reither  K. Pulmonary aspergilloma: a treatment challenge in sub-Saharan Africa. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2013;7:e2352. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. British Tuberculosis Association. Aspergillus in persistent lung cavities after tuberculosis. A report from the Research Committee of the British Tuberculosis Association. Tubercle. 1968;49:111. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Smith  NL, Denning  DW. Underlying conditions in chronic pulmonary aspergillosis including simple aspergilloma. Eur Respir J. 2011;37:86572. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. The Lancet Respiratory Medicine. Chronic pulmonary aspergillosis: help is on the way. Lancet Respir Med. 2016;4:83. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Patterson  TF, Thompson  GR III, Denning  DW, Fishman  JA, Hadley  S, Herbrecht  R, et al. Practice guidelines for the diagnosis and management of aspergillosis: 2016 update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clin Infect Dis. 2016;63:e160. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Denning  DW, Cadranel  J, Beigelman-Aubry  C, Ader  F, Chakrabarti  A, Blot  S, et al.; European Society for Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases and European Respiratory Society. Chronic pulmonary aspergillosis: rationale and clinical guidelines for diagnosis and management. Eur Respir J. 2016;47:4568. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Kohno  S, Tamura  K, Niki  Y, Izumikawa  K, Oka  S, Ogawa  K, et al. Executive Summary of Japanese Domestic Guidelines for Management of Deep-seated Mycosis 2014. Med Mycol J. 2016;57:E11763. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Denning  DW, Riniotis  K, Dobrashian  R, Sambatakou  H. Chronic cavitary and fibrosing pulmonary and pleural aspergillosis: case series, proposed nomenclature change, and review. Clin Infect Dis. 2003;37(Suppl 3):S26580. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Kohno  S, Izumikawa  K, Ogawa  K, Kurashima  A, Okimoto  N, Amitani  R, et al.; Japan Chronic Pulmonary Aspergillosis Study Group (JCPASG). Intravenous micafungin versus voriconazole for chronic pulmonary aspergillosis: a multicenter trial in Japan. J Infect. 2010;61:4108. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Cadranel  J, Philippe  B, Hennequin  C, Bergeron  A, Bergot  E, Bourdin  A, et al. Voriconazole for chronic pulmonary aspergillosis: a prospective multicenter trial. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2012;31:32319. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Ohba  H, Miwa  S, Shirai  M, Kanai  M, Eifuku  T, Suda  T, et al. Clinical characteristics and prognosis of chronic pulmonary aspergillosis. Respir Med. 2012;106:7249. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Jhun  BW, Jeon  K, Eom  JS, Lee  JH, Suh  GY, Kwon  OJ, et al. Clinical characteristics and treatment outcomes of chronic pulmonary aspergillosis. Med Mycol. 2013;51:8117. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Kosmidis  C, Denning  DW. The clinical spectrum of pulmonary aspergillosis. Thorax. 2015;70:2707. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Pasqualotto  AC, editor. Aspergillosis: from diagnosis to prevention. 1st ed. New York: Springer; 2010.
  28. Tomlinson  JR, Sahn  SA. Aspergilloma in sarcoid and tuberculosis. Chest. 1987;92:5058. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Camara  B, Reymond  E, Saint-Raymond  C, Roth  H, Brenier-Pinchart  MP, Pinel  C, et al.; Grenoble Aspergillus Committee. Characteristics and outcomes of chronic pulmonary aspergillosis: a retrospective analysis of a tertiary hospital registry. Clin Respir J. 2015;9:6573. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Salzer  HJ, Cornely  OA. Awareness of predictors of mortality may help improve outcome in chronic pulmonary aspergillosis. Eur Respir J. 2017;49:2. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Salzer  HJ, Heyckendorf  J, Kalsdorf  B, Rolling  T, Lange  C. Characterization of patients with chronic pulmonary aspergillosis according to the new ESCMID/ERS/ECMM and IDSA guidelines. Mycoses. 2017;60:13642. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Farid  S, Mohamed  S, Devbhandari  M, Kneale  M, Richardson  M, Soon  SY, et al. Results of surgery for chronic pulmonary Aspergillosis, optimal antifungal therapy and proposed high risk factors for recurrence—a National Centre’s experience. J Cardiothorac Surg. 2013;8:180. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Desai  SR, Hedayati  V, Patel  K, Hansell  DM. Chronic aspergillosis of the lungs: unravelling the terminology and radiology. Eur Radiol. 2015;25:31007. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Franquet  T, Müller  NL, Giménez  A, Guembe  P, de La Torre  J, Bagué  S. Spectrum of pulmonary aspergillosis: histologic, clinical, and radiologic findings. Radiographics. 2001;21:82537. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Denning  DW. Chronic forms of pulmonary aspergillosis. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2001;7(Suppl 2):2531. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Greene  R. The radiological spectrum of pulmonary aspergillosis. Med Mycol. 2005;43(Suppl 1):S14754. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Gadkowski  LB, Stout  JE. Cavitary pulmonary disease. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2008;21:30533. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Gotway  MB, Dawn  SK, Caoili  EM, Reddy  GP, Araoz  PA, Webb  WR. The radiologic spectrum of pulmonary Aspergillus infections. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2002;26:15973. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Martinez  S, McAdams  HP, Batchu  CS. The many faces of pulmonary nontuberculous mycobacterial infection. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2007;189:17786. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Jude  CM, Nayak  NB, Patel  MK, Deshmukh  M, Batra  P. Pulmonary coccidioidomycosis: pictorial review of chest radiographic and CT findings. Radiographics. 2014;34:91225. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Jeong  YJ, Lee  KS. Pulmonary tuberculosis: up-to-date imaging and management. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2008;191:83444. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. McAdams  HP, Erasmus  J, Winter  JA. Radiologic manifestations of pulmonary tuberculosis. Radiol Clin North Am. 1995;33:65578.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Ko  JM, Park  HJ, Cho  DG, Kim  CH. CT differentiation of tuberculous and non-tuberculous pleural infection, with emphasis on pulmonary changes. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2015;19:13618. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Izumikawa  K, Ohtsu  Y, Kawabata  M, Takaya  H, Miyamoto  A, Sakamoto  S, et al. Clinical efficacy of micafungin for chronic pulmonary aspergillosis. Med Mycol. 2007;45:2738. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Roberts  CM, Citron  KM, Strickland  B. Intrathoracic aspergilloma: role of CT in diagnosis and treatment. Radiology. 1987;165:1238. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Muldoon  EG, Sharman  A, Page  I, Bishop  P, Denning  DW. Aspergillus nodules; another presentation of Chronic Pulmonary Aspergillosis. BMC Pulm Med. 2016;16:123. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Muniappan  A, Tapias  LF, Butala  P, Wain  JC, Wright  CD, Donahue  DM, et al. Surgical therapy of pulmonary aspergillomas: a 30-year North American experience. Ann Thorac Surg. 2014;97:4328. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Reischies  F, Hoenigl  M. The role of surgical debridement in different clinical manifestations of invasive aspergillosis. Mycoses. 2014;57(Suppl 2):114. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Page  ID, Richardson  MD, Denning  DW. Comparison of six Aspergillus-specific IgG assays for the diagnosis of chronic pulmonary aspergillosis (CPA). J Infect. 2016;72:2409. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Dumollard  C, Bailly  S, Perriot  S, Brenier-Pinchart  MP, Saint-Raymond  C, Camara  B, et al. Prospective evaluation of a new aspergillus IgG enzyme immunoassay kit for diagnosis of chronic and allergic pulmonary aspergillosis. J Clin Microbiol. 2016;54:123642. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Fujiuchi  S, Fujita  Y, Suzuki  H, Doushita  K, Kuroda  H, Takahashi  M, et al. Evaluation of a quantitative serological assay for diagnosing chronic pulmonary aspergillosis. J Clin Microbiol. 2016;54:14969. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Kosmidis  C, Powell  G, Borrow  R, Morris  J, Alachkar  H, Denning  DW. Response to pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccination in patients with chronic and allergic aspergillosis. Vaccine. 2015;33:72715. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Bongomin  F, Harris  C, Foden  P, Kosmidis  C, Denning  DW. Innate and adaptive immune defects in chronic pulmonary aspergillosis. J Fungi (Basel). 2017;3:26. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Döffinger  R, Harris  C, Lear  S, Newton  P, Alachkar  H, Dinakantha  S, et al. Impaired Th1 and Th17 immunity in chronic pulmonary aspergillosis. In: Proceedings of the 6th Advances against Aspergillosis. 6th Advances against Aspergillosis Conference; Feb 27–Mar 1, 2014; Madrid, Spain [cited 2018 May 23].
  55. Page  ID, Richardson  M, Denning  DW. Antibody testing in aspergillosis—quo vadis? Med Mycol. 2015;53:41739. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. Kitasato  Y, Tao  Y, Hoshino  T, Tachibana  K, Inoshima  N, Yoshida  M, et al. Comparison of Aspergillus galactomannan antigen testing with a new cut-off index and Aspergillus precipitating antibody testing for the diagnosis of chronic pulmonary aspergillosis. Respirology. 2009;14:7018. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. Guitard  J, Sendid  B, Thorez  S, Gits  M, Hennequin  C. Evaluation of a recombinant antigen-based enzyme immunoassay for the diagnosis of noninvasive aspergillosis. J Clin Microbiol. 2012;50:7625. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. Baxter  CG, Denning  DW, Jones  AM, Todd  A, Moore  CB, Richardson  MD. Performance of two Aspergillus IgG EIA assays compared with the precipitin test in chronic and allergic aspergillosis. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2013;19:E197204. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. Shin  B, Koh  WJ, Jeong  BH, Yoo  H, Park  HY, Suh  GY, et al. Serum galactomannan antigen test for the diagnosis of chronic pulmonary aspergillosis. J Infect. 2014;68:4949. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. Oliva  A, Flori  P, Hennequin  C, Dubus  JC, Reynaud-Gaubert  M, Charpin  D, et al. Evaluation of the Aspergillus Western blot IgG kit for diagnosis of chronic aspergillosis. J Clin Microbiol. 2015;53:24854. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. Page  ID, Baxter  C, Hennequin  C, Richardson  MD, van Hoeyveld  E, van Toorenenbergen  AW, et al. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis of four Aspergillus-specific IgG assays for the diagnosis of chronic pulmonary aspergillosis. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2018;91:4751. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. Page  ID, Richardson  MD, van Toorenenbergen  A, Denning  DW. Siemens Immulite Aspergillus-specific IgG assay for chronic pulmonary aspergillosis diagnosis. Med Mycol. 2018 [cited 2018 May 25].
  63. Langridge  PJ, Sheehan  RL, Denning  DW. Microbial yield from physiotherapy assisted sputum production in respiratory outpatients. BMC Pulm Med. 2016;16:23. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. Nam  HS, Jeon  K, Um  SW, Suh  GY, Chung  MP, Kim  H, et al. Clinical characteristics and treatment outcomes of chronic necrotizing pulmonary aspergillosis: a review of 43 cases. Int J Infect Dis. 2010;14:e47982. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. Fraczek  MG, Kirwan  MB, Moore  CB, Morris  J, Denning  DW, Richardson  MD. Volume dependency for culture of fungi from respiratory secretions and increased sensitivity of Aspergillus quantitative PCR. Mycoses. 2014;57:6978. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. Camuset  J, Nunes  H, Dombret  MC, Bergeron  A, Henno  P, Philippe  B, et al. Treatment of chronic pulmonary aspergillosis by voriconazole in nonimmunocompromised patients. Chest. 2007;131:143541. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  67. Cucchetto  G, Cazzadori  A, Conti  M, Cascio  GL, Braggio  P, Concia  E. Treatment of chronic pulmonary aspergillosis with voriconazole: review of a case series. Infection. 2015;43:27786. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  68. Pashley  CH, Fairs  A, Morley  JP, Tailor  S, Agbetile  J, Bafadhel  M, et al. Routine processing procedures for isolating filamentous fungi from respiratory sputum samples may underestimate fungal prevalence. Med Mycol. 2012;50:4338. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  69. Howard  SJ, Cerar  D, Anderson  MJ, Albarrag  A, Fisher  MC, Pasqualotto  AC, et al. Frequency and evolution of Azole resistance in Aspergillus fumigatus associated with treatment failure. Emerg Infect Dis. 2009;15:106876. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  70. Izumikawa  K, Yamamoto  Y, Mihara  T, Takazono  T, Morinaga  Y, Kurihara  S, et al. Bronchoalveolar lavage galactomannan for the diagnosis of chronic pulmonary aspergillosis. Med Mycol. 2012;50:8117. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  71. Fayemiwo  S, Moore  CB, Foden  P, Denning  DW, Richardson  MD. Comparative performance of Aspergillus galactomannan ELISA and PCR in sputum from patients with ABPA and CPA. J Microbiol Methods. 2017;140:329. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  72. Prattes  J, Flick  H, Prüller  F, Koidl  C, Raggam  RB, Palfner  M, et al. Novel tests for diagnosis of invasive aspergillosis in patients with underlying respiratory diseases. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2014;190:9229. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  73. Eigl  S, Prattes  J, Lackner  M, Willinger  B, Spiess  B, Reinwald  M, et al. Multicenter evaluation of a lateral-flow device test for diagnosing invasive pulmonary aspergillosis in ICU patients. Crit Care. 2015;19:178. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  74. Godet  C, Alastruey-Izquierdo  A, Flick  H, Hennequin  C, Mikilps-Mikgelbs  R, Munteanu  O, et al.; CPAnet. A CPAnet consensus statement on research priorities for chronic pulmonary aspergillosis: a neglected fungal infection that requires attention. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2018;73:2806. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar




Suggested citation for this article: Denning DW, Page ID, Chakaya J, Jabeen K, Jude CM, Cornet M, et al. Case definition of chronic pulmonary aspergillosis in resource-constrained settings. Emerg Infect Dis. 2018 Aug [date cited].

DOI: 10.3201/eid2408.171312

Table of Contents – Volume 24, Number 8—August 2018

EID Search Options
presentation_01 Advanced Article Search – Search articles by author and/or keyword.
presentation_01 Articles by Country Search – Search articles by the topic country.
presentation_01 Article Type Search – Search articles by article type and issue.



Please use the form below to submit correspondence to the authors or contact them at the following address:

David W. Denning, National Aspergillosis Centre, University Hospital of South Manchester, Southmoor Rd, Manchester M23 9LT, UK

Send To

10000 character(s) remaining.


Page created: July 17, 2018
Page updated: July 17, 2018
Page reviewed: July 17, 2018
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.