Volume 25, Number 2—February 2019
Dispatch
Tick-Borne Encephalitis Virus Antibodies in Roe Deer, the Netherlands
Table
Province | No. (%) deer counted† | No. TBEV SNT–positive samples/no. tested |
Identification no. of foci | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Random sampling | Purposive sampling | |||
Drenthe | 10,728 (16) | 0/99 | NA | NA |
Flevoland | 2,358 (4) | 0/37 | NA | NA |
Friesland | 6,217 (10) | 0/62 | 0/1 | NA |
Gelderland | 10,687 (16) | 2/97 | 0/12 | 10 |
Groningen | 4,649 (7) | 0/32 | NA | NA |
Limburg | 4,674 (7) | 3/46 | 0/1 | 7, 8, and 9 |
North Brabant | 9,618 (15) | 3/101 | 0/5 | 4, 5, and 6‡ |
North Holland§ | 935 (1) | 0/0 | NA | NI |
Overijssel | 9,933 (16) | 9/87 | 5/18 | 1,¶ 2, and 3 |
South Holland | 1,103 (2) | 0/7 | 0/10 | NA |
Utrecht | 2,485 (4) | 0/16 | 0/1 | NA |
Zealand§ |
1,293 (2) |
0/8 |
NA |
NA |
Total | 64,680 (100) | 17/592 | 5/48 | NA |
*NA, not applicable; SNT, serum neutralization test; TBEV, tick-borne encephalitis virus.
†Provided by the game management units.
‡A fourth potential focus (no. 11) was identified by using serum samples obtained from roe deer during 2010 but not reconfirmed in 2017.
§No hunting, only victims of traffic accidents.
¶Sallandse Heuvelrug National Park (the confirmed site, also identified by using serum samples obtained from roe deer during 2010).
Page created: January 18, 2019
Page updated: January 18, 2019
Page reviewed: January 18, 2019
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.